Search Results: Wikipedia:OLDAGE


Wikipedia:Subjective importance
Rabu, 2025-04-02 03:16:45

proposed for deletion, and they sometimes have worked. Shortcuts WP:OLDAGEWP:OLDAGE WP:VERYOLDWP:VERYOLD WP:ANCIENTWP:ANCIENT Keep He is the oldest living person...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pocomail
Senin, 2025-12-01 10:17:50

Comment While these are not official policies they provide good points: WP:OLDAGE, WP:MASK, WP:COATRACK. This article might be somewhat old, but it is not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Shah Sulaiman Hall
Minggu, 2025-11-16 00:20:38

an historical building is by itself not a valid argument, please see WP:OLDAGE. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:GEOFEAT....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenwood Herald
Selasa, 2026-01-06 23:35:57

points and questions. Here's some essays on the topic--the first one, WP:OLDAGE seems to support your point. Likewise, Arguments against deleting articles...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Israel Synagogue (Asheville, North Carolina)
Senin, 2026-01-05 17:29:19

removed because "110 year old synagouge prima facie notablity", but per WP:OLDAGE, "Just because it's old, that doesn't mean it's notable." TM 19:38, 23 December...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryūkyū Kobudo Hozon Shinkokai
Jumat, 2026-01-09 01:56:02

old isn't a sign of notability (in this regard I concur with WP:BIG/WP:OLDAGE). The Bishop reference (pg. 147 of my copy) merely mentions that such an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Senin, 2025-11-17 03:12:43

well. Stop this bias on Wikipedia. I hate to say it, but please read WP:OLDAGE. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC) And, again, you...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve MacLean Public School
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 07:08:50

a number, and numbers are not used to judge notability on Wikipedia" WP:OLDAGE. The fact that this school is only 6 years old does not influence its notability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Me Home Tour (One Direction)
Senin, 2023-03-13 12:11:30

be ridiculous. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2012 (UTC) See WP:OLDAGE and WP:SOURCESEARCH. A bunch of articles stating "One Direction have announced...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicago Weekly
Selasa, 2026-01-06 03:01:50

publication) for a long time does not make something inherently notable; see WP:OLDAGE. — DroEsperanto (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC) People seem to be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Language learning centre/Word list/O
Sabtu, 2022-05-28 19:58:44

oinks ointment ointments ok okapi okapis okay okayed okays oklahoma old oldage olden older oldest oldfashioned oldie oldish oldmaids oldtimer oldtimers...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie-Rose Tessier
Senin, 2026-06-01 04:42:34

earth. This might be controversial, but I think this article violates WP:OLDAGE; just because something or someone is old does not make them notable. Looking...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject American football/Semi-professional football discussion
Senin, 2021-06-14 20:07:03

necessarily qualify that team for its own article on Wikipedia. Also, WP:OLDAGE covers that just because something has been around a while does not mean...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cathcart
Jumat, 2026-01-09 14:17:00

disagree that being "historic" is the same as being notable, see e.g. WP:OLDAGE. But that's somewhat beside the point; in the end this particular building...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines to cite in deletion debates
Rabu, 2026-06-17 14:06:23

Essay name Shortcuts Summary Age, notability of WP:OLDAGE The age of a subject alone, no matter how old, does not render it automatically notable Bare...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/OldAge
Sabtu, 2021-11-27 19:55:52

File:Old Age.JPG Self-nomination. I took this portrait of my great-grandmother for the Ageing-article, and I think it works fairly well. Support self-nomination...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kane Tanaka
Selasa, 2025-12-09 10:38:47

--Randykitty (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2018 (UTC) There's an essay at WP:OLDAGE that makes a good point about age alone not being notable. CommanderLinx...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/November-2005
Jumat, 2006-11-24 19:01:03

Please cut and paste new entries to the bottom of this page, creating a new monthly archive (by closing date) when necessary. A graceful picture of soybeans...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/COIReports/2007, Jun 9
Minggu, 2007-08-19 01:55:23

Sat Jun 09, 2007 - user:Oldage (contribs; 1/1) scores 100% (U->P) & 100% (P->U) (ratio: 100%) on calculated overlap Oldage <-> Old age (Old age - diff...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 July 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 23:08:12

old isn't a sign of notability (in this regard I concur with WP:BIG/WP:OLDAGE). The Bishop reference (pg. 147 of my copy) merely mentions that such an...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:47:23

disagree that being "historic" is the same as being notable, see e.g. WP:OLDAGE. But that's somewhat beside the point; in the end this particular building...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:23:46

removed because "110 year old synagouge prima facie notablity", but per WP:OLDAGE, "Just because it's old, that doesn't mean it's notable." TM 19:38, 23 December...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:47:36

a number, and numbers are not used to judge notability on Wikipedia" WP:OLDAGE. The fact that this school is only 6 years old does not influence its notability...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 4
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:25:15

--Randykitty (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2018 (UTC) There's an essay at WP:OLDAGE that makes a good point about age alone not being notable. CommanderLinx...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 July 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 23:07:18

points and questions. Here's some essays on the topic--the first one, WP:OLDAGE seems to support your point. Likewise, Arguments against deleting articles...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 October 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:31:43

Comment While these are not official policies they provide good points: WP:OLDAGE, WP:MASK, WP:COATRACK. This article might be somewhat old, but it is not...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 September 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:55:35

publication) for a long time does not make something inherently notable; see WP:OLDAGE. — DroEsperanto (talk) 18:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC) People seem to be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 28
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:26:15

an historical building is by itself not a valid argument, please see WP:OLDAGE. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:GEOFEAT....

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 December 29
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:10:52

well. Stop this bias on Wikipedia. I hate to say it, but please read WP:OLDAGE. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC) And, again, you...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Language learning centre/Word list
Jumat, 2026-03-13 19:45:34

oinks ointment ointments ok okapi okapis okay okayed okays oklahoma old oldage olden older oldest oldfashioned oldie oldish oldmaids oldtimer oldtimers...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 26
Senin, 2025-05-05 01:32:16

earth. This might be controversial, but I think this article violates WP:OLDAGE; just because something or someone is old does not make them notable. Looking...

Click to read more »