Search Results: Wikipedia:PLOTSOURCE
- From a shortcut: This is a redirect from a shortcut in any namespace to a page in any namespace.
- Shortcuts are wikilinked on community pages, talk pages, and edit summaries, but not in mainspace articles.
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction
Selasa, 2026-05-19 08:29:57neutral point of view. Shortcuts WP:PLOTREFWP:PLOTREF MOS:PLOTSOURCEMOS:PLOTSOURCE The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not need...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sleepy Hollow (film)/1
Selasa, 2019-04-30 15:52:15section of a work of fiction usually does not require citation, per MOS:PLOTSOURCE: the film itself is assumed to be the source. I personally try to provide...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/SLAPP Suits/archive2
Minggu, 2022-01-02 13:47:1706:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC) You're welcome. I'm a big believer in WP:PLOTSOURCE, having just promoted a book FA with a lengthy "unsourced" plot section...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas/Improvement drive
Minggu, 2023-09-17 21:47:51uncited real-world statements (plot does not need inline citations per MOS:PLOTSOURCE) Ensuring all articles meet notability standards. If they do not, discuss...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Source your plot summaries
Sabtu, 2025-04-12 18:35:46are not required to use secondary sources for plot summaries per MOS:PLOTSOURCE; the reasoning goes that it is generally assumed that the work itself...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sweeps 2023
Rabu, 2026-05-06 23:16:09as paragraphs in plot sections that do not require references (see MOS:PLOTSOURCE) and paragraphs that are artificially split into two parts because they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underground (comics)
Selasa, 2025-12-09 16:31:10which is verifiable. Name drop and redirect, no need for a source per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zak Ramsey
Jumat, 2025-12-19 11:48:25at the improving the Hollyoaks characters. Also, per WP:SOAPS and MOS:PLOTSOURCE, storylines sections don't need to be sourced. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Sweeps 2025
Selasa, 2026-05-12 22:29:34as paragraphs in plot sections that do not require references (see MOS:PLOTSOURCE) and paragraphs that are artificially split into two parts because they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Homer Loves Flanders/1
Senin, 2026-04-13 04:10:09have a feeling it is because readers believe that it is similar to WP:PLOTSOURCE as hence does not need a source, although that is not the case. DaniloDaysOfOurLives...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in Wii Music
Selasa, 2025-12-09 11:38:58lack of sourcing in the list article, I think the same rational as MOS:PLOTSOURCE can be used for verifiability (in that the game itself verifies the content)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Philosophy of Freedom
Kamis, 2025-12-18 01:57:56explanation: While a certain amount of MOS:PLOTSOURCE WP:OR is allowed, this article is nothing else than MOS:PLOTSOURCE WP:OR. After 17 years, this article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah (The Walking Dead)
Senin, 2025-12-22 06:55:41episode reviews cited substantially treat the Leah character. Per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, a plot synopsis does not need to be sourced with in-line citations, as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Masters of Doom/archive1
Sabtu, 2025-06-07 09:40:1910:35, 29 May 2025 (UTC) I would echo Guerillero above, and note that MOS:PLOTSOURCE (which allows for the plot summaries of fictional books to be uncited...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-05-29/Essay
Sabtu, 2024-01-06 09:57:52solution: sourced plot summaries. While editors are encouraged by MOS:PLOTSOURCE to rely on secondary sources, the guideline does not require that they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Ellis
Senin, 2025-12-22 05:29:10but unlikely. Indagate (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Comment Per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. the plot/storyline sections do not need to be sourced, and it isn't uncommon...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/Death's Game/archive1
Jumat, 2024-07-05 03:56:02note; to my understanding synopses do not need to be sourced per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 20:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC) There are still some grammar...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article review/Poppy Meadow/archive1
Minggu, 2024-10-27 07:16:02(UTC) Just a note - per the storylines guidelines at WP:SOAPS and per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, the storyline sections do not need sourcing, as watching the show acts...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Galaxy Railways characters
Minggu, 2025-12-14 03:56:03perfectly valid. Dream Focus 10:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Keep As per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, it is acceptable to have no sourcing as it is assumed the work itself...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Content that could reasonably be challenged
Rabu, 2025-04-09 07:00:36{{citation needed}} templates are routinely removed from plot summaries per WP:PLOTSOURCE, even though the content in question would technically now qualify as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Hard Luck/archive1
Kamis, 2019-06-06 05:20:12in sources so coming from the book itself: that can be fine, per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. A GA reviewer might argue with it. A DYK reviewer would likely insist...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cradle of Erotica
Senin, 2025-12-15 02:52:20WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT -- Ficaia (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC) @Ficaia However, MOS:PLOTSOURCE is about works of fiction, which afaict this is not. WP:PRIMARY#5 may...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 327
Sabtu, 2021-02-27 05:12:00suggest we soften the "summarizes" somewhat, something like "though a MOS:PLOTSOURCE approach can work well regarding some scriptural stories." Gråbergs Gråa...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Stranger Things episodes/archive1
Sabtu, 2025-03-22 07:25:39WP:NOTBROKEN and the series synopsis doesn't need a citation per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. The definition of "several" is more than two but not many, which seems...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/October 2019
Senin, 2019-10-28 07:26:43might be fine if this were an article on a fictional TV series (per MOS:PLOTSOURCE), but, since we're dicussing living people here, it might be best to err...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Voices of Morebath/archive1
Selasa, 2025-12-09 06:06:23technically breaks WP:PLOTSOURCE, in that it gives a synopsis of a non-fiction book without actually including citations -- in theory, PLOTSOURCE applies only...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiang Li (2nd nomination)
Senin, 2025-12-22 06:15:32other media sections solely rely on using the comics and the film as WP:PLOTSOURCE. This leaves only the Publication history section, but the majority of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article review/Pokémon Channel/archive1
Minggu, 2024-11-17 07:15:29but since the material would be fine even without citations per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, I'm not sure there's really an FAC criteria issue (although I'm not averse...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Line of Duty episodes/archive1
Selasa, 2024-08-06 07:26:14I believe that this would semi-fall under the same guidelines as MOS:PLOTSOURCE (in that the information is sourced to the work itself). I can probably...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2024 July 10
Minggu, 2024-07-14 07:27:202024 (UTC) @CRplayz7: I'm not going to evaluate the articles but MOS:PLOTSOURCE says: "The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Story of Saiunkoku characters
Selasa, 2025-12-16 07:41:21WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Comment Per WP:PLOTSOURCE no sources are required for plot and character summaries because it is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Torchwood episodes/archive1
Kamis, 2025-01-23 07:26:48@OlifanofmrTennant: Done on everything except the plot summaries. MOS:PLOTSOURCE says "The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1109
Selasa, 2022-12-27 14:59:14not debatable in my book: Everyone aspires for their own version of MOS:PLOTSOURCE ;-)—Bagumba (talk) 17:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Indeed, lol :-) That's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 10
Minggu, 2022-03-27 03:14:25possible; neiher has an inline citation, but that's not required: MOS:PLOTSOURCE. Creepers series is a stub, but the Brain Suckers mentioned there is the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2020 July 31
Selasa, 2020-08-04 07:37:44written down anywhere? Herostratus (talk) 08:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC) MOS:PLOTSOURCE. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:46, 31 July 2020 (UTC) Ohhh OK thanks. Herostratus...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Celebrity Big Brother (American TV series) episodes/archive1
Kamis, 2020-01-16 08:02:13might be fine if this were an article on a fictional TV series (per MOS:PLOTSOURCE), but, since we're dicussing living people here, it might be best to err...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 361
Jumat, 2025-11-21 01:46:51something like the plot of a show then, that's completely fine per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. You would get more helpful responses, if you could specify the context...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 169
Senin, 2022-07-04 23:03:49of plot summaries is considered to be the fictional work itself (MOS:PLOTSOURCE). To my mind, character descriptions fall under this convention. By all...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1172
Sabtu, 2023-01-07 14:07:56specific rules about places where adding a reference is not required (MOS:PLOTSOURCE, for instance). The overriding policy is "no original research". Medical...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 187
Selasa, 2022-03-22 10:28:338.77 (talk) 18:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC) This aspect (applies to MOS:PLOTSOURCE as well) was a challenge we encountered at the universal editnotice discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 185
Rabu, 2026-03-25 22:41:09BLPs/challenged material, and there are arguably exceptions like MOS:PLOTSOURCE and WP:BLUESKY) but still pretty directly communicates what we want newcomers...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1050
Rabu, 2023-03-22 03:51:04(talk) 09:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC) Hello Mistipolis! Yes there is, MOS:PLOTSOURCE. It goes for tv-series, films, novels etc. Basically you are meant to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/Your Lie in April/archive1
Jumat, 2021-10-22 06:55:12regarding that line about the light novel, I would say it falls under MOS:PLOTSOURCE since its just a summary and not referring to any specific lines. Link20XX...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1171
Minggu, 2023-06-04 14:53:16(talk) 07:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC) @Ps103ankit In general, no, see WP:PLOTSOURCE. But in the case you mention, you probably should, since you didn't see...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1136
Rabu, 2024-03-06 00:19:08(talk) 17:13, 26 December 2021 (UTC) @Mike Marchmont, Hello! Per MOS:PLOTSOURCE it's fine to write a plot without inline citations, however they are sometimes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/SLAPP Suits/archive1
Minggu, 2022-01-23 19:05:27with a heavy heart that I cut the kidney stone story—i'd have to rely on PLOTSOURCE to get that in there Can't access this source. "An enthusiastic litigator...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1128
Jumat, 2024-10-04 07:34:45Generally, it's fine if you don't have a citation for the plot (as MOS:PLOTSOURCE describes). —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 04:50, 22 October 2021 (UTC) Hello...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1158
Minggu, 2022-09-11 21:50:52relevant to a specific article, use Template:Cite AV media. See also MOS:PLOTSOURCE. To create your WP:USERPAGE, click the redlinked "MikiBishop" in your...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 July 15
Jumat, 2021-07-23 13:20:34perfectly valid. Dream Focus 10:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Keep As per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, it is acceptable to have no sourcing as it is assumed the work itself...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1155
Senin, 2022-08-08 21:53:3310 June 2022 (UTC) @Pizzarush: Welcome to the Teahouse. Per Wikipedia:PLOTSOURCE, plot sections do not need to be sourced with in-line citations, as it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 14
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:06:19which is verifiable. Name drop and redirect, no need for a source per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 04:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1132
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:54:26actually a section in the manual of style that talks about this: MOS:PLOTSOURCE. Basically the books themselves are considered primary sources and don't...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 17
Sabtu, 2022-07-30 01:34:41WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 00:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC) Comment Per WP:PLOTSOURCE no sources are required for plot and character summaries because it is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:07:13lack of sourcing in the list article, I think the same rational as MOS:PLOTSOURCE can be used for verifiability (in that the game itself verifies the content)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Cunningham
Jumat, 2025-12-19 03:54:24Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC) Per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, plots and storyline sections do not need to be sourced. We can help source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/Lucky Day (Doctor Who)/archive1
Minggu, 2025-11-30 23:09:40the same way that the episode itself sources the plot (WP:PLOTCITE / WP:PLOTSOURCE). These people are definitely credited in the episode. As for not mentioning...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1140
Selasa, 2026-04-14 06:25:3719:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC) @Ficaia Yup, that is generally fine, see MOS:PLOTSOURCE. Like with everything else around here, sometimes discussion is needed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Orpheus in the Underworld/archive1
Kamis, 2019-06-06 07:06:46Tim riley talk 19:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC) @Tim riley: Laying out @MOS:PLOTSOURCE, the plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not need...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 28
Senin, 2022-02-07 05:37:39WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT -- Ficaia (talk) 19:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC) @Ficaia However, MOS:PLOTSOURCE is about works of fiction, which afaict this is not. WP:PRIMARY#5 may...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1923 season 2/archive1
Minggu, 2026-05-17 06:05:33They should therefore be covered by the same concept as WP:CITEPLOT/WP:PLOTSOURCE I believe, in that the work itself serves as a primary source. Would it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Adaptations of Manon Lescaut/archive1
Kamis, 2025-11-27 06:25:38seems excessive. Removed. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC) MOS:PLOTSOURCE is a little ambiguous on whether the plot information in the lead needs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered/archive1
Selasa, 2021-06-01 19:02:28April 2021 (UTC) It looks to me like the relevant guideline here is MOS:PLOTSOURCE, which says that plot citations are nice but not necessary. If secondary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/May 2021
Senin, 2021-05-31 20:37:38April 2021 (UTC) It looks to me like the relevant guideline here is MOS:PLOTSOURCE, which says that plot citations are nice but not necessary. If secondary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 322
Sabtu, 2025-09-27 22:33:30opposed to citing Bible books to describe its own storylines, per WP:PLOTSOURCE) is that it passes off what the Bible says as being equally relevant as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 791
Selasa, 2022-05-17 10:57:43something uncontroversial. In fact, you don't even need to cite it. See MOS:PLOTSOURCE. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC) My question...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/Archive 90
Senin, 2023-03-13 11:38:45works. While a certain amount of MOS:PLOTSOURCE WP:OR is allowed, this article is nothing else than MOS:PLOTSOURCE WP:OR. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:14, 14 February...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 64
Kamis, 2020-06-18 07:29:57section of a work of fiction usually does not require citation, per MOS:PLOTSOURCE: the film itself is assumed to be the source. I personally try to provide...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1122
Selasa, 2023-04-11 23:30:06(and possibly a bit WP:PROMO). 2. Tricky. We have something called MOS:PLOTSOURCE, which doesn't really apply since that's about fiction. Secondary sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/June 2019
Minggu, 2019-06-30 20:03:25Tim riley talk 19:11, 15 May 2019 (UTC) @Tim riley: Laying out @MOS:PLOTSOURCE, the plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not need...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/December 2022
Minggu, 2026-02-08 19:01:30(UTC) It's the policy against the manual of style, I suppose; see MOS:PLOTSOURCE. ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC) In such circumstances...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 402
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:11:47on this? By comparison: For non-fiction there is a clear guideline, WP:PLOTSOURCE, which states: "The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 September 27
Jumat, 2023-10-06 07:34:29at the improving the Hollyoaks characters. Also, per WP:SOAPS and MOS:PLOTSOURCE, storylines sections don't need to be sourced. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive371
Jumat, 2025-10-31 07:16:56Launchballer, was under the impression that reality shows fall under WP:PLOTSOURCE. Which is correct? Do plot summaries for reality TV shows require in-line...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 47
Kamis, 2024-10-17 21:08:51secondary sources. For fiction texts, there is a clear guideline, WP:PLOTSOURCE, that clarifies the acceptability of this custom. It seems as if there...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2022
Selasa, 2022-02-01 04:38:15with a heavy heart that I cut the kidney stone story—i'd have to rely on PLOTSOURCE to get that in there Can't access this source. "An enthusiastic litigator...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 44
Jumat, 2024-10-18 01:15:02straightforward application of the "plot summary" guidance (in particular: MOS:PLOTSOURCE), and the WP:PRIMARY policy (in particular, "A primary source may be used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/October 2024
Sabtu, 2024-10-26 21:20:46(UTC) Just a note - per the storylines guidelines at WP:SOAPS and per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, the storyline sections do not need sourcing, as watching the show acts...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 178
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 08:33:01February 2023 (UTC) This happens due to a bad rule that we have, called WP:PLOTSOURCE: The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not need...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Archived nominations/June 2025
Selasa, 2025-07-01 03:51:1610:35, 29 May 2025 (UTC) I would echo Guerillero above, and note that MOS:PLOTSOURCE (which allows for the plot summaries of fictional books to be uncited...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article review/archive/November 2024
Minggu, 2024-12-01 01:39:36but since the material would be fine even without citations per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, I'm not sure there's really an FAC criteria issue (although I'm not averse...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/December 2025
Rabu, 2025-12-31 22:57:02technically breaks WP:PLOTSOURCE, in that it gives a synopsis of a non-fiction book without actually including citations -- in theory, PLOTSOURCE applies only...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/November 2025
Kamis, 2025-11-27 06:26:08seems excessive. Removed. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC) MOS:PLOTSOURCE is a little ambiguous on whether the plot information in the lead needs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1225
Kamis, 2024-11-21 22:04:36something like List_of_Two_and_a_Half_Men_characters#Jake_Harper, MOS:PLOTSOURCE can be argued to apply. You can also make a cite like Gråbergs Gråa Sång...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 94
Jumat, 2026-05-01 22:08:43have a feeling it is because readers believe that it is similar to WP:PLOTSOURCE as hence does not need a source, although that is not the case. DaniloDaysOfOurLives...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 479
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 15:05:30whether unsourced summaries of scriptural texts should be allowed under MOS:PLOTSOURCE. Something here could be as simple as the "copy homework" meme. Changing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 4
Minggu, 2024-05-12 16:37:17but unlikely. Indagate (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC) Comment Per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. the plot/storyline sections do not need to be sourced, and it isn't uncommon...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 March 23
Minggu, 2023-04-02 17:45:24explanation: While a certain amount of MOS:PLOTSOURCE WP:OR is allowed, this article is nothing else than MOS:PLOTSOURCE WP:OR. After 17 years, this article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 50
Minggu, 2024-04-14 00:17:39(talk) 22:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC) This is an inevitable result of MOS:PLOTSOURCE and WP:PLOTCITE, which I feel badly need revisiting, since they unacceptably...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Database reports/Long pages/MOS
Minggu, 2026-05-24 17:01:18SPELLNUM 180 DAB1 180 DABONE 180 DABORDER 180 DATE TIES 180 DERRY 180 PLOTSOURCE 180 NUMERAL 180 SENIOR 180 EXPLAINSYMBOLS 180 JRSR 180 SWT 180 JR 180...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 8
Selasa, 2024-04-16 21:44:15episode reviews cited substantially treat the Leah character. Per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, a plot synopsis does not need to be sourced with in-line citations, as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/March 2025
Senin, 2025-03-31 19:26:11WP:NOTBROKEN and the series synopsis doesn't need a citation per MOS:PLOTSOURCE. The definition of "several" is more than two but not many, which seems...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 October 11
Jumat, 2023-10-20 14:15:52Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC) Per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, plots and storyline sections do not need to be sourced. We can help source...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 16
Senin, 2024-07-29 04:31:27other media sections solely rely on using the comics and the film as WP:PLOTSOURCE. This leaves only the Publication history section, but the majority of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1216
Rabu, 2024-02-28 16:44:44mentioning, then, yes, it can be its own source, along the lines of WP:PLOTSOURCE. ColinFine (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2024 (UTC) Hi there. I updated my...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 210
Senin, 2026-05-11 19:34:46as anyone with access to the media can verify it themselves (à la MOS:PLOTSOURCE). That said, I wouldn't oppose making {{Cite AV media notes}} (or w/e...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 195
Kamis, 2025-11-13 05:57:10primary source. This is addressed at MOS:FILMPLOT, WP:PLOTCITE, and MOS:PLOTSOURCE. InfiniteNexus (talk) 20:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC) That. Gråbergs Gråa...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1179
Selasa, 2023-02-28 15:57:19the gameplay description of a video game falls under the guidance of WP:PLOTSOURCE, as it is analogous to the plot summary of a book; in that case "The plot...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1190
Jumat, 2024-01-19 23:43:20doesn't make them entirely useless. 3:Yep, no WP:COPYPASTE, and see MOS:PLOTSOURCE. If you actually have sources for the plot, there's nothing wrong with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archive 75
Senin, 2025-12-15 20:34:02edits 20:57, 22 November 2025 (UTC) @Vastmajority20025 Have you seen MOS:PLOTSOURCE? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC) Thank you @Gråbergs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1192
Selasa, 2023-07-04 13:17:40(talk) 14:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC) That is entirely normal, @1TWO3Writer. WP:PLOTSOURCE has the relevant guidance. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 14:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1214
Jumat, 2024-02-09 01:45:03StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 20:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC) StreetcarEnjoyer per WP:PLOTSOURCE plot itself doesn't have to be cited, and that presumably extends to descriptions...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/August 2024
Sabtu, 2024-08-31 07:26:36I believe that this would semi-fall under the same guidelines as MOS:PLOTSOURCE (in that the information is sourced to the work itself). I can probably...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1185
Kamis, 2023-04-20 17:47:53Wikipedia policy. Maurice Magnus (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC) WP:PLOTSOURCE says The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1224
Selasa, 2024-06-25 10:29:26verify the accuracy of the plot summary by viewing the work. See MOS:PLOTSOURCE – while quotations from the original work or secondary sources are helpful...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/January 2025
Sabtu, 2025-02-01 07:26:52@OlifanofmrTennant: Done on everything except the plot summaries. MOS:PLOTSOURCE says "The plot summary for a work, on a page about that work, does not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1145
Senin, 2026-02-16 01:54:08basis in policy, plot sections of articles do not require sources per WP:PLOTSOURCE. Incorrectly reverting edits is really harmful to the project - it upsets...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1198
Sabtu, 2025-10-11 20:09:25is pronounced? TurboSuperA+[talk] 03:50, 18 August 2025 (UTC) See WP:PLOTSOURCE and WP:PLOTCITE. But the TL;dr for plot summaries is that the movie or...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1124
Senin, 2024-05-20 17:16:27WP:CITE the Bible only for fairly uncontroversial stuff, such as MOS:PLOTSOURCE. If fail to see the difference between anti-Jewish and antisemitic, and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/May 2026
Minggu, 2026-05-31 18:26:13They should therefore be covered by the same concept as WP:CITEPLOT/WP:PLOTSOURCE I believe, in that the work itself serves as a primary source. Would it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/One giant table
Selasa, 2025-10-21 09:24:40whether unsourced summaries of scriptural texts should be allowed under MOS:PLOTSOURCE. — Republic TV (Republic World) WP:REPUBLICTVWP:REPUBLICTV 📌 2021 1...
Click to read more »