ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcuts WP:PROFWP:PROF WP:NPROFWP:NPROF...

over into the non-scientific area of "psychics". I don't see enough for NPROF nor do I find GNG evidence. There do not seem to be independent sources...

case are WP:NPROF. There are very good reasons why WP:NPROF is the way it is. --hroest 18:35, 16 July 2021 (UTC) And you're applying NPROF poorly by doing...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Assistant prof, seems like WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF to me. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't look like meeting WP:NPROF, WP:GNG, WP:RS. The article does not cite any independent sources. Looking...

this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject meets WP:NPROF (presumably C1). For concerns of promotion, the issue seems to have been...

2023 (UTC) Delete does not pass WP:NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 17:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Delete, does not pass NPROF. The Google Scholar profiled the article...

evidence of subject meet WP:NPROF. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. This is basically a CV. Does not pass NPROF. --Kbabej (talk) 20:41...

status is enough to meet WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC) Keep FGSA meets criterion 3 of WP:NPROF. Edwardx (talk) 11:27, 5 July...

Does not pass GNG nor NPROF.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:32, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Delete. As per above doesn't pass NPROF. Cuoxo (talk) 13:51, 4 February...

insufficient citations to pass WP:NPROF#C1, awards are all early career so do not contribute to a pass of WP:NPROF. No SIGCOV, so fails WP:GNG as well...

fails WP:NPROF, and no indication that WP:GNG is met. Curbon7 (talk) 00:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Delete. Looks WP:TOOSOON at best for WP:NPROF C1, and I...

absolutely no sign of an NPROF pass for this subject. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:45, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:NPROF, WP:NAUTHOR and most importantly...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC) Keep - passes WP:NPROF (criterion five) outright because he holds a named chair at a major university...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't believe the subject of this article meets WP:NPROF. She has not held a senior faculty position in any university. She has published...

speedy deletion. To repeat: non-notable academic, passes neither GNG nor NPROF, COI/promotional creation. Drmies (talk) 16:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC) Note:...

this page.‎ The result was keep. Keep to speedy keep. Clearly passes WP:NPROF. Professor at a major American university. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. No fellowships to societies (the John Douglas French one is a grant). Gusfriend...

notable by his citation counts and various awards that he won, he passes WP:NPROF#1. --hroest 17:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC) Draftify Keep Although the subject...

2021 (UTC) Keep. The IEEE fellow meets WP:NPROF C3. The citation record also looks sufficient for WP:NPROF C1. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:56, 17 April 2021...

pass WP:ACADEMIC and WP:NPROF. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 05:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC) If someone would show me how he meets WP:NPROF, which is the same as WP:NACADEMIC...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As far as I can tell this individual does not meet WP:NPROF. Their highest paper has 19 citations according to GS. I cannot otherwise...

Shellwood (talk) 07:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC) delete she clearly fails WP:NPROF with a two published papers in GS (the first of which has a respectable...

and Women. Skipple ☎ 17:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC) Comment: May pass WP:NPROF#3 as a fellow of the American Physical Society. Curbon7 (talk) 17:48, 8...

the has been added this individual does not meet WP:BIO nor does he WP:NPROF, a google search did not come up with any Reliable Secondary sources on...

deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:43, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF C1. The case isn't quite as clear as it looks at first glance -- the subject's...

meet WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC) Delete. Almost nothing citation-wise, and no details supporting meeting other NPROF criteria...

Styszyńska does not seem to pass either WP:NPROF or the GNG. An associate professorship does not suffice under NPROF crit. 5, and the low citation levels (Scopus...

treatments (vision therapy). No evidence she's actually notable through either NPROF or GNG. This is one of several UW WikiEd BIPOC bios that have strongly failed...

editing (most of which was cut down), for the following reasons: Under WP:NPROF, only (1) or (5) could possibly apply. Analysing both: The person's research...

Assistant prof who has only some early career awards. Not convinced passes WP:NPROF. Maybe WP:TOOSOON. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This...

insufficient citations to pass WP:NPROF#C1, awards are all early career so do not contribute to a pass of WP:NPROF. No SIGCOV, so fails WP:GNG as well...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No indication that the subject meets WP:BASIC or WP:NPROF. A BEFORE does not bring up additional independent coverage in reliable...

weighting whether the subject meets WP:NPROF, some delete !votes are given less weight since WP:NEXIST, and WP:NPROF does not require secondary sources....

WP:NPROF is specifically designed for academics which often are not well covered elsewhere. But in this case it seems that GNG apply and not NPROF. However...

enough to convince me that WP:NPROF is met. Papaursa (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC) Keep - Definitley meets WP:NPROF. Also, if the subject made the...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPROF. Störm (talk) 07:54, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Keep Appears to satisfy WP:NPROF: IEEE Fellow and the author of academic...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't pass WP:NPROF as far as I can tell; no books to help pass WP:NAUTHOR either. The things...

paper of his. No substantial coverage found, and I see no claim of meeting NPROF. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

) Anyway, this IP address makes the claim the article passes NPROF. (passes WP:NPROF) at AfC. It has WP:PEACOCK in the writing, again suggesting a close...

the problem here, see WP:NPROF and his GS which is independent enough. However, the issue is that he likely fails WP:NPROF with an h-index of 16 and...

which may be incomplete, but I don't see enough to warrant a pass of WP:NPROF. Kj cheetham (talk) 13:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

decade. His academic profile falls far short of what is required for WP:NPROF: he was never a full professor and his publications have single-digit citation...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPROF. – Ploni (talk) 23:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

There is overwhelming consensus that the subject of this article passes WP:NPROF. (non-admin closure) AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 14:14, 29 August 2021...

h index of 7, and likely autobiographical. No indication of meeting WP:NPROF. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't believe this person meets WP:NPROF. None of the criteria aside from #6 seem like they could apply. I considered...

JSTOR · TWL) BLP with possible undisclosed paid editing. It may be a WP:NPROF pass but the citations in Google scholar don’t seem very high and I don’t...

Keep Clear pass of WP:NPROF. WP:GNG is not what matters in this case. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC) Keep Meets NPROF. --Goldsztajn (talk)...

WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Delete. Quality scientist, but lack of independent coverage or meeting criteria at NPROF. —SmokeyJoe...

this page.‎ The result was Snow keep. Consensus is that Givi passes WP:NPROF. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 15:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC) AfDs for...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) doesn't appear to meet WP:NPROF or WP:NAUTH EGGIDICAE🥚 16:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

2021 (UTC) Delete. doesnt pass WP:NPROF, the impact on the field is not clear and his alone papers do not pass WP:NPROF#1. --hroest 21:37, 23 September...

dubious notability, some hits on Google Scholar, however I'm skeptical WP:NPROF is satisfied. Created by an SPA/paid editor (Ovedc) with a strong interest...

the AfD process works. I did mention the Amstat Fellow as a pass of WP:NPROF C3, for reasons. I don't believe that the citations that are in the article...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:NPROF. Classic WP:UPE and WP:PROMO pattern. Kqol • talk 23:38, 13 July 2026 (UTC)...

WP:NPROF. --hroest 18:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Keep Passed WP:NPROF and WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC) It clearly fails WP:NPROF...

cited are primary (and a search finds nothing better). Fails WP:GNG / WP:NPROF. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

such as Nigeria that have higher numbers, but are not notable. Fails WP:NPROF. Most of the sources are centered around her sensationalist comment about...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not satisfy NPROF. The publications in the list are not highly cited. Page has a single source...

Withdrawn by nominator - with the correct spelling, clearly passes WP:NPROF. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 11:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I'm not seeing how Ratha could pass WP:NPROF: an associate professorship doesn't qualify under crit. 5, and a fairly...

DaffodilOcean (talk) 01:58, 12 April 2022 (UTC) Delete I fail to see a case for WP:NPROF here, while some of her papers from 30 years ago have 100+ citations, that...

citation field. I think it's enough for WP:NPROF C1. The editor-in-chief position would be a possible claim to WP:NPROF C8, if it could be backed by a reference...

no highly prestigious awards or titles, so likely fails WP:NPROF. If he does meet WP:NPROF#C1 or is notable as an author, the article is still a WP:SOAPBOX...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Passes WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR. (non-admin closure) Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. Wikipedia's guidance about notability says nothing about number...

Keep. Appears to pass WP:NPROF #5. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC) Keep. I don't necessarily buy the WP:NPROF C5 argument, but agree that...

If there's nothing in secondary sources, well, then, I beg to differ, WP:NPROF is irrelevant, since there's no justification for basing an article entirely...

to get a consensus on it. The subject does not appear to me to meet WP:NPROF as an assistant professor. PROD by another editor was declined on the grounds...

insufficient citations to pass WP:NPROF#C1, awards are all graduate or early career so do not contribute to a pass of WP:NPROF. No SIGCOV, so fails WP:GNG as...

Delete does not pass NPROF. Too junior to be notable. Mccapra (talk) 14:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC) Delete. Far WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF, no sign of other notability...

doesn't meet WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC) Delete - although this feels like piling on, simply does not meet WP:NPROF. Onel5969 TT...

pass of WP:NPROF crit. 1: she is "an author of highly cited academic work". (It's possible that she might pass WP:NAUTHOR or other NPROF criteria as...

that she was the editor of Delhi Journal of Contemporary Law. I checked WP:NPROF only chief editor or head editor would make the cut. I checked the attached...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject does not appear to meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Current h-index is 4. Not able to find independent sources where...

depth coverage. Citation index shows too low number to consider for WP:NPROF. Being a chair person for Nepal Astronomical Society (NASO) does not qualify...

deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 11:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF; she is Professor of Scripture and Gender Hermeneutics at CIWA (the only...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't see how any of this passes WP:NPROF. All sources are primary, lots of her research is published in predatory...

22:54, 23 July 2022 (UTC) (edit conflict) Keep; passes WP:NPROF crit. 5 as a named chair, NPROF crit. 6 as president of Amherst College, and probably WP:NAUTHOR...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROF, maybe WP:TOOSOON. Is an associate prof, PhD in 2014, some recent books...

doesn't make him meet NPROF #5. Being an emeritus professor doesn't either. EddieHugh (talk) 17:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC) NPROF #5 reads "has held a named...

TWL) BLP based on a personal interview with the subject. Does not pass WP:NPROF or WP:AUTHOR. Mccapra (talk) 16:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

of Computer Science. The only point worth considering while judging WP:NPROF parameters is the Citation index in G scholar. Though it is not low, but...

feel like it doesn't belong in mainspace as there is no visible pass of WP:NPROF. Now I usually try to be very accommodating to the fact that academics rarely...

weak for WP:NPROF C1, and the administrative roles fall short of WP:NPROF C6. It's possible that the subject eventually passes WP:NPROF, but for now...

(talk/contribs) 16:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC) Delete - does not meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Having written one chapter of a EU document is not at all remarkable...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF, WP:SIGCOV. Searches bring back her thesis and teaching info, but no significant...

highly unlikely unless they are also a professional photographer. Fails WP:NPROF. Cabrils (talk) 03:51, 24 February 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

Bergman is the Charles Batchelor Professor at Columbia University. Per WP:NPROF she is notable. This is only one of three clearly-notable women whose articles...

throughout his career. So WP:NPROF is the standard to apply, rather than GNG. And his citation record looks like it passes WP:NPROF C1 — 7000 citations, nearly...

The result was keep. Consensus is that the subject is notable per the WP:NPROF guideline. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 17:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)...

JSTOR · TWL) Disputed draftification. Subject doesn't appear to pass WP:NPROF. I am not sure being the ex-director of the Institute of Immunobiology and...

the assertion it falls flat: google scholar profile. Does not pass GNG or NPROF. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Insufficient citations to pass WP:NPROF#C1, awards are all graduate or early career so do not contribute to a pass of WP:NPROF. No SIGCOV, so fails WP:GNG as...

Physical Society is sufficient in and of itself. Hs academic record passes WP:NPROF 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:58, 2 August 2022 (UTC) Keep...

not pass WP:NPROF, not a single citation in GS. Maybe just WP:TOOSOON. --hroest 00:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC) Delete. Fails in passing NPROF and GNG, google...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC) Note: This...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I'm not seeing anything here that amounts to an NPROF pass. Once you filter out a few unrelated people – an ophthalmologist and...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF. KartikeyaS (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject fails GNG, ANYBIO, and NPROF. Almost all the sourcing I could find is from what she wrote or schools...

May 2025 (UTC) Keep. Extremely easy WP:NPROF pass. Passes WP:NPROF#C1 based on his citation count, passes WP:NPROF#C3 as a Fellow of the American Association...

meet WP:NPROF, WP:NAUTHOR, or the GNG. Although he's published a few scholarly articles, they haven't received nearly enough citations to meet NPROF crit...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't pass WP:NPROF (no significant awards or positions). Awards are from non-significant sources...

pass of WP:NPROF C5. The citation record looks like a pass of WP:NPROF C1. Provost at University of Michigan might be a pass of WP:NPROF C6, and certainly...

WP:NPROF for this 2014 PhD: in particular, the citation record is a good bit short of WP:NPROF C1, and the associate editorship does not meet WP:NPROF C8...

umbrella of WP:NPROF#6, and while I am still leaning towards delete as I don't think this university is considered major for the purposes of NPROF and I've...

JSTOR · TWL) Article reads like a PROMO for the book. Not close to meeting NPROF (h-index of around 3). Seems his main claim to significance is co-authoring...

Meets WP:NPROF criterion 5. The subject has held a distinguished/named academic appointment at a higher-education institution. Per WP:NPROF 5.a, publications...

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF(1) - h-index of 26 per google scholar. Possibly also NPROF(8) for being editor in chief Journal of Economic...

Spider) 14:27, 11 August 2026 (UTC) Keep verging on speedy keep. Per WP:NPROF#C1 he passes notability based upon a significant impact. While it is common...

the subject does not currently satisfy the notability requirements of WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. TheSandDoctor Talk 18:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC) [Hide this box]...

Straightaway PR/Advertising WP:PROMO. Fails to pass WP:GNG and WP:NCORP WP:NPROF. Calling for an AfD discussion. Hatchens (talk) 16:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)...

above. The subject fails WP:NPROF.--KartikeyaS (talk) 07:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC) Delete - just doesn't cut it per WP:NPROF. ~riley (talk) 07:54, 31 March...

are a big deal. Combined with the strong claim to WP:NPROF C1 and C5, and possible claims to WP:NPROF C6 and C8, I don't think there's anything marginal...

deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 14:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF C1 for plenty of highly cited papers. The most highly cited ones have a...

British Academy recognises high scholarly distinction". That satisfies WP:NPROF criteria 3. Please learn from this, BeenAroundAWhile. The fellowship - an...

keep - subject meets WP:NPROF C1 - has some very highly cited works, h-index of 80, WP:NPROF C3 via IEEE fellowship, and WP:NPROF C5 via named chair. Zzz...

fails WP:NPROF. But they might still be notable as army colonel. Colonestarrice (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Weak delete. No sign of WP:NPROF, and...

NPROF criteria? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:36, 29 July 2026 (UTC) Keep. I think being in the Top 2% is enough for NPROF....

result was delete. Insufficient indication that she meets WP:GNG or WP:NPROF at this time. RL0919 (talk) 23:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

Chronos.Zx (talk) 02:36, 21 May 2025 (UTC) strong keep per WP:NPROF. He passes WP:NPROF#1 due to a high citation count in a low citation field with an...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NBIO/WP:NPROF. Most Ghits are him being cited as an "expert" in articles but I couldn't...

Professor described in a page with WP:Peacock. No evidence of a pass of WP:NPROF with an h-factor of 17, a total of 990 cites and multiple authors. No significant...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. Princess of Ara 20:53, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This academic does not pass WP:NPROF or WP:GNG, the sources cited in the article are a mix of articles he himself...

sources. JimKaatFan (talk) 15:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC) Snow keep per WP:NPROF #5. Holder of two endowed chairs: King Edward Professor of Music and Heather...

works that I'd look for with WP:NPROF. There are two books, with three reviews in total, which I think is short of WP:NPROF WP:NAUTHOR. A editor could in...

Technology Ladkrabang. Probably is a pass of WP:NPROF C6; citations look a bit short to me of WP:NPROF C1 in what I believe to be a medium citation field...

see WP:AUTHOR#1. In addition the person also clearly fulfills WP:NPROF#1 and WP:NPROF#5. It this point the evidence is just overwhelming. --hroest 15:28...

be made for WP:NPROF#C1 given Scholar cites. I'm not sure how named assistant professorships should be treated for purposes of WP:NPROF#C5. AleatoryPonderings...

made a (autobiographical?) draft without sources or evidence of meeting WP:NPROF. I declined. User then moved to mainspace. This was PROD by @Joseywales1961:...

completed in 2014, h-index of 11 on Google Scholar, doesn't seem to pass WP:NPROF. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

academic career is not distinguished enough to meet any of the criteria at WP:NPROF. I have not found any substantial reliable coverage that would point towards...

JSTOR · TWL) Not much for him in multiple sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Greenbörg (talk) 19:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

h-index of 37 (usually sufficient for NPROF#1, but depends on specific sub-field in CS). Passes NPROF#3 (FAAAS) and NPROF#5 (distinguished professor at UIC)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Passes WP:NPROF. Thanks everyone for participating. Unhappy with this decision? If one wishes...

with 100+ citations, thus satisfying WP:NPROF#1. Plus he also won the Dahl-Nygaard Prize contributing to WP:NPROF#2 - overall I see a profile that is substantially...

come to the conclusion that he doesn't meet WP:NPROF. Surprising lack of citations and no other WP:NPROF criteria. Chemistry is generally a high-citation...

Non-notable scientist, article reads like a puff piece. Minor awards, fails WP:NPROF. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

piece of coverage. Overall there is nothing here to suggest a pass of WP:NPROF. He only obtained his doctorate in 2005 and one of the only solid claims...

Delete TOOSOON. Publications are not yet there for NPROF#1, editorial board is not sufficient for NPROF#8. --hroest 00:23, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Delete. No evidence...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Can't see how this person meets WP:NPROF – he seems to be an associate professor with an h-index of about 8 or 9...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. WP:TOOSOON to meet WP:NPROF. Will restore to draft on request if anyone wants to work on it in the future...

possible her Presidency of the Alberta Psychiatric Association passes C6 of NPROF... Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC) As far as I can...

JSTOR · TWL) Disputed Draftification; WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies. Fails WP:NPROF. In an AFC review this was stated: "According to https://ludzie.nauka.gov...

Keep. Meets NPROF#3 as IEEE fellow and NRPROF#1 due to citation record.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF C1 and C3...

low citation field he seems to be either close or above the bar for WP:NPROF. Adding this to the media coverage the bamboo bikes have generated, he could...

result was delete. Apparently WP:TOOSOON for notability under either WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. RL0919 (talk) 01:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...

have clarified that the criteria I was assessing were for NPROF C1, which seemed to be the NPROF criterion he was most likely to pass (but I don't think...

is far below what we expect for NPROF C1. JoelleJay (talk) 02:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC) Delete. very clearly fails WP:NPROF#1. --hroest 04:08, 16 May 2021...

TWL) Economist at a few think tanks and newspaper columnist who fails WP:NPROF, WP:NAUTHOR, and WP:BASIC. I found a review of one of his books in the WSJ...

leaning towards Keep because it seems to me Baker meets Criterium 3 or WP:NPROF (membership of a fellowship). The award may also signal meeting criterium...

nominator, NPROF (unlike the vast majority of SNGs) is widely accepted as an alternative to the GNG, so articles about scholars who meet NPROF are generally...

(UTC) Speedy keep, clearly meets NPROF. JoelleJay (talk) 18:38, 20 August 2021 (UTC) Speedy keep: Easily meets WP:NPROF. I also recommend that the nominator...

article meets WP:NPROF criteria for notability. Netherzone (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2020 (UTC) Keep as is highly cited enough to pass WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham...

made to this page.‎ The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn, meets WP:NPROF(non-admin closure) Coolabahapple (talk) 11:04, 4 August 2018 (UTC) [Hide...

The result was no consensus. Notability of the subject according to WP:NPROF is too borderline for a strong consensus to form at this time. (non-admin...

notable. CT55555(talk) 18:49, 6 January 2023 (UTC) Delete Fails to meet WP:NPROF, student awards and certificates doesn't make him notable. 4 out 5 references...

would make him notable by WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR, but he likely fails WP:NPROF. --hroest 14:03, 5 April 2021 (UTC) Keep', appears to pass GNG and 1001...

enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and am not seeing how he passes WP:NPROF. Onel5969 TT me 14:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

17 March 2021 (UTC) Delete. Clearly doesn't meet NPROF C1–6 or GNG. Also clearly doesn't meet NPROF C7 (or C8), as the only examples of her giving "expert...

So I'd be inclined to disregard that particular paper for purposes of WP:NPROF#C1. (Although being asked to write a chapter for an Oxford handbook always...

result was keep. After two relists, a consensus has developed that he passes NPROF. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

morning (there's a halo...) 03:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC) Keep -- Meets WP:NPROF(5) as the holder of a named chair at a major R1 university. Furthermore...

appear to be a "major academic institution" that qualifies under WP:NPROF#C5, so fails NPROF. No SIGCOV so fails WP:GNG. Going to AfD as an alternative to CSD...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn’t meet WP:NPROF. Also WP:CONTENTFORK and WP:SOAPBOX, this article is supposed to be a biography...

deleted. I am submitting it on her behalf. I am well aware that she meets NPROF in more than one way, but I think there is a reasonable argument to be made...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF. H-index of 4. scope_creepTalk 00:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

the associated page), but it is abundantly clear that the subject passes NPROF and the GNG, and further sourcing was fairly easy to come across. Additionally...

mostly early career, and citations don't seem to be sufficient to meet WP:NPROF. WP:TOOSOON? Also not convinced there is enough material to pass WP:GNG...

editor on behalf of the subject. As far as I can tell, they don't pass WP:NPROF (does not hold a named chair or equivalent). Their google scholar profile...

in multiple secondary, independent, reliable sources afaics). As for WP:NPROF, I think the only criterion that could potentially apply is criterion 6...

2021 (UTC) delete clearly fails WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR with relatively little recognition or impact of her work. NPROF#8 would apply if the journal on which...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails to meet the notability criteria found at WP:NPROF. --Guy Macon (talk) 11:32, 3 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Lack of credible academic citations. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion...

 (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 18:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Keep Meets NPROF #1. Doesn't meet #NPROF #5 as he is only Emeritus Professor, and as per his own Linkdn...

fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 03:18, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Delete Does not pass WP:NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 04:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

February 2022 (UTC) Delete passes neither NPROF nor GNG. --hroest 19:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk)...

notable? seems to indicate that this topic may not be notable under WP:NPROF. Izno (talk) 13:33, 10 July 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...

Article has had unresolved referencing template on it for two years. Fails WP:NPROF. Subject has an H-Index of 25, does not hold a named chair, and does not...

(talk) 12:24, 28 May 2025 (UTC) Keep. Passes WP:NPROF. Scopus h-index of 68 is a pass of WP:NPROF#C1, position as a Fellow of the American Association...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF and lacks third-party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:15, 10 September...

doesnt meet WP:NPROF, the subject has had various academic position from dean to provost but no position that would qualify him under NPROF#6. Looking at...

Keep per WP:NPROF#6 as the president of a major college. That alone should be enough. --hroest 15:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF as noted in...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was keep per WP:NPROF. — CactusWriter (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

not sufficient impact for most of the WP:NPROF criteria, but what about this as evidence of meeting WP:NPROF#C7? AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:19, 20 October...

highly-cited ones) NPROF(1) seems plausible (need to further evaluate). However, by previously holding a named-chair in MIT she passes NPROF(5). As the subject...

WP:NPROF C5 case noted by Espresso Addict, and which I should have noticed myself. I'd normally expect to see a bit more other evidence of NPROF or NAUTHOR...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC) Keep. Clear pass of WP:NPROF#C1 with this citation record. He is a fellow of a number of organization...

though: usually, someone who passes WP:NPROF C3 also shows signs of progress on some of the other WP:NPROF criteria. I didn't find it here. For example...

connect to any of the WP:NPROF criteria. I cannot tell from the citations for the awards whether they are notable enough for WP:NPROF; if I became convinced...

does not make a plausible case for WP:NPROF#C1, and I wasn't able to find any signs of a pass of the other NPROF criteria. MCE89 (talk) 12:29, 10 September...

0-years-proves-ancestor-british/ Weak keep. While I don't buy GNG or WP:NPROF C7, I do see plenty of journal articles with 100s of citations (including...

to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus that the subject meets WP:NPROF. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 18:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC) [Hide this...

high-citation field indicates he is very far from meeting NPROF C1, and none of the other NPROF criteria are applicable. JoelleJay (talk) 06:55, 13 April...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't see any evidence that the subject passes WP:NPROF or GNG. Assistant professors are rarely notable and this doesn't seem to...

explanation, though a faculty page was added--well, that's not enough. NPROF says notability can come from a named chair at a major institution, but...

—CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:19, 21 March 2021 (UTC) delete does not pass WP:NPROF#1 or WP:NPROF#6. --hroest 01:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC) Comment- Ramsey is a FAAN...

JSTOR (3 mentions, no book reviews). Fails NPROF. --hroest 17:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPROF and not convinced passes WP:NAUTHOR either....

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) h-index of 1, fails WP:NPROF. Störm (talk) 15:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Insufficient secondary coverage to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. - The Guardian: an author profile, not independent coverage - Michigan...

23 September 2021 (UTC) Keep, based on citation record this passes WP:NPROF#C1.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 11:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC) Comment. As...

(UTC) Comment I created the article because I believe the subject passes WP:NPROF India Today has significant coverage in reliable sources such as the India...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF, WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk 09:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC) Delete...

inconsistent with WP:NPROF; the issue for NPROF is whether the subject qualifies under any of the criteria WP:NPROF#C1 to WP:NPROF#C8, not independent...

September 2021 (UTC) Delete. Per recent discussion, looks way WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF. I don't think the coverage of the plagiarism issues rises to GNG. Comment...

JSTOR · TWL) An academic with the post of professor but who doesn't meet WP:NPROF, nor WP:GNG. With a Scopus H-index of 13 in a high-citation field, this...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF. – Ploni (talk) 23:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

Meteorological Society confers notability. I'm not convinced it is the kind of WP:NPROF #3 "highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association ....

(talk) 11:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC) Keep, he satisfies criterion 1 of WP:NPROF by having a copious array of Nature and Science papers, and he satisfies...

professor. GScholar citations not that great. Nothing to shout about. Fails WP:NPROF. !dave 11:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...

02:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPROF. FITINDIA 17:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:NPROF. Preaky (talk) 16:51, 3 May 2018 (UTC) The...

source. Apart from that, he clearly fails WP:NPROF. --hroest 15:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC) Delete, fails WP:NPROF, sources aren’t in-depth either and don’t meet...

NPROF says: "This guideline reflects consensus about the notability of academics as measured by their academic achievements". The caveat in NPROF is...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Subject does not appear to passWP:NPROF. The sources in the Arabic Wikipedia article aren’t any help. Mccapra (talk)...

TWL) Contested PROD. Article subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. Source discussion below. – Levivich 17:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC) Note:...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG and NPROF. According to Scopus, she has ~18 papers and an h-index of 7. She also received...

on snow keep. Named chair at Cambridge meets WP:NPROF C5, and citations look like a pass of WP:NPROF C1. It looks like there are probably also reviews...

range of passing WP:NPROF but with 27 in a field that is a medium to high citation field and thus not a clear cut case for NPROF#1 but together with the...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to satisfy any of the criteria at WP:NPROF JMWt (talk) 08:44, 15 April 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...

may nonetheless meet WP:NPROF. He co-authored a book ([1]) with a very large number of cites, so there's a decent case for NPROF#1. I don't think WP:NPOL...

should be made to this page. The result was keep‎. Both articles pass WP:NPROF C6. The school might not be large or an academic powerhouse but it is a...

with a h-index of 46, passes NPROF#1. He is also a fellow (FRSC) of Royal Society of Chemistry, which possibly passes NPROF#3.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉)...

only minor sigcov. It will be many years until he reaches the level for WP:NPROF, and there is nothing for WP:GNG. WP:TOOSOON. Ldm1954 (talk) 03:15, 20 December...

have encyclopedic value. No genuine evidence of notability, fails at WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. Hitro talk 13:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

to this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus is that this topic meets NPROF. As a point of order, the discussion could not be closed by nominator withdrawal...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF, WP:WRITER or WP:ANYBIO. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:56, 30 September 2024...

to 2008 de-PROD by article creator. I don't believe this person meets WP:NPROF. Dean of a college within a university is not a "highest-level" post. Search...

9 March 2021 (UTC) Comment clearly her publication record does not pass NPROF so she will have to pass other criteria such as GNG or through her awards...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) non-notable academic, fails WP:NPROF and any other applicable academic criteria. VAXIDICAE💉 13:53, 16 March...

TWL) Page on a American structural biologist and biochemist who fails WP:NPROF. He has an h-factor of 37 and 5K cites which is below what we normally accept...

for her to be able to pass WP:NPROF. -- asilvering (talk) 01:51, 7 May 2022 (UTC) Delete, does not remotely meet WP:NPROF, which is unsurprising as she's...

multiple sources from media bureaus with no bylines. If anyone proficient in NPROF can evaluate his works, I might change my mind, as almost all the coverage...

Non-notable philospher. Fails WP:NPROF. Störm (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC) Delete: no indication that this meets WP:NPROF. Also, is this some kind of...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR. The citation counts on Scholar might be enough for WP:NPROF#C1, but I'm skeptical. For those keeping...

meeting WP:NPROF, as he had low citation numbers and no high academic position. Curbon7 (talk) 16:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet WP:NBLP. (Definitely doesn't meet WP:NPROF.) Leaving out the first-party sources and blogs, all that remains are: two...

WP:NPROF it is sufficient to use University resources as these are sometimes the only resources we have. So the question is does he pass SIGCOV or NPROF...

NPROF criteria? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:36, 29 July 2026 (UTC) Keep. I think being in the Top 2% is enough for NPROF....

04:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC). Delete. Fails WP:NPROF. --hroest 13:39, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPROF, but did wonder if the media attention for...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. Probably autobiographical (there's even one sentence left in the first...

publications in peer-reviewed journals which per my assessment do not rise to WP:NPROF (but kept me from PRODing). Icewhiz (talk) 16:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)...

from WP:NPROF C1; I also cross-checked with the publications listed in the article in case there were variations of his name. No sign of other NPROF criteria...

of any major awards, or major scientific contributions. Hence fails WP:NPROF. I see in a search no evidence of major WP:42 coverage so fails WP:GNG....

university is considered an automatic NPROF pass. JoelleJay (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF. Current title notwithstanding (likewise...

satisfy NPROF#6 either: 'Pedagogical academy' is not a major academic institute. The listed educational merits are also not enough to satisfy NPROF. Jähmefyysikko...

has been done. Hence time for an AfD as he seems to be far short of WP:NPROF Ldm1954 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

borderline pass of WP:NPROF, although it borders on WP:TOOSOON. Fellow of the American Heart Association is likely a pass of WP:NPROF C3, although the description...

have met WP:NPROF in 5 or 10 years. But alas, with low citation numbers and h-index, and no prominent position, he does not meet WP:NPROF. Curbon7 (talk)...

seems there is an argument due to him being editor of Peace & Change per WP:NPROF#8 even though he was only co-editor in chief, but its close enough for me...

books on Tarot and some on the occult, but not such that would support NPROF. Lamona (talk) 04:47, 8 January 2023 (UTC) Delete no evidence in the article...

Keep: As a fellow of the Royal Historical Society, he appears to pass WP:NPROF#C3. Additionally, a cursory search revealed reviews of some of his works:...

TWL) A perfectly respectable associate professor who doesn't yet meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG criteria. Has won early career prizes, but these aren't sufficient...

10:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF. The distinguished university professorship likely passes WP:NPROF C5, even at a regional university. And...

(UTC) Redirect to EServer.org. I don't see any way Sauer could pass WP:NPROF, and my search for GNG-qualifying coverage didn't find much more than a...

14:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Weak delete. There is a borderline case for WP:NPROF C1 based on citation counts([1], [2]) or C7 based on the number of times...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF. Possibly WP:TOOSOON. Citations are not yet impressive enough i.e., h-index...

receiving graduate fellowships passes WP:NPROF#C2 and being on a student advisory committee passes WP:NPROF#C7. Ldm1954 (talk) 15:37, 25 July 2025 (UTC)...

appear to meet any other NPROF or GNG criteria. JoelleJay (talk) 00:17, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Delete. My assessment of potential WP:NPROF C3 agrees with that...

WP:NPROF and GNG, membership in government committees is not enough for notability. She clearly doesnt have enough academic research to pass NPROF, see...

way too early . Not close to meeting WP:NPROF. Ldm1954 (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF.Lacks third party sources. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:01, 10 September...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) In general fails WP:BASIC, WP:NPROF. No WP:SIGCOV to establish nobility. RationalPuff (talk) 17:45, 14 January...

Content is irrelevant at AfD. Simple precursory viewing shows meeting WP:NPROF criteria 2 and 3 (awards and positions in international bodies, VP of the...

establish notability WP:GNG or WP:NBIO, no evidence of research work for WP:NPROF for the claims of being a researcher. Also, created by an WP:UPE sockfarm...

about nominating this for deletion myself, as the subject doesn't pass WP:NPROF; however, I'm persuaded that he would pass WP:AUTHOR, as his 2018 book in...

possibly snow. He appears to pass WP:NPROF C5 several times over, and his citation record looks like an easy pass of WP:NPROF C1. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:40...

previous AfD, the citation numbers here are not enough to satisfy C1 of WP:NPROF, and Dean of a College of Medicine (not the entire university!) does not...

satisfy NPROF C6, and I don't see which sources would satisfy GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 13:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC) Not sure where I mentioned NPROF C6. But...

not pass the GNG, and I'm not seeing any argument for notability under WP:NPROF: he doesn't hold a named chair, he's only been cited a few dozen times,...

relevant to notability. WP:NPROF may not be applicable here. Vikram Vincent 13:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Keep: Passes WP:NPROF. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 15:07...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails both WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Created by editor who is disrupting Wikipedia to prove a WP:POINT Guy Macon...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Highest accolades are not sourced independently. In fact there...

record is a good ways away from WP:NPROF C1 in a higher citation field. The early career awards are not a pass of WP:NPROF C2, little sign of other notability...

papers. I'm not seeing a pass of WP:NPROF C1. The journal editorship is of a new journal [1], which does not pass WP:NPROF C8. Little other sign of notability...

2019 (UTC) I'm not seeing coverage that meets the GNG or how he meets WP:NPROF. The h-index cited by Xxanthippe seems low for physics but I admit don't...

indicates he's only been cited 22 times (which seems too low to meet WP:NPROF). A search for sources only turns up profiles for him and sites hawking...

April 2020 (UTC) Keep He holds a named professorial chair so passes WP:NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 05:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Keep, meets WP:NACADEMIC as holding...

should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Consensus that neither NPROF or NAUTHOR is met. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC) [Hide...

as a fellow of the American Geophysical Union, she does in fact pass WP:NPROF. Curbon7 (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2022 (UTC) The American Geophysical Union...

and reliable sources is not key. Key is whether he passes NPROF. Again, please read WP:NPROF in detail. --hroest 14:45, 19 October 2023 (UTC) I think anyone...

with an h-factor if 5, 270 cites and no major award. Far WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF. While there are a couple of articles on him, nothing rises to the level...

2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. --hroest 16:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPROF as per all above. DmitriRomanovJr (talk)...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF, WP:NAUTHOR, etc. I did not find significant coverage of the subject in...

notability is apparent for WP:NPROF#C3 (was a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science) and WP:NPROF#C5 (as a distinguished professor...

--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Keep, per NPROF#8, probably a weak case of NPROF#1. --hroest 17:12, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Keep seems to easily...

(as I struggled to find much while doing a WP:BEFORE search), fails WP:NPROF. fuzzy510 (talk) 21:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator -fuzzy510...

article does not pass WP:NPROF. People brought up that this person has a high h-index and numerous citations as support for NPROF #1, but that doesn't mean...

cites insufficient citations to pass WP:NPROF#C1, awards are early career so do not contribute to a pass of WP:NPROF. No SIGCOV, so fails WP:GNG as well....

discussions. Pi (Talk to me!) 20:43, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Keep. WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this assistant professor (and Champions of Change doesn't seem relevant...

26 May 2026 (UTC) Delete does not pass WP:NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 06:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC) Delete WP:NPROF. Wallpaperwizard (talk) 14:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)...

sources or content in the article. I'm also not seeing citations for WP:NPROF, nor any of the other criteria. I'm not able to confidently search in French...

23:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Delete. No sign of WP:NPROF C1, dean is insufficient for WP:NPROF C6, and little sign of other criteria. Russ Woodroofe...

passes WP:NPROF. Surely having one publication with over 2000+ citations and the rest 80< is not indicative of an automatic pass of WP:NPROF. Cannot see...

should be made to this page. The result was delete‎ as failing WP:GNG and WP:NPROF. Complex/Rational 19:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

in the article is this [1] it has only 5 citations in 7 years. Fails WP:NPROF KSAWikipedian (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

delete. The consensus of the discussion is that Sørensen does not meet NPROF. I don't see enough of a consensus to spring for a merge or redirect. Guerillero...

Per consensus, subject meets academic notability guidelines especially WP:NPROF based on his academic work editr roles and reviewed publications. so, the...

doesn't discuss the two relevant notability criteria here, which are WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR. He has a notable sole-authored book ([1] [2] [3]) and 1...

not think Udeke meets NPROF. A quick search on Google Scholar shows he has been cited 6 times [1], which falls far below NPROF. I searched his name, as...

machine learning. --hroest 14:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Keep. Easily passes NPROF#1 per scholar profile. He also quite plausibly passes GNG (there are a whole...

Keep: per WP:NPROF#5: Karla has held a named chair in the University of Alabama. JavaHurricane 07:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC) Keep Passes NPROF not sure about...

could be amended, but I'm afraid that by the book we are looking at a WP:NPROF fail. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:09, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This...

@Espresso Addict: Publishing a couple of books is nowhere near enough to meet NPROF unless they can be showm to have made a major impact in the field. Can you...

Royal Danish and Finnish Academy of Science and Letters might satisfy WP:NPROF#1. Sgubaldo (talk) 10:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Danish sources about his...

shows 5 citations on Google scholar. I can’t see any basis for passing WP:NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 17:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Academic who does not seem to meet WP:NPROF - very few publications or citations. (He did hold a named chair, but not...

WP:NPROF, specifically #1 and the textbook that she wrote does not clear #4. --hroest 00:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC) Delete: per nom. Fails GNG and NPROF. JaredDaEconomist...

JSTOR · TWL) A taxonomist who does not appear to satisfy either special (WP:NPROF) or general notability requirements. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:50,...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG, WP:NPROF, WP:AUTHOR. While a prolific author, his books are not widely cited or a...

June 2021 (UTC) Keep. Besides possibly meeting GNG, Savoie is a very clear NPROF pass on the basis of citations (criteria 1), holding the Canada Research...

WP:NPROF. Adjuncts and researchers are rarely notable. Bearian (talk) 21:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC) Delete Impact seems insufficient to meet WP:NPROF, no...

TWL) Tagged for notability since 2014. Does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. PhD in 1993, h-index of 21 (Web of Science) or 23 (Scopus). The university...

the extent there are reliable sources, that coverage is WP:ROTM. Fails WP:NPROF, WP:ANYBIO. Cabrils (talk) 01:05, 23 May 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(UTC) Delete. Nothing to satisfy WP:NPROF criteria. --SatnaamIN (talk) 22:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPROF as already stated. Iljhgtn (they/them...

directly in main. With a Scopus h-factor of 34 & 3.4K cites the case for NPROF is weak. No awards and most of the page is promo that would be removed if...

page. The result was keep‎. Rough consensus that while she may not meet WP:NPROF, she has received an unusual amount of coverage in her role. asilvering...

was keep. It is to be noted that efforts of Ldm1954 and argument of WP:NPROF#1 for a keep was also maintained by most of the keep voters. (non-admin...

January 2021 (UTC) Keep: How is someone with a named chair at Harvard failing NPROF? The article needs sourcing but the subject clearly has presumed notability...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't appear to pass WP:NPROF, WP:GNG, etc. Some previous discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)#Carolina...

in fact he was elected to NAE in 2023. This is an automatic pass of WP:NPROF#C3. The page needs a complete rewrite, but he passes notability. Comment...

15:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Delete. It looks to be _far_ WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this 2019 (!!) DBA. I'm not as familiar with WP:NTRACK, but I don't...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF. scope_creepTalk 01:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

keep. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC) Weak keep per WP:NPROF C1. I deprodded for procedural reasons (previously prodded) a few years...

Keep per WP:NPROF #1 and #3 (ACM fellow). The counter-arguments do not apply here, see NPROF. --hroest 07:31, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Keep, meets NPROF for Fellow...

passes NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 06:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC) Keep Is in the highest seat of a major university, although not meeting GNG passes NPROF. Toadette...

appears to be consensus that the subject of this article does not pass WP:NPROF. Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:21, 9 August 2026 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 09:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF and possibly WP:AUTHOR. Prince of Thieves (talk) 10:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)...

one then, and it still isn't one. I do not see anything that passes WP:NPROF, and running a magazine that "underscores industry pioneers" is not WP:GNG...

argument that any of the criteria of WP:NPROF is fulfilled, a search on GS indicates that he likely fails NPROF#1 due to low citations. --hroest 15:19...

numbers much so I don't promise). Surely we have some non-empty subset of WP:NPROF criteria 1, 2, and 3 here? --JBL (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2021 (UTC) Keep...

93 should be enough to pass WP:NPROF#C1, even in a relatively high-citation field. I don't see a pass of any other NPROF criteria though (noting that his...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPROF. Mariamnei (talk) 09:48, 18 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been...

WindsorMaster47 (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2026 (UTC) Keep, he passes WP:NPROF#C1 with an h-factor of 119 and 88K cites. A little care is needed to check...

February 2026 (UTC) Keep The relevant criteria are both WP:NPROF and WP:GNG. For WP:NPROF I do not see a pass of C1 based upon her citations. However...

coverage. And to say "not a clear pass of WP:NPROF" is to put it mildly: for an academic administrator, NPROF generally requires something along the lines...

Delete it seems very doubtful that he passes WP:NPROF and the posters above dont make a strong case for NPROF either, I only see a single article with more...

cited in the article, meet this quite clearly. Second Maguire fulfills WP:NPROF point 7: The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their...

the WP:NPROF criteria either although I fully admit it is not my strong suit. I will withdraw if there's a reasonable indication she passes NPROF. ♠PMC♠...

peer-reviewed scholarly publications such as journals or academic books. To meet NPROF C1, a scholar must have an outstanding number of citations of their work...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) The subject fails WP:NPROF and WP:NBIO. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

(talk) 21:25, 21 November 2022 (UTC) Delete. Looks well WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this 2017 PhD and newly minted lecturer. For WP:NAUTHOR, the one book...

etc. that could meet any of the other NPROF criteria. MCE89 (talk) 07:14, 16 January 2025 (UTC) Delete Fails NPROF and GNG. Polygnotus (talk) 07:54, 16...

record looks light for WP:NPROF C1, and I didn't find reviews to support WP:NAUTHOR. Fellow of the ACA is a possible pass of WP:NPROF C3, if independent sourcing...

he would pass WP:NPROF just on that and quite possibly WP:NAUTHOR on top of it. --hroest 21:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC) Keep pass WP:NPROF. Sonofstar (talk)...

passing NPROF#2/3 (Lans Distinguished Award by the International Society of Refractive Surgery, American Academy of Ophthalmology award) he passes NPROF#1 due...

indicate he meets criteria set in WP:NPROF. Glendoremus (talk) 03:53, 5 April 2020 (UTC) Delete, WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF. I don't think the Nicaraguan award...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Associate professor who doesn't meet WP:NPROF. His work has been covered in news outlets, but these seem to be passing...

papers. I'm not seeing a pass of WP:NPROF C1. The journal editorship is of a new journal [1], which does not pass WP:NPROF C8. Little other sign of notability...

result was keep. Clear consensus among editors that the subject meets WP:NPROF #2. (non-admin closure) EmilyR34 (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2025 (UTC) [Hide...

WP:NACADEMIC.Chirota (talk) 17:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC) weak Delete fails WP:NPROF. she has written two books one book chapter and a paper that have no citations...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) There is at least one Sarah Fine who passes WP:NPROF, but it is not this one. Does not pass WP:GNG either. Onel5969 TT me 16:13...

claims of notability. By the looks of it, he doesn't pass any of the WP:NPROF criteria, and without any sources, he can't get a WP:GNG pass either. ♠PMC♠...

The argument above from NPROF and NJOURNALS doesn't convince me: first, societies are not professors, and most of the NPROF criteria involve verifiable...

made to this page.‎ The result was delete. Weight of the evidence and WP:NPROF are pretty clear here. As a note, harping on h-index and citation count...

page.‎ The result was delete. Insufficient coverage to show he meets WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. RL0919 (talk) 05:35, 11 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to...

00:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC) Delete. It's not surprising not to see WP:NPROF for a guitar instructor. I also didn't find reviews for WP:NCREATIVE. I...

stuff) – would therefore not meet #4 of WP:AUTHOR. Nowhere near meeting WP:NPROF. Britishfinance (talk) 12:02, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unproven notability. Does not meet WP:NPROF. XXN, 15:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in...

of WP:NPROF#C3, so having two is a very strong pass. One can add to that the SEMI award which would probably also by itself be a pass of WP:NPROF. Because...

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 08:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC) keep changed to delete per WP:NPROF#6, he is the vice chancellor of International University of Business Agriculture...

citations sufficient for WP:NPROF C1, and membership on an editorial board (not chief editor) isn't going to give WP:NPROF C8. Although the article mentions...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable academic - does not meet WP:NPROF PRehse (talk) 10:49, 29 November 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Biography of an academic who does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. Created by a single purpose account. Mccapra (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2019...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPROF. Mariamnei ✦ reach out 🕊️ 10:09, 9 June 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion...

Scholar profile are not his), so I can't see any possibility of him passing NPROF. The sources are all unbylined pieces like these [2] [3] that seem like...

JoelleJay (talk) 00:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Keep. Easily passes NPROF, e.g. on NPROF-1 we have an h-index of 169 and nearly 115,000 citations. Fourteen...

editorial roles, fellowships and publications together add up to a pass on NPROF, so the article is a keep. Elemimele (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2026 (UTC)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails against WP:NPROF, WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG. The sources are WP:ROUTINE coverage of a WP:Run-of-the-mill...

nom.'s point that this academic fails to meet the policy criteria in WP:NPROF. The guidelines clearly say in the summary: Having published work does not...

page.‎ The result was keep. Very clear consensus that the subject meets WP:NPROF. Just Chilling (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

university, passing NPROF C5. JoelleJay (talk) 17:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC) Comment. If consensus is that this named chair passes NPROF#C5, keep. However...

pass of WP:NPROF#C1, his position as an IEEE fellow is definitely a pass of WP:NPROF#C3, and his named professorship should be a pass of WP:NPROF#C5. MCE89...

TWL) Fails WP:NBIO and WP:NPROF, Google search did not bring up articles, has 120 citations in Scopus (note that WP:NPROF says to use Scopus or Web of...

the University of Melbourne is probably also enough for WP:NPROF#C5. Not the strongest NPROF pass (although for some reason his university profile is down...

promotional. There is reference to academic roles but these don’t pass WP:NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 10:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

(UTC) Delete Fails WP:NPROF. scope_creep (talk) 21:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC) Delete I don't believe either WP:GNG or WP:NPROF is met. Papaursa (talk)...

January 2018 (UTC) Keep, I declined the prod because he clearly meets WP:NPROF criteria 1 and 2, and possibly 3, 6, and 7 as well. Υπογράφω (talk) 16:54...

WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. Admittedly I'm hampered by being restricted to searching in English only, but I don't see that he would pass any of the NPROF criteria...

paths to notability both under WP:NPROF #5 and under WP:NAUTHOR #3, either one of which would be sufficient. For NPROF, he holds an endowed chair indicating...

impact factors. Cannot find sources to qualify for notability under WP:NPROF, WP:NOLYMPICS, or WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:28, 13 June 2017...

minimum there is an undeclared WP:COI. No evidence that subject meets WP:NPROF or WP:AUTHOR. At best subject is WP:ROTM lecturer. Cabrils (talk) 01:00...

be fairly common. Given this, I think it's still a bit WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this 2012 PhD. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 14:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC) Delete...

of any clear concensus at WT:NPROF on the interpretation of "National Academy" in WP:NPROF#C3. I have posted to WT:NPROF#International National Academies...

28 March 2023 (UTC) Notable via WP:NPROF; yes. Curbon7 (talk) 03:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC) Keep. Notable per WP:NPROF#1 with 24k citations and an h-index...

02:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Delete as nom said, doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC) Delete-per nom. Best Regards...

to claim "significant" impact in their field to pass NPROF 1, and fails points NPROF 2 to NPROF 8 Polyamorph (talk) 18:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC) Note:...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No coverage found other than some mentions. Fails WP:NPROF. Störm (talk) 08:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

strong case for WP:NPROF#C1 and his named professorship is potentially a pass of WP:NPROF#C5. Clearly meets both WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NPROF. MCE89 (talk) 07:17...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this is a WP:NPROF pass, unless someone in theology has some good arguments otherwise? Does...

is 21, 3.5K cites, no major awards. A clear case of WP:TOOSOON, fails WP:NPROF, and his citations/year are low so it will be some time before he qualifies...

named chairs are what NPROF 5 is about. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 23:46, 26 August 2025 (UTC) Keep per Jclemens - WP:NPROF#5. --A. B. (talk •...

which Rüegg won in 2000. A respectable academic, but no sign of passing WP:NPROF, WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 13:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Keep...

cited Nature paper) who founded a non-notable company. Doesn't meet WP:NPROF and seems like WP:TOOSOON. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:37, 19 July 2022 (UTC)...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to meet any of the criteria at WP:NPROF JMWt (talk) 07:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC) Note: this discussion has been included...

does not meet WP:NPROF C6, but doesn't detract from notability either. Membership in the Iranian Academy of Literature might meet WP:NPROF C3, if it could...

TWL) Coverage fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA or general paid media. Fails WP:NPROF. Aronitz (talk) 13:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

delegations from 20 countries? This article shouldn't be deleted as per WP:NPROF TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:17, 23 February 2020 (UTC) — Note to closing...

Distinguished Chaired Professorship in Immigration and Human Rights Law, to meet WP:NPROF#C5 Vycl1994 (talk) 16:03, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Delete agreeing with nominator...

(talk) 07:39, 23 August 2025 (UTC) Weak keep. Maybe meets WP:NPROF#C1 [1] and WP:NPROF#C5 [2], and definitely meets WP:NAUTHOR [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An associate professor not yet meeting WP:NPROF; some junior investigator awards, but these are insufficient for GNG; some...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:42, 24 September 2025 (UTC) Delete from the perspective of WP:NPROF. He has 22 publications, an h-factor of 9, 267 total citations, no major...

She also fails WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR. --hroest 15:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Keep. Although I don't see any sign whatsoever of WP:NPROF here, there are substantial...

(talk) 07:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC) Keep as meets NPROF#2 for awards as noted previously by editors as well as NPROF#1 with h-index of 34 (Google Scholar) where...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG Kieem trra (talk) 10:41, 7 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

both procedural grounds and via WP:NPROF#C1. On procedural grounds, the nom seems to have misunderstood WP:NPROF, and does not provide any justification...

TOOSOON for NPROF and lacks significant coverage.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 13:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC) Delte Doesn't seem to pass WP:NPROF or WP:GNG....

—David Eppstein (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC) delete fails WP:NPROF. This seems to be a different person than the one previously discussed that...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't see a WP:NPROF pass here, and I don't see a WP:GNG pass either. The sources in the article...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not close to meeting GNG nor NPROF, see Google scholar profile. Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 15:12, 22 September...

Delete Not at all notable as NPROF; not yet notable as an author. DGG ( talk ) 20:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPROF ,WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG.Pharaoh...

Certainly doesn't meet WP:GNG and I'm seeing nothing that indicates he meets WP:NPROF. Not a primary reason for deletion, but article is also quite WP:PROMO and...

it's a pass of WP:NPROF for any of the criteria, or WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC) Delete Cannot meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Azuredivay...

result was keep. There is consensus that the subject is notable under WP:NPROF, particularly with the lone delete !vote being based on the original argument...

h-factor of 43 is reasonable for an associate professor, it is too low for WP:NPROF, it is WP:TOOSOON. His awards are junior starter grants, not peer reviewed...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF. This is mostly a resumé-like article with no independent coverage. Headbomb...

this page.‎ The result was keep. Consensus appears to be that he meets WP:NPROF Category 6 (non-admin closure) Jupitus Smart 04:13, 28 November 2021 (UTC)...

Delete. H-index = 6. No academic passes NPROF if below 20, and 40 is closer to normal. No chance at this time, NPROF is never suitable for early career scientists...

per the many reviews I just added, possibly meets WP:NPROF#C1 per Scholar and possibly meets WP:NPROF#C3 if he is verifiably a fellow of the Royal Historical...

ItsKesha (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Snow keep. Subject clearly meets WP:NPROF C1 (with a huge number of citations in a lower citation field) and C5 (with...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR. Not an endowed chair or, as far as I can see, a member of...

work satisfying WP:NPROF#C1, no named chair or distinguished professorship per WP:NPROF#C5, and no major academic award per WP:NPROF#C2. The listed books...

11:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC) delete no indication of notability per WP:NPROF neither through book reviews nor through citation counts. Currently GS shows...

TWL) I can't find much about this professor that would serve to satisfy WP:NPROF, except that he seems reasonably highly cited. What I can't determine is...

notable per guidelines other than NPROF, it does not appear that other guidelines are subject to the constraints of NPROF criteria. Beccaynr (talk) 21:58...

Do any of the societies listed on his CV get him past WP:NPROF #3? I don't know science. NPROF #5 also looks relevant, but I'm not sure about the prominence...

had promo and details on his funding, some of which I removed. Fails WP:NPROF and most of the coverage is routine press releases etc so fails WP:GNG....

00:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC) Keep per BhamBoi, passes WP:NPROF#C3, WP:NPROF#C5, and likely WP:NPROF#C1. I would also point out that this article has existed...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail NPROF, ANYBIO and GNG, lacks any reliable independent sources and my BEFORE search...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPROF. He won an award from the Indiana section of the Mathematical Association...

Evidence provided shows that Donald C. Chang‎ has a high h-index and passes WP:NPROF. (non-admin closure) scope_creepTalk 10:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC) [Hide this...

WP:NPROF#3. Similarly Cyril Hilsum is NAE plus a stack of other major peer recognition awards, WP:NPROF#3 and perhaps also WP:NPROF#1b and WP:NPROF#2....

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:GNG , WP:NPROF and WP:NBIO. Sources are not reliable Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:45,...

Waddington, who is quoted occasionally in news media, but not enough to meet NPROF's 7a criterion, "frequently quoted". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs)...

changed: little sign of the kind of impact that we're looking for in WP:NPROF, nor of other notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 15:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)...

of a University founded in 2018 which is clearly not in the spirit of WP:NPROF: "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative...

Sciences passes WP:NPROF(3). Quite a few death notices in Chinese in the article, which may indicate SIGCOV as well, though NPROF(3) is sufficient by...

Business School and held a named professorship so passes criterion 5 of WP:NPROF. Mccapra (talk) 10:38, 30 December 2025 (UTC) Withdraw per above ~Darth...

JSTOR · TWL) I am not sure if this person meets any of the criteria at WP:NPROF. JTtheOG (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2025 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

to pass WP:NPROF#1. Overall not the strongest arguments, but for me enough to pass the bar for NPROF and clearly in line with other NPROF outcomes. --hroest...

dealt with, but there is no point in doing that if it still can't get past NPROF. If someone can turn turn up some publications that get sufficient citations...

subject appears to pass WP:NPROF C5 as holding a named chair at a major university. The citation record is marginal for WP:NPROF C1 via citations, but the...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to fail WP:NPROF. Awards not confirmed in reliable sources. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Low index, fails WP:NPROF. Störm (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

November 2022 (UTC) Keep: Yes it desperately needs cleanup, but he passes WP:NPROF on a few counts. He held a named professorship (William Lighty Professor...

award that satisfies WP:NPROF#C2. And, as MovesandTelevsionFan said, he's a named chair his university, which satisfies WP:NPROF#C5. So based on this, I...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An Associate Professor not yet reaching WP:NPROF. A Google scholar H-index of 11 in a high-citation field suggestion that...

Stats) An assistance professor with only one book in publication - fails WP:NPROF (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) ·...

mainspace. Any other sources out there seem to be mainly social media. Fails WP:NPROF Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

and papers over the years she doesn't pass NPROF(1). She is untenured and does not pass any of the other NPROF criteria. Icewhiz (talk) 06:07, 28 August...

it, but that's already been tried. He doesn't meet any criterion of WP:NPROF that | can see. His h-index is 8 according to Scholar or 5 on Scopus....

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No obvious indication of meeting WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. Tagged for notability since 2021. As typical with people involved in high-energy...

position that both seem to meet WP:NPROF. Sandals1 (talk) 15:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC) Keep meets the criteria at WP:NPROF.4meter4 (talk) 12:40, 23 September...

2025 (UTC) I absolutely agree policy-wise he passes several WP:NPROF, but as WP:NPROF says, {{tq|"An article's assertion that the subject passes this...

prejudice against recreation if additional citations proving towards WP:NPROF and WP:GNG can be found. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:46...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF. h-index is 14. Non-notable. Fails WP:SIGCOV scope_creepTalk 16:09, 18 December...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NPROF and WP:GNG limited coverage CeltJungleSnake (talk) 07:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)...

Cuthbert (talk) 11:46, 24 July 2025 (UTC) Weak delete. Looks WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF for this 2014 researcher. Many of the claims in the article appear to fail...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Seems to fail WP:NPROF. Previously deleted for this reason at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulnaz...

particularly low-citation. So no WP:NPROF C1. I don't think the RPM institute is large or well-established enough for WP:NPROF C7. I don't see any other signs...

this title? Phil Bridger (talk) 09:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC) Delete fails WP:NPROF#1 with a low citation count even in a medium citation field and an h-index...

result was keep. There is consensus that the individual is notable per NPROF C1, but there is also consensus that a name change is warranted. However...

selective MacArthur Fellowships AKA 'Genius grants' that might qualify for WP:NPROF #2. It is asserted that 'his work is taught in many universities around...

examples together, I agree this moves the needle but I'm seeing more WP:NPROF than WP:NJOURN here: Newsweek is, indeed, citing her work, but Newsweek...

TWL) It's hard to see how this lecturer bio is supposed to meet any of the nprof criteria, and gng is out of the question. OrangeWaylon (talk) 19:43, 26...

2020 (UTC) Keep Easy pass of WP:NPROF. WP:DINC. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:59, 22 November 2020 (UTC) Keep passes WP:NPROF.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:01...

keep seems like just at the edge of being notable, clearly does not pass NPROF but given the Shorty award, the number of views of the channel and the activism...

Article written in good faith by a student editor without knowing about WP:NPROF. StarryGrandma (talk) 15:59, 13 June 2018 (UTC) Comment I share the sentiment...

research experience. TJMSmith (talk) 01:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC) Keep. WP:NPROF from highly cited papers. Several items of coverage in the NYTimes and other...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Was prodded with reason "Fails WP:NPROF, WP:NATH and WP:GNG. No sourcing to suggest otherwise. Best source is a...

JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't pass WP:NPOL as local councillor, and I think fails WP:NPROF but happy to be corrected. Awarded Freedom of the City of London but this...

March 2025 (UTC) Keep. I'm seeing plenty of impact for WP:NPROF. Citations appear to meet NPROF C1. I don't think the American Society for Plant Biology...

science specialist and associate professor. These are not notable. Fails WP:NPROF and WP:notability (people). Otr500 (talk) 23:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC) Note:...

references below. Aoziwe (talk) 09:26, 9 April 2020 (UTC) Weak keep per WP:NPROF. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics seems to be a well regarded...

research universities are notable, per WP:NPROF. According to WP:NPROF, merely holding a named chair will satisfy WP:NPROF. Holding such a named chair confers...

(UTC) Delete. This is listed under academics, but I don't see a pass of WP:NPROF via citation or other recognizable impact. The best case for GNG appears...

Billlion (talk) 16:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC) Keep Speedy keep he appears to meet NPROF, with six books and over 200 journal articles. Click the "publications"...

respectfully disagree with the assessment that the subject fails to meet WP:NPROF. Re: WP:NPROF#C1: The subject's citation record is robust for the field of semiconductor...

like a pretty clear cut case for NPROF#1. --hroest 10:47, 17 June 2024 (UTC) That's a pretty gross misreading of WP: NPROF. It says "The person's research...

especially large number of coauthors. I don't think it's enough for WP:NPROF C1. GNG looks like a better fit, but the only coverage seems to be local...

JSTOR · TWL) Assistant prof with a postdoc award, don't see how meets WP:NPROF. Not convinced being in Fortune magazine and a bit of other coverage meets...

but it looks like there's enough citations of his papers to suggest a WP:NPROF#C1 pass here. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC) Relisted...

ago). And only editors-in-chief of major journals automatically satisfy WP:NPROF, whereas this subject seems to only have held editorial board and associate...

reviews in total. I do think that the combination of WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NPROF gives a solid case for keeping. Comment that Xxanthippe is referring to...

—David Eppstein (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC) Delete. With regards to NPROF C1, Singh is at the median for citing docs, publication number, and h-index...

(talk) 17:50, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Keep - clearly meets WP:NPROF per citations (C1) and ALSO passes NPROF through membership of the Spanish Royal Academy of Sciences...

is strong enough for NPROF-1.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC) Keep as others have said, seems to meet WP:NPROF. Also, WP:DINC. -Kj...

non-notable academic. Nothing about his academic career seems to pass WP:NPROF. He does have some written works, as can be seem by the long list in the...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this meets WP:NPROF, unless the professional memberships are prestigious enough to carry the...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unless someone can show how this would meet WP:NPROF, subject is not notable under any other guideline. Putting aside COI and...

review of the WT:NPROF archives I am not convinced that there has ever been a consensus to exclude deans of professional schools from NPROF#6; rather there...

her career, and I wasn't able to find anything to indicate a pass of any NPROF criteria. One notable book and one notable edited volume falls short of...

I take the WP:NPROF C5 case seriously. It is backed by a citation record that looks to be the kind of impact we look for in WP:NPROF C1. The reviews...

citations which fails WP:NPROF. --hroest 13:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC) Delete Not seeing enough to warrant a pass of WP:NPROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:52...

sure he passes NPROF(5) (as Elizabethtown College would not seem major), and given the common name I am having difficulty assessing NPROF(1) (I did manage...

Eppstein. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 21:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Keep per WP:NPROF C1, via plenty of highly-cited papers. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 21:34, 7 October...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Potentially notable, but fails WP:NPROF. Possibly meets WP:NAUTHOR. scope_creepTalk 03:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)...

to his page) I have to reluctantly conclude that he probably passes WP:NPROF. It is a weak keep because most of his citations are team papers, and I...