ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

page or redirect, for example [[Red link example]]. Shortcut WP:REDYESWP:REDYES Create red links whenever a non-existent article with more information would...

redirecting the other WP:TOOSOON as-yet-unnamed teams were reverted "per WP:REDYES" (which I don't quite understand, since there were no red links involved)...

have articles. This falls foul of WP:SELFREF, and misses the point of WP:REDYES. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

signed, Rosguill talk 14:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Comment: If there is enough sources...

Sundance Film Festival award winners, where it seems to have been a WP:REDYES link since 2011. Skynxnex (talk) 20:15, 18 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

November 2023 (UTC) keep has more than one topic, before being removed. WP:REDYES and WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES show that just because there are links that are red...

(talk) 23:07, 16 December 2022 (UTC) Delete: REDYES. Veverve (talk) 00:37, 17 December 2022 (UTC) WP:REDYES doesn’t apply since an article at this title...

January 2015 (UTC) If his prominence equates to notability then per WP:REDYES the redirect should be deleted to encourage the creation of an article....

sources are found. This article is so minimal I'd prefer to go with WP:REDYES delete than the redirect as ATD. asilvering (talk) 02:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)...

found at the current target. Those terms should probably stay red under WP:REDYES, as contracts under Islamic law are a notable topic that currently do not...

deleted it would possibly be constructed to an appropriate standard under WP:REDYES or at least would not be an article that at the current moment does not...

unless there's a real possibility of a viable article being created per WP:REDYES. I've tried to find something which might reasonably indicate such a thing...

agreed with keeping. Also, to alleviate Red-tailed hawk's worries about WP:REDYES, I'll tag this redirect with {{R from possibilities}}. (non-admin closure)...

Tyrrell. If either of them is notable, then this seems like a case of WP:REDYES since there doesn't seem to be any coverage anywhere on the encyclopedia...

the date, it should be deleted as it is misleading the reader. See: WP:REDYES. Day-month-year or month-day-year? How many commas? Chronological ordinal...

to refer to the *kóryos. MB 02:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES (encouraging creation); the subject already exists in other version of Wikipedia...

just delete. MB 06:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom. and possibly WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 09:36, 13 June 2022 (UTC) Keep, retarget or create article...

Misleading Roostery123 (talk) 01:58, 14 November 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES to encourage article creation. The best redirect target would seem to be...

26 December 2021 (UTC) Delete I very much agree with nom's rationale. WP:REDYES is an appropriate policy to apply here. snood1205 14:37, 26 December 2021...

Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. There are a few pages that link to Question Team and they'd benefit from...

Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:52, 22 February 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10 and to allow for uninhibited search as there are several mentions...

covering itself. Don't see an advantage to delete since it's unlikely WP:REDYES would help create/justify a standalone article. Skynxnex (talk) 17:57, 10...

links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] Delete per WP:REDYES and per previous discussions of deleting circular redirects of this type...

SaintAmand (talk) 09:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC) Delete per Hucbald.SaintAmand, REDYES. Veverve (talk) 19:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Struck off to avoid the double-vote...

favour of valid red link per WP:REDYES. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 22:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC) Delete: as per WP:REDYES. Also, the women's football team...

Delete: I don't think there is a suitable retarget. This is a modified WP:REDYES argument as the article should be at Barrier islands of New Jersey as stated...

for this to be its own article, I think this should be deleted under WP:REDYES. TartarTorte 13:19, 2 November 2022 (UTC) Keep: The Legacy section of the...

confusion (see "no coverage of the subject at the target page") and against WP:REDYES - this is a very-likely-notable subject, and a "phantom redirect" discourages...

become its own page and not a redirect. I am thus voting for deletion per WP:REDYES as this is a notable topic that probably deserves a full article. TartarTorte...

Oriental Orthodox liturgy used in the Coptic Church. Therefore, and as per WP:REDYES, this redirect should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 06:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC)...

light fixtures, etc. Steel1943 (talk) 06:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES and the target being misleading per nom. Also, some equipments can be used...

Bdushaw at Talk:Green Acres Mall#Weird redirect. In summary, delete per WP:REDYES. TartarTorte 18:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

but not necessarily theology. I would suggest deletion as a case of WP:REDYES. signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC) Interesting. I didn't...

User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC) Delete: WP:REDYES. Also, subtitles are not captions and the synonymity is unfortunate. Veverve...

article creation for this non-profit, if it is notable and verifiable, per WP:REDYES. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC) Strong Remove This redirect...

❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 23:05, 12 August 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10: KreekCraft seems to be a prominent YouTuber/esports personality...

target is a DAB. Per WP:REDYES this redirect should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 10:15, 26 July 2025 (UTC) Delete as a WP:REDYES. 49.151.187.185 (talk) 10:04...

think this redirect should be deleted as it is misleading, and as per WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC) Oppose. Most Christian feast...

92.246.142 (talk) 13:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom. and WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC) Comment It was WP:BLAR'd,...

links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Delete per REDYES. This could be its own article. There's currently a draft about it, but...

the Americas. Duckmather (talk) 04:49, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Delete: WP:REDYES. There's a number of different examples of CIA activity in Brazil. While...

unlinked there. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) Delete: Under WP:REDYES and as unsuitable target. The AfD in which this was made into a redirect...

Ho (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC) Delete: expression too broad, WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 23:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC) Delete. Too vague to be useful...

redirect there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:28, 13 May 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. I question calling the ceviche a salad; that seems really reaching. And...

current target, but still broader than the scientific field. Delete per WP:REDYES. Jay (Talk) 15:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC) Delete as vague and WP:XY. This...

Thanks, ✗plicit 23:56, 24 February 2022 (UTC) Delete: too vague and WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 20:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC) Retarget per nom. If Constitutive...

meets WP:GNG on its own merits (one source) and I think it qualifies for WP:REDYES; the redirect should be deleted and a standalone article created. Carguychris...

any adequate coverage on Wikipedia. Given this, I'd suggest delete per WP:REDYES, with no prejudice against recreating them if relevant content is added...

this is a real person with pages on other wikis. Probably delete under WP:REDYES Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC) Delete per IAmChaos. A7V2...

Esolo5002 (talk) 04:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC) I'd like to point you to WP:REDYES. mwwv converse∫edits 11:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

no article discusses this, but one probably could be created (ie per WP:REDYES and WP:RFD#D10). A7V2 (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per A7V2...

here, here and here. Therefore, this redirect should be deleted. Also, WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 16:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC) Actually, at least the first...

not the same. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:14, 6 August 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:37, 3 August 2025 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

time. signed, Rosguill talk 18:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom. and WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 10:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

others, similarly to the horseshoe theory. Therefore, delete per nom. and WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 10:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC) Keep as the expression is now mentioned...

target is wrong, but aside from that it's roughly split. I find the WP:REDYES argument to be slightly more persuasive as this discussion has surfaced...

placeholder for an article here per the history. This should be deleted per REDYES to allow for the article to be created. TartarTorte 14:06, 18 April 2022...

redirect. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 19:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC) Delete as REDYES BhamBoi (talk) 08:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC) Delete per the above. A7V2...

redirect here as a {{R with possibilities}}). Decided against that per WP:REDYES. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 21:06, 2 July...

jurisdiction. Thryduulf (talk) 20:01, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 21:57, 6 February 2022 (UTC) We already have sooo many stub...

think that the articles Jews or Judaism are the same topic. Delete per WP:REDYES and lack of appropriate target. TartarTorte 15:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Delete...

common as they once were but red links are still considered a good thing. WP:REDYES is an essay about it, and the FA criteria don't say anything about it. Mike...

mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 22:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Either delete under REDYES or retarget as a {{R from species to genus}}. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 03:05...

wikipedia in another language both per the no and Thryduulf. I think the WP:REDYES argument by El cid is strong and is an argument I support as well. TartarTorte...

21:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC) Delete. This isn't their only song, and is a redyes. CLYDEFRANKLIN 04:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

isn’t there). 217.117.125.83 (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2022 (UTC) Delete: WP:REDYES, the target article states A list of highest mountains of Oceania with the...

Ryall (entrepreneur) is an article. I don't think this would count under WP:REDYES as the current links to Edward Ryall are mostly if not all in reference...

article. 1. There is a comment above suggesting to remove red links. Per WP:REDYES, you can keep a red link if the subject is notable (I haven't checked what...

Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:47, 4 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES as those are different situations. Veverve (talk) 09:08, 5 February 2022...

non-Thomas works as well. Delete, either to favour search results, or per WP:REDYES. Jay 05:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Draft:Redirect to given name → Olive (given...

02:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC) I think that Ram Squad could be deleted under WP:REDYES. They likely do have notability, but they're just not covered at all at...

deletion has not been made. The cited ground is WP:REDLINK. However, WP:REDYES cautions that "The topic may well be covered in a section of another article"...

to them.) R Prazeres (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES to promote article creation. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:28...

Either restore original articles with more information, or delete per WP:REDYES. The second may fall under WP:G6, but it has been the page's name for ~2...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  No mention at the target, possibly WP:REDYES. Therefore, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 07:52, 12 February 2023 (UTC)...

notable presence of Romani People in Afghanistan and this seems like a WP:REDYES scenario if there actually are Romani people in Afghanistan as seemingly...

other examples. - Eureka Lott 02:34, 25 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:REDYES and since this is not discussed at the target, but it seems a very strange...

until his sanctions are lifted. BMK (talk) 13:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC) WP:REDYES says "Create red links everywhere they are relevant to the context for terms...

neither band's article has much on the concert. Either delete per WP:XY or WP:REDYES, but as it stands this redirect is not helpful. I will note, this was BLARred...

the Brandywine Trail is not the Horse-Shoe Trail. We can delete per WP:REDYES and per WP:SURPRISE. TartarTorte 17:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC) The above...

Delete per Narky Blert. There seems to be no good retarget, and also WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 18:26, 12 February 2022 (UTC) Delete This can never help...

—Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Delete: WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Delete Can easily be incorporated...

Can't believe I'm saying this, but delete all per WP:REDYES. Bet we'd set a record for a REDYES deletion turning into an article, too. Reverse racism...

implications of WP:BLPPRIVACY. Additionally it is clear from existing WP:REDYES that editors should not create red links that do not conform to WP naming...

Thank you! QueenofBithynia (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Delete - I also feel that the general...

November 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:REDYES. Fieari (talk) 07:16, 15 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES --Lenticel (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2024...

article). 61.239.39.90 (talk) 14:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

sending it here. DrowssapSMM 19:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC) Delete: per WP:REDYES 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 20:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC) Delete -...

bad. Sławobóg (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 19:13, 15 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom. I see that...

Alternatively, I think it makes sense as a being a red link on that page per WP:REDYES/WP:RPOSS as it would encourage article creation. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk))...

Thanks, Arminden (talk) 14:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC) Delete per either WP:REDYES or the expression being too vague. Veverve (talk) 12:02, 30 January 2022...

notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES, or at least refine to Irish nationalism#Militant separatism and Irish independence...

for a retarget. Jay (talk) 04:12, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 10:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC) Keep - Sellers wrote "Blue...

see if he knows more. Jay 💬 06:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. Not sure what the article would be titled exactly, but the subject appears...

would be Jovanov then Might link house arrest. What's your criteria for WP:REDYES wrt some members of government (e.g. Bekteshi, Neziri, Saliu) but not others...

13:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC) Delete: to encourage article creation (WP:REDYES). TartarTorte 19:58, 16 September 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

{{ill}} linked. Narky Blert (talk) 21:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 22:10, 19 May 2025 (UTC) @LaundryPizza03, Narky...

suitable overview type article for this. I think delete per WP:RFD#D10/WP:REDYES, but disambiguation is an option, with potential articles including Crack...

small meme associated with Dqw4w9wgxcq so I guess you could also argue WP:REDYES here, but this is one of those cases where it's a bit of a fun redirect...

No mention at the target, so I recommend deletion. Also, possibly WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 12:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC) Keep. Actually, the term "para-fascism"...

notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. Per BD2412, cisgender people's sexuality is a valid encyclopedic topic...

Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 00:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom and REDYES. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 00:50, 21 January 2023 (UTC)...

the stub and send to Afd to either improve and expand or WP:TNT and WP:REDYES it to encourage creation of a more complete article. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:44...

mentioning never on the page it might make sense to either delete this per WP:REDYES to have a disambiguation or as an alternate find a more appropriate target...

asilvering (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom. Also, WP:REDYES. Modern period is not the contemporary period; see also Timelines of modern...

links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Possible WP:REDYES? Pittville is mentioned in the page but as a WP:SELFRED Okmrman (talk) 20:31...

about military journalism worldwide, so suggest deletion of both per WP:REDYES, to encourage creation of an article (probably at the latter title). --...

and Initiation (2020 film). Delete to encourage article creation per WP:REDYES. Utopes (talk / cont) 08:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved...

WP:GEOLAND, and so therefore reason to delete number 10 (WP:RFD#D10, see also WP:REDYES) applies here as this could be expanded into an article. A7V2 (talk) 00:10...

suffix. It is possibly best to leave that as a red link. For now. Per WP:REDYES. To "encourage" someone to create the article. Right now, the redirect serves...

Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 20:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC) Comment Links should not WP:REDYES be made to the herbicide article in preference to this even if red. Invasive...

either needs to be its own article exploring the term (so deletion per WP:REDYES) or delete because there is no place to target it. If kept (or retargeted)...

logical. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:REDYES. Charlotte (Queen of Hearts • talk) 19:55, 13 October 2024 (UTC) Delete...

article. In fact, this term seems like it may be ripe for an article, and WP:REDYES is a thing, but I'd be surprised if we don't have an article that covers...

04:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC) Are all/ any of the cast members notable per WP:REDYES? Also, surely we need to cite their names? Done in this edit "Filmmakers...

not look like boar teeth. Might be worth linking Jennifer Foster per WP:REDYES; there's not much, but it's equally not impossible [3]). Done. That one's...

history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Probably a case of WP:REDYES; most of what I can find on this term is from Christian websites discussing...

redirecting the other WP:TOOSOON as-yet-unnamed teams were reverted "per WP:REDYES" (which I don't quite understand, since there were no red links involved)...

film of the same name, and WP:REDYES applies. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 16:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES in favor of the upcoming film....

lot. As per current usage, (recent) species are clear candidates for WP:REDYES links, as laid out by nominator, and this is universally observed in all...

exist. Ideally, all red links should be limited to subjects who meet WP:REDYES, but unfortunately they often seem to be added more randomly than not. So...

searching and the creation of redlinks to encourage content edition, per WP:REDYES. – Scyrme (talk) 16:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Delete. Enwiki does not appear...

(let's talk|contribs) 16:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC) Ideally, delete per WP:REDYES. However, since the content was merged, I feel it is likely to be kept....

I suggest deletion per WP:REDYES. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Delete: per WP:REDYES. Current redirect kinda fails...

redirect should be converted to the article shortly, or deleted per WP:REDYES. It definitely should NOT be protected, which will only prevent creation...

neutral on targeting there as it isn't very detailed, and deletion per WP:REDYES may be better. A7V2 (talk) 04:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC) Delete – I'd be very...

keep Radical Theology but delete Radical theology to leave room for WP:REDYES for that aspect, although there isn't as much non-primary source material...

and the above redirects as red links instead of unlinking since there's a REDYES argument; if anyone believes that these shouldn't be kept feel free to unlink...

2024 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:REDYES to encourage article creation. Fieari (talk) 03:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES and to avoid confusion per...

under 19 and under 18 teams, but not the under 17 team. Also potentially WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10. A7V2 (talk) 00:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved...

have articles. This falls foul of WP:SELFREF, and misses the point of WP:REDYES. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

it here. Eman235/talk 18:57, 23 April 2019 (UTC) @Hkhenson: Also, per WP:REDYES, it's not only allowed but encouraged to red link any instances of the name...

per nom TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 17:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. I think articles on all these dialects are deserved. Perhaps this list...

Spices (talk) 18:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per the above and perhaps WP:REDYES. A7V2 (talk) 01:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per above: the target is almost...

unless there's a real possibility of a viable article being created per WP:REDYES. I've tried to find something which might reasonably indicate such a thing...

a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: WP:REDYES or useful as-is? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed...

resources. As for the particular website, that would be deleted per WP:REDYES as there is no article here. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 02:31, 4 November 2024...

consistency is more important, so would suggest all or none. And per WP:REDYES, this can be an encouragement for others to create said article. Up to you...

December 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES Fieari (talk) 09:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC) Delete. I agree this is a case of WP:REDYES. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk...

Sundance Film Festival award winners, where it seems to have been a WP:REDYES link since 2011. Skynxnex (talk) 20:15, 18 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This...

per nom. Veverve (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:REDYES. A7V2 (talk) 01:03, 6 June 2023 (UTC) Delete per all above. This was created...

appropriate place to retarget to, but otherwise this should be deleted under WP:REDYES to encourage article creation. TartarTorte 13:21, 19 September 2022 (UTC)...

number-one hits of 2023 (Germany) and 2023 MTV Europe Music Awards. WP:REDYES and WP:RFD#D10 also likely apply as he has articles on other language Wikipedias...

allows for uninhibited search, and also it may be that WP:RFD#D10 and WP:REDYES apply. A7V2 (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC) The above discussion is...

nonexistence, I'm leaning delete for the redirect until such a list is created per REDYES. — Anonymous 19:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC) @Anonymous, agreed, but I think...

the concern that it's a "trivial passing mention" using the claimed WP:REDYES-level sourcing. -- Tavix (talk) 23:28, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Headwaters...

astonishing. This should probably be deleted per WP:RFD#DELETE#10 i.e. WP:REDYES, but I would be okay with retargeting to the page where it is mentioned(Treatments...

would be a primary topic here, and thus this redirect should be deleted as REDYES (a hatnote can be placed on the article for the genus when it is eventually...

murders in Russia but no such article exists at this time. Deletion per WP:REDYES seems appropriate. Russian businessmen mystery deaths is perhaps specific...

(talk) 19:19, 14 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, and maybe even WP:REDYES –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 19:40, 14 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per...

this is neither such case. Rather than leaving a cross-wiki redirect, WP:REDYES notes that red links should be created whenever a non-existent article with...

substantive content there anyway. Either this person is notable, in which case WP:REDYES, or not, in which case, let the search function do its job. 35.139.154.158...

Tevildo (talk) 06:55, 19 September 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:RFD#D10/WP:REDYES or create an article over the redirect if possible. InterstellarGamer12321...

31 March 2023 (UTC) Delete: This should absolutely be a redlink per WP:REDYES. It doesn't help people to target the 2023 election if they are searching...

(talk) 22:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:INTDABLINK (and possibly WP:REDYES to promote article creation). The redirect's title doesn't match the name...

may be worth having one for it too in english, which is essentially a WP:REDYES argument for deletion. I personally have no opinion on the redirect at this...

oppose a FAC, and a coordinator would not treat that as a valid oppose. WP:REDYES is the relevant guideline: there's no obligation to include redlinks but...

Marie Stopes Myanmar is not discussed at the target. Seems like a WP:REDYES situation. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 14:45, 24 November 2024 (UTC) Relisted to...

pulp illustrator and it would be better to leave this as a redlink per REDYES until someone (possibly me) gets around to finding the sources and creating...

discussion (a discussion which unfortunately didn't happen). Delete per WP:REDYES, and I would have nominated the others as a follow-up after this was deleted...

If this film does exist, should probably "Delete per WP:REDYES". Either way, it's a bit misleading and WP:UNDUE and WP:SURPRISEing that...

draftified. Pelmeen10 (talk) 22:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10 and previous discussion. No prejudice against article creation...

this topic be turned into a redirect towards one big mission statement. WP:REDYES, and "deleting redirects which lie to readers" is valid. Utopes (talk /...

being subject BLARed in 2024. Delete to encourage article creation per WP:REDYES. 49.151.187.185 (talk) 09:45, 2 August 2025 (UTC) Retarget to 90.3 FM § Philippines...

unsatisfying for the reader. Further, I suspect it's a notable topic, WP:REDYES. signed, Rosguill talk 00:45, 7 June 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

better than having no link at all (or a redlink only). After all, per WP:REDYES, placing red links to notable topics is encouraged and I don't see the harm...

expectation. What? Invasive Spices (talk) 21:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10. It seems as though there is no article about talent scouting...

per Altenmann --Lenticel (talk) 03:47, 19 August 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES and MOS:NOFORCELINK. This is an adjective that might redirect to anorectum...

strong distaste for WP:REDYES as a policy. We already have Category:Redirects with possibilities, but there's no such listing for REDYES-style deletions, and...

redirects to the list. Thryduulf (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2025 (UTC) See WP:REDYES, but I'd say at least half of these are notable enough to warrant their...

target, delete. Ss112 16:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Delete: For either WP:REDYES or just to not send the reader somewhere with little information on what...

(talk) 23:41, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:RETURNTORED, WP:REDYES, and WP:NSPECIES. NSPECIES states In general, all extant species that are...

(talk) 19:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC) Mildly surprised at the lack, per WP:REDYES, of a link to Kenneth Drury, one of the most infamous coppers of the post-war...

here to either encourage the creation of an article about the novel (WP:REDYES) or ensure readers attempting to look for information about the nonexistent...

stand with delete. Plant🌱man (talk) 04:37, 8 April 2025 (UTC) See also WP:REDYES. Plant🌱man (talk) 01:41, 8 April 2025 (UTC) When I searched this the question...

User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 21:58, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES per nom. Gang rape is not an ideal target either, per Historyexpert2. Disambiguation...

research into the nature of Caledonia), so I don't think this would meet WP:REDYES. Hog Farm Talk 18:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC) The Union unit fired several...

Thryduulf (talk) 17:27, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:TOOSOON and WP:REDYES. mwwv converse∫edits 19:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Disqualify as per above...

redirect to the family, which is already visible in a taxobox. Delete per WP:REDYES. Cremastra (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC) I am not sure why this was moved...

(talk) 23:20, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom, unmentioned and WP:REDYES 35.139.154.158 (talk) 23:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC) Delete. No article has...

Priest, Motorhead, Testament and Heaven & Hell. Either the issue is the WP:REDYES in case, there is Judas Priest's Nostradamus, Motörhead's Motörizer, Heaven...

September 2024 (UTC) Either delete per nom (and possibly per WP:RFD#D10/WP:REDYES), or soft redirect to wikitionary wikt:pseudointellectual. Current target...

"Robert Burley" linked was born in the 20th century. Oops. Delinked per WP:REDYES. John Greenwell, a monk of Fountains, was elected Abbot in October 1442...

untouched since 2008. If there's a good article to be made here, we've got WP:REDYES. If there isn't, we can simply remove it. We don't need to tie ourselves...

Veverve (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC) Delete as ambiguous and also per WP:REDYES as the Johannine literature is not limited to the gospel. - Presidentman...

CLalgo (talk) 19:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC) Delete all per WP:RFD#D10/WP:REDYES. Definitely the presence of these redirects can mislead readers into thinking...

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per the above, WP:REDYES and WP:RFD#D10. No prejudice against article creation. A7V2 (talk) 00:56...

below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC) Delete per REDYES. Veverve (talk) 14:18, 14 April 2023 (UTC) Delete extremely unlikely search...

Year of Faith that it created. That being said, I support deletion per WP:REDYES, as this warrants its own page rather than a redirect to an article that...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Not a good target, and WP:REDYES: this should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 03:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC) Delete...

deletion. BDD (talk) 15:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC) *DAB This is the opposite of REDYES. As you say KBC also exists and thus search will not work. Additionally...

should best be deleted, so it can be created as a proper article per WP:REDYES and because there is no appropriate target on Wikipedia. TartarTorte 16:36...

few things to be clarified. I adjusted the curious Wikidata link per WP:REDYES. If there's a real need for the WD link—I can't remember ever seeing it...

we think an article is warranted, which would not be true here. See WP:REDYES. Even if some type of dabbing was necessary, the existing article on Fire...

non-bluelink entries, then you either leave it as a redlink in the list per WP:REDYES, or you delink it and redirect this to the list. Ehh. 35.139.154.158 (talk)...

share the same fate. A7V2 (talk) 01:43, 5 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10. Articles exist for other seasons so it seems reasonable one...

(UTC) Retarget for now per nom although I won't mind this deleted per WP:REDYES --Lenticel (talk) 00:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC) Retarget per nom. Geschichte...

that could, theoretically, be expanded into a mainspace article, so WP:REDYES applies. Fieari (talk) 07:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC) Comment Summary news...

Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:50, 21 May 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES and allow search to work. Although in a quick Google search shows it's very...

rises in the Atlantic": I think this is worth a couple of redlinks, per WP:REDYES: perhaps "the Ceará and Sierra Leone rises in the Atlantic"? Removed as...

one of the greatest freedom fighters of Himachal Pradesh. Delete under WP:REDYES. Jay 💬 10:19, 19 April 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...

Delete per GobsPint's statement that this is worthy of an article, thus WP:REDYES applies. Fieari (talk) 06:45, 2 October 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved...

Delete because we just do not seem to have such a comprehensive list. WP:REDYES may apply. Steel1943 (talk) 22:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC) Keep per Kowal2701...

to this list. It's OK that some of these may end up being notable per wp:REDYES and wp:RETURNTORED. A red link at List of minor planets (or wherever) may...

to allow unhibited searching and allow the creation of redlinks per WP:REDYES. Treating this as a misspelling is not appropriate when it's plausibly the...

simply for consistency's sake (this is an unwritten rule). See the policy WP:REDYES for more information. I hope this answers your question.  — TORTOISEWRATH...

ostensibly new one. BD2412 T 03:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES and BD2412 --Lenticel (talk) 03:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC) The above is...

This would likely best be its own article and should be deleted per WP:REDYES. Casablanca 🪨(T) 15:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved as an...

is also simply a reference to pragmatism. This seems like a case of WP:REDYES. It could also be a case of WP:NEO; a brief search gives largely social...

the song, which can then replace the redirect. Could be deleted per WP:REDYES, but given there is information about the song at the target, better to...

last three centuries. Therefore, the target is misleading. Furthermore, WP:REDYES, so that an article (like one exists for Judaism at Loans and interest in...

article, but the target is informative so I don't know that we need to WP:REDYES here. signed, Rosguill talk 21:50, 23 February 2024 (UTC) Retarget to...

distinct, literary device, making this a misleading redirect. Delete per WP:REDYES. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 14:51, 10 June 2025 (UTC) Malapropism lists acyrologia...

Thanks, Utopes (talk / cont) 04:07, 20 September 2024 (UTC) Delete - per WP:REDYES to encourage article creation and remove a circular link. Fieari (talk)...

Loudon, Barron Trump. Given the number of pageviews, this could be a good WP:REDYES to encourage article creation. Shazback (talk) 05:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)...

then I would assume that the phrase was a notable topic, which means WP:REDYES would apply. I mean, our princess is in another castle! Steel1943 (talk)...

fact that this title is a redirect and not an article seems to validate WP:REDYES deletion. In addition, the article for the group mentioned in the title...

clickbait. Polarbear678 (talk) 23:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. There's probably an article to be written on this or, if not, content that...

would still apply. Викидим (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC) Delete: per WP:REDYES 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 00:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Delete per...

(talck) (contirbuton s) 11:48, 7 April 2026 (UTC) Comment - Could be a WP:REDYES situation? I guess you could just make the page using a Template:Wiktionary...

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per the above (and WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10). A7V2 (talk) 00:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

articles. I believe that this redirect should be deleted in line with WP:REDYES; he's probably notable, and leaving a redlink to encourage article creation...

Heitzman. —Danorton (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:RFD#D10/WP:REDYES. A7V2 (talk) 01:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC) @Danorton and A7V2: Ric Heitzman...

there would be a need to reach the species list from somewhere else. Per WP:REDYES and also via a lot of species' precedent, it's more useful to keep species...

we do? Robert McClenon (talk) 00:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES and/or to make room for the draft. Legoktm (talk) 04:07, 15 April 2025 (UTC)...

(UTC) There is little information of substance though. This looks like a WP:REDYES situation to me. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:55, 25 September...

networks with their content policies and arbitrary deletions. Clearly a WP:REDYES -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC) Retarget per Crouch...

longer accurate. Janhrach (talk) 12:40, 15 October 2023 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:REDYES. An article is generally written at Next _ parliamentary election about...

film, etc. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. See this article for a definition. It doesn't look like we currently have...

could be best as its own article as it is a distinct topic. Delete per WP:REDYES and WP:SURPRISE. Casablanca 🪨(T) 17:25, 2 May 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved...

not the company meets GNG, but even if it doesn't, it still seems like WP:REDYES. Anyone searching this exact phrase, particularly with this exact capitalisation...

This team is not discussed in depth at the target. Delete per WP:REDYES. Cremastra (u — c) 15:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC) @Cremastra: It looks like...

31 October 2024 (UTC) They appear to be fairly notable so delete per WP:REDYES TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 20:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved...

fact that this title is a redirect and not an article seems to validate WP:REDYES deletion. However, the subject of this redirect is mentioned twice in the...

indicate where content "should" be added. In fact the opposite is true per WP:REDYES. There is no such content on Wikipedia for this topic at this moment. The...

-- Otr500 (talk) 18:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Delete per CaribDigita and WP:REDYES. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Delete...

this misleading. There might very well be an article to write here, but WP:REDYES until then. I'd say more, but I don't want to miss the opening face off...

definition for this redirect. The phrasing of the redirect hints some sort of WP:REDYES potential. Steel1943 (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC) Retarget to History...

Delete: No inbound links, and if it does gain notability, I'd say that WP:REDYES would apply here. 🔥HOTm̵̟͆e̷̜̓s̵̼̊s̸̜̃🔥 (talk・edits) 23:15, 30 March 2024...

heists. Steel1943 (talk) 04:23, 15 December 2025 (UTC) Delete as possible WP:REDYES --Lenticel (talk) 23:31, 16 December 2025 (UTC) Delete as per WP:RETURNTORED...

Chaos chaos Currently redirecting to genus, should be a redlink as per WP:REDYES. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:01, 17 November 2025 (UTC) Comment: See...

the nom. FOARP (talk) 21:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom and WP:REDYES. Cremastra (u — c) 01:39, 25 October 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom --Lenticel...

(talk) 05:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC) Delete for the reasons given by the nom (WP:REDYES, WP:RFD#D10), but also I don't think the one passing mention "and his brother...

name and the content is supported by a reliable source. I think that WP:REDYES may apply here because some of these names can pass WP:GNG. OccultZone (Talk...

Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC) Delete: out of WP:REDYES concerns. It seems very much, like as noted above by Ivanvector, that this...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Linked exclusively from its target: a WP:REDYES situation where a circular link does no good. Cremastra (talk) 12:21, 16...

page. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES TeapotsOfDoom (talk) 18:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved...

CU-blocked sock, I'm reading this as deletion based solely on Steel1943's WP:REDYES argument. signed, Rosguill talk 05:12, 18 July 2023 (UTC) Imitation City...

specific to English but don’t know what would be a better target. Maybe WP:REDYES would be the way to go here. I at least just tagged it with {{R possibilities}}...

(talk) 14:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC) Delete per the above (also WP:RfD#D10/WP:REDYES) without prejudice to recreation as an article. A7V2 (talk) 08:13, 17 June...

22:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC) Delete per Queen of Hearts, the IP, and WP:REDYES. This should absolutely be an article, I'd love to get down to the...well...

whatsoever, making it a misleading search term. This is a big part of why WP:REDYES exists. If anybody is looking for any information about the season, they'll...

written about them. However, some allowances may be made in the case of WP:REDYES individuals which are properly supported by a citation to a reliable source...

Would any of the non-linked people rate a redlink, under WP:GNG (and so WP:REDYES)? Done. I looked at non-linked persons, and it seems unlikely that they'll...

that Tarrat wrote. I suggest deletion per WP:ASTONISH, and possibly per WP:REDYES if Tarrat happens to be a separate notable person. Duckmather (talk) 23:34...

better than having no link at all (or a redlink only). After all, per WP:REDYES, placing red links to notable topics is encouraged and I don't see the harm...

beige) (count ribs) 18:39, 5 August 2026 (UTC) Delete all per above and WP:REDYES --Lenticel (talk) 00:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved as an...

links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Delete per WP:REDYES. The top-level domain .sex does exist,[1] but it is not the same as .xxx...

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gwen (singer). Delete to enough article creation per WP:REDYES. 49.151.187.185 talk 11:42, 12 August 2025 (UTC) The very recent (June 2025)...

—Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫‍(talk) 23:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC) Delete sounds like WP:REDYES material --Lenticel (talk) 00:29, 20 October 2025 (UTC) The above is preserved...

at several other page including Template:Tuguegarao Radio. Delete per WP:REDYES as encourage article creation ~2026-15650-77 06:33, 13 March 2026 (UTC)...

people are searching for them they are more likely to be notable, so WP:REDYES or WP:RFD#D10 may apply in addition to the reasons given above. A7V2 (talk)...

Ivanvector found, I don't see how a dab page wouldn't be overwhelming. WP:REDYES maybe also applies. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 13:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC) Relisted...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Delete as ambiguous as a redirect and per WP:REDYES. This subject of this redirect was also in Ferrari (2023 film). Steel1943...

CycloneYoris talk! 00:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Delete Egafd and EGAFD per WP:REDYES to match European Girls Adult Film Database, which is already red. An external...

assume is what the nom intended. It's mentioned there so unsure about WP:REDYES makes a lot of sense. Anyone is able to make a new article either directly...

on wire guidance, and so could we, so we should delete these all per WP:REDYES. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 21:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Keep...

(talk) 17:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC) 'Delete all of these are essentially WP:REDYES per Myceteae's comment and "chateaux en espagne". There's a variety of possible...

does it contain a list of terrorists. Either this should be deleted per WP:REDYES to make room for an article, or it could reasonably be retargeted to List...

except this time the topic is not even mentioned in the article. WP:REDYES etc. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:48, 16 June 2023...

--Lenticel (talk) 01:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC) Delete per above; qualifies for WP:REDYES. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 13:45, 3 March 2024 (UTC) The...

Cut Roller. Is there any reason to believe that Elmer Saunders meets WP:REDYES? Based on the sources, he was a local boilermaker who was on the (amateur...

fully sourced. Red links are not an issue as long as they conform to WP:REDYES. Numerous notable Russian topics lack en articles, which is a problem for...

completeness, the ones we do have are part of a series, and these are not, so WP:REDYES applies. We shouldn't have these redirects to cover up the fact that these...

Genshin Impact. Ahri Boy (talk) 00:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES for now. It seems that this term transcends cultures and not just exclusive...

at the target, or only for Islam. If Steel1943 is fine with Duckmather's REDYES argument for deletion, he may modify the nomination rationale and bundle...

rises in the Atlantic": I think this is worth a couple of redlinks, per WP:REDYES: perhaps "the Ceará and Sierra Leone rises in the Atlantic"? Removed as...

delete per nom Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES. Cursory google search shows that hunter safety courses are mandatory for...

billed co-headliners. There might be the probable cause of WP:PTOPIC or WP:REDYES on BLAR-ing the joint co-headlining tour. I would suggest restore the article...

— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Delete as per WP:REDYES. This is a common enough English phrase/expression, and it might be worthy...

the federation's article). Number 57 15:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC) I think WP:REDYES would say it is probably preferrable Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:28, 23 July...

for. DonIago (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC) Delete per WP:RFD#D10/WP:REDYES (to encourage article creation). Basically nothing about her at the current...

would not support that so I don't think it's worthwhile deleting via WP:REDYES. TartarTorte 14:53, 16 August 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom: misleading. Edward-Woodrow :)...

Jay 💬 08:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC) Delete per Jay. This seems like a WP:REDYES situation where it's better to leave the reader saying "darn, I guess there...

consistency is more important, so would suggest all or none. And per WP:REDYES, this can be an encouragement for others to create said article. Up to you...

written. NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 15:02, 25 February 2026 (UTC) delete per WP:REDYES --Lenticel (talk) 06:56, 26 February 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved as...

temporary redirect for the Burmese musical artist. Maybe delete per WP:REDYES? Duckmather (talk) 06:52, 17 February 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved...

a WP:DAB page is a good idea in the long term, but in the meantime, WP:REDYES and WP:WTAF apply. Carguychris (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2025 (UTC) Delete...

printf/scanf and we currently don't cover it anywhere, we should delete per WP:REDYES, no? Then an article that covers all the contexts format strings can appear...

Not mentioned at the target...may or may not be a case of WP:REDYES, but it's unhelpful as is. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:01, 4 February...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Delete as unmentioned and WP:REDYES. Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:17, 28 December 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom although...

Uterine fibroids. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:06, 22 August 2025 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES and because the current redirect is misleading since not all uterine tumors...

non-Thomas works as well. Delete, either to favour search results, or per WP:REDYES. Jay 05:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) Draft:Redirect to given name → Olive (given...

not look like boar teeth. Might be worth linking Jennifer Foster per WP:REDYES; there's not much, but it's equally not impossible [49]). Done. That one's...

could be recreated, or even an article could be created at this title (WP:REDYES). -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (they|xe|she) 05:07, 22 December 2023 (UTC)...

alsready a page, is Establishment (works council) a viable relink per WP:REDYES? What is the difference? I replaced red link with workplace. Any worker...

stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]  Confusing self-link; delete per WP:REDYES (much as I hate citing it, I think it's the only way to make Liu (state)...

type of book with affinity with a specific non-English language, so WP:REDYES may apply. Steel1943 (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC) मेटाउन (that means...

Οκτωβρίου 1935. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:06, 26 May 2026 (UTC) Support WP:REDYES per all. Jay 💬 09:07, 31 May 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved as an archive...

article is created. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES --Lenticel (talk) 03:22, 16 July 2026 (UTC) Comment this was a (very short...

associated with it. Carguychris (talk) 21:27, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Delete, WP:REDYES. I'm also surprised we don't have an article for this. Since someone ought...

LGBT rights in the SADR whatsoever. As such, I think this is a case of WP:REDYES, where we might want to leave it red in order to inspire someone to write...

(Talk/Edits) 20:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Add back to the list, or delete per WP:REDYES for both the soccer/football and hockey terms. This search for "insurance...

article should be written at a redirect title, they !vote to delete per WP:REDYES. RfD is not the place to discuss creating an article or whether a topic...

If we don't have an encyclopedic target, the link should be red per WP:REDYES, which communicates the truth that we have no encyclopedic information for...

misleading, and should be deleted (or retargeted, if appropriate) per WP:REDYES to encourage the creation of content about this character, as such content...

common as they once were but red links are still considered a good thing. WP:REDYES is an essay about it, and the FA criteria don't say anything about it. Mike...

Delete all these species -> genus-list redirects per WP:REDYES and very strong existing consensus that these redirects are misleading and...

Miller. ISBN 978-0-905203-04-1. Thanks in advance! (For the as-yet WP:REDYES Ricardus Franciscus, a late Medieval scribe.) —Fortuna, imperatrix 16:18...

That, and the acronym seems like it may be a subject which has either WP:REDYES potential as either a standalone article or a subtopic to add into TeX or...

a connection to the subject Ridley Scott; in other words, delete per WP:REDYES. Steel1943 (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

submission template at the draft. Jay 💬 10:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC) Delete per WP:REDYES/nom, as it's not clear when the draft will be ready. signed, Rosguill talk...

article about a detention camp where she is never mentioned or alluded to. WP:REDYES would seemingly apply... but it has already been tried and tested at AfD...

history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] Delete all per WP:REDYES and WP:RETURNTORED, all of these could potentially be articles but instead...

Ed [talk] [OMT] 19:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom, and BD2412 as WP:REDYES. Jay 15:47, 10 August 2026 (UTC) The above is preserved as an archive of...

on what to do outside of that, between retargeting to a category or a WP:REDYES delete. Given that a mention has not been added, I have retargeted to the...

this? Cremastra (talk · contribs) 05:26, 22 July 2025 (UTC) Oppose: WP:REDYES is useful and helpful in many cases. It also hasn't been demonstrated that...

mentioned at current target or Futsal Association of India. Also per WP:REDYES/WP:RFD#D10. A7V2 (talk) 01:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC) Relisted to generate...

Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:29, 19 August 2025 (UTC) Delete for now per WP:REDYES. Although I think anal disease/s is a more proper term. --Lenticel (talk)...

topic in general instead of as a redirect, so I support deletion per WP:REDYES. Casablanca 🪨(T) 18:27, 19 May 2026 (UTC) Retarget to Disproportionate...

Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC) weak delete per WP:REDYES Okmrman (talk) 15:14, 12 May 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved as an archive...

more annoying species-> genus redirects. Delete' all per precedent per WP:REDYES. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 22:04, 5 February 2026 (UTC) Delete per nom...

draftspace which were all BLARED by the creator. Don't redirect per WP:REDYES. QueenofHearts 19:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved as an...

simply not the article someone searching this is looking for. Delete per WP:REDYES since this is likely a notable topic. A7V2 (talk) 03:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)...

for more appropriate use and allow redlinking at pages like Beebase (WP:REDYES). – Scyrme (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2023 (UTC) The above is preserved as...

(talk) 19:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC) Mildly surprised at the lack, per WP:REDYES, of a link to Kenneth Drury, one of the most infamous coppers of the post-war...

possibly merged to the genus article). These redirects can be deleted per WP:REDYES. Plantdrew (talk) 16:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC) The above is preserved...

specific related topic. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:39, 13 May 2026 (UTC) delete per WP:REDYES as potential article --Lenticel (talk) 00:12, 14 May 2026 (UTC) The above...

Red Palace is the primary topic for this title, so this seems like a WP:REDYES WP:PLA situation. Cremastra (talk) 14:51, 14 September 2024 (UTC) Disambiguate...

cables section and many mentions to telegraph wires. After all this time WP:REDYES has not lead to an article (this redirect was only created last December)...

vacant to avoid misleading readers and leave space for an article (per WP:REDYES). I lean towards delete, unless someone can demonstrate that they actually...

creation at this title even more (which is why I've long had issues with WP:REDYES as an argument). Duckmather (talk) 01:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC) Relisted...

mentioned at Polytypic makes me think it is {{R with possibilities}}, and REDYES could be an option, but maybe someone who knows biology could speak to whether...

This refers to an acedemic field. I suggest deletion per WP:REDYES. Veverve (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Delete per nom. There's not...

oppose a FAC, and a coordinator would not treat that as a valid oppose. WP:REDYES is the relevant guideline: there's no obligation to include redlinks but...

target. Should probably be deleted to encourage article creation per WP:REDYES. Casablanca 🪨(T) 02:36, 5 January 2026 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...

deleted it would possibly be constructed to an appropriate standard under WP:REDYES or at least would not be an article that at the current moment does not...

sources are found. This article is so minimal I'd prefer to go with WP:REDYES delete than the redirect as ATD. asilvering (talk) 02:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)...

same codepoint). Or letters that are themselves notable enough to meet WP:REDYES criteria? What about logographic characters used in Chinese or Japanese...

attitude to article creation has changed, and I don't think that's true. WP:REDYES is similar: it exists because incompleteness is seen as not inherently bad...

The subject deserves more comprehensive coverage so I think we should WP:RedYes. I am excited to see more retargetting proposals, though. Aaron Liu (talk)...

04:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC) Are all/ any of the cast members notable per WP:REDYES? Also, surely we need to cite their names? Done in this edit "Filmmakers...

November 2023 (UTC) keep has more than one topic, before being removed. WP:REDYES and WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES show that just because there are links that are red...

to this list. It's OK that some of these may end up being notable per wp:REDYES and wp:RETURNTORED. A red link at List of minor planets (or wherever) may...

untouched since 2008. If there's a good article to be made here, we've got WP:REDYES. If there isn't, we can simply remove it. We don't need to tie ourselves...

this? Cremastra (talk · contribs) 05:26, 22 July 2025 (UTC) Oppose: WP:REDYES is useful and helpful in many cases. It also hasn't been demonstrated that...

redirect here as a {{R with possibilities}}). Decided against that per WP:REDYES. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 21:06, 2 July...

Cut Roller. Is there any reason to believe that Elmer Saunders meets WP:REDYES? Based on the sources, he was a local boilermaker who was on the (amateur...

and generally should not be removed. WP:RED has some useful guidance, WP:REDYES in particular tells you where you should be adding or retaining red links...

are, in principle, OK for articles when they meant the conditions of WP:REDYES, but I don't know enough about Samsung mobile phones to say whether that's...

(talk) 12:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC) @Tofusaurus, you might want to read WP:REDYES. Schwede66 04:09, 8 August 2024 (UTC) Oppose The article will need significant...

alsready a page, is Establishment (works council) a viable relink per WP:REDYES? What is the difference? I replaced red link with workplace. Any worker...

"Robert Burley" linked was born in the 20th century. Oops. Delinked per WP:REDYES. John Greenwell, a monk of Fountains, was elected Abbot in October 1442...

intentional red link from the lede, multiple times. I directed them towards WP:REDYES, to which they replied "There is no link LOL". That response made it clear...

"write the article first" is the same as reverting vandalism, given WP:REDYES. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC) Prince Louis of Wales (edit...

few things to be clarified. I adjusted the curious Wikidata link per WP:REDYES. If there's a real need for the WD link—I can't remember ever seeing it...

than the proposed target, which doesn't mention this precisely, also WP:REDYES. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 06:09, 10 December 2025 (UTC) This is...

Would any of the non-linked people rate a redlink, under WP:GNG (and so WP:REDYES)? Done. I looked at non-linked persons, and it seems unlikely that they'll...

Declined. Target article does not so much as mention Argentina. Per WP:REDYES, this may be the sort of thing to leave as red rather than create a redirect...