ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTSWP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS WP:OTHERSTUFFWP:OTHERSTUFF WP:OTHERWP:OTHER WP:OSEWP:OSE WP:WAXWP:WAX Examples: Keep There's an article on x, and this is just as...

Reporting statistics of link ose-erfurt.de; 0 records. ose-erfurt.de: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck...

deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Takaki Ose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

(UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for deletion/Takaki Ose Articles for deletion/Takaki Ose (2nd nomination) [Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion...

deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Eudora OSE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)...

1 July 2022 (UTC) Template:TrainOSE stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:TrainOSE lines (talk · history · transclusions ·...

don't feel restricted by how featured articles are written. Wikipedia:Former featured articles Wikipedia:Unreviewed featured articles WP:IMPERFECT WP:OSE...

comprehensive discography; an encyclopedia should be encyclopedic. As WP:OSE says, Wikipedia intends to be a comprehensive reference. In categories of...

Jonathan as their first name. Tizio 15:42, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Falls under WP:OSE, but in this example, not for long. I'm not going on a crusade though. Bongomatic...

articles Anita Ose, Paša Zirgs and Pa$a Zirgs. Ben Ben (talk) 23:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC) I have added Anitaose, another SPA on Anita Ose. JohnCD (talk)...

have is from the companies themselves. Much of the discussion here is clear OSE reasoning which is discounted. JodyB talk 19:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC) Comparison...

using OSE as an argument, one should explain why and not just state the fact. Similarly, in refuting a OSE argument, an explanation of why the OSE argument...

not to be listed. Stout1070 (talk) 01:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Please see WP:OSE. Triplestop x3 02:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC) Listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject...

by Minohaha simply because other first ladies of Egypt have articles - WP:OSE. Being a first lady is in itself not notable. A quick Google search provides...

And also, WP:OSE is NOT, I repeat, NOT policy! I could just as well write an essay outlining why OSE is a completely valid argument. OSE is used every...

(history · last edit) from http://world.guns.ru/machine/mex/mendoza-e.html CCI: Ose\fio. MER-C 03:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC) Article cleaned by investigator or others...

which is where I'm deriving the notability concern off of. Also using WP:OSE with Gerry Connolly is not such a good idea. Hasteur (talk) 00:21, 22 January...

Empressplantagenet (talk) 23:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC) Vbaime2 (talk) 23:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC) Elvira Dyangani Ose Evita Robinson Lindsey Day Mary T. Washington...

"has had significant roles in multiple notable films". She hasn't. Also WP:OSE Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:37, 24 May 2021 (UTC) "Has had significant...

2013 (UTC) So to sum up this keep, WP:OSE, policy is irrelevant. Toddst1 (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC) WP:OSE states "a logical rationalization of...

57: On the other hand, the rest of your !vote seems to be based off of WP:OSE. Put WP:NSEASONS aside, that seems to be a red herring for you, why should...

(talk) 18:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC) OSE is only relevant if there isn't a good reason to keep an article except for OSE. In this case, I don't believe that...

the Monk (talk) 05:03, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Because I stumbled across it. WP:OSE is not relevant.The Dissident Aggressor 16:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC) That's not...

13:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC) @[email protected]: I don't want to invoke WP:OSE here, but we have thousands of articles on bands and musicians who arguably...

explains all my reasons and has nothing to do with OSE (consensus over hundreds of AfDs is not OSE, incidentally). And please also explain why you think...

@Editking100: see WP:OSE, Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Vestrian24Bio 03:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC) I looked at WP:OSE as per you said...

notable recording artists. All his other albums have individual pages. As WP:OSE recommends, In categories of items with a finite number of entries where...

JSTOR · TWL) Created by now-blocked WP:SPA User:Guelphchamber, used as WP:OSE excuse by AfC candidates, relies solely on information from the organizations...

author of the article defended it by pointing to other similar articles (WP:OSE). Those articles probably also should be deleted, but need to be evaluated...

of it at all. Chetsford (talk) 20:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC) Yes, I knew that OSE would be dragged in now :) I think I'm going to make a template that I can...

April 2016 (UTC) WP:OSE. Are you offering any policy-based reason to keep these articles? C679 09:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC) WP:OSE is not the lazy, negative...

which we have many. While I appreciate that this is, in effect, an OSE argument, OSE and convention/consensus are a "double edged" sword. Personally I...

18 September 2017 (UTC) Regarding the WP:OSE comment below, it would appear that the editor is unaware that OSE is an entirely valid reason for keeping...

EEng 16:50, 5 February 2026 (UTC) OSE is overinterpreted, and also an essay not a policy. There are cases where OSE is a perfectly valid argument. If...

away). Then, "if confusion is a problem -- OSE". Sigh. -DePiep (talk) 18:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC) Just shouting "OSE" is not a valid counter-argument to an...

notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Keep. As noted in WP:OSE, it serves no encyclopedic purpose to remove a single item from an otherwise...

review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was delete. OSE/uses these sources digression aside, there is consensus tha the sourcing...

2010 (UTC) Delete Sources don't cut it, also suggest that author read WP:OSE. Just because other furry conventions have short articles doesn't mean a...

2014 (UTC) The logic for the proposed deletion is seemingly a variant of WP:OSE, if there is a significant cultural variation regarding the History of Jews...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was no consensus. WP:OSE is not a very good stand-alone argument. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades...

collision to name a few. Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 01:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC) OSE is not a reason for excusing such discussions. Case=by-caseLihaas (talk)...

a "Soft Keep" is supposed to be, but the argument given is basically, WP:OSE, which doesn't work. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:17, 9 August 2018 (UTC) [Hide...

searches show coverage of the initial release by sources like Billboard. As WP:OSE declare, "In categories of items with a finite number of entries where most...

JSTOR · TWL) Since the PROD tag was removed with a poor rational (basically WP:OSE), I brought it here. Besides one review, the album lacks substantial coverage...

one for a bit. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC) WP:OSE Andy Dingley (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2019 (UTC) Dude, I'm getting irony whiplash...

So, no it is absolutely nowhere near enough to warrant a page. Also WP:OSE. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) The page has been updated...

the case with this one. matt91486 (talk) 01:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC) WP:OSE. If there are other Hallmark movies that need to have their articles deleted...

articles, and there appears to be no dispute over their notability. As WP:OSE declares, when looking at "categories of items with a finite number of entries...

a keep, but I'm not seeing that right now. The "5th-10th tiers" is a WP:OSE argument: those teams receive secondary independent coverage. SportingFlyer...

(Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC) There is, WP:OSE. SwisterTwister talk 19:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC) I see your point, SwisterTwister...

June 2017 (UTC) Keep Sufficiently sourced per WP:GNG, notwithstanding WP:OSE. — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis 11:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC) Keep...

included. This argument may be critiqued as WP:OSE, but I think this is one rare case where an WP:OSE argument carries water. --Batard0 (talk) 15:50,...

encouraged" Do you believe I have referred them to WP:OSE and nothing else? I've mentioned OSE in one response and I also mentioned WP:N, WP:WWIN, and...

Deletion of articles section of WP:OSE but i suggest you re/read it. Particularly this section which states: WP:OSE: — Another contributor may respond...

article on-wiki. --Urbanoc (talk) 00:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Its not just WP:OSE when they've survived AFDs time and time again. If consensus to to keep them...

reason to keep this", as per wp:ose. however, i disagree that "it's a reason to get rid of them too", also as per wp:ose. in addition, i do not think that...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prod removed by IP with WP:OSE as an argument. No reliable sources given or found to establish notability...

WP:OSE, which is an argument to avoid in afd, but that's what you're doing here. Vestrian24Bio 15:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC) How exactly? You cite WP:OSE, which...

far more troubling. As for DePauw, WP:OSE is on point. Cbl62 (talk) 05:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC) Cbl62, WP:OSE is a red herring, as it almost always is...

articles use them does not say anything about their reliability - see WP:OSE) and SoundCloud not suitable to establish notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk...

WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Deprodded with invalid reasons of WP:PRETTY and WP:OSE. No sourcing found whatsoever on this album. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did...

redirect is kept, it will pop up in search results. On the first point, see WP:OSE, unless you can point me to some form of consensus that individual round...

history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] Wikipedia:OSEWikipedia:OSE → Wikipedia:When to use or avoid "other stuff exists" arguments  (talk ·...

(talk) 14:34, 8 August 2018 (UTC) Precisely what Barkeep49 said. And WP:OSE is not a valid argument in this case. Onel5969 TT me 15:26, 8 August 2018...

be kept. --TorriTorri(Talk to me!) 04:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC) See also WP:OSE - 'Precedent in usage' --Wintonian (talk) 04:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Note:...

references check out as per VQuakr. On the page, the editor has made the WP:OSE argument, but that is not relevant; we try and fix things as we find them...

would not be considered notable outside of niche local setting. Used as WP:OSE excuse in ongoing AfC debates. Bkissin (talk) 18:24, 1 May 2019 (UTC) Delete...

HKLionel but cannot log in at the moment.\ Redirect per nom. The above WP:OSE argument is unpersuasive in the absence of significant coverage of the subject...

own, so it seems fair that volleyball players should be able as well." WP:OSE isn't a valid rationale, and the reasons for the original prod still remain...

WoahCoin (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC) WP:OSE isn't a valid argument. YODADICAE👽 14:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC) WP:OSE can be used in a valid argument, I'm not...

consensus.A redirect is more beneficial than an outright deletion.Also, see WP:OSE. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 11:21, 12 December 2017 (UTC) Julia...

There is a majority of "Keep" comments, but many stray too far towards WP:OSE and WP:ITSNOTABLE. If the article is to be merged, that is a discussion that...

in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. Draft was contested with an WP:OSE argument. Onel5969 TT me 09:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Delete. I'm not finding anything of note here. There is an element of WP:OSE in what Necrothesp says but, on the other hand, the arguments in favour of...

sources. Author also appears to be non-notable. Prod contested using an WP:OSE rational relating to Star Trek and Buffy episodes. Farix (Talk) 04:46, 19...

Hilton) :) nb. no admonishments for the WP:OSE ref please. Debate (talk) 00:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC) WP:OSE is not a policy. It's simply an essay Do you...

many people championing both 'OSes' and 'OSs' to be the prural of the acronym 'OS' (operating system). I argue that 'OSes' is correct since someone not...

reliable and independent unless you can prove they aren't. And who has given OSE as argument to keep? Also please sign your comments. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C}...

Commonwealth countries. See, e.g., Kerala Gazette, Ontario Gazette. Making a WP:OSE argument because these are, in my view, strictly analogous. AleatoryPonderings...

Powell (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC) What historical significance? WP:OSE: The existence of other non notable and unencyclopedic info does not mean...

such portals implies that other portals are worth staying. That's a case of OSE. But we will have to look into this namespace now or later; so why not now...

it, yet you have found issue with this D'Amico page. This is basically WP:OSE, but I voted "delete" on Thomas Doherty at AfD, IIRC, and still feel that...

What are the protocols for this app, and does it have analogs in other OSes? Bogger (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC) This technique is called a captive...

fictional characters discussion right now. czar ♔ 20:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC) WP:OSE is not a valid argument. But seriously, I can similarly provide sources as...

independent sources can be found. Previous WP:Prod removed with a weak WP:OSE reason. Fails under the policy WP:NOTDIR and notability guideline WP:LISTN...

(UTC) This discussion is about this articles merits, not others (see WP:OSE). Deunanknute (talk) 03:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC) Relisted to generate a...

(talk) has made no other edits outside this topic. Comment This is a WP:OSE argument, and again, interviews are mainly self-promotional. Charli Baltimore...

03:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Question: merged with what? And please read WP:OSE. – ukexpat (talk) 03:24, 30 June 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Category:Hospitality schools may share the same problem, but that's a WP:OSE argument that we need not concern ourselves with, here. Shawn in Montreal...

you should probably read about arguments to avoid at AfD, particularly WP:OSE. John from Idegon (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2018 (UTC) John from Idegon, I...

(Talk|Contribs) 17:43, 27 December 2010 (UTC) Keep as per Punkrocker and per WP:OSE. It's bad practice, and contrary to the encyclopedic nature of this project...

yourself and watch. LoveInDance (talk) 04:40, 27 November 2022 (UTC) WP:OSE. It is not other editors' jobs to fix poorly created articles on non-notable...

Bohemia and Moravia and its status as an emergency issue zinc coin. I know WP:OSE, but the article seems more notable than many of the WP:WikiProject Numismatics...

November 2020 (UTC) Your the one that linked to a category. Not that WP:OSE is a valid argument or that I care if you change your vote anyway. I was...

Mar4d (talk) 12:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Eh? WP:RS, for starters. WP:OSE also. - Sitush (talk) 13:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC) Keep Agreed with Mar4d...

see any good policy-based arguments on either side. There's a lot of WP:OSE and WP:ILIKEIT/WP:IDONTLIKEIT, but not much beyond that. In any case, there's...

16:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Redirect as per nom. Agree with 117Avenue per WP:OSE. She's at least as notable as all those Pokémon characters. --Whoosit (talk)...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Rediret undone per WP:OSE. No individual notability asserted. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw...

TFD then why stop there? Naleksuh (talk) 18:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC) WP:OSE. Templates actually need to be used. Some of those, which you've linked,...

structure than some of the others, but still very poorly sourced. The WP:OSE argument doesn't really hold water in these instances. An article on Mexican-Americans...

those four student articles? Mitchumch (talk) 18:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC) WP:OSE is a poor argument - and some of those victims may merit deletion as well...

impact land. ~ HikingHurricane (contribs) 20:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC) WP:OSE is not an argument for deletion or keeping. Every article needs to be independently...

clearly for either delete or redirect, with the two keep !votes being of the OSE variety. No harm in the redirect. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 21:10...

Jens24 says, these sorts of things do exist on Wikipedia. I guess maybe WP:OSE could apply on either side of the argument. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13...

about this particular group in this particular country is notable. The WP:OSE doesn't really hold water in these cases, since different countries have...

that's it - no need to move that content into another article. See also WP:OSE based on the edit summary of that diff. theinstantmatrix (talk) 03:06, 2...

but the article history and no reliable sourcing indicates WP:N. It's WP:OSE. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

but rather an observation to help frame the discussion. Responding with "OSE" even if I had advocated to keep is also a regrettably facile and dismissive...

difficult this. Denebleo 12:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC) Keep: I know there is WP:OSE, but we generally have articles down to this level for non-league seasons...

Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 05:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC) Keep and yes, I know this is OSE, but we have ICOM, AAM and this fits within there as well. We're deficient...

February 2018 (UTC) WP:OSE for a non-notable POV fork? It's a bad argument. — MapSGV (talk) 00:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC) WP:OSE is not absolutely invalid...

more notable Social Security number) - no reason not to have TPIN (save the OSE - mentioning to show we have other similar numeric id codes) - it is a valid...

Cyanotic (band). Per WP:ATD. A sole !vote for keeping seems to be verging on WP:OSE, while redirecting was suggested by multiple nominators. Further, rejecting...

coverage of the album's release about 30 years ago. In addition, per WP:OSE, "In categories of items with a finite number of entries where most are notable...

under-20 football team --Dustfreeworld (talk) 20:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC) WP:OSE on its own is not a good enough reason to keep. It would be better to prove...

unsigned comment added by Randybenn (talk • contribs) So you're arguing WP:OSE, WP:LOSE, WP:ALLORNOTHING. Nice. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat...

18 December 2013 (UTC) WP:OSE. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC) I wouldnt say OSE here. Rather its WP:OUTCOMES...

scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Redirect undone per WP:OSE. No individual notability asserted. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw...

WP:N. Famous is not the criteria for inclusion of the article. And look WP:OSE.- Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 10:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC) To, Jayanta Nath There...

(talk • contribs) While it may be an essay, you might want to look at WP:OSE. GABHello! 19:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC) Pallaviharsh Please see WP:OSE, just because one Television show has a portal, doesn't mean another show...

should be expanded, not deleted. (Sector311) 16:15 April 2008 'Comment: WP:OSE is an invalid reason to have an article. Toddst1 (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2008...

i tried to add a "Crticism" section but it was removed on the grounds of OSE that "Bush doesnt have a criticism section". Whatever that may mean, its...

(talk) 00:05, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Weak Keep. I don't want to sound like WP:OSE, but I've seen worse lists. If we merge this content, the page will become...

be deleted. --Jwslubbock (talk) 12:49, 27 March 2018 (UTC) That's just WP:OSE. Maybe they should be questioned - I think further scrutiny is needed. I...

wp:OSE: These "other stuff exists" arguments can be valid or invalid. In otherwords, judge them on whether they make sense, not on whether they are OSE arguments...

arguments as to why the articles should be deleted. You are basically using WP:OSE as your rationale, however it clearly states "simply referring them to this...

for improvement. Then it was objected to being sent to draft, using an WP:OSE argument. As per DRAFTOBJECT, was returned to mainspace, and now we are here...

take a look at those as well, but WP:OSE. SportingFlyer talk 04:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC) I'm not implying WP:OSE, I'm just asking, I can nominate them...

programs does not imply every large company's loyalty program is notable (WP:OSE), and the existence of a template does not change this. The sourcing for...

(a) and (b) you cited do not seem to fit these criteria. (c) is just WP:OSE and does not count into the argument. 舎利弗 (talk) 15:29, 6 August 2014 (UTC)...

please present them here and save the article from deletion. See also, WP:OSE. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 17:19, 14 December 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

articles cited. It is not an encyclopaedic article unto itself - per WP:OSE - as it is not inherently notable, just bits and bods put together to create...

an article on locations in the series has previously been deleted. Per WP:OSE, the fact that Fauna of A Series of Unfortunate Events exists at this time...

on Wikipedia offers no justification for more bad stuff to appear. See WP:OSE. -The Gnome (talk) 14:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC) You’ve misunderstood my...

So, no it is absolutely nowhere near enough to warrant a page. Also WP:OSE. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) The page has been updated...

included in deletion discussions? As of now, it's just being used as an WP:OSE argument. Bkissin (talk) 19:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC) Delete - "If we have...

me, Wikipedia would be making headlines in Ireland. While I know that WP:OSE is normally non-kosher reasoning here, if you delete one province's article...

per policy. Regarding the arguments made here, the "Weak keep" is an WP:OSE and thus an argument to avoid, as is one of the deletes: for "Not a notable...

I'm a layman, and -ase is the bio-chem suffix I know best, except maybe -ose. If not expanded to show how important this is in biochemistry, then maybe...

delete‎. The sole call for retention is based on WP:ITSIMPORTANT and WP:OSE. Owen× ☎ 00:35, 5 September 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles for...

and the nomination was based on alleged (but unsubstantiated) COI and WP:OSE. When pushed on the sources he claimed interviews didn't count - a claim...

as it is so clearly notable. Andrew🐉(talk) 01:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC) WP:OSE, many of those articles pages were created by the same person and are likewise...

times and lastly salted to be created by some administrator. I'm not citing OSE, but seeing the coverage of the subject, I'm inclined to believe that it...

ESD allows editors to follow one page, not multiple. Finally, we have WP:OSE considerations. – S. Rich (talk) 16:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Comment -...

So, no it is absolutely nowhere near enough to warrant a page. Also WP:OSE. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) The page has been updated...

Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:12, 29 June 2017 (UTC) Comment - in my view, it doesn't. But WP:OSE isn't a very valid argument. Onel5969 TT me 15:21, 29 June 2017 (UTC) How...

should not be removed. I believe there would also be a genuine use of the OSE WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument as DougWeller has pointed out above that a previous...

EscoLaFlare (talk) 17:04, December 27 2016 (UTC) Please take a moment to read WP:OSE, WP:FUTURE, and Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Unreleased material. Magnolia677...

deleted as well. --Shuki (talk) 05:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC) A bit like a reverse OSE? Greg Tyler (t • c) 09:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Comment what's up with a brand-new...

and sounds good, is a lousy argument. Let's use policy and precedent. WP:OSE applies here. Cities, towns, and even census-designated places have their...

free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Prod removed by IP with WP:OSE as an argument. No reliable sources given or found to establish notability...

random train station is non-notable and "run-of-the-mill", as that is a WP:OSE argument; many stations meet the GNG as they are important to the communities...

added by Egrant1102 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC) See WP:OSE -- the "what about other articles" argument is not entirely compelling in...

blog [1] does not mention OpenSolaris JeOS, only other JeOSes (which weren't even called JeOSes by their makers at the time or now.) Someone not using his...

discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC) You understand WP:OSE says your argument means Delete, right? Toddst1 (talk) 03:36, 13 March 2013...

talk page and Teahouse respectively. However, you should probably read WP:OSE. John from Idegon (talk) 21:07, 3 September 2018 (UTC) Keep – I have restored...

merging/redirection. See relevant policy at WP:ATD. Otherwise, there are WP:OSE arguments on both sides, and the purging of the nonnotable names has obviated...

8 May 2017 (UTC) Thats not a valid reason for keeping an article. See WP:OSE. Sergecross73 msg me 03:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC) The page has existed for over...

nations?--T. Anthony (talk) 18:08, 21 October 2015 (UTC) Comment - A WP:OSE argument not germane to the discussion. Feel free to research those articles...

rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC) File:Picture of Anita Ose, 2010.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Khermanis...

notability as outlined above. Randomcrunchycookie please have a look at WP:OSE for more about why referring to other sub-standard articles is not a reason...

deletion/Snow White and the Seven Clever Boys has been closed as Delete. However, WP:OSE. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 13:13, 28 December 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is...

edits should be made to this page. The result was delete‎. Disregarding OSE and socks, we're left with a clear consensus against retention. That said...

own, so it seems fair that volleyball players should be able as well." WP:OSE isn't a valid rationale, and the reasons for the original prod still remain...

for the tie he is credited with designing, which I realize may smack of WP:OSE, but not quite. If the thing he designed is notable, perhaps a case can be...

answer my question. Love of Corey (talk) 00:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC) See WP:OSE. Articles should be evaluated on their own merits. SportingFlyer T·C 23:46...

Obama judicial appointment controversies as the keep !vote is essentially OSE and this is a viable ATD. Star Mississippi 02:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)...

30 January 2026 (UTC) WP:OSE, also I'm completely okay with draftification. Vestrian24Bio 05:56, 31 January 2026 (UTC) OSE? You have about literally...

(t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC) So basically WP:OSE, right? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One...

four other "Keep per..." rationales, stated this. Other Keeps invoked WP:OSE (or even OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST) but there is generally a failure to rebut...

01:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO; Steve should prolly read WP:OSE. The fact that other similar lists exist is immaterial. Ten Pound Hammer...

extremely high page and domain authority: https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/links?site=http%3A%2F%2Fww2.frost.com%2F&filter=&source=external&target=...

November 2014 (UTC) By mentioning 'Mat Rempit', I'm not intended to invoke OSE. I can't say anything for sure, but if there are not any extra-ordinary coverage...

notability in the relation to having others write about it is. Also, see WP:OSE. I'll review those articles and nominate the ones that should be deleted...

notability, perhaps similar to René Angélil and Mutt Lange, respecting WP:OSE) divorced a notable person (fails WP:BLP1E, and having a muzzle/C&D prevents...

the last one that it was messy. It is now more easily organised. Despise OSE, see the various political leders "by tenure"/"by..." Likewise, this is chronological...

While this should not be taken as a referendum on other tennis players, OSE and if it shouldn't,AfD is available. Star Mississippi 01:23, 29 May 2024...

shoehorn it to fit WP:OSE. The rest of the sentence is where most of the context is at, please refer to it. I'm not arguing OSE, I'm arguing WP:N. Please...

anything relating to other sports being used as a parallel, that's just WP:OSE, which isn't a good argument to use in AFDs. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:15, 10...

2006, but deprodded (mostly based upon WP:OSE reasons) per discussion on its talk page. Way back in the day, OSE arguments might've have been given much...

the last editions were a significant contribution for the content, per WP:OSE I wish to give Biotechnology industry in China and Biotechnology in India...

spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Ose\fio (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block...

§§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 06:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Jclemens, please go through WP:OSE. Criticizing something in Wikipedia without a reason tends to get you nowhere...

Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 23:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC) A vague wave to WP:OSE is not helpful because, if you actually read that essay, it says that '"other...

2019 Canadian Premier League Championship is similarly unnecessary. WP:OSE. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC) I hear your point with...

the Norwegian wiki isn't enough in itself to show notability here, per WP:OSE. --Batard0 (talk) 13:16, 23 October 2012 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

on the US High School record list. And before some smarty-pants throws WP:OSE at me, I'm just trying to draw parallels, to clarify the significance of...

(and include how users may, unknowingly, already be converted under various OSes and proxying networks...) Wikipedia tools User scripts Wikipedia policy ...

Mjroots (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC) Comment. Oh come now, what about WP:OSE? Even so, at least Boeing has rolled out a 787... – ukexpat (talk) 20:26...

Designation of Origin rather than an advert. People are very averse to WP:OSE, but sometimes other stuff does exist, like Guaranteed Irish, Appellation...

Round_Table_Advertising. JMacD77 (talk) 00:48, 30 December 2019 (UTC) Please read WP:OSE and WP:COI. Jikaoli Kol (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC) Relisted to...

wonders why Morrison alone should be singled out. (No, this is not an WP:OSE argument since "identifying articles of the same nature that have been established...

more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: See WP:OSE. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Winged BladesGodric...

Smartyllama (talk) 12:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC) First you talk about WP:OSE, and then you claim that there are AfDs that have been decided on notability...

the article anymore. Your comment about Ro, Sona, etc is an example of WP:OSE; if you find those articles to be a greater priority than Angos then you...

and the prod was declined on the basis that similar articles exist. But WP:OSE usually covers this argument as baseless for keep. Phearson (talk) 12:56...

options; in particular, for backwards compatibility with older BIOSes and OSes. Worrying about these was much more common for P-ATA drives, and I don't...

celebs have been kept on similar sourcing; which, to be clear, is not an WP:OSE argument, it's a same-standards-for-all argument.) Hemantha (talk) 05:14...

significant coverage to establish his notability? With all due respect to WP:OSE, other high school players are deemed notable enough for inclusion (e.g....

- pure and simple fancruft. Both of the keep !votes above are simple WP:OSE, and should be avoided. And perhaps those other worthless lists also need...

try it ... --Ben Ben (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC) WP:LOSE and WP:OSE? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:58, 4 November 2012 (UTC)...

April 2010 (UTC) Oh, and invoking WP:OTHERCRAP is actually a no-no as is WP:OSE. It's an essay only and not policy. !! Justa Punk !! 10:12, 22 April 2010...

for privacy reasons — i.e. many other language editions (and countries and OSes and browsers) receive search traffic, but they would be represented as “other”...

campaign passing that test independent of the current crisis. This is an WP:OSE cop-out, but the #BringBackOurGirls campaign redirects to the Chibok schoolgirls...

automatically notable? — JFG talk 20:29, 30 October 2016 (UTC) That would be an WP:OSE premise, so no.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Keep...

TelCoNaSpVe :| 08:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC) Keep per WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:OSE. NOTINHERITED notes quite clearly that notability can be, and often is, "inherited"...

comment by Rhadow 02:14, 26 February 2019‎ WP:OSE? Qwirkle (talk) 02:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC) Yes, Qwirkle, OSE applies, in this case positively. The topic...

not just what they are named after. I know not to rely on WP:OCE or WP:OSE but, this I suggest is far more interesting than lists of asteroids and lists...

alternative.Lucky Strike (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2020 (UTC) The old WP:OSE argument. I am fully aware that other such articles exist, but as I stated...

PaleAqua (talk) 02:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Not to make this a case of WP:OSE, but what makes this different from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RinkWorks...

probably makes this car notable. That, in a sense, is the "good" side of WP:OSE. Protonk (talk) 00:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

this is unreferenced promotional material, and has raised the cliché WP:OSE argument. Recreation challenged on 18 Jan. but editor had failed to provide...

doubt that he/she has any intentions to merge something. In addition, WP:OSE is not a justification for such pages. The draft has previously been moved...

not bother anyone. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2025 (UTC) WP:OSE, but I might agree to delete that one as well. Andre🚐 04:40, 29 December...

December 2023 (UTC) Delete as per the nom. The only keep vote is just WP:OSE, and doesn't actually demonstrate that this article passes WP:GNG. Joseph2302...

also result in delete in my opinion. Just like Amirul Syafik and Takaki Ose, third time's a charm? GauchoDude (talk) 17:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC) Speedy...

software repository, such list can be created for all Linux distros and BSD OSes. Editor-1 (talk) 14:04, 10 August 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

per nom and other delete !voters. Users arguing to keep are making an WP:OSE argument. SK2242 (talk) 00:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Comment - how is this...

keeping this article simply because a similar article exist is good example WP:OSE Dman727 (talk) 01:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC) Keep - I am willing to acquiesce...

one of 24 barangays to have a page. Per (an admittedly microcosm of) WP:OSE, none of these pages meet notability standards unless there's something of...

damage to Wall Street, gaining WP:SIGCOV along the way. Not to incite WP:OSE, but as cofounder of his firm5, even if you ignored his many other significant...

shouldn't—see WP:OTHERSTUFF. Mz7 (talk) 04:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC) Delete - WP:OSE isn't a valid rationale for keeping a bad article. Mz7 and the nom give the...

below.) Elijahandskip (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC) Wikilink: WP:OSE. Sarrail (talk) 13:50, 21 November 2022 (UTC) That’s it! Thank you Sarrail...

of temples in Bhubaneswar. —МандичкаYO 😜 10:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC) WP:OSE. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC) Yeah, as...

argument. Edgeweyes (talk) 14:57, 17 May 2019 (UTC) WP:OSE I would be happy to nominate any of the 70 articles about other non-notable...

of notability either. But that's a problem for a different AFD. (See WP:OSE). WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC) Delete, I can find no...

for die-hard fans rather than something people might find - see also wp:OSE Neonchameleon (talk) 23:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

America1000 10:33, 7 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - Nom's assessment is spot on. WP:OSE isn't a valid argument in this case, and there is simply not enough in-depth...

rationale on the article's talk page which amounts to nothing more than an WP:OSE argument. Article was declined at AfC, then was simply moved to mainspace...

some unrealiable sources and dead links. The basketball article is an WP:OSE argument. Leviv ich 17:51, 13 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

added by Swamilive (talk • contribs) 22:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC) See WP:OSE. Then see WP:NOTE, and WP:RS. You may wish to read WP:AFD as well. Regards...

(UTC) @Marvellous Spider-Man: WP:OSE is not a valid argument. -- AlexTW 17:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC) I am fully aware of WP:OSE, be neutral and use same policy...

I understand that one thing is not necessarily notable just because WP:OSE, but this is not substantially different from the other articles about Canadian...

for the general problem with lists such as these, well—notwithstanding WP:OSE—we'd probably have to do something about List of Chinese restaurants as well...

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes. Contributor copyright investigation This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns...

occasionally source code. Southen (talk) 03:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC) See WP:OSE; you can't use the existence of other articles to justify it (arguably Comparison...

pinned, Facebook Ellen Swepson Jackson tweeted, pinned Elvira Dyangani Ose Ida Gray - tweeted, pinned, Facebook Life on Mars Michel Martin - upgrade...

them, this one can be kept.TH1980 (talk) 03:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC) See WP:OSE.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 03:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC) Also see Category:Reactions...

other local politicians exist" is not relevant. Given WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:OSE guidelines. Subject's are notable on their own merits. Not by association...

Completely WP:OR. WP:OSE is not an valid reason to keep. Accessibility issues are huge here.   // Timothy :: talk  15:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC) OSE may not be a...

information is not normally found on Wikipedia, but I don't want to make a WP:OSE argument. Also want to note the one person on the list with an article passed...

(talk) 22:48, 24 August 2018 (UTC) Keep Despite the WP:INHERITED- and WP:OSE-type arguments made by some of the "snow(ball) keep" !votes above (the claim...

works the other way around. Specifications for hardware are released, and OSes are written to interface with the hardware according to those specifications...

the relevance of the band. AJunior0923 (talk) 18:24, 25 May 2022 (UTC) WP:OSE is not a valid argument and you've failed to provide a single source that...

and there're no articles about them" is meaningless and the opposite of WP:OSE ("The nature of Wikipedia means that you cannot make a convincing argument...

led by an Arabic speaker. --Habst (talk) 12:17, 30 September 2025 (UTC) WP:OSE. Your AFD stats also leave quite a bit to be desired (and your strategy of...

2008 (UTC) Anyone not already familiar with it might do well to read WP:OSE Andy Dingley (talk) 21:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC) Delete Whilst I applaud the...

ILoveSport2006 (talk) 11:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Delete way WP:TOOSOON. WP:OSE isn't a reason to keep this, it's a reason to get rid of most of the other...

carry very little weight compared with established editors. See also WP:OSE. Ty 07:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Louis St. Lewis (edit | talk | history |...

surprising. Peridon (talk) 12:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC) Dons nerd hat WP:OSE and WP:OTHERSTUFF Catfish Jim & the soapdish 13:55, 23 November 2010 (UTC)...

Missvain (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Comment @Billy Hathorn: WP:OSE and WP:CRYSTAL. The subject may be notable, but we should not care whether...

Pathfinder (with its use of the Dacia Duster platform) and while it's an WP:OSE cop-out, we do have a history of creating separate articles for vehicles...

articles, and all are as just poorly sourced as this one. I know that WP:OSE is usually not an argument, regarding Deletion discussions, it says "In general...

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST seems to apply here. –Ammarpad (talk) 15:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC) OSE is not policy. L3X1 (distænt write) 20:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC) Keep, the...

from independent reliable sources to show that it passes WP:GNG. The WP:OSE argument in this case is quite weak. Onel5969 TT me 19:50, 21 March 2017...

and took a photo is NOT sufficient to pass GEOLAND4. That's a worthless WP:OSE. There is a small number of users who have mass-produced articles on places...

Delete per nom; notability has not been demonstrated + COI may be an issue (OSE) Eagleash (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC) Delete lacking notability...

identify the celebrity appearances and is thus viable. Btw, I know that WP:OSE is not really a valid point but I think List of guest stars on The Simpsons...

(talk) 05:40, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Adamstraw99, see WP:CRYSTAL and WP:OSE.Best, ∯WBGconverse 08:33, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...

has an article, but that doesn't justify this article's existence (see WP:OSE). Would like to get community input this time. I amsajin keeps trying to...

Come on, you are smarter than that to make such a baseless remark. Your WP:OSE arguments are unconvincing but I expected someone would try to invoke them...

(UTC) IDONTLIKEIT is as "widely cited" as OSE and is not a CIVIL violation. Even so, my statement was "OSE is an essay and not a policy, and as valid...

on whether this particular article meets the notability standards (see WP:OSE for more on that). clpo13(talk) 17:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC) For arguing that...

allowing for negative opinions while removing positive opinions adheres with WP:OSE. To add, I have removed the excess quotes, which does not constitute WP:QUOTEFARM...

coverage, but might also be justified for AFD. This isnt to be construed as an OSE argument, just speculating on the standard to use here, as Speaker elections...

2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:MUSIC, not enough sources foun. Also, 600block, WP:OSE. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One...

also do not always agree. In actual uses we see "OS's", "OS'es", "OSs" and "OSes". I think all are fine.  --Lambiam 18:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC) Probably not the...

coaches) should have articles. The status of other such coaches falls under WP:OSE. The only question here is whether Whitt has received significant coverage...

other fan films require deletion also, but that's not relevant here, see WP:OSE Vanamonde (Talk) 02:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC) What is the further procedure...

and here. Finally, the nominator's comparison to Sterling Heights is WP:OSE and inapposite; unlike Lowell, Sterling Heights is barely even a real city;...

events. Listmeister (talk) 15:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC) (P.S. I know about WP:OSE, I refer you to Nutshell Bullet Point Two: "When used properly, a logical...

for example, appearing nowhere on the internet other than in this article. OSE claims do not address these concerns. Mine is a firm "delete" recommendation...

Koncorde (talk) 16:46, 17 March 2019 (UTC) Keep on (I don't believe it) WP:OSE grounds: we do tend to keep these sort of articles on the flipside, and this...

less important--Melitikus (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Remember, WP:OSE is not a valid reason to keep a page. Each page must be considered on its...

discuss the bibliography. Rjensen (talk) Comment I don't want to make an WP:OSE argument since Wikipedia does host a number of bibliographies like Pershing...

page that exists. That is by sports, this is by month. I dont want to use OSE, but for context its akin to the various different organisation of list of...

The fact that there are articles about other non-notable episodes is an WP:OSE argument. Which in this case, in my opinion, isn't valid. I came across this...

four other "Keep per..." rationales, stated this. Other Keeps invoked WP:OSE (or even OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST) but there is generally a failure to rebut...

keep stuff like this and there is massive precedent for doing so (so no, WP:OSE doesn't apply here, before you try teaching me to suck eggs). No, we probably...

WP:NONDEFINING with no function other than to act as a catch-all for obscure WP:OSE. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:35, 19 April 2016 (UTC) Delete grouping fictional...

Ronin (talk) 03:23, 17 March 2018 (UTC) Comment I don't want to make a WP:OSE argument here, but I'm curious as to why this fails WP:N when other similar...

Marvellous Spider-Man 17:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC) I am aware of the argument WP:OSE, still I want to mention that there are many crap articles created, which...

June 2010 (UTC) Your argument mainly appears to be WP:ITSNOTABLE and WP:OSE. Can you find reliable sources which discuss this position specifically,...

discussions". —David Eppstein (talk) 01:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC) WP:WAX /WP:OSE is also one of the least productive arguments for deletion. A more useful...

title. The above two articles were wrong, and have been fixed. Also, WP:OSE is no excuse for wrongness.  Done Union is a disambig page. Either link to...

other local politicians exist" is not relevant. Given WP:OTHERSTUFF and WP:OSE guidelines. Subject's are notable on their own merits. Not by association...

running on top of other OSes, they had ventured into hardware, failed, and returned to selling a toolkit running on top of other OSes. Although OPENSTEP had...

coverage. Arguing that the article should be kept based on participation, on WP:OSE or on WP:SOURCESEXIST is not persuasive, since those arguments are not supported...

Thanks, ✗plicit 10:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC) Comment - I'm sorry, but WP:OSE, WP:ILIKEIT, and WP:USEFUL are not policy based arguments. I am not saying...

Edward (Talk | Contribs) 12:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC) That's the ultimate OSE to say that because other more famous people have subarticles (which are...

based on the existence of an article on another language Wikipedia, per WP:OSE and WP:ININ. For one, the English Wikipedia has much higher standards for...

Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC) Not to encourage more WP:OSE, but no one is ever "automatically notable", as they must meet criteria for...

not a reason for deletion (nominator, please familiarize yourself with WP:OSE before submitting further nominations!). Dotson has significant coverage...

additional references. Baseballtom, regarding the criteria, please see WP:OSE and WP:N. As for getting hold of an 'old' issue of Vanity Fair, my suggestion...

are commonly accepted on Wikipedia, and while that argument violates WP:OSE, the article is also now well-sourced, and all other teams in the conference...

when this AfD is closed. GUtt01 (talk) 11:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC) WP:OSE - The British programme has other issues that don't affect this AfD. --AussieLegend...

nothing. AusLondonder (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC) Auslondonder, see WP:OSE. - Sitush (talk) 08:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC) Delete As discussed here, this is...

in the same category?Ottawahitech (talk) 01:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC) WP:OSE applies. Some of those, like Fleecefield Primary School, look like they wouldn't...

Bearian (talk) 18:27, 10 March 2021 (UTC) I dunno but that seems like an OSE type argument for keeping but we could also redirect to The Institute. CUPIDICAE💕...

small dinghies here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC) WP:OSE. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:55, 2 October 2012 (UTC)...

definition -- the term used on Wikipedia is 'preliminary event' -- same thing. WP:OSE is not a valid way to establish notability. If winning established notability...

of articles "on far less notable players" is not a reason to keep. See WP:OSE. For this to be kept, we need to see examples of WP:SIGCOV discussing Gibson...

States with facial hair existing doesn't justify this existing (i.e. WP:OSE is not a good argument). But, the three (and, I see another one is running...

reliable, published, third party sources. Re: prod removal/talk, see also wp:OSE - notable, sourced guest info can go into the show's article. -- Jeandré...

merged into the league team. As far as "why A not B?", see WP:WAX and WP:OSE. Otherwise, it seems it would fall under WP:CLUB, which says it must meet...

2015 (UTC) I've drawn an analogy to test the premise of this very MfD. WP:OSE, which you've probably never read, has the following to say: "When used correctly...

suggestion or Delete. The actual interwoven history of the various *nix OSes is interesting, but minor individual entries are not. SkArcher 06:51, 29...

pertaining to tennis. Adamtt9 (talk) 14:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC) Keep - the WP:OSE arguments aside, it is/was (notability is not temporary) a tournament on...

is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. That's a WP:OSE argument and not related to this deletion discussion. Richard3120 (talk)...

searching on the web. Abbasulu (talk) 11:25, 25 January 2023 (UTC) This is an WP:OSE argument. The fact that other articles exist with poorer sourcing is not...

Vidya Shankar Aiyar.Soham321 (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC) Please read WP:OSE. - Sitush (talk) 08:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC) Delete and salt. Clearly promotional...

an argument from the viewpoint of WP:OSE, but I think the Presidents article is a valid one, and to quote from OSE: "In consideration of precedent and...

or has been nominated for one several times". I'm not intended to use WP:OSE as an argument here, but we do consider, WP:ANYBIO as a criteria of inclusion...

WP:SOFTWARE, article gives no hint of why. Software is still available for modern OSes, so things aren't quite as obvious as you'd think from the article. Still...

out. Aneirinn (talk) 20:47, 7 July 2025 (UTC) Comment Dont take this as an OSE, but given this, should we delete 2031, 2030, etc as well? And where do we...

discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:23, 23 October 2018 (UTC) Keep not to WP:OSE, but we have these lists for every other country, and those lists aren't...

is problematic and may have notability problems too, but please read WP:OSE. Just because another article (inappropriately) exists doesn't mean this...

deleted on the above rules. Will re-enter with adequate details, Respecting WP:OSE - ...Captain......Tälk tö me... 18:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Delete GNG not...

searches show coverage of the initial release by sources like AllMusic. As WP:OSE declare, "In categories of items with a finite number of entries where most...

above make a lot of sense. StAnselm (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC) WP:OSE isn't a valid argument. Leaving that aside, I don't understand your problem...

(UTC) Comment, the notability of the conference isn't relevant here, per WP:OSE. What the lesser-know entrants may do in the future is also irrelevant, per...

Pudgethefish (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC) What you have mentioned is WP:OSE. By looking at this article on its own merit it doesn't meet the required...

responses. First, on Mr. Miller - that's not an argument for inclusion, see WP:OSE for an explanation (note that isn't policy, it's unofficial, but it's still...

argument that "other, similar stuff already exists in Wikipedia" is, per WP:OSE, not a valid one. -The Gnome (talk) 11:04, 24 May 2019 (UTC) The above discussion...

article certainly meets GNG. The nominator's objections seem to amount to WP:OSE--but if we have 50 gin distilleries in London that have this level of independent...

progressively increases the number of "hard-coded" programs bundled with its OSes. Probably most users find nLite when searching the Internet for a way to...

long lists exist on Wikipedia, that doesn't mean this one should, per WP:OSE. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:38, 28 June 2022 (UTC) Keep How is this original research...

niche product, but it meets WP:GNG so there's not need to delete. See WP:OSE for a refutation of your argument. However, if you would like to nominate...

articles like New York Red Bulls II and FC Barcelona B exist (note: not an WP:OSE argument) I want to make sure the information here is correct before it's...

not grounds for inclusion of others. You may wish to read WP:AADD and WP:OSE. Bongomatic 16:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

point to other poorly-sourced articles about albums but acknowledge the WP:OSE weakness of that argument. The Redirect argument is strong per the general...

(talk) 07:58, 20 October 2025 (UTC) I think this is a narrow case where OSE is valid. If there are lists of city flags for every other continent, its...

13th. Did you not see that message? Regarding the other article, per WP:OSE the fact that there are other bad articles isn't an excuse to allow other...

List of supercentenarians by continent where her name is present. I know WP:OSE, but I want to point to Elizabeth Bolden and say there might be a bit of...

used to add references.TheLongTone (talk) 22:31, 29 April 2012 (UTC) WP:OSE. If you have references, expand the article and add them, or list them to...

WP:CFORK. The keep votes to date are a mixture of asserted notability and WP:OSE and should not be considered in closing the discussion. BrigadierG (talk)...

November 2025 (UTC) What does this list do which a category doesn't? Also, WP:OSE. Let'srun (talk) 20:27, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Lists and categories serve...

somewhat odd-seeming lists as a section in a broader article. However per WP:OSE we must consider each case on its own merits. My suspicion is that Janitor...

remove the warning. --Kasper2006 (talk) 15:36, 18 September 2012 (UTC) See WP:OSE. It's true that the words "national" and "symbol" are often used figuratively...

the others, but he is using subjective standards of significance and an "OSE" argument. Incidentally, why is there a WikiProject tag on the article-page...

Ditto the policies pointed to by User: sgeureka. Keep arguments are WP:OSE-based. Nothing in this article is encyclopedic. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 17:19, 6...

And to say that other NYC politicians may have articles is merely the WP:OSE argument. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:10, 20 April 2021 (UTC) WP:NPOL doesn't...

August 2015 (UTC) Comment - Hi Daniel Karmy - That's an argument based on WP:OSE (other stuff exists), and that criteria alone doesn't merit keeping an article...

be deleted. --Muzammil (talk) 16:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC) Please read WP:OSE. Saying that a certain other article exists is not a reason to keep or delete...

is an EP, it makes sense to keep the article under the guidelines of WP:OSE, "In categories of items with a finite number of entries where most are notable...

2008 (UTC) Keep. What about MikeOS, Visopsys and the rest of other 'hobby' OSes out there? Anyway, Wikipedia sux, if the first thing I get on my Talk Page...

subjects' importance. If anything, Cappy made more of an impact. Note that WP:OSE states that "these comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be...

understand the opening argument, given Saturday Night Live hosts. I know, wp:OSE, but using the lack of something as an argument falls flat when the something...

creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. Please be aware of WP:OSE. Especially considering the examples of "precedent" you list have a rough...

lineup, this is expected to grow in the near future. I'm not supporting WP:OSE, but we have an existing FL—List of bowlers who have taken over 300 wickets...

(talk) 14:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC) Comment Yes, it is circular. This is not an OSE argument but see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salem Monthly for a similar...

with a WP article. Attempt to redirect was contested by creator with WP:OSE, so I’m going here. ミラP 00:06, 18 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

the amount of mentions in lists that I personally would prefer to exist. OSE is not policy. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC) The above...

--DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC) Keep per WP:OSE. It's bad practice, and contrary to the encyclopedic nature of this project...

Piotrus| reply here 11:26, 19 February 2020 (UTC) Keep. As the often-cited WP:OSE points out, "In categories of items with a finite number of entries where...

than that in Croydon). Ehrenkater (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2024 (UTC) WP:OSE. If you find other non-notable articles, please nominate them for deletion...

this needs to be done, we should merge all of the above templates. Also, WP:OSE isn't applicable here because the circumstances differ for articles vs templates...

about this pilot, was tagged for notability, which was removed with an WP:OSE argument. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 11:51, 23 December 2022 (UTC) Note:...

means), the operatic cycles of Wagner and Stockhausen, etc. And, while WP:OSE does not help things, List of longest novels may provide some ideas on how...

are the only ones to vote "Keep". The SPA's defense is a disingenuous WP:OSE suggesting that there are no notable sources on JArchitect (there are). There...

sources. Author also appears to be non-notable. Prod contested using an WP:OSE rational relating to Star Trek and Buffy episodes. Farix (Talk) 05:07, 19...

22:40, 15 September 2006 (UTC) Undelete they have an IDE which other WebOSes don't have. Greenminz 15:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Comment The above undelete...

still notable.  Adam Mugliston  talk  21:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC) Comment. WP:OSE is not a valid argument for AfD. Beagel (talk) 14:18, 26 March 2013 (UTC)...

2018 (UTC) Ocasio-Cortez easily passes WP:GNG on her own, please avoid WP:OSE arguments. SportingFlyer talk 06:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

quality over quantity. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 14:06, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Check out WP:OSE. benzband (talk) 14:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC) Keep and expand with sources already...

images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Another contested redirect, using an WP:OSE argument - zero independent sources, fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 09:36,...

September 2020 (UTC) Weak keep I'm tempted to vote delete and not fall to the WP:OSE fallacy, but we do have an entire category here at Category:American police...

projects and don't know if they are as dubious as they sound, but per WP:OSE they are not relevant here. Johnuniq (talk) 03:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)...

organisations" that don't meet NORG they should be nominated for deletion too; see WP:OSE. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 23:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Keep Well-known...

--Worthawholebean TalkContribs 19:52, 3 December 2005 (UTC) Delete; unreleased OSes are generally non-notable unless they're being developed by a major company...

Oversight Policy, which makes it invisible to everyone but stewards, local OSes (if an account exist on their project), and certain number of WMF staffers...

hereby dismiss both claims. BasFey (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2016 (UTC) WP:OSE? Just because other articles exists does not mean they should or they could...

Coolabahapple (talk) 07:51, 26 September 2017 (UTC) Keep. While the WP:OSE arguments are weak, the nominator and other delete !voter overlook that notability...

North America1000 02:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC) Keep Some promising sources. WP:OSE isn't really an argument, but all the players except one who play for the...

–Totie (talk) 23:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC) Support, for both templates. For OSes as a whole, those templates are convenient - especially if you have both...

whether or not a level and type of article should be on Wikipedia." — WP:OSE. ... discospinster talk 12:33, 26 April 2013 (UTC) Keep - The Guardian ran...

nomination!--Mishae (talk) 04:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC) Please review WP:OSE. Just because other articles have a problem does not mean this article satisfies...

GNG, I'm intrigued to hear such a seasoned editor make such an obviously OSE argument.... Guliolopez (talk) 12:55, 15 October 2020 (UTC) For some type...

December 2011 (UTC) Merge as per above suggestions. Keep !votes boil down to WP:OSE and WP:ILIKEIT arguments. No independent coverage of the character. But +10...

single that charted better but doesn't have its own article is a complete WP:OSE failure. Sergecross73 msg me 22:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Note that this...

that would put him on par with Hans Reiser or Linus Torvalds (yes I know WP:OSE is a bad justification, but it's useful to compare similar articles). Hasteur...

30 January 2026 (UTC) WP:OSE, also I'm completely okay with draftification. Vestrian24Bio 05:56, 31 January 2026 (UTC) OSE? You have about literally...

reliable sources. Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC) Delete - WP:OSE is not a valid argument in this instance. And the lament "and the new editor...

Umair mosque massacre#Aftermath, lacks continued coverage. Regarding the WP:OSE argument above, the 2004 ambush led to a lawsuit in 2005, so it is more notable...

with other OSes, also giving a brief overview of each's design: here's the section on MVS (the core of z/OS and earlier IBM mainframe OSes). --47.157...

(talk) 11:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC) Also at risk of a bad analogy à la WP:OSE - Compare and contrast the "encyclopedic usefullness" of List of pornography...

unless it's survived a deletion discussion of sorts, it's just an invalid WP:OSE argument too. Sergecross73 msg me 23:30, 14 May 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...

version of iOS. That said currently the only navigation we have for Apple II OSes is via Template:Apple Inc. operating systems (which covers too large a topic...

the 2010 show Apno Ke Liye Geeta Ka Dharmayudh met with negative reviews. OSE! And show meeting negative reviews doesn't say anything about the acting...

minor league players. The article in its current form is being used as a WP:OSE rationale by WP:PAID editors in Draftspace. Bkissin (talk) 17:55, 19 June...

WP:ANYBIO. 20-30 awards a year? Borderline at best, regardless of the WP:OSE arguments. Without that, clearly not notable. Onel5969 TT me 03:35, 31 May...

nomination if the consensus is relatively clear. The ultimate response to WP:OSE is to nominate the other stuff too. BrigadierG (talk) 08:45, 23 August 2022...

decide they're not worth keeping. This isn't your garden-variety case of OSE; this is systemic. What I am saying is this needs is a RfC in the list article...

peer-reviewed journal, was not cited, and no evidence of the use of the OSE by anyone other than the author. See also article's talk page. Alexei Kopylov...

Husskeyy (talk) 16:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC) Please be mindful of WP:OSE @Husskeyy but if you believe they don't meet notability, you're welcome to...

demonstrating a pass of WP:LISTN. Andrew🐉(talk) 01:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC) WP:OSE is not a valid argument. That book is a ANNOTATED selection of books on a...

historically significant car. Sesamehoneytart 00:45, 31 July 2026 (UTC) I hate to OSE it, but this is very similar to the theaters and theater companies in Category:Theatre...

reference, and thus the article on The Dark Knight did not. While not a strict OSE reasoning, the overarching concept remains, that of precedent and consistency...

discussion, you'd see that WP:OSE is seldom a persuasive argument. John from Idegon (talk) 00:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC) That said, WP:OSE may be valid in this case...

Japanese food supply ship Nozaki Japanese icebreaker Ōdomari Japanese oiler Ōse Japanese patrol boat No.105 Japanese patrol boat No.109 Japanese seaplane...

misread it, but can you help me understand (other than with reference to WP:OSE) how each of Ireland's 61,000 townlands automatically meet NGEO? (Townlands...

Barkeep49 (talk) 06:59, 8 June 2019 (UTC) Yeah, but we are going into WP:OSE here. It works for that article as there is Rocky the Flying Squirrel, and...

not discussing other articles - which also would lead down the path to WP:OSE. We are discussing this article and you would need to address why you feel...

or a two-letter country code displayed in your status bar somewhere. Most OSes with changing layouts will not omit a status indicator of this type, all...

from this discussion. --Mrmatiko (talk) 15:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC) See WP:OSE Phearson (talk) 16:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

is to a non-existent blog page. If WP is the source then WP:NOTSOURCE. WP:OSE is not an valid reason to keep.   // Timothy :: talk  15:36, 5 August 2020...

WP:Promo and lacks GNG-passing sources. This is not the case for your WP:OSE links. Reywas92Talk 19:23, 15 March 2025 (UTC) There are solid GNG-passing...

penalties (missed or saved). Hyperion82 (talk) 02:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC) WP:OSE. Also, would support deleting own goals one, probably red card one too. Penalty...

are equal, why shouldn't be OSes equal? Why would you delete DexOS and not Windows? DexOS is one of the few independent OSes that are not related at all...

coffman (talk) 04:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC) Comment At the risk of applying WP:OSE, the subject looks noteworthy enough based on the content in Category:Online...

the wall of text that Epeefleche has put above is relying on a lot of WP:OSE, some incredibly small-scale sources and/or sources of dubious reliability...

16:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC) Delete - coverage is simply routine. And WP:OSE isn't a valid rationale. We should probably take a look at those other articles...

That's not a comment on this particular article, nor an invocation of WP:OSE, just an observation. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 05:08, 25 June 2008 (UTC)...

articles, but discuss each article up for deletion on its own merits. See WP:OSE Silverfish (talk) 23:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC) weak keep I've added some more...

would we need a list of every captain ever at one competition? Also, WP:OSE applies to this rationale. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC) How...

whatsoever to this page. WaltonOne 15:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC) Well, even OSE recognizes that it's not quite so applicable when the "OS" in question has...

notability, nothing happened other than the shops opening. The rest is simply WP:OSE. AlbinoFerret 18:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC) Yes, it really is notability....

software and the way the current list deals with two different separate OSes (Mac OS X and Mac OS) with major architectural differences that prevent the...

violates WP:SYNTH. Of course, that other pages like it might exist (WP:OSE) is not sufficient reason to keep it. I would be fine with this as a true...

Andrew? --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC) Indeed, as WP:OSE states "these comparisons are important as the encyclopedia should be consistent...

is by no means the only one with its own Wikipedia entry, either. See WP:OSE. Deadbeef 22:10, 17 November 2014 (UTC) This page should be called "Capital...

"thousands of similar systems" as JulesH claims; could anyone name thousands of OSes that also have over 10,000 downloads? ThanksForLettingAllUsernamesBeTaken...

the league played in the 1929–30 National Challenge Cup. At the risk of WP:OSE every other team that every played in the league, even those that didn't...

Question - and I'm already familiar with 'villages are inherently notable', 'OSE' and its variants and precedent, so this is separate from that. Even with...

local general aviation crash of a Piper which barely scrapes by WP:GNG. WP:OSE. SportingFlyer T·C 18:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC) See also [3], which is from...

articles that are as bad as, if not worse than, this one. Yes, this kinda OSE-ey, but it would look really silly if all the entries on the linked list...

discussion 24 Jun 2022 – Template:TrainOSE stations TfDed by Frietjes was closed; discussion 24 Jun 2022 – Template:TrainOSE lines TfDed by Frietjes was closed;...

Wikipedia as an encyclopedic resource. As I pointed out in the previous AFD, WP:OSE declares that "that "In categories of items with a finite number of entries...

Hour-Detroit has a picture - no text at all. Need I go on? And please read WP:OSE. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:28, 4 May 2013 (UTC) RHaworthThe entire...

good reason. But at the moment, one hasn't been presented, other than WP:OSE. The club hasn't played in the national cup. I am not sure publishing from...

even in the tournament - as opposed to the entire tournament. (Note that WP:OSE goes both ways - while the existence of articles for other conferences' tournaments...

regional differences alone. Iljhgtn (talk) 02:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC) see WP:OSE an argument to avoid in AfD. Vestrian24Bio 15:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC) That...

GiantSnowman 18:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC) Delete fails WP:GNG. Just because WP:OSE for similarly minor leagues elsewhere on Wiki, that doesn't justify the existence...

first one, but I would like to remind past and future participants that WP:OSE and WP:ITSA are essays, as the Slick mentions.L3X1 (distænt write) 01:14...

06:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC) Strong Keep - Precedent has been set per WP:OSE and many other discussions; High Schools have an inherant notability. Granted...

exist. If an article for the Seals family is not in order, why (besides WP:OSE) do articles for the Krupp and Bach families exist? --Jax 0677 (talk) 04:28...

in Category:Browser engine comparisons. (Yes, I'm blatantly invoking WP:OSE here, because this is ridiculous.) This page should be renamed to drop the...

part of my !vote. I was just citing a precedence, in accordance with WP:OSE which says that "arguments ... that other articles have been put forward...

Comment: I'm torn. I understand the reason for deletion, on the other hand (OSE notwithstanding), we do have List of science fiction television programs...

discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Please be mindful of WP:OSE when sharing an opinion Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks...

the "essay" comment is baseless misdirection.  The post continues with WP:OSE hyperbole that policy based treatment under ATD of mayors is the equivalent...

Carpenter is the appropriate result. Both of the above comments are simple WP:OSE, which are extremely weak in this case. I understand why it's at AfD, as...

give the Gamergate talk page 500/30 protection was due to precedent, and WP:OSE did not apply. The point I am making is that previous AE requests with patently...

WP:NOTINHERIT. power~enwiki (π, ν) 07:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC) Comment (OSE, but...) - In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third child of the Duke and...

seemed to mostly revolve around claims that all schools are notable and WP:OSE. As it currently stands, the article only cites two primary sources and is...

would've, then I cannot see any way of keeping this because despite the WP:OSE type of !vote for keeping this given above. You would think WP:NEXIST would...

par with the list I linked, or should that be AFD'd as well? I know that OSE, but if this AFD'd article had the quality and worksmanship as the example...

02:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC) Delete - Unnecessary and uncivil redirect for WP:OSE. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC) Keep and fix history. There...

notability. There is however, a clear precedent (not to be confused with WP:OSE and WP:OCE) demonstrated by 100s (or 1,000s) of AfDs for redirecting non...

culture, but where I live (US, Midwest) we pronounce it with a hard O, By-ose (ose as in toes). A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 15:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC) I live...

articles should be done at WT:NFC or WP:VPP. Moreover, trying to argue WP:OSE is not always a good argument to try and make with non-free content because...

| contribs) 09:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC) That would be a fallacy per WP:OSE. The undeletion you cite is about a composite image and it was undeleted...

appropriate for a company at this kind of stage in its lifecycle. I know WP:OSE is not a criteria, but closest rival HelloFresh seem sufficient to have an...

"Organismos Sidirodromon Ellados (O.S.E.)" infobox of this article. First, the information is on the OSE webpage http://www.ose.gr/ecportal.asp?id=656&nt=18&lang=2...

re-examine the global question". Also, the following is stated under WP:OSE - "When applied to creation of articles, this concept must demonstrate that...

entirely WP:OSE. Not valid, try agian. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:00, 30 October 2011 (UTC) Everything up until the OSE argument is...

will be considering nominating them for merging with WP:CRIC too. As per WP:OSE, the existence of these other WikiProjects is not a reason to keep this one...

comment here per WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 Speedy Keep. Not a valid nomination (WP:OSE) - certainly there are non-notable shootings (in Chicago and in the West...

AfD an article about a fellow podcaster, Mur Lafferty after there was some OSE discussion about why these other podcasters have articles. Valfontis (talk)...

WP:N. Warrush they are on youtube also...http://youtube.com/watch?v=geIsWq5xOSE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.135.38.14 (talk • contribs) Delete...

and of local interest but haven't been up for deletion, it's a WP:WAX/WP:OSE argument I know but this probably is more notable even within a list with...

should exist because these others do; that would be in improper use of WP:OSE. What I am saying is that, as examples of Wikipedia's less-than-easily-referenced...

YouTube be exempt from having a notable YouTuber list? That would be an WP:OSE argument. wumbolo ^^^ 12:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC) Keep, obviously. Easily...

something like Milton Keynes Dons F.C. league record by opponent. And I know WP:OSE is a weak argument, but I am unclear as to where the line is drawn. Is it...

Aussie Aussie Aussie, Oi Oi Oi? WWGB (talk) 03:45, 18 May 2009 (UTC) WP:OSE? Please base your rationale off of this article and not other random repeated...

even though it isn't a valid argument, but gives a comparison (see also WP:OSE). However, ultimately the COG page needs to pass WP:N. If there aren't verifiable...

own, or A2Command has been covered by a reliable source. Oh, and as for WP:OSE, I've nominated ADTPro. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhtooefr (talk...

recent World Cup competitions as reasons NOT to have this article, but WP:OSE cannot be a valid argument (something I myself was recently reminded of in...

Deleting this would be WP:BIAS. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC) WP:OSE, also the issue is whether a WP:SPLIT is needed for a separate article on...

WP:TRAINWRECK. So nominating some separately like this is perfectly sensible, and WP:OSE isn't a valid keep reason. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC) Comment...

consultants. --MahmoudHashemi (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Addressing the OSE arguement, if I throw "Jeff Bezanson" julia into gNews, I get quite a few...

topic. Blocked sock 86.** IP (talk) 14:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC) Please see WP:OSE for why comparison to other articles isn't generally a strong argument. More...

coverage of not-individually-notable fictional elements and WP:WAX or WP:OSE are not designed to prohibit appropriately cleaning up multiple similar articles...

Sometimes bad articles slip under the radar. I'd focus less on these WP:OSE type observations, and more on this particular articles notability. Sergecross73...

of some other similar page is not a valid reason to keep this, as per WP:OSE. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:28, 14 June 2022 (UTC) Delete - no demonstration of...

players who were in the same situation. I imagine I'll get an accusation of WP:OSE, but it appears a valid precedent to me.Doctorhawkes (talk) 11:49, 10 November...

14 October 2019 (UTC) Delete - While ErieSwiftByrd makes a cogent if WP:OSE point, I would contest that Petersen's position in Maricopa County is not...

orthagonally (orthogonally) orthgonal (orthogonal) orthogonaly (orthogonally) OSes (OSs [plural]) otehr (other) othere (other) otheres (others) ottaman (Ottoman)...

they were running. It seems to be a big deal (at least in terms of linux OSes) and notable for that reason. I'd be wary of adding any more tracks by this...

--LaserLegs (talk) 21:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC) @LaserLegs: Please read WP:OSE. wumbolo ^^^ 21:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC) Comment - I've no idea why the article...

is notable. 106.66.180.36 (talk) 09:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC) Please see WP:OSE--DBigXrayᗙ 07:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC) Delete Too soon for a political party...

a potential U.S. bid. That being said I'm actually sympathetic to the WP:OSE argument being made above - there's a bit more coverage of the Men's 2034...

Nightfury 10:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC) Comment while being mindful of WP:OSE, I note that there are similarly-titled pages for preceding years - although...

on Wikipedia). Nor does its usage in other Wikipedias or articles, see WP:OSE. What does make a source reliable is if they have a proper fact-checking...

Double standards? Irrevocabile tempus (talk) 06:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC) WP:OSE. Firestar464 (talk) 09:37, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Firestar464 is constantly removing...

does not make it notable. Please see WP:CORP (and WP:OWN). In addition, WP:OSE is not usually a good strategy for XfD discussions. If this company is actually...

Agnieszka653 (talk) 02:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC) That argument is just WP:OSE. You must prove independent notability of the subject. Wikipedia is not "a...

Vacation). BD2412 T 18:25, 7 January 2023 (UTC) Now we are straying into WP:OSE. Your first example has a section about "Background and recording", and has...

did I screw up now?) 18:34, 12 October 2011 (UTC) Yes. One article is WP:OSE. The infamous past serious discussion about the need for a whole Pokemon...

can use more cleanup, that is not a reason to oppose a merger. Nor does WP:OSE give a valid reason to keep an article on a subject that should not have...

be different. This is not WP:OSE, they all fall in the category sports. The example about Star Trek episode lists in WP:OSE seems to me to follow the same...

not a good enough reason to keep this a year before the event, as per WP:OSE. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC) Draftify. We have a policy...

more so, as the inclusion of this entry. len (talk) 7 March 2015 (UTC) WP:OSE. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Keep: "Appearing" to be...

the article. --Human3015 knock knock • 02:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC) Read WP:OSE and WP:CCC. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:44, 21 July 2015 (UTC) Delete...

---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC) Reply - WP:OSE. Unlike the other articles, this page is well sourced. Metal All Stars, Go...

dimensions. 217.136.119.143 (talk) 20:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC) Again, WP:OSE. Those islands have significant coverage dedicated to them, this one doesn't...

November 2017 (UTC) delete per Axisixa, all consumer desktop and mobile OSes include Korean support and have done for a decade or so. Anyone still on...

also owned by them. Kyuukurochan (talk) 03:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC) WP:OSE @ Ohayocon. It might be posted by a newspaper, but it very much looks like...

deleted as a reason for deletion of an article is like an obverse of the WP:OSE argument. AugusteBlanqui (talk) 11:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC) Indeed it is...