ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. Shortcut WP:NSPECIESWP:NSPECIES...

(UTC) Delete fails WP:NSPECIES. Hughesdarren (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Delete: the subject of the article fails WP:NSPECIES because it is a cultivar...

meets NSPECIES, no issues, good patrol Paco Camino – Pichpich Y meets GNG, no issues, good patrol Tectarchus huttoni – Pichpich Y meets NSPECIES, missing...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NSPECIES and WP:GNG as an extinct genus with only one species that only appears...

notable per NSPECIES. The article should be improved, not deleted.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. This is snowballing...

notable per WP:NSPECIES --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 16:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Keep. All species are notable and pass WP:NSPECIES. Eastmain...

passes WP:NSPECIES Adelaide Football Club (SAFA) – A412 – Y no issues, passes WP:GNG Vagitanus venetus – A412 – Y no issues, passes WP:NSPECIES Prime Minister...

is at WP:NSPECIES; basically valid species are invariably keep. Elemimele (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC) Keep, obviously, per WP:NSPECIES. Owen× ☎...

Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NSPECIES. It is not listed on Catalogue of Life. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?)...

04:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. Jfire (talk) 04:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count)...

unreviewed Megapariopsis opaca - CFA - Y - passes WP:NSPECIES Leucetta solida - CFA - Y - passes WP:NSPECIES, tagged with {{one source}} but still good Acantholimon...

October 2023 (UTC) Keep. Not sure why the nom says it doesn't meet WP:NSPECIES. It appears to be a validly named species, so it would actually meet that...

asilvering (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NSPECIES. Which is very clear that WP:NSPECIES is a guideline for indicating notability, and does not...

result was keep‎. !voters pointed out that the subject is notable per WP:NSPECIES and that being short isn’t a reason to delete an article. (non-admin closure)...

Peter coxhead (talk) 09:46, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Keep. Clearly meets WP:NSPECIES with a valid name/sourcing, especially after Peter coxhead's edits. KoA...

Editors who work in this subject area believe this article subject meets WP:NSPECIES which is the notability standard here. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 23 September...

for deletion, that's a WP:FIXIT situation. The species clearly meets WP:NSPECIES having a valid name and in reliable sourcing, so this isn't even one we'd...

clarification of this at the NSPECIES talk page. Esculenta (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2026 (UTC) @Anteosaurus magnificus, NSPECIES only addresses extant species...

Spider) 09:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC) Keep The species existed in terms of WP:NSPECIES, but given its synonym is also Xylotoles abnormalis[1], and it appears...

per WP:NSPECIES PeriodicEditor (talk) 17:23, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Keep - This is a valid and recognized eukaryotic species ([1]). Per WP:NSPECIES All eukaryotic...

2025-12-04T08:16:02Z (diff; ; had been pending for 22 days) Pass Fails WP:NSPECIES CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 10:33, 7 December 2025 (UTC) Declined Draft:Trainz...

is encyclopedic, and WP:NSPECIES is good. Also, seems to be WP:POINT. Crossroads -talk- 21:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC) WP:NSPECIES appears to be bad, as it...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NSPECIES. Rhacophorus depressus is now classified as a species inquirenda since...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No published scientific name, and therefore fails WP:NSPECIES. This as well as Ptenothrix species 4 are ecomorphs that have been identified...

JSTOR · TWL) Appears to have little in the way of coverage, unsure if WP:NSPECIES is satisfied. Chumpih t 06:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No published scientific name, and therefore fails WP:NSPECIES. This as well as Ptenothrix species 4 are ecomorphs that have been identified...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NSPECIES. Pyxicephalus cordofanus was scientifically described as a new species...

at 2025-12-29T11:57:26Z (diff; had been pending for 0 days) Pass because WP:NSPECIES is a really low bar. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 20:56, 31 December 2025 (UTC)...

notable if they meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. Shortcut WP:NSPECIESWP:NSPECIES All species of animal, plant, fungus, and microorganisms (including bacteria...

far as I searched). Unfortunately, this species falls far short of WP:NSPECIES as source 6 [3] lists it as "potentially valid" and source 5 [4] lists...

to Spider) 23:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Keep - Looks to me to pass WP:NSPECIES. And here's another piece of significant coverage to throw in, as well...

greenlet, reviewed by Ryan shell: Y meets NSPECIES, no issues, good review Helea, reviewed by Ryan shell: Y meets NSPECIES, no issues, good review Gerdesiidae...

thoroughly read the deletion policy; here, this article meets notability (WP:NSPECIES) as a eukaryotic species, and can likely be expanded in future. Staraction...

March 2026 (UTC) Keep. Each species is notable per notability guideline WP:NSPECIES. --Snek01 (talk) 10:45, 3 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Organisms, and Greece. Zeibgeist (talk) 15:44, 31 July 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES Esculenta (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep: All recognized...

mentioned in Google Books, here and here. I don't know if it is enough for NSPECIES. Kelob2678 (talk) 17:08, 17 December 2025 (UTC) This AfD wasn't done properly...

found a source and used it to add a species list to the article. Per WP:NSPECIES, accepted genera are presumed to be notable. Chess enjoyer (talk) 22:10...

Organisms. Plantdrew (talk) 21:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Delete. Fails GNG, NSPECIES, and completely lacks references. SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:05, 18 June 2023...

clades consitute one of the "other main classifications" outlined in WP:NSPECIES. Epsilon.Prota talk 22:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

00:09, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Keep: All eukaryote species are notable per WP:NSPECIES. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Keep Per longstanding consensus (WP:NSPECIES), individual species are invariably notable. Jfire (talk) 03:12, 24 October...

issues, good patrol Bauhinia madagascariensis – Miminity – Y – meets WP:NSPECIES, no issues, good patrol Jess Teesdale – Miminity – Y – meets WP:NPOL, no...

--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC) Keep: per WP:NSPECIES. We only need one reliable source for verifiability. Owen× ☎ 17:52, 5 January...

Montenegro[4], It is estimated that Montenegro has 225 endemic plant[5]. Since WP:NSPECIES is rather lax, this list can be transformed into a navigational one. Finally...

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bivalves#Structure All species and higher are notable per WP:NSPECIES. You must be able to verify it is valid (MolluscaBase is a great way to...

multiple venues. Loopy30 (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. Jfire (talk) 04:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Keep The first half of the nomination...

2024 (UTC) Keep: sources such as [1], [2] and [3] suggest this meets WP:NSPECIES. Owen× ☎ 23:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Keep: Per @OwenX:. It's a recognized...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to pass WP:NSPECIES (given that this animal does not appear to represent a new taxon) or WP:GNG...

—asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 23:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Keep: meets WP:NSPECIES. Owen× ☎ 00:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

discussions. Aydoh8 (talk) 02:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:NSPECIES and lack of a policy-based deletion rationale by the proposer. @Aydoh8:...

and is not eligible for inclusion under the principles outlined in WP:NSPECIES. As a result, I'd propose that this be either redirected to pear or deleted...

actually exist or documented in reliable sources, this would not satisfy WP:NSPECIES. KoA (talk) 14:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Note, another genus in this family...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Weak keep. WP:NSPECIES says Their names and at least a brief description must have been published...

(also known as BIO, NBIO, PERSON, PEOPLE, BLPNOTE) Species (also known as NSPECIES) Sports (also known as ATH, ATHLETE, NSPORT, NSPORTS) Web (also known as...

2025-12-04T18:23:17Z (diff; had been pending for 20 days) Pass – excellent NSPECIES accept. Nil🥝 19:56, 10 December 2025 (UTC) Rejected Draft:Nigar Gozalova...

taxonomy; I don't see convincing evidence that this name qualifies under WP:NSPECIES. Choess (talk) 17:30, 29 April 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 15:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. The plant clearly exists. This article has the plant name in the title...

correct name (botany) or valid name (zoology) are generally kept − WP:NSPECIES. There are some topics which are generally kept/considered notable as long...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Never scientifically named, and thus fails WP:NSPECIES. One of several preliminary recognised species mentioned in a paper. These...

article. Since this is a species published somewhere reputable, it passes WP:NSPECIES (which it would have to, even to justify a stub), and I see no reason to...

(Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:32, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Speedy keep as WP:NSPECIES applies. While I'm an advocate of WP:TNT through AfD at times, that isn't...

Faveoloolithidae (0 days) Pass. Though it's a fossil egg, same idea as WP:NSPECIES. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 18:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC) R (n) Draft:EnamuL Vau (0 days)...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Sadiq Malkani), as such it it fails WP:NSPECIES. As far as I can tell, the genus and species have never been mentioned...

Scientific career:"Entosthodon neoscoticus" This would be notable per NSPECIES, so probably shouldn't be a red link Why did she decline the PhD- there...

considered notable for articles, when the species name is approved (WP:NSPECIES). Minerals also undergo an approval process overlooked by the International...

of auto-generated report. Accepted species are presumed notable per WP:NSPECIES. Make sure it's not a hoax by checking the species name on a website such...

Delete per Chess enjoyer and as a logical conclusion following from WP:NSPECIES and WP:RETURNTORED. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:28, 1 July 2026 (UTC) The...

see how it's the least bit applicable here. It would be like applying WP:NSPECIES to a concept in anatomy. jlwoodwa (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC) I don't...

and therefore leaves us floating in doubt, species are notable (see WP:NSPECIES). This article is about a single species of moth, which is why I'm very...

doesn't override GNG without clear consensus, such as was achieved with WP:NSPECIES. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 22:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC) @Cremastra You are...

above, I think we are looking at a simpler situation in these cases. WP:NSPECIES is based on the fundamental assumption that there exists a valid description...

Actualcpscm – no issues, good patrol Tristagma bivalve – Hughesdarren – meets WP:NSPECIES, no issues, good patrol 2024 AFL draft – Hughesdarren – probably needs...

– Y no issues, good patrol Urostreptus – Hey man im josh – Y meets WP:NSPECIES, no issues, good patrol 2024–25 FIS Cross-Country World Cup – SunDawn –...

tonganus – Joseywales1961 – Y meets WP:NSPECIES, no issues, good review Freesia viridis – Joseywales1961 – Y meets NSPECIES, no issues, good review 2025–26 Saudi...

WP:NSPECIES, accepted species are presumed to be notable. I think this should be deleted to return it to red. Lepoarctus coniferus passes NSPECIES, and...

agreement that species are inherently notable (and a failed proposal at WP:NSPECIES), these clearly fall below species level. This one is not notable by our...

target page does not discuss the redirects beyond simple mentions. Per WP:NSPECIES, all species (and the genera containing them) are considered notable. It...

GNG, no issues, good patrol Barnardia numidica – Chaotic Enby – meets WP:NSPECIES, no issues, good patrol Kifrawi Kifli – Chaotic Enby – meets NPOLITICIAN...

as about a non-notable school or educational organisation. Species WP:NSPECIES Decline the submission as about a non-notable species. Sports and athletes...

article. Dyanega (talk) 18:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC) Not according to WP:NSPECIES. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC) Today I learnt...

species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer...

are assumed inherently notable enough for a stand alone article per WP:NSPECIES so this should not be a redirect. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2021...

will frequently use "Keep: per WP:NSPECIES" in species-related AfDs. This doesn't make much sense because NSPECIES is just a sentence saying they "generally...

(UTC) Not all subjects have to pass GNG. NPOL, NPROF (I believe), and NSPECIES only require that subjects (that meet the criteria) need to be verifiable...

Most of these are circular redirects on the page. Per WP:NSPECIES, taxa that meet those guidelines should be redlinked by default. –LaundryPizza03...

Orthohantavirus#Classification are either redlinked or have articles. Per WP:NSPECIES#Viruses and similar forms, viruses are presumed notable only if they are...

correct name (botany) or valid name (zoology) are generally kept − WP:NSPECIES. There are some topics which are generally kept/considered notable as long...

notable per NSPECIES. The article should be improved, not deleted.--Eostrix  (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 07:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. This is snowballing...

pectoralis at 2025-12-08T23:33:51Z (diff; had been pending for 1 days) Pass. NSPECIES pass. MCE89 (talk) 14:06, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Accepted Paraxenoacria...

and therefore leaves us floating in doubt, species are notable (see WP:NSPECIES). This article is about a single species of moth, which is why I'm very...

to Spider) 23:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Keep - Looks to me to pass WP:NSPECIES. And here's another piece of significant coverage to throw in, as well...

agreement that species are inherently notable (and a failed proposal at WP:NSPECIES), these clearly fall below species level. This one is not notable by our...

asilvering (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2025 (UTC) Keep Per WP:NSPECIES. Which is very clear that WP:NSPECIES is a guideline for indicating notability, and does not...

21 February 2022 (UTC) @I'ma editor2022: Welcome to the Teahouse! WP:NSPECIES tells us "Species that have a correct name (botany) or valid name (zoology)...

you need to provide evidence that this species has been accepted, per WP:NSPECIES. Also, the draft is supported by a single citation in the lead section...

WP:NSPECIES." If you know where to look, it takes maybe five seconds to determine this. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC) NSPECIES is an...

JSTOR · TWL) Appears to have little in the way of coverage, unsure if WP:NSPECIES is satisfied. Chumpih t 06:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

and is not eligible for inclusion under the principles outlined in WP:NSPECIES. As a result, I'd propose that this be either redirected to pear or deleted...

clarification of this at the NSPECIES talk page. Esculenta (talk) 20:57, 10 February 2026 (UTC) @Anteosaurus magnificus, NSPECIES only addresses extant species...

December 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:RETURNTORED, WP:REDYES, and WP:NSPECIES. NSPECIES states In general, all extant species that are accepted by the relevant...

17:57, 13 February 2022 (UTC) That would fall under WP:OUTCOMES eg WP:NSPECIES. Not so much a GNG issue. --Masem (t) 18:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC) I think...

absolute notability, it's always presumed. Even a guideline as strong as WP:NSPECIES – and they don't really come much stronger than that – only says "all extant...

(Culoptila aguilerai) is a fossil species, and these are not covered by WP:NSPECIES. I don't think any of the redirects in this nomination are fossil species...

2026 (UTC) Delete per nom. I agree that WP:RETURNTORED applies per WP:NSPECIES. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:12, 28 April 2026 (UTC) delete per above --Lenticel...

issue. At the time I was doing the categorization, I was not aware of the NSPECIES guideline, and also only started using Google Books for the very last uncategorized...

history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Revert to red per WP:NSPECIES. The hatnote of the island Tahay and information regarding the planet Gliese...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. Per WP:NSPECIES, bacterial species are presumed notable when they are accepted by the ICNP...

13:05, 30 April 2026 (UTC) Delete all per nom, WP:RETURNTORED, and WP:NSPECIES. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:10, 30 April 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved...

October 2023 (UTC) Keep. Not sure why the nom says it doesn't meet WP:NSPECIES. It appears to be a validly named species, so it would actually meet that...

WP:NSPECIES, prior to which RETURNTORED did not (in theory) apply to most species redirects, since there was no inherent notability. Post-NSPECIES, it...

databases have the species already listed, or if the article meets WP:NSPECIES. Since I don't know all of the DBs, pinging someone with knowledge in that...

species to its genus. accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer...

because Wikispecies and Wikipedia have different notability criteria. WP:NSPECIES states that "In general, all extant species that are accepted by the relevant...

them as multiple sources – as if that could be a problem, given that WP:NSPECIES does not require multiple sources. I ignored Wikidata in counting the links...

2025-12-02T05:40:40Z (diff; had been pending for 63 days) Pass Not quite a clean NSPECIES (as not a species), but enought references for a GNG pass. Nil🥝 14:10...

species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think this should be deleted to return it to red. Chess enjoyer (talk)...

2025-06-07T04:14:38Z (diff; had been pending for 0 days) Pass Passes WP:NSPECIES. Pedantical (talk) 02:11, 25 June 2025 (UTC) Accepted Phoebanthus grandiflorus...

2026-08-02T12:07:47Z (diff; had been pending for 0 days) Pass, passes WP:NSPECIES. PeriodicEditor (talk) 19:16, 16 August 2026 (UTC) Declined Draft:C. Govindakrishnan...

2025-12-28T10:44:19Z (diff; had been pending for 0 days) Pass, meets WP:NSPECIES. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:16, 3 January 2026 (UTC)...

2025-12-23T15:44:45Z (diff; had been pending for 0 days) Pass, meets WP:NSPECIES. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 16:19, 28 December 2025...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NSPECIES. Pyxicephalus cordofanus was scientifically described as a new species...

news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NSPECIES and WP:GNG as an extinct genus with only one species that only appears...

species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer (talk)...

People notability (WP:BIO) No particular advice. Species notability (WP:NSPECIES) No particular advice. Web notability (WP:WEB) No particular advice....

(UTC) Delete fails WP:NSPECIES. Hughesdarren (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Delete: the subject of the article fails WP:NSPECIES because it is a cultivar...

at 2025-12-02T07:50:25Z (diff; had been pending for 0 days) Pass, good NSPECIES accept. MCE89 (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2025 (UTC) Declined Draft:Pist'N'Broke...

notable per WP:NSPECIES --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 16:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC) Keep. All species are notable and pass WP:NSPECIES. Eastmain...

species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer...

The target page does not discuss the redirect subjects in depth. Per WP:NSPECIES, which is broadly applied to extinct taxa as well by WP:PALAEO, all species...

result was keep‎. !voters pointed out that the subject is notable per WP:NSPECIES and that being short isn’t a reason to delete an article. (non-admin closure)...

species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer...

target page does not discuss the redirect beyond a simple mention. Per WP:NSPECIES, all species (and the genera containing them) are considered notable. It...

species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer...

is encyclopedic, and WP:NSPECIES is good. Also, seems to be WP:POINT. Crossroads -talk- 21:35, 25 June 2024 (UTC) WP:NSPECIES appears to be bad, as it...

May 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, in accordance with WP:RETURNTORED and WP:NSPECIES. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 20:10, 1 May 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved...

Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 6 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:NSPECIES. It is not listed on Catalogue of Life. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?)...

I agree that this should be deleted because Rissoina stricta passes WP:NSPECIES, which says that [a]ll eukaryotic species that are accepted by taxonomists...

species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer...

carnatus at 2025-12-01T12:42:25Z (diff; had been pending for 0 days) Pass as NSPECIES. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:00, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Accepted Ternstroemites...

far as I searched). Unfortunately, this species falls far short of WP:NSPECIES as source 6 [15] lists it as "potentially valid" and source 5 [16] lists...

species to its genus. Accepted species are presumed to be notable per WP:NSPECIES, so I think these should be deleted to return them to red. Chess enjoyer...

discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC) Weak keep. WP:NSPECIES says Their names and at least a brief description must have been published...

at 2025-12-02T16:06:03Z (diff; had been pending for 0 days) Pass. Good NSPECIES accept. MCE89 (talk) 14:40, 3 December 2025 (UTC) Declined Draft:Astronomitaly...

species article at all then if nothing meaningful can be said about it? WP:NSPECIES exists, whether you like it or not. For many beetle species their technical...

Editors who work in this subject area believe this article subject meets WP:NSPECIES which is the notability standard here. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 23 September...

is at WP:NSPECIES; basically valid species are invariably keep. Elemimele (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2023 (UTC) Keep, obviously, per WP:NSPECIES. Owen× ☎...

WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Keep Per longstanding consensus (WP:NSPECIES), individual species are invariably notable. Jfire (talk) 03:12, 24 October...

whether that article's topic meets WP:SUSTAINED, regardless of GNG... or WP:NSPECIES. Indeed, WP:V#Notability and WP:NOTEVERYTHING, both policies, come into...

FENS · JSTOR · TWL) No published scientific name, and therefore fails WP:NSPECIES. This as well as Ptenothrix species 4 are ecomorphs that have been identified...

04:00, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. Jfire (talk) 04:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. --A. B. (talk • contribs • global count)...

disparaging attitude to "hobbyists" that I remember from the RfC on the WP:NSPECIES guideline. Yours was a small minority view in that discussion, and the...

discussions. Aydoh8 (talk) 02:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Speedy Keep per WP:NSPECIES and lack of a policy-based deletion rationale by the proposer. @Aydoh8:...

per WP:NSPECIES PeriodicEditor (talk) 17:23, 6 March 2026 (UTC) Keep - This is a valid and recognized eukaryotic species ([20]). Per WP:NSPECIES All eukaryotic...

above, I think we are looking at a simpler situation in these cases. WP:NSPECIES is based on the fundamental assumption that there exists a valid description...

databases have the species already listed, or if the article meets WP:NSPECIES. Since I don't know all of the DBs, pinging someone with knowledge in that...

—asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 23:46, 9 February 2024 (UTC) Keep: meets WP:NSPECIES. Owen× ☎ 00:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Montenegro[12], It is estimated that Montenegro has 225 endemic plant[13]. Since WP:NSPECIES is rather lax, this list can be transformed into a navigational one. Finally...

multiple venues. Loopy30 (talk) 16:12, 22 October 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. Jfire (talk) 04:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Keep The first half of the nomination...

2024 (UTC) Keep: sources such as [3], [4] and [5] suggest this meets WP:NSPECIES. Owen× ☎ 23:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC) Keep: Per @OwenX:. It's a recognized...

microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 15:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES. The plant clearly exists. This article has the plant name in the title...

found a source and used it to add a species list to the article. Per WP:NSPECIES, accepted genera are presumed to be notable. Chess enjoyer (talk) 22:10...

March 2026 (UTC) Keep. Each species is notable per notability guideline WP:NSPECIES. --Snek01 (talk) 10:45, 3 March 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Organisms, and Greece. Zeibgeist (talk) 15:44, 31 July 2025 (UTC) Keep per WP:NSPECIES Esculenta (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2025 (UTC) Speedy keep: All recognized...

mentioned in Google Books, here and here. I don't know if it is enough for NSPECIES. Kelob2678 (talk) 17:08, 17 December 2025 (UTC) This AfD wasn't done properly...

--Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:55, 5 January 2024 (UTC) Keep: per WP:NSPECIES. We only need one reliable source for verifiability. Owen× ☎ 17:52, 5 January...

article. Since this is a species published somewhere reputable, it passes WP:NSPECIES (which it would have to, even to justify a stub), and I see no reason to...

in this day and age especially if they don't fall into the evergreen WP:NSPECIES, WP:NPOL and WP:NGEO spectrum. I personally prefer the AFD route than the...

Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous Village pump (policy) archive   This page contains discussions that have been archived...

actually exist or documented in reliable sources, this would not satisfy WP:NSPECIES. KoA (talk) 14:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC) Note, another genus in this family...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Sadiq Malkani), as such it it fails WP:NSPECIES. As far as I can tell, the genus and species have never been mentioned...

clades consitute one of the "other main classifications" outlined in WP:NSPECIES. Epsilon.Prota talk 22:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

00:09, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Keep: All eukaryote species are notable per WP:NSPECIES. - UtherSRG (talk) 00:53, 15 May 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

absolute notability, it's always presumed. Even a guideline as strong as WP:NSPECIES – and they don't really come much stronger than that – only says "all extant...

(Talk) PHLOGISTON ENTHUSIAST 15:32, 14 April 2026 (UTC) Speedy keep as WP:NSPECIES applies. While I'm an advocate of WP:TNT through AfD at times, that isn't...

results does not mean that secondary sources don't exist for it. The WP:NSPECIES proposal is problematic too. From 2007 to 2017, two editors mass-created...

taxonomy; I don't see convincing evidence that this name qualifies under WP:NSPECIES. Choess (talk) 17:30, 29 April 2025 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

considered notable for articles, when the species name is approved (WP:NSPECIES). Minerals also undergo an approval process overlooked by the International...

see how it's the least bit applicable here. It would be like applying WP:NSPECIES to a concept in anatomy. jlwoodwa (talk) 17:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC) I don't...

thoroughly read the deletion policy; here, this article meets notability (WP:NSPECIES) as a eukaryotic species, and can likely be expanded in future. Staraction...

2011 by @Acalamari) in light of discussion at their talk page and the NSPECIES guideline talk page (the latter is a long discussion that only partially...

doesn't override GNG without clear consensus, such as was achieved with WP:NSPECIES. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 22:54, 22 July 2025 (UTC) @Cremastra You are...

species articles sourced from GBIF, and it shouldn't be an issue for WP:NSPECIES, especially since they quote the relevant sources. However, they still...

journal. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC) @Jlwoodwa WP:NSPECIES is not a notability guideline, it merely represents the "status quo" of...

@TrademarkedTarantula and UnexpectedSmoreInquisition: I suggest taking a look at WP:NSPECIES. While many species are effectively perma-stubs, we still de facto consider...

Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1217. I believe that's because of WP:NSPECIES: Species that have a correct name (botany) or valid name (zoology) are...

Gone Extinct (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2026 (UTC) Well, according to WP:NSPECIES, it's likely notable by default, so it's OK in mainspace. If you want it...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't seem to pass WP:NSPECIES (given that this animal does not appear to represent a new taxon) or WP:GNG...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Never scientifically named, and thus fails WP:NSPECIES. One of several preliminary recognised species mentioned in a paper. These...

People notability (WP:BIO) No particular advice. Species notability (WP:NSPECIES) No particular advice. Web notability (WP:WEB) No particular advice....

(although obviously multiple sources are always preferred). WP:NPOL and WP:NSPECIES are two of the more obvious examples. In solidarity, nil nz 07:34, 4 June...

essays-masquerading-as-guidelines, WP:NSPECIES and WP:NJOURNALS... JoelleJay (talk) 16:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC) NSPECIES is because named species must pass...