ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

be discussed on the article Talk page. Shortcut WP:PRIMARYNOTBADWP:PRIMARYNOTBAD "Primary" is not, and should not be, a bit of jargon used by Wikipedians...

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Neighbours 30th Anniversary/1 and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Additionally, several of the primary sources are then backed up by...

| ctrb) 18:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Keep per WP:PRIMARY not bad (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC) See WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. If a topic is the subject of dozens of publications since the 1970s...

Sirfurboy🏄 is putting undue emphasis on the primary news issue, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Its written about (and notable) because it's a large, long-standing...

has some potential for elucidating on the specific use cases where WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD applies, but it is, as has been said by Mdewman6, clearly incomplete...

many of the other novels and publications that discuss Glittergold, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. AugusteBlanqui (talk) 15:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC) Delete - The non-primary...

asminternational.org/2020-fellows is sufficient to show the fellowship (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD), but agree would need secondary sourcing for the latter part of your...

please tell me where all to remove it? I thought it was an example of WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC) @Aoba47: No not...

long as they are used with caution in a non-promotional way per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Bratjoggs (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

case-by-case basis for the best possible source for that information, see WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD or WP:PRIMARYCARE, which provides examples of primary sources being...

is the organisation that awarded the medal this is an example of WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD) and edited a journal, which counts towards criteria 8. Her notable...

Primary sources can be used, they just can't prove notability, see WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Jonpatterns (talk) 11:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC) Maybe I'm misunderstanding...

Comment While the Centro source is primary, it is not invalid per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Centro are (or at the time were) the overseeing government body. Est8286...

the primary sources are comic book pages is absolutely no problem. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD Regardless, the Marvel official handbook counts as a secondary source...

stating basic facts rather than being promotional, so fine to use per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Toviemaix (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2021 (UTC) You could have 50 sources...

like me to understand historians). News sources can be primary/good WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD or secondary. The nom does specify that primarynews needs to be discounted...

film's making, and the book should not violate WP:PRIMARYSOURCE or WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD since it is an interview. --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2019...

Sitush (talk) 23:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Sitush as a general point, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Second, specific to this, I should clearly have made my <cough> comment...

that oversees the service does stand to reason there will be some. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD states primary sources can be used, but should be done so with caution...

meant convenient for the reader, not for myself as an editor per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. I should have specified. My point being, Primary sources were NOT used...

statement; we are simply reporting that the endorsement occurred. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD is relevant here: primary sources can be reliable and, for some claims...

reinforce the point about primary sources, note WP:PRIMARY#3 and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) Comment It looks...

though that would probably warrant a separate discussion. Also, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD explicitly states "Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be...

present what the authors said, in their own words. For more, look up WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. That is all, and as stark as it gets. -The Gnome (talk) 05:22, 16 June...

Risk Professionals. Retrieved 12 October 2020. -> please review WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, and WP:PRIMARYCARE. It says, "...although it will be acceptable for...

When I reverted and told him that it was primary, he pointed me to WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD (which is not a policy), as you can see in this diff. I only know that...

said so. Mitch Ames (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2014 (UTC) WP:PSTS / WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD may apply, again I don't think this is the venue for that discussion...

sources." I've read the article, primary sources are not forbidden WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Lots of new editors can figure out what a review article is and how...

the foundation to the Info box. It is missing that number. Using WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD I attempted to add this number. I was reverted by Scjessey. Saying I...

organization tself - a fully acceptible and even encouraged usage per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Jamez42's aversion to the topic of US involvement in regime change...

August 2017 (UTC) I am not sure we should be so prescriptive on this. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD is a good thing to read, particularly when dealing with a composer from...

though that would probably warrant a separate discussion. Also, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD explicitly states "Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be...

application of WP:Primary applies with verification of elected officials WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. - --Enos733 (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Well it has its own...

used by Wikipedians to mean "bad" or "unreliable" or "unusable". WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD So there is some application of this to the use of Marxist.net, but...

discussion. Bondegezou (talk) 09:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Per WP:PSTS and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, a primary source is perfectly acceptable as the only source for actual...

aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC) See WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. If a topic is the subject of dozens of publications since the 1970s...

TOI which is a Primary Source, can be considered acceptable as per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD because this is just not the only references about his debut in Dhollywood...

long as they are used with caution in a non-promotional way per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Bratjoggs (talk) 21:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

quotations as a secondary source. In this case, I would also refer to WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. However, when it comes to notability, how much this CNBC article confers...

Primary sources can be used, they just can't prove notability, see WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Jonpatterns (talk) 11:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC) Maybe I'm misunderstanding...

present what the authors said, in their own words. For more, look up WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. That is all, and as stark as it gets. -The Gnome (talk) 05:22, 16 June...

many of the other novels and publications that discuss Glittergold, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. AugusteBlanqui (talk) 15:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC) Delete - The non-primary...

Cryptocurrency as deprecated/blacklisted (WP:CONTEXTMATTERS and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD are not being applied). They tell me that I should go to WP:RSN if I...

application of WP:Primary applies with verification of elected officials WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. - --Enos733 (talk) 18:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Well it has its own...

Comment While the Centro source is primary, it is not invalid per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Centro are (or at the time were) the overseeing government body. Est8286...

a matter of good editorial judgment and common sense" (see also WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC) Keep I feel...

asminternational.org/2020-fellows is sufficient to show the fellowship (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD), but agree would need secondary sourcing for the latter part of your...

references. As I said above, I very rarely use primary sources (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). But, they have been removed. I found so many other sources since I...

that oversees the service does stand to reason there will be some. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD states primary sources can be used, but should be done so with caution...

references. As I said above, I very rarely use primary sources (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). But, they have been removed. I found so many other sources since I...

Sitush (talk) 23:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC) Sitush as a general point, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Second, specific to this, I should clearly have made my <cough> comment...

YouTube video is a (necessarily rare but needed) primary source (see WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). However, I am more than happy to have a discussion about all of these...

stating basic facts rather than being promotional, so fine to use per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Toviemaix (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2021 (UTC) You could have 50 sources...

| ctrb) 18:43, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Keep per WP:PRIMARY not bad (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...

essays you link to - for example, that one has a section called WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. There is NO PROBLEM whatsoever with using primary sources, anywhere...

we're not giving undue weight to this particular blog post. See WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. I strongly disagree with the "extraordinary claims" analysis - that...

source. "Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be used." WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. As noted therein, a primary source may be "even the best possible source"...

addition, you can read more about the differences at WP:PSTS. Also see WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD for situations when primary sources may actually be preferred. --GoneIn60...

abort their pregnancies." Regarding the second issue about sources: WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD "Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be used. Sometimes, a...

discussion. Bondegezou (talk) 09:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Per WP:PSTS and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, a primary source is perfectly acceptable as the only source for actual...

like me to understand historians). News sources can be primary/good WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD or secondary. The nom does specify that primarynews needs to be discounted...

context or make unsupported claims. In the past I have used the WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD to highlight the misunderstanding that primary resources are invalid...

TOI which is a Primary Source, can be considered acceptable as per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD because this is just not the only references about his debut in Dhollywood...

because sources are sponsored doesn't mean they can't be used at all (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD), just they don't add to the notability case. Use of Amazon links is...

source. "Primary sources can be reliable, and they can be used." WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. As noted therein, a primary source may be "even the best possible source"...

Wikipedia if information from this opinionated fountain is cut off (see WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD; see also this RfC discussion (corrected per Newslinger's heads-up below)...

tweet was posted is important or to include a direct quotation. See WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Erlbaeko (talk) 15:18, 29 June 2015 (UTC) My point is that twitterings...

life information uses secondary sources (and it is worth noting WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). Long running television series (e.g. The Simpsons have pages for each...

many articles justify a category. Regarding WP:LISTN, when I review WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD and consider the ubiquity of D&D content (deities, monsters, settings...

you've misunderstood the role of primary sources in Wikipedia (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). Homelessness in the United States is clearly a topic worthy of inclusion...

sources Yes, but in compliance with WP:NNC and understanding that WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Compare to the Platinga article Yes, and perhaps others. WP:Some stuff...

many other primary sources that should be acceptable, according to WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, like links to SEC filings or annual reports. While these are self-published...

Fomenko claims, following the recommended advice of Wikipedia of WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD : "Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source, such...

the arguments against it-we're talking about a work of fiction. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD "Primary" is not, and should not be, a bit of jargon used by Wikipedians...

the standards of a different scientific field, failing to consider WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, dismissing the importance of valid field of scientific inquiry, and...

many articles justify a category. Regarding WP:LISTN, when I review WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD and consider the ubiquity of D&D content (deities, monsters, settings...

which is blurred out. Such a link is a PRIMARY reference, but as per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, is not a material issue as the information is not manipulated and is...

August 2017 (UTC) I am not sure we should be so prescriptive on this. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD is a good thing to read, particularly when dealing with a composer from...

no primary source is reliable, which is contradicted directly by WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, as well as by WP:PSTS and a whole host of other policy pages. Red Rock...

he considers inadmissible because he does not appear to get that WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD and WP:NOTGOODSOURCE. I am not foreclosing on the possibility of a section...

is still guided by Butler's work" creates guilt by association. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD states, when you are supporting a direct quotation, the original document...

than a region"[[23]]. On the talk page I went over things such as WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD and WP:WINARS with him. I even pointed out a book named Jacob Abbot...

attention to WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, the opposite in fact.FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk) 02:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC) I believe WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD here is overridden...

desirable by beign more recent and belonging directly to author, then WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, but also because accussation is reinstated with more explicit and understandable...

sources, including notable newspapers, magazines, and news outlets. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD says, "While some primary sources are not fully independent, they can...

sources Yes, but in compliance with WP:NNC and understanding that WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Compare to the Platinga article Yes, and perhaps others. WP:Some stuff...

20 January 2026 (UTC) Support use of primary sources. Simply put, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. If a primary source is the highest-quality source available, there...

Sirfurboy🏄 is putting undue emphasis on the primary news issue, WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Its written about (and notable) because it's a large, long-standing...

case-by-case basis for the best possible source for that information, see WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD or WP:PRIMARYCARE, which provides examples of primary sources being...

life information uses secondary sources (and it is worth noting WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). Long running television series (e.g. The Simpsons have pages for each...

material. Bon courage (talk) 02:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Well, what about WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD? Just because something is primary is not an automatic deletion. Geogene...

a matter of good editorial judgment and common sense" (see also WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 20:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC) Keep I feel...

primary source, it would be acceptable as said in WP:PRIMARY and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. It seems like other editors are saying you're calling mainstream press...

subject is non-notable. SilverserenC 23:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC) WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. It is not true that there is a blanket prohibition on primary source...

meant convenient for the reader, not for myself as an editor per WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. I should have specified. My point being, Primary sources were NOT used...

peer review journal. Per WP:SPS, WP:ABOUTSELF, WP:RSOPINION, and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD; primary sources are not only allowable, but hold significant weight...

WP:PRIMARY, and WP:SPS, ignoring well-established discussions like WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, other language RSN's, usage of shortened footnotes, and more). This...

Also, please keep in mind that primary sources are not always bad (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD), and I would even go so far as to say that that government registry...

used by Wikipedians to mean "bad" or "unreliable" or "unusable". WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD So there is some application of this to the use of Marxist.net, but...

meme post-2014. The usage of the primary source appears valid under WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD, however to provide context for who Professor Ivan Denikin and his "Magazine"...

content, Primary Sources would be best sources as mentioned in Wikipedia:PRIMARYNOTBAD. As the intention of the section is to present the claims made by each...

source; and again we already have policies such as PRIMARYCARE and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. With regard to their website research, this is not the forum for that...

the primary sources are comic book pages is absolutely no problem. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD Regardless, the Marvel official handbook counts as a secondary source...

is the organisation that awarded the medal this is an example of WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD) and edited a journal, which counts towards criteria 8. Her notable...

reinforce the point about primary sources, note WP:PRIMARY#3 and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC) Comment It looks...

because sources are sponsored doesn't mean they can't be used at all (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD), just they don't add to the notability case. Use of Amazon links is...

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Neighbours 30th Anniversary/1 and WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD. Additionally, several of the primary sources are then backed up by...

sources, including notable newspapers, magazines, and news outlets. WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD says, "While some primary sources are not fully independent, they can...

statements and new reporting that incorporates them) comply with WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD: "authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, expert-approved...

WP:CONSENSUS. I have rescued dead links and tweaked misused tags under WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD and I know those aren't policy violations. So, nothing to add in that...

and that doesn’t really seem to be the case in Wikipedia as far as WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD and secondary sources can say things completely innacurate too WP:SECONDARYNOTGOOD...

subject to editorial control, and published by a reputable publisher" (WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD), and to discount them serves no valid purpose. You point me to WhatamIdoing's...

investigative reporting is often considered primary (keeping in mind WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD). But that distinction doesn't hugely matter for the purposes of an...