ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

treated differently from other information. Shortcut WP:NOTWHOSWHOWP:NOTWHOSWHO Who's who. Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may...

that makes him, but... Quis separabit? 13:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC) WP:NOTWHOSWHO Tpdwkouaa (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

JSTOR · TWL) Subject is known only for one event, fails WP:GNG. See WP:NOTWHOSWHO Flat Out (talk) 22:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC) Delete The clip may be notable...

(talk) 20:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Delete: Violates WP:NOT, namely WP:NOTWHOSWHO and by analogy to WP:NOTSTATSBOOK. Even if the event itself may have been...

Nicaragua alone isn't enough to warrant coverage, per WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. If all the info you can provide in an article is that she won something...

anything more than the average Belmont contender. I would point to WP:NOTWHOSWHO here. Aspening (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

Tam herself—a self-published source. Additionally, the article fails WP:NOTWHOSWHO as coverage of Tam comes from news reports about political developments...

JSTOR · TWL) Good faith creation; however, subject fails WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Merge relevant info into Pittenweem witches. It's me... Sallicio! ⊕ {\displaystyle...

the story.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTWHOSWHO.  sami  talk 00:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

much contest to that being enough. The best argument in support of WP:NOTWHOSWHO in this case would be the long list of Miss South Africas on that page...

credited in the Anthem of the Republic of Buryatia article. Wikipedia is WP:NOTWHOSWHO. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

news coverage of the game and so should be included on that page. WP:NOTWHOSWHO In addition, a lot of the information here is either unsourced or seemingly...

individual. Lack of significant coverage in references. WP:NOTDIR WP:NOTWHOSWHO WP:NOTIINFO 150.212.46.23 (talk) 18:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC) Note I...

been covered in reliable sources, but should not get an own article: WP:NOTWHOSWHO or WP:BLP1E. --Ben Ben (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...

either in reference to his role as a participant of a reality show (WP:NOTWHOSWHO) or in the form of gossip jornals describing mundane events that are not...

leading back to his YouTube account and videos. Requesting deletion per WP:NOTWHOSWHO. --Anarchyte 08:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

because he won the Volvo Environment Prize, to which I would contest WP:NOTWHOSWHO Tpdwkouaa (talk) 17:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

has statistics from "fan sites", but I fail to see how that relates to NOTWHOSWHO. At the end of the day, it's our job to provide useful information for...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTLINKEDIN, WP:NOTWHOSWHO. This is a non-notable bio subject. All sourcing is primary. It's a résumé...

and others that the purpose of WP:BLP policy, as well as WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTWHOSWHO, seems best served by deletion at this time. Beccaynr (talk) 19:34, 27...

him being popular on reddit, seems a bit tautological. WP:1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO also seem to justify flagging this for deletion. Esoxidtalk•contribs 16:12...

extensive biographical information that's not relevant to the charges (WP:NOTWHOSWHO "Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be...

and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOTWHOSWHO Aintabli (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Keep. This individual has...

fuss, but what do you mean by worthiness? For a figure like this, WP:NOTWHOSWHO seems the closest to a call for "worthiness", which is why I pointed out...

for the legal actions against the IEC, I think the guidelines from WP:NOTWHOSWHO are relevant: "Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in...

think the policy reasons to delete this are WP:NOTYELLOW, point 2, and WP:NOTWHOSWHO, point 4. --Pgallert (talk) 08:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Keep First, let...

unsure if the entire credit of the event goes to the subject. Per WP:NOTWHOSWHO I prefer a redirection to the event article here for a possibly balanced...

the WP:REFBOMBing, here's a source analysis: Delete. WP:NOTCV and WP:NOTWHOSWHO, routine coverage and interviews are insufficent to write an article from...

Israel. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 16:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTWHOSWHO The sourcing is in possibly Hebrew, but the overall content reads like...

TWL) Coverage does not go "beyond the context of a single event" per WP:NOTWHOSWHO, in this case, one audition on one episode of a reality show (an extremely...

seems to be what has happened here, seems to invoke WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:NOTWHOSWHO (the draft is indeed a notable event, but the coverage of these individuals...

players here are female has absolutely nothing to do with this AfD). See WP:NOTWHOSWHO - Wikipedia does not constitute a primary source... JMHamo (talk) 22:09...

be already found in Occupy Canada and what's left seems to violate WP:NOTWHOSWHO - so far the importance of these people have not been shown. Zangar (talk)...

the available encyclopedic material relating to that person." and WP:NOTWHOSWHO: "Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be...

was not a mere short-term interest" (emphasis mine). Furthermore, WP:NOTWHOSWHO states that "even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it...

these suggest we have article on the circumstance, not those involved WP:NOTWHOSWHO - this was already a notable subject; these people have not made it so...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:39, 23 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTWHOSWHO not an indiscriminate collection of information. — Maile (talk) 17:22...

search.InspireTheWorld (talk) 06:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Delete Borders WP:NOTWHOSWHO and WP:CFORK as well. The parent article 2016 JNU sedition controversy...

discrimination/protests about drag artists in Ontario or Canada, see WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Establishing a biographical article for this subject is much WP:TOOSOON...

the new adventure. This time in taxi. So while DGG says by way of WP:NOTWHOSWHO that this is a one event about a taxi company, an Italian newspaper says...

reporting, written in news style, celebrity gossip, nor a violation of WP:NOTWHOSWHO. The ultimate question here is whether it's wiser to merge our coverage...

(yesterday). I can't help feeling this is WP:NOTNEWS(particularly WP:NOTWHOSWHO), but if so it is (presumably) outside our remit. Since the redirect is...

Qwerfjkltalk 09:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. SpinningSpark 11:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC) I agree, but not list the...

Tribune) and the birthday special on ABP Live are routine news events of WP:NOTWHOSWHO which are not independent as per WP:ROUTINE. Points #3 (Sales), #7 (Playback...

said, the officer himself isn't notable per WP:BLP1E WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO, but the incident is, making this a case of an "Assassination of" article...

disagree with me. Some might point to WP:NOT, perhaps thinking of WP:NOTWHOSWHO. I don't think this applies in many cases about local politicians where...

WP:What Wikipedia is not (stated in the lead), which it is, here: WP:NOTWHOSWHO. It also says in WWIN that biographical articles are required to meet...

much weight on the Vice or Wired articles as you do. WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTWHOSWHO both clearly specify that we need to examine how issues would best be...

opinion is not policy. Wikipedia policy can speak for itself, see WP:NOTWHOSWHO. I've brought up weight issues (specifically giving a false balance) that...

the new adventure. This time in taxi. So while DGG says by way of WP:NOTWHOSWHO that this is a one event about a taxi company, an Italian newspaper says...

factoids about a person. Does nobody have any qualms that this violates WP:NOTWHOSWHO? At this point I am genuinely perplexed why y'all care so much for keeping...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The articles fail WP:GNG, WP:NOTNEWS (WP:NOTWHOSWHO), WP:ROUTINE, and most also fail WP:BLP1E. I am also nominating the following...

Sång (talk) 06:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC) I contend that this article fails WP:NOTWHOSWHO. It is tough to identify any notability beyond a single invention, a product...

news coverage of the game and so should be included on that page. WP:NOTWHOSWHO In addition, a lot of the information here is either unsourced or seemingly...

and media coverage for a very short time would flood Wikipedia. See WP:NOTWHOSWHO, JTdaleTalk~ 16:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Keep It is way too soon to determine...

seems to be what has happened here, seems to invoke WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:NOTWHOSWHO (the draft is indeed a notable event, but the coverage of these individuals...

has statistics from "fan sites", but I fail to see how that relates to NOTWHOSWHO. At the end of the day, it's our job to provide useful information for...

now about him being unpopular, seems a bit tautological. WP:1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO also seem to justify flagging this for deletion. Esoxidtalk•contribs 20:43...

the story.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTWHOSWHO.  sami  talk 00:10, 1 August 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

search.InspireTheWorld (talk) 06:41, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Delete Borders WP:NOTWHOSWHO and WP:CFORK as well. The parent article 2016 JNU sedition controversy...

25 April 2011 (UTC) Keep - I'm not finding anything against this (WP:NOTWHOSWHO: most of the guests have an article; WP:NOTNEWS: not breaking news, not...

(talk) 08:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Merge into Wikipedia community per WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Emily does a good job, but as the policies state, merely being verifiable...

him being popular on reddit, seems a bit tautological. WP:1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO also seem to justify flagging this for deletion. Esoxidtalk•contribs 16:12...

fuss, but what do you mean by worthiness? For a figure like this, WP:NOTWHOSWHO seems the closest to a call for "worthiness", which is why I pointed out...

that makes him, but... Quis separabit? 13:11, 19 March 2016 (UTC) WP:NOTWHOSWHO Tpdwkouaa (talk) 17:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

unsure if the entire credit of the event goes to the subject. Per WP:NOTWHOSWHO I prefer a redirection to the event article here for a possibly balanced...

reporting, written in news style, celebrity gossip, nor a violation of WP:NOTWHOSWHO. The ultimate question here is whether it's wiser to merge our coverage...

discrimination/protests about drag artists in Ontario or Canada, see WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Establishing a biographical article for this subject is much WP:TOOSOON...

JSTOR · TWL) Subject is known only for one event, fails WP:GNG. See WP:NOTWHOSWHO Flat Out (talk) 22:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC) Delete The clip may be notable...

been covered in reliable sources, but should not get an own article: WP:NOTWHOSWHO or WP:BLP1E. --Ben Ben (talk) 19:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC) The above discussion...

credited in the Anthem of the Republic of Buryatia article. Wikipedia is WP:NOTWHOSWHO. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has...

think the policy reasons to delete this are WP:NOTYELLOW, point 2, and WP:NOTWHOSWHO, point 4. --Pgallert (talk) 08:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Keep First, let...

WP:What Wikipedia is not (stated in the lead), which it is, here: WP:NOTWHOSWHO. It also says in WWIN that biographical articles are required to meet...

be already found in Occupy Canada and what's left seems to violate WP:NOTWHOSWHO - so far the importance of these people have not been shown. Zangar (talk)...

was not a mere short-term interest" (emphasis mine). Furthermore, WP:NOTWHOSWHO states that "even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it...

and others that the purpose of WP:BLP policy, as well as WP:NOTNEWS/WP:NOTWHOSWHO, seems best served by deletion at this time. Beccaynr (talk) 19:34, 27...

and media coverage for a very short time would flood Wikipedia. See WP:NOTWHOSWHO, JTdaleTalk~ 16:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Keep It is way too soon to determine...

extensive biographical information that's not relevant to the charges (WP:NOTWHOSWHO "Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be...

failed candidacy, because the application of NOT would be NOTNEWS or NOTWHOSWHO, but if this person is notable, it's for multiple things, so these would...

for the legal actions against the IEC, I think the guidelines from WP:NOTWHOSWHO are relevant: "Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in...

be already found in Occupy Canada and what's left seems to violate WP:NOTWHOSWHO - so far the importance of these people have not been shown. Zangar (talk)...

25 April 2011 (UTC) Keep - I'm not finding anything against this (WP:NOTWHOSWHO: most of the guests have an article; WP:NOTNEWS: not breaking news, not...

encyclopedic in the current state, it's practically the inverse of WP:NOTWHOSWHO. As many others have mentioned, although I doubt it passes the WP:10YT...

because he won the Volvo Environment Prize, to which I would contest WP:NOTWHOSWHO Tpdwkouaa (talk) 17:06, 19 March 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

the available encyclopedic material relating to that person." and WP:NOTWHOSWHO: "Even when an event is notable, individuals involved in it may not be...

these suggest we have article on the circumstance, not those involved WP:NOTWHOSWHO - this was already a notable subject; these people have not made it so...

individual. Lack of significant coverage in references. WP:NOTDIR WP:NOTWHOSWHO WP:NOTIINFO 150.212.46.23 (talk) 18:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC) Note I...

now about him being unpopular, seems a bit tautological. WP:1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO also seem to justify flagging this for deletion. Esoxidtalk•contribs 20:43...

was unrelated to the Limbaugh scandal (which it isn't.) Please see WP:NOTWHOSWHO - as she in no way merits a mention in the article about the 2012 election...

JSTOR · TWL) Good faith creation; however, subject fails WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Merge relevant info into Pittenweem witches. It's me... Sallicio! ⊕ {\displaystyle...

disagree with me. Some might point to WP:NOT, perhaps thinking of WP:NOTWHOSWHO. I don't think this applies in many cases about local politicians where...

leading back to his YouTube account and videos. Requesting deletion per WP:NOTWHOSWHO. --Anarchyte 08:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

dogman15 (talk) 06:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:INDISCRIMINATE WP:NOTWHOSWHO WP:NOTNEWSPAPER Who does and does not support these bills is not encyclopedic...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTLINKEDIN, WP:NOTWHOSWHO. This is a non-notable bio subject. All sourcing is primary. It's a résumé...

dogman15 (talk) 06:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:INDISCRIMINATE WP:NOTWHOSWHO WP:NOTNEWSPAPER Who does and does not support these bills is not encyclopedic...

anything more than the average Belmont contender. I would point to WP:NOTWHOSWHO here. Aspening (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

players here are female has absolutely nothing to do with this AfD). See WP:NOTWHOSWHO - Wikipedia does not constitute a primary source... JMHamo (talk) 22:09...

much weight on the Vice or Wired articles as you do. WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTWHOSWHO both clearly specify that we need to examine how issues would best be...

enduring notability in a way that many reality show contestants aren't. WP:NOTWHOSWHO, but coverage of Trimble goes beyond a single event, in my view. Cheers...

encyclopedic in the current state, it's practically the inverse of WP:NOTWHOSWHO. As many others have mentioned, although I doubt it passes the WP:10YT...

(talk) 08:47, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Merge into Wikipedia community per WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Emily does a good job, but as the policies state, merely being verifiable...

was unrelated to the Limbaugh scandal (which it isn't.) Please see WP:NOTWHOSWHO - as she in no way merits a mention in the article about the 2012 election...

14 March 2023 (UTC) @Suriname0, yep, I understand your predicament. WP:NOTWHOSWHO offers some guidance on this (related to BLP1E), as does NOTGOSSIP, which...

Actual policy considerations include WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Should Baron Trump have his own article? All of Musk's other kids? Should...

accomplishments (e.g. for a widely reported public controversy, etc.). See also WP:NOTWHOSWHO; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of people, and the average graduate...

notable; he should be covered in the article Survivor 48. See also WP:NOTWHOSWHO. cagliost (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC) You are correct that 'presumed'...

John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:17, 10 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTWHOSWHO and WP:BLPCRIME mdm.bla 00:39, 12 February 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved...

notability test and as per MOS:TVCAST should not be included. I think WP:NOTWHOSWHO is very relevant for this discussion. "Even when an event is notable,...

criterion. c) Some applicable guidelines are WP:NOTLINK, WP:NOTDIR, WP:NOTWHOSWHO. And common sense. The list would be in the hundreds, if not thousands...

WP:NOT I see some issues with regard to WP:NOTNEWS (2nd clause) and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Either way, it's going to be pretty challenging to create a BLP article...

rules WP:NOT#NEWS WP:NOT#NEWSPAPER WP:NOT#NEWSREPORTS WP:NOTDIARY WP:NOTWHOSWHO. There is s seperate "2G spectrum section" , but still, the informations...

of primary sources that are virtually indistinguishable from a CV. (WP:NOTWHOSWHO, WP:NOTCV). --Animalparty! (talk) 04:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC) I agree with...

articles for Charlie Kirk and his death would be in line with WP:1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Merging instead of deleting would also alleviate concerns about overzealous...

per WP:NOTSOAPBOX and WP:NPOV; that fail other aspects of NOT, like WP:NOTWHOSWHO, WP:NOTGOSSIP, WP:NOTCRYSTAL, WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTSOCIAL, WP:NOTCV...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The articles fail WP:GNG, WP:NOTNEWS (WP:NOTWHOSWHO), WP:ROUTINE, and most also fail WP:BLP1E. I am also nominating the following...

WP:NOT I see some issues with regard to WP:NOTNEWS (2nd clause) and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Either way, it's going to be pretty challenging to create a BLP article...

either in reference to his role as a participant of a reality show (WP:NOTWHOSWHO) or in the form of gossip jornals describing mundane events that are not...

guessing it would be a speedy delete per WP:NOT/WP:NOTDB/WP:NOTPROMO/WP:NOTWHOSWHO/WP:BLP1E/WP:LOWPROFILE. If the media cared enough to report on every trans...

TWL) Coverage does not go "beyond the context of a single event" per WP:NOTWHOSWHO, in this case, one audition on one episode of a reality show (an extremely...

said, the officer himself isn't notable per WP:BLP1E WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO, but the incident is, making this a case of an "Assassination of" article...

Actual policy considerations include WP:BLP1E, WP:NOTEVERYTHING and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Should Baron Trump have his own article? All of Musk's other kids? Should...

@BeanieFan11 I checked are only sourced with databases. WP:NOTDATABASE,WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Both shortcuts are to policies. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 01:20, 18 March...

enduring notability in a way that many reality show contestants aren't. WP:NOTWHOSWHO, but coverage of Trimble goes beyond a single event, in my view. Cheers...

and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:55, 14 February 2024 (UTC) Delete: WP:NOTWHOSWHO Aintabli (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC) Keep. This individual has...

Tam herself—a self-published source. Additionally, the article fails WP:NOTWHOSWHO as coverage of Tam comes from news reports about political developments...

failed candidacy, because the application of NOT would be NOTNEWS or NOTWHOSWHO, but if this person is notable, it's for multiple things, so these would...

14 March 2023 (UTC) @Suriname0, yep, I understand your predicament. WP:NOTWHOSWHO offers some guidance on this (related to BLP1E), as does NOTGOSSIP, which...

Tribune) and the birthday special on ABP Live are routine news events of WP:NOTWHOSWHO which are not independent as per WP:ROUTINE. Points #3 (Sales), #7 (Playback...

factoids about a person. Does nobody have any qualms that this violates WP:NOTWHOSWHO? At this point I am genuinely perplexed why y'all care so much for keeping...

loose significance down the line. Hence the suggestion in line with WP:NOTWHOSWHO - "Wait 14 days for 'Breaking-related' living beings." I think this will...

Sång (talk) 06:58, 9 May 2023 (UTC) I contend that this article fails WP:NOTWHOSWHO. It is tough to identify any notability beyond a single invention, a product...

Israel. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 16:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOTWHOSWHO The sourcing is in possibly Hebrew, but the overall content reads like...

do between reporting (Wikipedia is not WP:NOTNEWS for WP:ROUTINE, WP:NOTWHOSWHO) qua posting a legal threat. I think this needs a 3rd opinion. Ngenazulu...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:39, 23 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTWHOSWHO not an indiscriminate collection of information. — Maile (talk) 17:22...

full list of every athlete is not appropriate for this purpose, per WP:NOTWHOSWHO among others, and NSPORTS was designed to try to quell the number of stub...

the WP:REFBOMBing, here's a source analysis: Delete. WP:NOTCV and WP:NOTWHOSWHO, routine coverage and interviews are insufficent to write an article from...

articles for Charlie Kirk and his death would be in line with WP:1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Merging instead of deleting would also alleviate concerns about overzealous...

notable; he should be covered in the article Survivor 48. See also WP:NOTWHOSWHO. cagliost (talk) 12:51, 6 February 2026 (UTC) You are correct that 'presumed'...

I notice that although the word 'Zentangle' is on the list of art techniques here and has a slot on wikiHow (BTW, is wikiHow anything to do with this encyclopedia...

guessing it would be a speedy delete per WP:NOT/WP:NOTDB/WP:NOTPROMO/WP:NOTWHOSWHO/WP:BLP1E/WP:LOWPROFILE. If the media cared enough to report on every trans...