ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

a mass of pages Shortcuts WP:NOTVANDALISMWP:NOTVANDALISM WP:NOTVANDWP:NOTVAND Although at times the following situations may be referred to colloquially...

in my opinion, {{subst:uw-notvand}}. If there is a cause to use this as the next level up (that is the user ignored uw-notvand) then I think a personalised...

kettle black (WP:KETTLE) Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars Template:Uw-notvand – A notification template for users who incorrectly label edits as vandalism...

deletion/Kreuz Kaiserberg. Bahnfrend (talk) 18:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND explicitly states that "disruptive editing" (regardless of whether this...

between vandalism and bold editing. For more information on this, see WP:NOTVAND. Do not bite the newcomers! See WP:NEWCOMER for more details. All articles...

Bahnfrend (talk) 18:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Please see WP:AGF and WP:NOTVAND. Note that "disruptive editing" is expicitly stated as not being vandalism...

regulars Wikipedia:Witch hunt Wikipedia:Passive aggression Template:Uw-notvand - A warning template for users who misuse vandalism warning templates....

for Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings, some of which (uw-ewsoft, uw-notvand, uw-fringe1, uw-fringe2, uw-fringe3) are included with Twinkle. I am running...

that suggests "same person" and not just "same pov"? Also, please read WP:NOTVAND and don't call other editors' edits "vandalism". Thanks. asilvering (talk)...

be researched and added. -- pde (talk) 18:37, 31 October 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND. Please do not make statements like "would be an act of vandalism". Also...

merely misrepresenting constructive edits as vandalism in violation of WP:NOTVAND. I think this should be enough per WP:BEANS. Srijanx22 (talk) 13:23, 30...

represents a form of vandalism. --Cvdr (talk) 18:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Also there...

policy is to treat them differently from vandalism. There is a {{subst:uw-notvand}} template for explaining this. Wikipedia:Vandalism's policy says: 'On...

2024 (UTC) Some points of fact: This is not DRN nor AIV; please check WP:NOTVAND on what is vandalism and what is not vandalism. The user is not even attempting...

confused about the definition of "vandalism" as it applies to Wikipedia. WP:NOTVAND may be helpful. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 17:29, 25 July 2015...

template to the end of your unsigned comment is not vandalism. Please see WP:NOTVAND; Wikipedia uses a stricter definition of the word vandalism, and none of...

other editors of vandalism because you disagree with their edits. Read WP:NOTVAND") 18:24, 28 August 2011 (edit summary: "restored reference") 18:40, 28...

but I could easily be missing some nuance. Abu reiss, please read WP:NOTVAND - Rameshnta909 is editing in good faith. Please work this out on the talkpage...

revert my edits. This is despite the fact that I have linked him to WP:NOTVAND and have explained to him that twinkle is for reverting vandalism only...

opposing editors. Useitorloseit (talk) 01:58, 4 June 2014 (UTC) See WP:NOTVAND. You are not allowed to violate WP:BLP in a discussion on your tendentious...

disagreements, even if exercised by a new editor, are not vandalism. Please read NOTVAND to understand more. Warmly, Lourdes 22:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC) Page:...

closer to blocking you for abuse of warning templates and WP:AIV. See WP:NOTVAND. --NeilN talk to me 15:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC) @NeilN: You have amused...

Wikipedia" --Александр Мотин (talk) 10:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC) See WP:NOTVAND. Alexbrn (talk) 11:19, 12 August 2020 (UTC) According to Wikipedia:Administrators'...

record of Cookshat's edits ([1], [2], [3]), they are not vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND because you clearly misunderstand what qualifies as vandalism here. If...

Filter worked properly, you were evading a block. Oh and please read WP:NOTVAND, WP:AGF, WP:ATWV and maybe WP:NPA and WP:HARASS as well. --TL22 (talk)...

vandal.Outliner73 (talk) 19:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC) @Outliner73: Read WP:NOTVAND. Adamgerber80's edits are not vandalism. I've left a summary of some site...

--Ghirla-трёп- 20:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC) I recommend that you read WP:NOTVAND; replacing original research and unverifiable cruft with a link to a well-written...

There is also a difference between POV-pushing and vandalism, see WP:NOTVAND. Neither of you has made any attempt to discuss things on talkpages, and...

3rr warning, just incorrectly applied vandalism warnings. Please read WP:NOTVAND. Also, while "Restored correct and accurate info" is not the most useful...

Shovon76 has mischaracterized a content disagreeement as vandalism, see WP:NOTVAND.  Sandstein  21:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC) Page: South China Sea (edit | talk...

(talk) 18:16, 20 August 2016 (UTC) @RunnyAmiga: What you're missing is WP:NOTVAND: "Disruptive editing or stubbornness", "Edit summary omission". Vandalism...

that this is neither accurate or helpful; if you haven't already, read WP:NOTVAND. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:42, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Apologies...

revert. AmateurEditor (talk) 19:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTVAND. What he did was a good faith edit - not vandalism. Hipocrite (talk) 19:11...

interesting anymore. Nick Cooper is STRONGLY urged to acquaint himself with WP:NOTVAND and to edit accordingly, at the risk of a block. The IP is urged to stop...

Kam (talk) 11:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC) No evidence of vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND. Drafting and AfC pior to publication, in principle, are optional. Editors...

{{subst:uw-notga}} Incorrectly marking an edit as vandalism {{subst:uw-notvand}} Using voting instead of consensus {{subst:uw-notvote}} Creating talk...

assertions, Winston, John Smith's actions were not vandalism. According to WP:NOTVAND, even disruptive editing and NPOV violations do not count as vandalism...

83 (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2012 (UTC) You are going to have to review WP:NOTVAND, then. Regardless of whether you are right or not, you may not edit war...

harsh--technically, what they were reverting wasn't vandalism (see WP:NOTVAND) but they were disruptive for various other reasons. And, at that point...

Vandalism policy).163.1.147.64 (talk) 18:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC) See WP:NOTVAND, as you've been told. Your continued accusations, despite discussion, that...

wrong thing by placing a vandalism message on the user's page (WP:DV, WP:NOTVAND), which made this much more difficult to decide for us, but I still think...

was vandalism. Disruptive editing and edit warring are described by WP:NOTVAND as actions which are not vandalism, and this case seems closer to those...

it's up to them to decide if they want to re-revert you. [27] This is WP:NOTVAND, disruptive if anything. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC) 213...

‑Scottywong| comment _ 18:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC) Ouch. Please read WP:NOTVAND. Those edits were misguided but there is no evidence of deliberate bad...

"revert"), try to get JDC808 blocked for vandalism (strike two - read WP:NOTVAND), and then file this report (strike three). Have I got this right? NeilN...

3rr before now. As it is, I'd like to remind him to read WP:AGF and WP:NOTVAND. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC) I would have thought filing...

Talk 15:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC) "m" is not an explanation! Please read WP:NOTVAND and stop making personal attacks. I like how you are trying to paint the...

2014 (UTC) (edit conflict)WP:Disruptive editing is not vandalism. Read WP:NOTVAND. He's being WP:tendentious, especially in trying to hide this report, but...

Blocked Both editors blocked. Fustos gets a little more time to read WP:NOTVAND NeilN talk to me 19:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC) Page Karna (edit | talk |...

WP:VANDTYPES does this fall under? The IP's edits seem to fall under WP:NOTVAND's definition of not being vandalism. Your edits do not appear to be reverting...

@Kavitha Swaminathan and Abesam: Both of you can use this time to read WP:NOTVAND NeilN talk to me 19:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC) Page Democratic Party (Italy) (edit...

resolve dispute on article talk page Comments: Edits appear to fall under WP:NOTVAND. That said, they were edit warring. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:36, 24 November...

reverts without discussing will result in a block. But please read WP:NOTVAND. Editing against MOS and not providing cites may be disruptive and blockable...

Calling me a vandal is a personal attack. I think you need to revise WP:NOTVAND and WP:NPA. 146.90.39.236 (talk) 12:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC) What is "obviously...

"removing sourced material" isn't (generally) considered vandalism (see WP:NOTVAND), unfortunately. Having said that, Number 57, I think it's pretty unhelpful...

Liqunaei (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC) Certainly not. Please read WP:NOTVAND for starters. And then meta:The Wrong Version might be of interest. Suggest...

what their problem was there either. I think they need to read WP:3RR, WP:NOTVAND, WP:BEBOLD, and WP:REVEXP. 88.217.152.166 (talk) 15:25, 13 November 2019...

the remove content does not seem to be an issue either. One can read WP:NOTVAND to see how every part of that is false. 128.40.1.2 (talk) 09:54, 4 July...

(UTC) This appears to be a content dispute. Sliekid, Please remember WP:NOTVAND, vandalism is intentionally defacing a page. Since you are by now edit...

edit summary "rv vandal" when removing 3RR warning and pointers to WP:NOTVAND and WP:BLP from Verbal. Verbal tries again to educate Urban XII about what...

vandalism [96] The Banner replied "Because it was" I left the template {{uw-notvand}} on their talk page; they responded by saying "Hope you overcome your...

exact same edit, and it was then reverted as "vandalism". I then left a uw-notvand template on User:Raeky's talk page, and tried to show Raeky that the edit...

12 May 2022 (UTC) CONTENT DISPUTE the OP is strongly advised to read WP:NOTVAND and to never use the word "vandalism" incorrectly again, nor to use the...

relevant to this discussion, as it does not involve vandalism. Please read WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 10:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Here's a recent...

--Sable232 (talk) 00:46, 17 July 2011 (UTC) I would suggest you read WP:NOTVAND, and if you still think the above diffs show vandalism, explain which of...

There are numerous examples of disruption that aren't vandalism, see WP:NOTVAND for examples. -- Atama頭 22:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC) Comment As I mentioned...

contribs) is consistantly calling things vandalism that are either WP:NOTVAND, content disputes, or just plain good edits. Here are some examples, dated...

little light on this particular situation. The relevant policy here is WP:NOTVAND. Depending on the viewpoint you take, Tentontunic's actions could be counted...

Pentes's edits were WP:TEND and just plain wrong, they do fall under WP:NOTVAND since he did what he did because he earnestly believed that was somehow...

not seeing vandalism. Disruption maybe, but you might want to read WP:NOTVAND.--v/r - TP 13:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC) This is not vandalism in your eyes...

latter example and the other diffs in this thread are not vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND generally. Vandalism is actually more narrowly defined around here than...

opposed editors. Useitorloseit (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Read WP:NOTVAND. And technically, we could go and revert more since it falls under WP:BLP...

idealogical issues (relating to the choices of usernames). A quick review of WP:NOTVAND would not go amiss, either. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:44, 26 November 2010...

revert to re-insert the same material, but it is not vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND for further info. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2010 (UTC) You're...

calling their edits to your talk page "vandalism" is also not cool: see WP:NOTVAND. Generally, the word "vandalism" shouldn't be slung around carelessly,...

(talk) 15:21, 15 September 2022 (UTC) You should read up on what is WP:NOTVAND. LL, you've got two options here: (1) acknowledge your mistakes and tell...

WP:EW#WHATISNT 16:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Yes, the problem is that WP:NOTVAND clearly says that personal attacks aren't vandalism. Confusing, isn't it...

disruptive editing, if done in good faith, is not considered vandalism per WP:NOTVAND. -- Atama頭 02:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC) From my experience, the articles...

recommend action here. All the rest of you, meanwhile, please go and read WP:NOTVAND. Calling people vandals when they aren't can get you blocked. Vanamonde...

Content dispute. Use his talk page or article talk page. Also read WP:NOTVAND to know what is not vandalism. Capitals00 (talk) 10:31, 2 January 2023...

error, he chose not to. I would ask that an uninvolved admin explain WP:NOTVAND to him, and possibly remove rollbacktwinkle. See: false accusation of vandalism...

finally, considering such actions as "indecent vandalism" (bonus link: WP:NOTVAND) - in addition to the continued urge to post walls of texts isn't particularly...

protests Warns Therexbanner Warns Gladsmile once and then again Per WP:NOTVAND "if an editor treats siuations which are not clearly vandalism as such...

pointy edits are explicitly mentioned as things that are not vandalism: NOTVAND. These fall under disruptive editing. For an admin to initiate a block...

that? Debresser (talk) 18:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC) I would point to WP:NOTVAND - "Some users cannot come to agreement with others who are willing to talk...

keep Twinkle, and won't mark edits as vandalism when it's a dispute/WP:NOTVAND. Is everyone reasonably happy now? (yes, I'm butting in) tedder (talk)...

(UTC) First of all, none of those edits are vandalism - please read WP:NOTVAND. Both of you are edit warring and need to discuss on the talk page, and...

policies you linked to really say that. Here's a better policy to read: WP:NOTVAND. Levivich 20:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC) Yes, those policies are correct, and...

28 December 2011 (UTC) IvanOS you should familiarise yourself with WP:NOTVAND; the edits you mention are not vandalism. Salvio Let's talk about it! 20:56...

further edits should be made to this discussion. CONTENT DISPUTE See WP:NOTVAND. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC) The following discussion...

blame the admin, blame the community that created the stupidity that is WP:NOTVAND, which means that practically nothing except replacing the article with...

April 2013 (UTC) Whoa whoa whoa, hang on a minute strike eagle. Read WP:NOTVAND. Vandalism is a deliberate attempt to deface the encyclopedia in bad faith...

Area/Resources (Depending on how fast that works, re-read WP:NOTVAND in the meantime). Then I think we're done here. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 20:12...

isn't an admin - and has apologised. The OP is also advised to read WP:NOTVAND, and that he's as bound by WP:CIVIL as anyone else. As Davey has apologised...

(edit conflict)It looks like somebody needs to peruse WP:TRUTH and WP:NOTVAND, as well as possibly WP:EW, WP:COMPETENCE and WP:NOTHERE. I'm personally...

vandalism | the vandalism of this user | My work, Your vandalism. @Niyskho: WP:NOTVAND. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 03:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Niyskho this person...

contribs) 21:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC) Reports by editors who haven't read WP:NOTVAND or WP:3RRNO. Some background to this dispute: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon...

whether involving the same or different material. I also suggest reading WP:NOTVAND, because nothing here is vandalism. Woodroar (talk) 16:36, 14 February...

reverted as "vandalism", no matter how often people try to explain WP:NOTVAND. I can't speak for other editors but Abhidevananda has reported me to AIV...

to damage Wikipedia rather than to right great wrongs (see generally WP:NOTVAND). You should be careful with that designation, especially in a dispute...

cover it. --Ring Cinema (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2012 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTVAND. "Bold edits, though they may precede consensus or be inconsistent with...

instead of sniping.--BETA 15:11, 26 July 2011 (UTC) BETA, please see WP:NOTVAND. I don't believe there is a valid way to characterize the edit you reverted...

pointed out, the 2nd instance I noted wasn't Twinkle, but was WP:EW and WP:NOTVAND - the latter could be considered WP:CIR, but not the former. More fundamentally...

users as "vandals" and their edits "vandalism" in manners proscribed by WP:NOTVAND ([134][135] [136]) since they acknowledged that it is "a violation of wiki...

very serious... But, "Harassment and personal attacks" are primarily WP:NOTVAND. In addition, Talk:Sarabjit Singh edits are definitely not vandalism. They...

"vandalism". Mjroots is an admin, and so should should be aware of WP:NOTVAND, and should not try to justify their actions in a content dispute by making...

Tim Trent, you really need to stop calling it vandalism. Please read WP:NOTVAND. That said, something does need to be done. Can we find a mentor?--v/r...

normal editing and improvements to the article. The OP is directed to WP:NOTVAND. And for future reports of actual vandalism, WP:AIV is thataway→. That...

Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk) 02:42, 20 June 2022 (UTC) Not a vandal. See WP:NOTVAND and use talk page to resolve your dispute. So far neither of you have used...

even know.--Haldir Marchwarden (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND is rather clear, FWIW. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 11:07, 16 September...

you alone don't like it, vandal (diff). That looks bad. Have you read WP:NOTVAND? El_C 12:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC) El_C, That's fine, I accept the distinction...

WP:Recentism, but do not care to make them myself. 142.105.159.60: please read WP:NOTVAND. You are also edit warring just as much as JoeSakr1980 is. If JoeSakr1980...

Randolph Fladmark, Jr." InfoLeak (talk) 07:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC) See WP:NOTVAND and WP:AGF. This poorly attributed paragraph length quote potentially goes...

having looked at the history of JD's page, the IP needs to remember WP:NOTVAND, as well, but given they were pretty thoroughly bitten I think they can...

over that you didn't miss. It is an easy thing to do. These edits are WP:NOTVAND. Per Rob, WP:AGF may be a bit lacking but no action is currently needed...

that the user should be blocked per NOTHERE. Absolutely pathetic. See WP:NOTVAND when looking to policy on vandalism blocks (esp. indefinite) for dangerously...

refers usual content removal/addition as vandalism,[6][7][8] (see WP:NOTVAND) while he is abusing,WP:ROLLBACK,[9] he re-inserts sentence that is unsourced...

cooperated or discussed. Dragovit (talk) 14:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC) See WP:NOTVAND, read the linked discussion where there is clear consensus (Wikipedia talk:Manual...

thing, calling a Bold action Vandalism. Clearly someone hasn't read WP:NOTVAND in a while. Hasteur (talk) 13:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC) Both of you stop...

strongly suggest you carefully read our vandalism policy, especially WP:NOTVAND, as more incorrect accusations will result in a topic ban or block. --NeilN...

2016 (UTC) Then tennis project members will get a very swift lesson in WP:NOTVAND and WP:LOCALCONSENSUS. Only in death does duty end (talk) 10:28, 23 December...

he's right or wrong is not what would make the edits vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND. Noformation Talk 12:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Agreeing with Noformation,...

sources? 151.20.4.197 (talk) 18:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTVAND. Whether or not this is appropriate it is not vandalism, and continued...

username by himself.[157] He has no idea what a vandalism is contrary to WP:NOTVAND.[158][159] Makes a page move by misspelling the "Bangladeshis" as "Bengladeshis"[160]...

maybe bring it back here. Monty845 03:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC) @IP: WP:NOTVAND.--v/r - TP 03:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC) The basic problem is that the IP...

2021. Holy WP:MWOT! Not quite sure what "subtle vandalism" is but per WP:NOTVAND accusations of vandalism which aren't, are a WP:PA, which would be an issue...

think we're looking at a block here. So Kb217, please read WP:BRD and WP:NOTVAND and explain how you're going to change your editing behavior. --NeilN talk...

diff, this diff, this diff and this diff). This, of course, violates WP:NOTVAND and can be considered harassment. And because I'm banned from their talk...

(Talk/Edits) 23:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC) You need to read WP:V and WP:NOTVAND before editing any further. Mr rnddude (talk) 23:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)...

Sanketio31 (talk) 15:37, 30 July 2021 (UTC) @Sanketio31: Please re-read WP:NOTVAND. Vandalism has a specific meaning on Wikipedia and misusing the term can...

keep Twinkle, and won't mark edits as vandalism when it's a dispute/WP:NOTVAND. Is everyone reasonably happy now? (yes, I'm butting in) tedder (talk)...

TT me 19:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Bahnfriend: please remember that WP:NOTVAND explicitly states that "disruptive editing" is not vandalism. Even if there...

for it--and admins and others should not be afraid to use Template:uw-notvand. Now, let's get back to work. Fender Stratocaster XII is wholly unverified...

[114] [115] and continued [116] to do so even when I pointed them to WP:NOTVAND, clearly explained that we had a content dispute [117] , and asked them...

meaning of vandalism, and agree to change how you use the word. See also WP:NOTVAND for more information. --Jayron32 12:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC) That is not what...

IP's edit "is bordering on vandalism" (diff) is bordering too much (WP:NOTVAND). If anything, it'd be disruptive editing to which vandalism is a narrow...

bully.--Robertmossing (talk) 19:12, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Please read WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC) No, it's the...

without his permission. I think someone might have to explain WP:OWN and WP:NOTVAND to him. I doubt he's going to listen to me or NorthBySouthBaranof, as he...

but true).--Amadscientist (talk) 10:31, 6 December 2012 (UTC) When WP:NOTVAND specifically points out that harassment is not vandalism, it's not appropriate...

information 11 December: Falsely claims other user is vandalizing. See WP:NOTVAND. 11 December: When presented evidence of his wrongdoing, he removes discussion...

Please ban her. --Momo Monitor (talk) 02:54, 21 April 2016 (UTC) See WP:NOTVAND, WP:ADVOCACY, WP:DUE, and WP:SYNTH. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:58, 21 April...

April 2018 (UTC) @WikiNutt: How these[62][63] edits are vandalism? See WP:NOTVAND. Have you attempted to discuss the issue with Ashbourne1? Why do you mark...

recent my edit, calling it a "rv possible vandaliam"[30], contrary to WP:NOTVAND, and has been warned about that before as well."possible_vandalism?" I...

discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. WP:NOTVAND. This is a content dispute, please discuss it at Talk:Pinto Martins – Fortaleza...

vandalism is bad. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC) Per WP:NOTVAND: ... sometimes honest editors may not have expressed themselves correctly...

constitutes a "vandalism"[60] even after already being told about "WP:NOTVAND".[61] This misuse of ANI after filing a malformed report on ANEW should...

lack of understanding of key policies, particularly WP:IMPARTIAL and WP:NOTVAND. Moreover, in discussions on the user's talk page they seem unamenable...

commented on it. Also, the edits they commented on were not vandalism (see WP:NOTVAND), as these edits reflected what appears to be a genuine attempt to improve...

information 11 December: Falsely claims other user is vandalizing. See WP:NOTVAND. 11 December: When presented evidence of his wrongdoing, he removes discussion...

your conclusions." This message reeks of WP:BATTLE and ignorance of WP:NOTVAND. 12 February: Removes maintenance tags without resolving the issue in the...

rnddude: As you should well know, good faith edits are not vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND 1, 2 did indeed have broken DYK sections. My bad; I had been watching out...

after being reverted.[7] 5 July: Alleges me of vandalism contrary to WP:NOTVAND.[8] 5 July: Refuses to self-revert and falsely claims that "Indian government...

to Interfase not to refer to content disagreements as vandalism (see WP:NOTVAND) was not successful, and that inaccurate accusations of vandalism are personal...

reports. Those who make them should, if anything, be educated earlier on NOTVAND rather than later, and we get a net reduction of frivolous warnings and...

real mess if using it without having an understanding of WP:VAND and WP:NOTVAND. I think filtering for Huggle/SWViewer is only real point of rollbacker...

project. Adapting the page to policy is not harming the project QED. See WP:NOTVAND. (ii) IMDB has never and will likely never be a reliable source on WP because...

Template:Uw-notenglishedit-no Template:Uw-nothanks Template:Uw-notvand Template:Uw-notvote Template:Uw-npa Template:Uw-npa1 Template:Uw-npa2 Template:Uw-npa3...

personal attacks, and also strike that bogus accusation of vandalism (see WP:NOTVAND). As I clearly noted both above and on the portal page, I reverted because...

that editors are exempt from it in certain arbitrary circumstances; WP:NOTVAND by claiming that persistent revert may be handled as vandalism even though...

a lot of stuff. Littlecat456💬(.log) 09:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND. If the templates are too close together, the solution is to separate them...

deletion/Kreuz Kaiserberg. Bahnfrend (talk) 18:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND explicitly states that "disruptive editing" (regardless of whether this...

ensure your image abides by copyright guidelines. Thank you. {{subst:uw-notvand|Article}} Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However...

Vandalism means to intentionally cause harm to Wikipedia pages. See WP:NOTVAND. Also, on Wikipedia, there is a difference between a block and a ban. Plain...

described at WP:VAND, and not something else (i.e. anything listed at WP:NOTVAND) because labelling non-vandalistic edits as vandalism is not good, against...

signs of vandalism (see WP:VANDTYPES for examples of vandalism and WP:NOTVAND for examples of non-vandalism), remember that most Wikipedia editors intend...

ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC) Have a look at WP:NOTVAND and the links I gave in the edit summary. Justify your additions on the...

Bahnfrend (talk) 18:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Please see WP:AGF and WP:NOTVAND. Note that "disruptive editing" is expicitly stated as not being vandalism...

left them unblocked. If you properly warn a user (making sure that WP:NOTVAND does not apply to their edits) and they keep engaging in blatant vandalism...

project. Adapting the page to policy is not harming the project QED. See WP:NOTVAND. (ii) IMDB has never and will likely never be a reliable source on WP because...

TT me 19:40, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Bahnfriend: please remember that WP:NOTVAND explicitly states that "disruptive editing" is not vandalism. Even if there...

represents a form of vandalism. --Cvdr (talk) 18:18, 22 July 2012 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Also there...

admin."NightHeron (talk) 02:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC) You need to read WP:NOTVAND. Considering the circumstances my renomination was good and I believe fully...

be researched and added. -- pde (talk) 18:37, 31 October 2013 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND. Please do not make statements like "would be an act of vandalism". Also...

WP:BLOCK(including WP:BEFOREBLOCK, WP:NOPUNISH) WP:PREFER, WP:ROLLBACK, WP:NOTVAND Worm That Turned WP:AC/DS,(check Expectations) WP:TBAN HJ Mitchell WP:BLOCK...

ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2009 (UTC) Have a look at WP:NOTVAND and the links I gave in the edit summary. Justify your additions on the...

147.187 (talk) 03:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC) (edit conflict) Please see WP:NOTVAND. That's not vandalism. While there may be other issues with including such...

template to the end of your unsigned comment is not vandalism. Please see WP:NOTVAND; Wikipedia uses a stricter definition of the word vandalism, and none of...

reverted it, maliciously and falsely labelling my edit as vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND, and please learn some basic manners. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs)...

the encyclopedia is no less than required in a vandal fighter as per WP:NOTVAND, WP:AGF, and WP:BITE. The STiki instruction page cannot override our policies...

statement than I was previously comfortable with as Lar has gone against WP:NOTVAND/WP:VANDTYPES in [21]. "Significant content removals are usually not considered...

sampling of recent vandalism warnings suggests this editor understands wp:NOTVAND, and while a lot of the automated warnings are canned, they are the right...

there's no reason whatsoever to call any such revert "vandalism" per WP:NOTVAND.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Oppose. Demonstrated in...

against Adamgerber80, alleging IP and him of vandalism contrary to WP:NOTVAND. Nauriya never interacted Adamgerber80 ever before,[45] neither he edited...

direct them to? Someone else already requested that they see WP:VAND and WP:NOTVAND but it's seemingly had no effect. 109.236.4.20 (talk) 20:10, 19 January...

March 2016 (UTC) Also, make sure that the problem does not fall under WP:NOTVAND before warning and reporting someone. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:02, 21 March...

” and restoring it. Nick Levine (talk) 08:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND may be worth a read. Regards, HaeB (talk) 09:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)...

admin."NightHeron (talk) 02:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC) You need to read WP:NOTVAND. Considering the circumstances my renomination was good and I believe fully...

nationalist glasses"[16] Doesn't understand difference between Vandalism and WP:NOTVAND.[17][18][19] Both made edit request on Kulbhushan Jadhav[20][21] Both voted...

3 reverts in less than 20 minutes), but also failing to understand WP:NOTVAND, which is expressly clear that any good faith attempt to improve the encyclopedia...

that with them. If the warner is new, I'll be more likely to explain WP:NOTVAND. If I recognize their name more easily than User:Jimbo Wales, then I might...

for Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings, some of which (uw-ewsoft, uw-notvand, uw-fringe1, uw-fringe2, uw-fringe3) are included with Twinkle. I am running...

[74][75] Canvases people by misrepresenting others edits as vandalism (see WP:NOTVAND).[76][77] Canvassing same editor in a friendly manner.[78][79][80][81]...

so blanking it from the talk page does not do any harm, but it's not vandalism. (See WP:NOTVAND.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)...

other people's edits - as vandalism despite repeated warnings about WP:NOTVAND. For instance, [6] [7]. Previous Bormalagurski socks had the same habit...

will be automatically unprotected. Nemov, that is not vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND. El_C 20:02, 1 September 2022 (UTC) Joseph Quinn (actor) (edit | talk |...

and how can I report her? Mridu (talk) 05:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC) See WP:NOTVAND. The user you describe does not appear to be a vandal at all. If she has...

Ekdalian, that is not "vandalism," please don't misuse the term (see WP:NOTVAND). El_C 20:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC) Conservapedia (edit | talk | history...

may be unhelpful, but the majority seem to be made in good faith. See WP:NOTVAND. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:50, 23 December 2022 (UTC) Anti-Hero (song) (edit...

material that could have been completely made up is not vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Hi again Capankajsmilyo...

attempting to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. I suggest you read WP:NOTVAND. Wikipedia is pretty strict on what is considered vandalism, and accusing...

page or other forms of dispute resolution. Kush sinhala, please read WP:NOTVAND NeilN talk to me 14:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC) Otherkin (edit | talk | history...

read WP:NOTVAND after he several times called me a vandal, and increased his vandalism counter after I left a comment asking him to read WP:NOTVAND on his...

AldezD, that is not "vandalism," please don't misuse the term (see WP:NOTVAND). El_C 02:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC) MG 42 (edit | talk | history | links...

unprotected. El_C 13:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC) BTW, onel5969, please review WP:NOTVAND. Vandalism is a narrow subset of disruptive editing, so best to employ...

for Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings, some of which (uw-ewsoft, uw-notvand, uw-fringe1, uw-fringe2, uw-fringe3) are included with Twinkle. I am running...

resolution. Copyvio to boot. @NZ Footballs Conscience: Please read WP:NOTVAND. NeilN talk to me 01:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Hi User:NeilN Can you explain...

but it isn't vandalism, and shouldn't be referred to as such. See WP:NOTVAND. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC) Frank Hamer (edit | talk |...

preferred version be fully protected. Also, please read WP:AGF and WP:NOTVAND. NeilN talk to me 14:16, 17 September 2016 (UTC) Bhut jolokia (edit | talk...

in my mind. If Бровар's edit are indeed vandalism (be sure to read WP:NOTVAND before saying it is), then the solution would be dealing with that user...

105.123 (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC) Declined XyZAn, please read WP:NOTVAND. If you must, take it to WP:ANEW after warnings have been given. NeilN...

no reason under the policy to protect the page. The user should read WP:NOTVAND. I've now seen then make numerous false claims of vandalism. 167.98.54...

Semi-protected to stop the drive-by IP edits. Bob80q, please read WP:NOTVAND and use the talk page which hasn't been touched in months. NeilN talk to...

resolution. NeilN talk to me 19:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Dan56, and see WP:NOTVAND. The IP is using the talk page. Please join them. --NeilN talk to me 19:48...

enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Please read WP:NOTVAND, and note that you are expected to provide an edit summary when reverting...

vandalism that you've made here and in several other places. Read up on WP:NOTVAND and WP:NPA. I corrected an absurdly incorrect statement. I thought that...

inappropriate editing. We have demonstrated multiple times with reference to WP:NOTVAND that our edits are fair. Minphie does not accept this and keeps telling...

inappropriate editing. We have demonstrated multiple times with reference to WP:NOTVAND that our edits are fair. Minphie does not accept this and keeps telling...

(talk) 01:39, 13 August 2016 (UTC) Declined Johnsc1277, please read WP:NOTVAND NeilN talk to me 01:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC) Sofia Richie (edit | talk...

mind that 1) Vandalism means to intentionally harm the project (See WP:NOTVAND for more things on what is and isn't vandalism) and 2) You are responsible...

While Breein1007 shouldn't refer to good faith edits as vandalism (see WP:NOTVAND), you should note that neither diff shows Breein1007 calling you disgusting...

--LennBr (talk) 15:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC) Disruptive editing is WP:NOTVAND. Also, not an issue for ITN, but for AN/3RR or ANI RandomCanadian (talk...

An article being non-notable is not vandalism (please see WP:N and WP:NOTVAND - I will nominate the article for deletion as I agree it is not notable...

Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit/Academy might be of interest for you, as well as WP:NOTVAND. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2021 (UTC) This would've been better...

Urban XII (talk) 16:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC) Please take a look at WP:NOTVAND. This is your final warning. Verbal chat 16:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC) No...

crude humor. Content disputes are not considered vandalism, as per WP:NOTVAND, which is why the administrator declined the AIV report. Also, please assume...

parler) 04:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC) (Oh, and I also gave the IP a {{uw-notvand}} warning.) — Francophonie&Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler) 04:11...

focus on being less WP:BITEy, such as Template:Uw-ewsoft, Template:Uw-notvand, and Template:Uw-middlepost. 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing...

(talk) 17:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Declined This isn't vandalism: see WP:NOTVAND. However, there may be issues with sourcing. Marcelus, please warn the...

diffs of Randy accusing you of vandalism after Valeree advised them of WP:NOTVAND? I also don't see any evidence provided for the WP:CIR allegation. Concerning...

you, however, are edit warring. This edit is not reverting vandalism (WP:NOTVAND), and it's not helpful to have an edit summary that simply says stop edit...

summary that is a personal attack agaisnt the IP editor here. Please read WP:NOTVAND. This is a content dispute, but it's over multiple articles. I have protected...

Further he labeled my well explained edits as vandalism (ignoring WP:NOTVAND)[27], made 3rd revert during active WP:3o request & talk page discussion...

Comments: Mislabeling any edits he disgrees with as "vandalism" contrary to WP:NOTVAND despite having been warned to stop it.[229] Was reported to ANI before...

edits as "vandalism " in their edit summaries, which is a violation of WP:NOTVAND. I have explicitly asked the user in my edit summary at 15:40 to use the...

Kam (talk) 11:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC) No evidence of vandalism. See WP:NOTVAND. Drafting and AfC pior to publication, in principle, are optional. Editors...

that it is also absolutely not bordering on vandalism; please read WP:NOTVAND. Vandalism has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia, and referring to edits...

you have mentioned above are "a textbook example of vandalism" (see WP:NOTVAND), and given that UtherSRG is an editor with 200,000 edits, many to the...

WP:NOTURBANDICTIONARY WP:NOTUS WP:NOTUSA WP:NOTUSEFUL WP:NOTV WP:NOTVALUABLE WP:NOTVAN WP:NOTVAND WP:NOTVANDAL WP:NOTVANDALISM WP:NOTVIDEOGAME WP:NOTVOTE WP:NOTW WP:NOTWALLOFSHAME...

you sent me shows you don't understand what vandalism is; please read WP:NOTVAND. Cases where subtle vandalism are missed would not be helped by your suggestions...

supporting their agenda. Swoonfed (Ping) 18:13, 18 February 2025 (UTC) See WP:NOTVAND. Capitals00 (talk) 02:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC) Considerably more harm...

top of the edit page regarding notifing editors you bring here. Also, WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC) The edit in...

it is. @The Herald, do you think WP:VANDALISM was right in context? WP:NOTVAND applies to automated messages as well. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:46...

Lemonademan22 (talk) 17:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC) You might find WP:PASG and WP:NOTVAND worth a read. Daniel Case (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2025 (UTC) War 2 (film) (edit...

edit was obviously not vandalism, because it hits multiple criteria at WP:NOTVAND. Someone patrolling for vandalism shouldn't have even touched it, because...

talk page for removal? Kj1595 (talk) 05:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC) @Kj1595: WP:NOTVAND. Accusing other editors of vandalism when they are not vandalizing is a...

this is extremely concerning coming from an editor of your stature. WP:NOTVAND. Calling admins who are adhering to policy vandals is a bold strategy,...

even in your false dichotomy, neither case would be vandalism; see WP:NOTVAND. EducatedRedneck (talk) 00:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC) O.K. I see. We are...

vandalism, as they are both plausible good-faith contributions. Please see WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:29, 17 September 2025 (UTC) The link...

not understand. Longislandtea (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC) WP:NOTVAND. Note that accusing editors of vandalism when they are not, in fact, vandalising...

of the templates were vandalism ones, which this plainly wasn't per WP:NOTVAND. Meanwhile, they've now been pblocked from the article, and the block message...

in the last 50 edits, that I can see. The user should be referred to WP:NOTVAND and warned not to make false claims like this. 86.28.234.5 (talk) 18:49...

highly contentious article" does not equal vandalism per se. Come on, WP:NOTVAND is quite clear. Users may be sanctioned for disruptive editing or edit-warring...

requesting what the user just did be noted as vandalism Please read WP:NOTVAND; "vandalism" has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia, which is edits whose...

policies and guidelines. As an example, note that what Gawoan did was WP:NOTVAND, and claiming it was constitutes a personal attack, which is forbidden...

edit war with me by falsifying my edits as "vandalism" contrary to WP:NOTVAND.[299] Evidently he is falsely terming productive edits as "vandalism" for...

the baptism. PahlaviFan (talk) 06:48, 4 August 2025 (UTC) Please see WP:NOTVAND. Any edit done in good faith is not vandalism, no matter if you don't like...

21:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC) @Logosx127:, your edit summary here violates WP:NOTVAND. "Edits I disagree with" are not vandalism. Note that referring to edits...

talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. @Dapr03: please read WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:40, 4 April 2026 (UTC) Template:More...

sections above. SakuraSmart, for a start, you're going to need to read WP:NOTVAND. -- asilvering (talk) 07:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC) @SakuraSmart, I've...

disruptive. Calling it "MOS-compliant vandalism" seems way over the top. See WP:NOTVAND. Secondly, in cases where the information is sourced, I do relocate it...

own article. Nathannah • 📮 16:39, 18 June 2025 (UTC) Also please see WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:12, 19 June 2025 (UTC) The discussion...

One ping only 19:52, 29 March 2026 (UTC) @Avishai11: and please read WP:NOTVAND. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC) Robox (edit...