ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

information about what the proposal was and why it failed. Shortcut WP:PPOVWP:PPOV This section covers deletion arguments based on personal biases rather than...

Honestly, this doesn't even pass the WP:TITLE test. WP:COMMONSENSE (and WP:PPOV) applied, it's tautological. I've yet to see 'communism' and 'right wing'...

there, does not make sense. Besides, making a 'Personal point of view' WP:PPOV basis or reason for deletion is clearly in violation of Wikipedia policy...

means knock yourselves out. EEng (talk) 03:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC) See WP:PPOV. Esquivalience t 12:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC) Weak keep - the Daily Mail is...

Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan and Deobandi Group. A clear and obvious case of WP:PPOV where he has been pushing his Personal Point Of View and showing intolerance...

@JavaFilter Policy based discussions are welcome, but please refrain from WP:PPOV like WP:IDONTLIKEIT kind of commentary in the AFDs. Thanks! BhikhariInformer...

certainly looks well sourced, and your reasoning seems to fall under WP:PPOV. Praemonitus (talk) 16:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC) Comment . looks well sourced...

through diligent WP:BEFORE and application of policy and guideline... not WP:PPOV. Cheers. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC) @MichaelQSchmidt:...

navigation tool either. @Smallchief: you may wish to compare their comments to WP:PPOV. Fenix down (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Not being a wiki wonk, I don't...

you say it isn't happening doesn't mean it isn't happening. See also WP:PPOV 206.41.25.114 (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC) Keep per "nom" you say...

all of this in would probably overbalance the article and be a failure of nPPOV, so I think its best just to keep a summary there, and have this separately...

Alaexis¿question? 08:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Your rationale seems like WP:PPOV to me, as the author of the article reached out to you earlier through the...

254.73.92 (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC) Anything to add that isn't WP:PPOV? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC) Redirect...

there is the potential for more. Most of the delete votes seem to be WP:PPOV WP:WHOCARES. --Richiepip (talk) 23:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Keep: The House...

neither discloses his address nor details of his family members. So the WP:PPOV !votes should be judged accordingly. - NitinMlk (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2020...

(UTC) Not really, I don't see that...isn't a proper response either. WP:PPOV Muneebll (talk) 13:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC) @Saqib: are you suggesting that...

believe WP:IAR applies. JRPG (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC) @JRPG: See WP:PPOV. Even if the site is useful, it still needs to meet our notability guidelines...

"just like" are not standards used on Wikipedia and are simply Wikipedia:PPOV. More participation? Good thing, no? More keep !votes is irrelevant; (is...

October 2021 (UTC) @Ajax.amsterdam.fan: Please read WP:AGF, WP:EG, and WP:PPOV. Thank you. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Do not Delete...

be met, as outlined in WP:LISTCRITERIA. Your argument sounds more like WP:PPOV or WP:PLEASEDONT. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 01:21, 20 April 2023...

Macedonia_(ancient_kingdom) that aimed to change its stable version and push PPOV. Luxure also assisted Taivo on his argument in the talk page. Stevepeterson...

reintroduce it into the main article space. Shortcut WP:AADP#PPOVWP:AADP#PPOV Include Makes article look good – Vanity Fair (talk), 01:01, 1 January 2001...

to advise GNG, and make an effort to not rely on arguments listed in WP:PPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B k (talk • contribs) 18:56, 13 August...

whatever: disregard any votes that may fail WP:ATAIDD, especially the WP:PPOV ones. ミラP 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Comment: Can people who want to keep...

and clearly identifies the people involved. So it is not a matter of WP:PPOV. What other users think or say is irrelevant. They might be affected by a...

covered topic can be presented per policy and guideline, not deleted per a WP:PPOV. Schmidt, Michael Q. 10:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Every newspaper you mentioned:...

she will abuse it. Any way, all of my points were valid: He was using his PPOV to determine what should and shouldn't be on the page, he did not give a...

2019 (UTC) "Critical Race Theory has absolutely no place in this article. PPOV is not appropriate." 16:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC) "As per previous editor:...

and posting what I already posted on his talk page. Also, he's using his PPOV to revert what he feels is not relevant. I would like the assistance of an...

to have 'impressions of reading Havakook's book'. I can see no reason but PPOV. In short, every 'human-rights' NGO is RS while those who support settler...

contribs) 11:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC) FWIW, this is an invalid vote per WP:PPOV. Prove he is a legend. Reality check - he's not. Addicted4517 (talk) 05:20...

has deleted the quote three times in 13 hours, claiming "PPOV"[61], "PPOV" [62] and then "PPOV, WP:PRIMARY" [63]. The figure of 25 fliers is supported...

@MarcelB612: to answer your question, the rule would be WP:NOTFORUM (and WP:PPOV and WP:POLEMIC). Your edit was completely inappropriate. EvergreenFir (talk)...

to have 'impressions of reading Havakook's book'. I can see no reason but PPOV. Repeating violations of WP:CIVIL (WP:CPUSH) Is there a good way to give...

removals were based on somehow being just instead of just being uninformed WP:PPOV. So, when are you going to stop scraping the bottom of the barrel in your...

canvas for this article. He wants the thing dead because it contradicts his PPOV that people with more education than him might believe in Creation. If he...

WP:DISRUPTION. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC) Your use of PPOV in this case is apparently ironic, and your essay spam is noted, but it's...

an abusive proxy address, has edited the INC article by adding obvious PPOV statements about INC members, as well as other edits similar to recent sockpuppet...

show clear notability and this nomination seems to be a clear case ofWP:PPOV and WP:IDL . Kpgjhpjm 04:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Keep in the more extreme...

nonsense responses which do not fool anyone and are not driven by policy but by PPOV. Settleman (talk) 18:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 2) Again, the worst offenders...

repetative vandalism to the same articles where anon editors were pushing PPOV edits or attempting to delete factual info they did not aggree with. Richard...

WP:DISRUPTION. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC) Your use of PPOV in this case is apparently ironic, and your essay spam is noted, but it's...

neither discloses his address nor details of his family members. So the WP:PPOV !votes should be judged accordingly. - NitinMlk (talk) 15:45, 28 June 2020...

means knock yourselves out. EEng (talk) 03:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC) See WP:PPOV. Esquivalience t 12:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC) Weak keep - the Daily Mail is...

argued on the basis that the best way -- and the only way compatible with nPPOV-- to show the absurdity and evil of the other side , is to let its proponents...

all of this in would probably overbalance the article and be a failure of nPPOV, so I think its best just to keep a summary there, and have this separately...

contribs) 11:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC) FWIW, this is an invalid vote per WP:PPOV. Prove he is a legend. Reality check - he's not. Addicted4517 (talk) 05:20...

believe WP:IAR applies. JRPG (talk) 16:18, 7 April 2015 (UTC) @JRPG: See WP:PPOV. Even if the site is useful, it still needs to meet our notability guidelines...

(UTC) Yes, naughty naughty, Matthew. First, you ave no right to impose your PPOV in that manner, and second, the default in cases of dispute is to exclude...

there is the potential for more. Most of the delete votes seem to be WP:PPOV WP:WHOCARES. --Richiepip (talk) 23:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Keep: The House...

to advise GNG, and make an effort to not rely on arguments listed in WP:PPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B k (talk • contribs) 18:56, 13 August...

through diligent WP:BEFORE and application of policy and guideline... not WP:PPOV. Cheers. Schmidt, Michael Q. 20:37, 15 September 2014 (UTC) @MichaelQSchmidt:...

third attempt to delete this article topic, and while WP:JNN, WP:BELONG, WP:PPOV, are not valid deletion rationales, after some WP:BEFORE, I did minor work...

Jamaat-e-Islami Pakistan and Deobandi Group. A clear and obvious case of WP:PPOV where he has been pushing his Personal Point Of View and showing intolerance...

certainly looks well sourced, and your reasoning seems to fall under WP:PPOV. Praemonitus (talk) 16:17, 22 April 2015 (UTC) Comment . looks well sourced...

254.73.92 (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2022 (UTC) Anything to add that isn't WP:PPOV? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC) Redirect...

"just like" are not standards used on Wikipedia and are simply Wikipedia:PPOV. More participation? Good thing, no? More keep !votes is irrelevant; (is...

navigation tool either. @Smallchief: you may wish to compare their comments to WP:PPOV. Fenix down (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC) Not being a wiki wonk, I don't...

covered topic can be presented per policy and guideline, not deleted per a WP:PPOV. Schmidt, Michael Q. 10:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Every newspaper you mentioned:...

Honestly, this doesn't even pass the WP:TITLE test. WP:COMMONSENSE (and WP:PPOV) applied, it's tautological. I've yet to see 'communism' and 'right wing'...

there, does not make sense. Besides, making a 'Personal point of view' WP:PPOV basis or reason for deletion is clearly in violation of Wikipedia policy...

you say it isn't happening doesn't mean it isn't happening. See also WP:PPOV 206.41.25.114 (talk) 16:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC) Keep per "nom" you say...

third attempt to delete this article topic, and while WP:JNN, WP:BELONG, WP:PPOV, are not valid deletion rationales, after some WP:BEFORE, I did minor work...

October 2021 (UTC) @Ajax.amsterdam.fan: Please read WP:AGF, WP:EG, and WP:PPOV. Thank you. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC) Do not Delete...

and clearly identifies the people involved. So it is not a matter of WP:PPOV. What other users think or say is irrelevant. They might be affected by a...

whatever: disregard any votes that may fail WP:ATAIDD, especially the WP:PPOV ones. ミラP 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Comment: Can people who want to keep...

As for disregarding non-policy-based views, that is standard practice. WP:PPOV outlines why personal points of view are not valid arguments in deletion...

As for disregarding non-policy-based views, that is standard practice. WP:PPOV outlines why personal points of view are not valid arguments in deletion...

cannot possibly be achieved because said sources are non-existent) and WP:PPOV (it's clear that those users don't like me, and they use it as a reason to...

creating this type of wiki-drama. If BLP is this strong, then we have a PPOV policy for living people, period. SchmuckyTheCat 16:25, 25 February 2007...

enough for these pages. Editors may like her politics or hate them, but such PPOV notwithstanding, we have coverage enough for inclusion herein. Issues with...

claimed..." (WP:CLAIM) not in the references cited that come across as heavy PPOV. There's a further three paragraphs of retorts to H&H from SES in the "Comments...

repetative vandalism to the same articles where anon editors were pushing PPOV edits or attempting to delete factual info they did not aggree with. Richard...

opinion: firstly, in the light of that many Wikipedia abbrevations, I have the PPOV that LOL-ing should be allowed under all circumstances, ROFL-ing might be...

cannot possibly be achieved because said sources are non-existent) and WP:PPOV (it's clear that those users don't like me, and they use it as a reason to...

enough for these pages. Editors may like her politics or hate them, but such PPOV notwithstanding, we have coverage enough for inclusion herein. Issues with...

editors has opened a discussion on the BLPN here, which is attracting new PPOV edit warring. Thanks! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 05:25, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Fully...

different, because it is Nazi-POV we are dealing with here? Did I say "your Nazi-PPOV"? I don't know Zara1709 at all, nor do I know anything about his personal...

was clearly notable but for a different topic and was getting an unfair WP:PPOV from politician/area editors; so sought to improve the article instead. On...

Therefore, there are no more reasons to keep the article deleted, other then PPOV pushing of some/one administrator(s). So, I am forced to ask those administrators...

consensus and seem to be simply a collection of arguments to avoid. see: WP:PPOV or other such arguments. "already in the article" WP:DONTNEEDIMAGE "not a...

Therefore, there are no more reasons to keep the article deleted, other then PPOV pushing of some/one administrator(s). So, I am forced to ask those administrators...

be met, as outlined in WP:LISTCRITERIA. Your argument sounds more like WP:PPOV or WP:PLEASEDONT. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 01:21, 20 April 2023...

Alaexis¿question? 08:00, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Your rationale seems like WP:PPOV to me, as the author of the article reached out to you earlier through the...

@JavaFilter Policy based discussions are welcome, but please refrain from WP:PPOV like WP:IDONTLIKEIT kind of commentary in the AFDs. Thanks! BhikhariInformer...

was clearly notable but for a different topic and was getting an unfair WP:PPOV from politician/area editors; so sought to improve the article instead. On...

(UTC) Not really, I don't see that...isn't a proper response either. WP:PPOV Muneebll (talk) 13:26, 16 August 2024 (UTC) @Saqib: are you suggesting that...

show clear notability and this nomination seems to be a clear case ofWP:PPOV and WP:IDL . Kpgjhpjm 04:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC) Keep in the more extreme...