Search Results: Wikipedia:REFSPAM
Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Spam
Sabtu, 2026-07-18 18:28:09most cases result in all of them being removed. Shortcuts WP:REFSPAMWP:REFSPAM WP:CITESPAMWP:CITESPAM Citation spamming is the illegitimate or improper...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mgstaggers/Archive
Jumat, 2017-06-23 00:38:51Mgstaggers's last refspam edit was on 2017-05-24, which was the exact date that I started reverting their edits and warned them about refspam. On the exact...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Иван Трухницкий/Archive
Minggu, 2018-08-05 10:26:25July and soon made a single refspam link to casinobonusesfinder.com [1] First sock was created 5 July and added refspam link to same domain [2] Next...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ChicagoNext/Archive
Senin, 2022-01-31 12:12:40sockmaster engages in WP:REFSPAM for the works of "Yevhen Marynchak". After I instructed the editor to stop engaging in refspam,[1] numerous other accounts...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gay beaches in France
Jumat, 2025-11-14 10:34:16June 2015 (UTC) Delete I'm trying hard to AGF but for me this looks like refspam, and in any case it's impossible to verify beyond a shadow of a doubt if...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Northernlapwing/Archive
Rabu, 2020-08-26 06:42:51Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour. WP:REFSPAM - multiple additions of papers by Gregory Anderson, accounts all registered...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harold the phish/Archive
Jumat, 2024-04-05 04:57:36utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools Both accounts being used for refspam [1] [2] Loafiewa (talk) 20:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC) Accused parties may...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RedwoodReserves/Archive
Kamis, 2020-02-13 13:05:21Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour. Both adding refspam to promote "RedwoodReserves"; compare apparent sock and master. I have...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VTP Apps/Archive
Sabtu, 2021-10-23 21:00:31unblock request (though it still appears to contain original research and refspam). — LauritzT (talk) 18:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC) Accused parties may also...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love spells
Minggu, 2025-11-23 14:54:01result was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G11. Article was just cover for WP:REFSPAM. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Love spells (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/John Peyang/Archive
Jumat, 2018-10-12 21:31:43garbage after editing warring on Yingkiong, which essentially serves as refspam to placesforvacations.com. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:46, 18 September...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JKnewsmagazine/Archive
Sabtu, 2020-05-16 06:14:07Defending yourself against claims. Blocked JKnewsmagazine for username & refspam (http://jknewsmagazine.com). 19clancyt looks to be heading towards a block...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EC-Council Certified Encryption Specialist
Selasa, 2025-11-25 04:05:00FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article about a technical certification replete with WP:REFSPAM and several dubious references. This is one of several non-notable certification...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brand intimacy
Rabu, 2025-12-10 03:21:08and external links lead to them: the whole article is WP:LINKSPAM and WP:REFSPAM. To the extent there is an objective concept one might call "brand intimacy"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JasonReal2021/Archive
Kamis, 2021-09-02 14:59:12Auto-generated every hour. Near identical names, apparent COI in the form of WP:REFSPAM, through a website that generates zero results when searched on-wiki. https://en...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nitin Raj Patel/Archive
Sabtu, 2025-06-28 15:37:41of references. User:Moksha Legal Group is created 3 April and inserts refspam to mokshalegalgroup.com into Divorce [4], user is then blocked the same...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jamrock18/Archive
Kamis, 2021-06-10 17:55:19added a lightly modified block of the same WP:PROMO citing identical WP:REFSPAM as the suspected sockpuppeteer. Both accounts were created recently and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jnyssen/Archive
Senin, 2021-12-27 01:12:15engaged in refspam and COI on the same topic and in the same manner. In June 2019, Jnyssen was cautioned on his talk page [159] about COI and refspam. A quick...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Nejd, Sultanate of Oman
Rabu, 2025-12-03 03:49:33concerning this site that attests to its notability. This seems like a case refspam which specifically says "Variations of citation spamming include academics...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diaa Eldin Mohamed/Archive
Jumat, 2011-03-11 03:44:01the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~" IP is inserting refspam on Universal law. The link goes to some paper written by "Diaaeldin Mohamed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NLA-Collections/Archive
Minggu, 2025-12-07 06:34:11are engaged in widespread WP:REFSPAM of his research. High level of page overlap between the accounts: [1] Similar refspam of Guest's research: Saysinclair:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renal Fibrosis
Kamis, 2026-01-08 22:47:16Delete - entire purpose of article is likely to house spammed links / refspam to Shijiazhuang Kidney Disease Hospital, spam report here. --CliffC (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theunheardstories75/Archive
Senin, 2024-09-09 06:43:55material cited to their own website (theunheardstories.com) which is both WP:REFSPAM and not a WP:RS. (See [1] and [2].) Then the sock came along with multiple...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explainer video
Senin, 2025-11-17 11:09:05product, that seems to exists as a WP:COATRACK for WP:LINKSPAM and WP:REFSPAM. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 13:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AtosiOBP/Archive
Selasa, 2019-05-14 02:53:49Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour. same mass OBP refspam as doi urls to circumvent the blacklist/spam filters Praxidicae (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States flash flood emergencies
Kamis, 2025-12-18 00:41:20WP:REFSPAM, I was citing the primary sources, but since it appears that people do not see the notability, I have begun doing borderline WP:REFSPAM, citing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Democracy Network
Minggu, 2025-12-14 10:30:18Rusalkii (talk) 01:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom and above. WP:REFSPAM in the article is trying to connect the organization with the larger voting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Fulk
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:34:31at this time. Gong show 19:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Delete—Typical refspam to press releases or trivial coverage. Fails GNG. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 14:16...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daniel vic/Archive
Kamis, 2020-10-08 01:31:10was created two days ago, and has not only been adding the same kind of refspam to the same domain:[8], [9], but has also requested the removal of that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JanosKörmendyRacz/Archive
Kamis, 2019-10-24 09:50:22administrative action - Both are clearly introducing (& re-introducing) refspam for Racz's biography of Beck, sourced to a retail website. Please indef...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcel Miska
Jumat, 2025-12-12 12:04:21satisfies WP:NACTOR and WP:RS. Also some refs appears an attempt at WP:REFSPAM, i have removed some just thought i should bring it here. Possible WP:PROMO...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Badtoothfairy/Archive
Sabtu, 2021-03-13 06:42:07Blablubbs|talk 19:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC) I'm also going to start cleaning up the refspam. Help is appreciated. Blablubbs|talk 19:33, 12 March 2021 (UTC) JKlug81...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smita Shewale
Selasa, 2025-12-09 15:09:19scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) after cleaning up the refspam, I did some before and can find little in the way of coverage. It appears...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winter Mountain
Minggu, 2025-12-14 12:00:58scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) after the removal of refspam and a search for RS, I see no indication this meets WP:SINGER or WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xxjennybrownsxx/Archive
Selasa, 2014-12-16 04:06:44Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility Both have added similar WP:REFSPAM, usually as a replacement for dead links. Both first edited in February...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenk Oz
Senin, 2025-12-15 03:38:03images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:TOOSOON: there is countless refspam arguabley 2/28 refs meet GNG Yogiile (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WilliamNFlowers/Archive
Senin, 2022-10-17 23:37:52of their edits is reverted There are some notable differences however: REFSPAM is dominant in nearly all of WilliamNFlowers's edits; none in Tywonwilliams12's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Expert editors
Kamis, 2026-07-16 08:24:35encyclopedia. Please do not use Wikipedia to promote your own papers (see WP:REFSPAM and WP:SELFCITE), and please do not author literature reviews in Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Remus00/Archive
Jumat, 2017-03-24 21:29:24below. See Defending yourself against claims. We should blacklist the refspam URL seezislab.com. Binksternet (talk) 23:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC) Confirmed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Presley
Jumat, 2025-11-14 03:11:34Kierzek (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per Nom, whoever is adding refspam from Bangalore isn't helping this article any. Brianhe (talk) 05:08, 27...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver-side (wolf)
Senin, 2025-12-01 12:30:42contribs) 19:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTDIC, WP:HOAX or WP:REFSPAM: take your pick — Iadmc♫talk 19:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Alan Yule
Rabu, 2025-12-03 07:02:05TWL) autobiographical article created by a user that has been adding WP:REFSPAM all sources are self published or affiliated. Fails WP:NOTPROMO Dom from...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AC4 (album)
Jumat, 2025-11-28 00:36:39JSTOR · TWL) Blatant advertising. References are to commercial sites WP:REFSPAM, no notability as per WP:NALBUMS. This may qualify for G-11 and or A-7...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amnesty the game
Selasa, 2025-12-09 05:35:17CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC) This doesn't look notable. The refspam notwithstanding, the only interesting source I can see out and about it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untranslatability
Senin, 2025-12-01 14:47:27as WP:OR for over five years, and the only "fixes" have been adding WP:REFSPAM. Guy (Help!) 13:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizq
Rabu, 2025-12-03 06:23:32author of the sources. fails WP:GEOFEAT and WP:GNG this is a serial WP:REFSPAM user Dom from Paris (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Positive Promotions, Inc.
Jumat, 2025-11-28 03:29:46either Press Releases, WP:SPSes, or minor coverage. A great example of refspam that does nothing to satisfy WP:N. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 14:13, 6 September 2013...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikirank.net (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 19:35:54Renominating this in light of Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Refspam_across_many_articles as in the previous AFD the first four keep !votes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20150107/Feature
Jumat, 2026-03-27 01:25:48contributor"? Couldn't this be viewed as a form of promotion via REFSPAM? The answer is no. Refspam is the " illegitimate or improper use of citations, footnotes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Conservative Woman (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 18:01:54neither in the presented sources nor in a WP:BEFORE. Lots and lots of WP:REFSPAM - but only one reference link that even mentions the site itself (the New...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naser Parvani
Rabu, 2025-12-24 05:26:16(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:REFSPAM + likely WP:UPE. Sources are mainly press releases / WP:SELFPUB profiles...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garment sewing data
Senin, 2025-11-17 13:00:16roundabout advertisement for SewEasy products featuring chunks of canned WP:REFSPAM. I did a google search with "Garment sewing data" in quotes, only got 6...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Altamash422/Archive
Kamis, 2025-07-03 11:18:15as an IP) to continue spamming these links disguised as references (WP:REFSPAM). Notice both users have broken English, and canned edit summaries; the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aubrey Burl
Senin, 2026-01-05 14:27:38expectation that sources be added to 'improve' the article, rather than as {{refspam}} for already verifiable points is hardly unreasonable. My 'Delete' opinion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Search engine optimization methods (2nd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-11-15 22:54:38article is much better watched, unlike this one which is a magnet for WP:REFSPAM.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Black-Mica
Sabtu, 2022-02-26 14:50:54| history | links | watch | logs) An apparent copy of Biotite with WP:REFSPAM. Shows up in Google when searching for "black mica" which I assume is the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10 Honest Thoughts on Being Loved by a Skinny Boy
Rabu, 2025-12-10 01:28:00probably. In any event, there's a lot of Button Poetry-related promo and refspam that gets added regularly wherever possible in the encyclopedia. The pattern...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lavender Town
Selasa, 2025-12-16 07:21:33Non-notable game level that doesn't have WP:SIGCOV. If you review the WP:REFSPAM you will find that most of these are passing mentions, or even unreliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darryl Dobbs
Selasa, 2026-01-06 09:25:35Article uses deceptive methods in an attempt to mask lack of notability (refspam for example). For example, it says "Labeled an "honest-to-goodness expert"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spartan1977/Archive
Sabtu, 2018-07-28 06:22:43almost all the refs are from them. Similarly plenty of apparent SELFCITE refspam like this and this and this, adding another patent application by them...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davina Reichman (3rd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-12-20 00:17:16JSTOR · TWL) Solely passing mentions + nothing comes up in Google News. Refspam is also evident TLA (talk) 10:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MCE-CN/Archive
Senin, 2021-08-09 01:01:31all of which include links to medchemexpress.com. This is apparent WP:REFSPAM and the "MCE" portion of two of the usernames is the abbreviation for medchemexpress...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willem Barnard
Jumat, 2025-12-19 11:31:52interview (which does not count toward notability). I removed a number of WP:REFSPAM sources and all other included sources really scraped the barrel; I removed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comb-shaped people
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:17:43February 2013 (UTC) Delete Non-notable neologism and fairly obvious WP:REFSPAM. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Snow Delete per WP:NEO...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScaleFactor
Selasa, 2025-12-09 14:44:19providing an in-depth, independent look at the company. I will also mention WP:REFSPAM, as many of the sources (over half) are links to the homepages of companies...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIFA Allstars Ontario
Minggu, 2025-12-14 04:36:10article to try and fix this issue, but there's other issues with COI/UNDUE/REFSPAM that also need to be addressed. I do think the sources provided constitute...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sh.eshmuradov/Archive
Sabtu, 2020-10-03 07:21:33Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour. Refspam for samarkandtours.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadja Sayej
Selasa, 2025-12-09 12:48:08of the subjects own work being used to reference things it feels like refspam. Curdle (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederic Colier (2nd nomination)
Kamis, 2025-11-13 20:35:03self-published sources when I happened upon this article. It was riddled with WP:REFSPAM and when that was removed, only one source remains, a news clipping naming...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Reich-Rohrwig
Jumat, 2025-12-19 04:51:24like a resume which wikipedia is not and with an excessive amount of WP:REFSPAM which does nothing to assert notability of the subject. Bungle (talk •...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-followed Twitter accounts
Senin, 2025-12-01 06:54:02article should be internal links to other Wikipedia articles, not offsite refspam links to other websites. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature exposure sufficiency insufficiency
Senin, 2025-12-01 09:00:00created by Sdurante07 who has been spamming wikilinks to this page, and refspam to the Medical Hypotheses article, in many other articles, which is how...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SEMrush
Rabu, 2025-12-03 07:27:42news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An interview, refspam of mentions does not notability and WP:CORPDEPTH maketh (amusing that the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anastasiia Ivanova (fashion designer)
Selasa, 2025-04-08 21:06:26undisclosed paid editing, because the article creator was reverted for refspam and has created or edited articles in a promotional way across multiple...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mirfishe/Archive
Sabtu, 2021-09-11 20:02:42SI) User compare report Auto-generated every hour. Massive WP:SPAM / WP:REFSPAM campaign seeding hundreds of articles to an Adsense "fan" site. See WikiProject...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shimelba massacres
Minggu, 2025-12-14 09:08:50This article was part of a series of over 100 articles created as WP:REFSPAM for a self-published source (the Atlas) by an editor now under sockpuppet...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softgarden e-recruiting
Jumat, 2024-10-11 10:37:4318:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC) Delete. Coverage is trivial, and honestly the refspam makes it look like UPE product. Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:25, 5 October 2024...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Delnex/Archive
Selasa, 2014-01-28 02:54:18report Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility Adding WP:REFSPAM to fundoofun.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple -...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Kubassek
Rabu, 2026-01-07 09:47:10inclusion bar. Carrite (talk) 18:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC) Delete. Suffers from refspam in a desperate attempt to prove notability (22 in a 5 kb article). These...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kofi Adjorlolo
Selasa, 2025-12-09 10:55:03as well have been submitted unsourced as what I removed was essentially refspam and otherwise unreliable sources. After searching myself, all that I can...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trialome
Jumat, 2025-11-28 04:20:46Sakaton, has also inserted a great deal of other links I would call refspam, the majority of which point to other of Huser's papers. This editor was...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Card games online
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 21:37:58Jclemens (talk) 21:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Delete Seems to be WP:REFSPAM, article creator contributions are pretty much solely trying to add "citations"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Harrison
Jumat, 2026-01-09 18:49:09July 2010 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable as can be seen by the quantity of refspam and lack of substantial reliable coverage. Article has also suffered from...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ark25/RefScript
Sabtu, 2022-02-26 14:56:54links | watch | logs) It could, conceivably, be used without violating WP:REFSPAM, but the author has specifically stated he is going to violate it. — Arthur...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uladzimir Levaneuski (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 18:52:45renominating this in light of Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Refspam_across_many_articles which strongly indicates that the editor who created...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump Divorce
Selasa, 2025-12-09 16:25:13(talk) 09:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC) Delete Literal WP:WHOCARES, along with WP:REFSPAM, we're not the Miami New Times or Deco Drive. Dave Aronberg is also packed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christine Conix
Senin, 2025-11-17 04:42:14multiple independent reliable sources focused on her, but there is some WP:REFSPAM in there, plus WP:PRIMARY sources. If the article is kept, I'll try to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-11-14 23:31:09the article before it was stripped of what was termed "refspam". I've looked at it, and "refspam" seems a fair enough description. Delete per nom; and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PCoIP
Kamis, 2026-01-08 15:04:03desktop virtualization article. Currently just being used as a vehicle for refspam, and I don't see it being developed into an encyclopedic article given...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subpopulation Algorithm based on Novelty
Senin, 2025-11-24 04:18:22as minimal as a brief citation. Fails WP:NOR, WP:GNG, and probably WP:REFSPAM. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Q42 (Wikidata item)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 15:00:20article (I count five independent sources cited, out of 41 citations—WP:REFSPAM?), and this item doesn't strike me as particularly significant to the project's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto McCausland Dieppa
Rabu, 2025-12-24 05:28:10news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A lot of WP:REFSPAM, and it seems like WP:COI. A lot of the sources are very questionable,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GAPS diet
Senin, 2025-12-01 02:37:01Brackett. All three books unambiguously serve to promote the diet (WP:REFSPAM). The diet itself claims to treat various mental disabilities at opposite...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Onlinebooks.asia/Archive
Kamis, 2018-07-12 04:28:05search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com ...as inappropriate refspam. PaleoNeonate pulled the last remaining links and may be interested in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10ZiG
Senin, 2026-01-05 04:52:27edits, almost all of their edits since have been to insert various spam or refspam into articles. It looks like 10ZiG has been their only article creation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philip Adrian/Archive
Selasa, 2020-10-06 00:13:17Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour. These accounts add refspam to recent deaths articles. The references link to obituaries on the following...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/129.234.0.13/Archive
Kamis, 2022-03-10 04:50:58(129.234.252.65) go back to September 2009, but so far I've found the refspam behavior only on March 6, 2013. Possibly a shared IP, but on the user page...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaimesbean/Archive
Sabtu, 2020-05-16 06:24:39something on Wiktionary that got deleted. Jakevape shows up on May 4 to add refspam to Usage of electronic cigarettes.[2]. Jeloantonio shows up on May 5 to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Born-Oppenheimer equation
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:03:18undue weight WP:UNDUE and the blatant advertising WP:ADVERT through WP:REFSPAM, this article should be deleted per WP:TNT. --Mark viking (talk) 21:45...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Digital Akshit12/Archive
Rabu, 2022-12-28 01:51:57Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools Similar refspam as the earlier case on the same page. Jasper Deng (talk) 10:02, 20 December...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haste1066/Archive
Rabu, 2018-06-20 06:43:02topics like Customer success and Aunt Bessies. Note introduction of same refspam link [1][2] and coordinated promotion of a pork food brand [3][4] ... ☆...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Music News
Jumat, 2025-12-19 02:20:44WP:NCORP. Despite the large number of references, it's basically all WP:REFSPAM, where DMN is passingly mentioned, but there is no significant coverage...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trystanburke/Archive
Senin, 2017-06-12 03:28:28discussion regarding the same: [7][8]. Two of the accounts have also added WP:REFSPAM to createasite.net in the same timespan: [9][10][11][12] MER-C 10:51, 17...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desi Music Factory (2nd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 22:58:22Promospam. No sign of meeting WP:NCORP. More than 100 sources, most of them refspam, and nothing that's actually about the company. bonadea contributions talk...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graeme Blevins
Senin, 2025-12-22 05:29:19references do not solve the problems highlighted by the nomination. Lots of WP:REFSPAM overall. Pilaz (talk) 09:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aximilli Isthill/Archive
Minggu, 2022-03-27 15:27:32promotion only, but has done a little page curation) adding the same WP:REFSPAM to articles, including shopchimney.com and fundraisingscript.com. Editing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Louton
Sabtu, 2025-12-20 00:16:57January 2024 (UTC) Delete per nom, considering the WP:SPI, an array of WP:REFSPAM & non-WP:SIGCOV as well. TLA (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Affinity marketing
Minggu, 2025-11-16 20:40:52results for the phrase 'affinity marketing'. It easily passed WP:GNG. WP:REFSPAM can (and should) be cleaned up, but that is not a valid reason for deleting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LoanMart
Selasa, 2025-12-09 11:43:35Delete Per above, with thanks to Newslinger for organizing the refs. WP:REFSPAM is the issue here; unless an independent, in-depth source provides a information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Richzog Tri/Archive
Selasa, 2017-12-12 15:56:21behavior is more similar to the master, all of the other accounts are adding refspam to articles. Two – EdisonHawk and Ukmoner12 – are using the same website...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mego Sonny & Cher Toys
Kamis, 2026-01-08 05:10:43dolls. Geo Swan (talk) 03:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC) Delete: a nine-source 'refspam' for the simple fact that WP:ITEXISTS, plus a whole swathe of citations...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SMGeorge34/Archive
Senin, 2022-03-28 01:59:26constructive edits is a steady stream of spamming, usually in the form of WP:REFSPAM of links to commercial sites that have nothing to do with the subject of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law Society, Aligarh Muslim University
Jumat, 2025-11-14 08:31:05JSTOR · TWL) No real evidence of notability, despite a huge amount of refspam. Created by an SPA, all sources in the article are primary, unreliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaikh Syed Abdul Razzaq Jilani
Sabtu, 2025-11-15 23:23:38pushing into various Wikipedia articles for a couple of months now (WP:REFSPAM). It appears that unless new reliable sources are found and prove otherwise...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D20minus/Archive
Sabtu, 2026-01-03 10:57:59at least one group that's known to operate from this geolocation with refspam, I just can't point to them off the cuff. Izno (talk) 20:03, 1 November...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cuhs/Archive
Rabu, 2021-08-18 04:08:17think we've done all we can from the chemistry side; maybe ask at WT:MATH? Refspam is a problem, and finding better secondary refs even if these are "ok"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abanny
Selasa, 2025-01-14 21:27:47his supposed digital marketing school (I previously deleted that as WP:REFSPAM and will do so again), links to the homepages of Nigerian local governments...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thelittlegreenfrog/Archive
Sabtu, 2023-03-25 07:09:37Jones have images tagged as the author's own work, and quite a bit of refspam. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:20, 14 March 2023 (UTC) Accused parties...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle Dodgeball League
Sabtu, 2026-02-14 07:19:02is highly questionable (relative to WP:NOTMIRROR, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:REFSPAM.) FWIW, I had investigated whether a merge to Australian Dodgeball League...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim privilege
Sabtu, 2024-09-14 06:27:2717:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC) Delete WP:MADEUP racist filth filled with refspam without any context to the term or just filled with the banned editor's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perfect box theory
Minggu, 2025-12-14 07:05:04that the creator of this article cited in another article (WP:SPS, WP:REFSPAM). The article Perfect box theory was created in late July, not long before...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/whythebookwins.com
Rabu, 2021-10-20 10:30:465 different IPS, at least one blocked as open proxy. Qualifies as WP:REFSPAM, and I don't expect that XLinkBot reverts will give the message seen the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Failatu Abdul-Razak
Rabu, 2025-12-24 05:17:49like he just recently broke records. Article is certainly promotional + refspam, so cleanup is needed. But I think recent events since the nomination help...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahindra University
Rabu, 2026-08-12 11:55:23dropping sources in a nom and just calling it a day) is just the same as REFSPAM, so we're going to need more than that, please. Nathannah • 📮 22:42, 20...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Deerdog40/Archive
Jumat, 2024-05-31 13:20:56SPAs popping up to promote Ronnete Santos the financial advisor through refspam, all using the same formatting. ([1] [2] [3]). Pahunkat (talk) 21:36, 14...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/createandfly.com
Kamis, 2020-02-20 17:03:032020 (UTC) Reverted, warning issued, but IP seems to change owner. WP:REFSPAM. --Dirk Beetstra T C 09:41, 20 February 2020 (UTC) New data reported. No...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zhanmiko/Archive
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 07:43:56Almaty related drafts with improper citation and a common aspect of WP:REFSPAM (https://zhetysu.travel/) in all the drafts. ~ Amkgp 💬 20:04, 1 November...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quantam1986/Archive
Senin, 2026-08-03 00:38:56Quantam1986: [13], also in Foreign trade of Pakistan table[14] c/w same refspam Xcalibur19: [15] 3) Marking almost all edits as minor, though not those...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smarketing
Selasa, 2025-11-18 17:20:12Keep but it is good this article was AfD-ed, since it was entirely WP:REFSPAM, with promotional links to marketers hawking Smarketing. The spam is removed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Abo
Selasa, 2025-12-16 06:26:2812 June 2022 (UTC) Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. The refs provided are refspam at most. – The Grid (talk) 23:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:AUTHOR...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Caplan (2nd nomination)
Minggu, 2025-11-30 23:03:57WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I have been cleaning up a large amount of refspam related to the paid editing ring of user:Vipul. Among his edits were dozens...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Women of Rock Oral History Project interviews
Senin, 2025-12-01 06:43:23view, definitely yes. It doesn't matter whether the links are inline or refspam, it's still predominantly a list of links to outside content, and this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Chitwan
Jumat, 2025-12-12 03:31:21is used in the article), even though among the Nepali sources it's got refspam fitting every description. Looking at the current revision (permalink)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erum Akhtar (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2026-02-04 00:58:44nothing found in article or BEFORE that meets WP:SIRS. Article has a lot of refspam, but none or it meets WP:SIRS, addressing the subject directly and indepth...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/mosartlabs.com
Jumat, 2025-01-31 19:31:31data reported. --COIBot (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC) Reverted WP:REFSPAM. 1 edit per IP, warning is going to be futile, blacklist if persisting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 September 13
Sabtu, 2021-07-31 01:45:16condom: the sole mention of TheyFit at the target is in the title of WP:REFSPAM at Condom#Causes of failure (not even in the body text of the article)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanner Fox
Senin, 2025-12-01 13:30:10unreliable sources inappropriate for a BLP. I removed tfoxbrand.com as WP:REFSPAM. --Ronz (talk) 16:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/575broadway/Archive
Kamis, 2015-02-19 15:59:42SI) User compare report Auto-generated every hour. 575broadway added WP:REFSPAM links to many articles linking to Interview Magazine and Art in America...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive352
Minggu, 2023-02-19 13:27:25problem? The question is whether the many Esquire sources come under REFSPAM. REFSPAM is a subtle version of spamming and people can legitimately disagree...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Wearing Smith
Rabu, 2025-12-10 07:20:33reliable sources other the reports about his court case. Take out the iMDb refspam, the blogs, and the primary sources where Mr. With discusses Sylvester...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fractional calculus of sets
Jumat, 2024-11-08 09:40:01references (all of the ones in the final paragraph) appear to be present as WP:REFSPAM and to lend credibility to the subject by WP:Citation overkill rather than...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JamesSmith63/Archive
Selasa, 2026-05-12 16:11:19stuff is different, but between the usernames, the proxy use, and the refspam interspersed with other edits, I figured it was worth asking. Extraordinary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EverlyWell
Rabu, 2025-12-10 05:32:01--SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:29, 19 January 2019 (UTC) Delete irrespective of the REFSPAM going on in the subject article, there is a clear lack of in-depth, reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lawmander/Archive
Minggu, 2019-03-03 17:47:12with identical editing pattern, strongly suggesting sockpuppetry and WP:REFSPAM. (1) All edits are to articles pertaining to law; (2) Adds a citation to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State-Based Control
Jumat, 2025-03-28 13:23:30through the Conflict of Interest material on Wikipedia, WP:COI WP:GNG , WP:REFSPAM. Please give me some time to read through those and I will get back to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive455
Rabu, 2026-02-11 07:26:24science, which was again reverted on the basis of REFSPAM. It appears to me from the discussion that REFSPAM is no longer the concern, but it is instead one...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rorylyng/Archive
Senin, 2019-04-29 23:37:57authored by Eoghan Lyng here, continuing the pattern of violations of WP:REFSPAM. Binksternet (talk) 18:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC) Accused parties may also...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimitri Vangelis & Wyman (2nd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 18:24:06for those not on the chart. Not good enough. This is a bloated mess of refspam and promotion and needs to go. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2016...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cocainaenvenenada/Archive
Kamis, 2022-03-10 05:18:24articles as refspam. Plus post four totally bogus user warnings and a fake block notice on my talk page when I removed the most blatant refspam... - Tom | Thomas...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Glossary
Sabtu, 2026-08-08 12:40:44recognition, or a search advantage by appearing in Wikipedia. Synonym: refspam. Civility Behavior can be civil without being warm, friendly, or agreeable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive950
Selasa, 2024-10-08 13:03:58continues with "omg someone is reverting refspam without spending an hour to polish each turd". Instead of enabling refspam, those commenting here should be trying...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 88
Jumat, 2023-04-21 21:59:20same old tricks in 2015: seocertification.co.in refspam (2013); WHOIS record bangalorean.net refspam (2015); [http://www.whois.com/whois/bangalorean.net...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camila Krysicka Janniger
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 12:19:15unsourced claim. The three references to academic journals are bordering refspam - not sure what they are to prove (WP:PRIMARY). Of course, I don't need...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Rothfeld
Rabu, 2025-08-13 06:34:30There's significant independent coverage here, though there seems to be WP:REFSPAM with passing mentions (such as the New York Times piece currently used)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NotWildDaisy/Archive
Kamis, 2022-03-10 06:18:35same behavior: long-term (months) sleeper / minor edit accounts adding refspam over long (months) timescales and adding links to custom-writing.org, an...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive951
Jumat, 2024-10-18 02:49:10spammy. Many users have expressed concern that JzG went too far in his anti-refspam efforts because the blacklisted sites have also in many cases been referenced...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 20
Rabu, 2026-03-11 20:31:41my edit was reverted promptly and soon I was accused of edit-warring, refspam, being against Wikipedia rules, I was inundated with Wikipedia jargon and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 21
Kamis, 2022-05-05 22:59:40references? EWikistTalk 01:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC) While I agree that refspam has indeed been used as a tool for POV-pushing (specifically, giving undue...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Riceissa/Animal Charity Evaluators
Sabtu, 2025-08-16 15:51:232017 (UTC) Delete all, not least because the amount of effort removing refspam and looking for POV is such that WP:TNT represents a better use of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abby Martin (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2025-11-25 03:28:01independent source (the pleasontonweekly article), and it has a lot less refspam (links to her own show), so I'd say it just barely passes WP:CSD#A4. With...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Conferences on Creationism
Rabu, 2026-01-07 07:10:52two references for the bare existence of these conferences. Can we say {{refspam}}? This is no substitute for "significant coverage"! HrafnTalkStalk(P)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tequila Mockingbird (song)
Rabu, 2025-12-10 13:40:38last 14 hours online (don't they ever sleep??) adding a huge amount of refspam to pad out the article and make it appear notable. The editor has seen...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Students Organization of India MSO
Selasa, 2025-11-18 06:32:39they aren't there, and that's also one of the most appalling attempts at refspam I've seen in recent times. And you've not even formatted them. Lukeno94...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 162
Kamis, 2026-08-13 02:18:17added refspam to Urdu Wikipedia Hilda Lucy Adelaide Low (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) added refspam to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernie would have won
Selasa, 2025-12-09 06:15:53combination of NPOV violations, original research, and a coatrack for refspam. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Redirect to United...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Role
Kamis, 2025-11-13 13:44:12in third party reliable sources. while someone has done a good job of refspam, even a cursory review shows that most blatantly fail WP:RS. when looking...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Long-term abuse
Minggu, 2026-08-02 11:38:13primarily from Rhode Island. Europeanhematology 2020-03-24 19:43:42 WP:REFSPAM: IPs geolocating to Czech Republic or Slovakia adding references using...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Accounts
Sabtu, 2026-06-06 19:41:05log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) Y gnomish edits, refspam gobonobo + c 01:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC) Freenvaby (talk+ · tag · contribs ·...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vicky4567/Archive
Kamis, 2022-03-10 06:57:52interaction utility Very similarly named accounts who exclusively add WP:REFSPAM for sgs.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive970
Minggu, 2024-02-18 08:51:47copyvio. It also was indeed refspam. That being say I saw the CC BY-SA on the page, however I'm in agreement, this was refspam. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:29...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1104
Selasa, 2024-05-07 17:58:41logs · filter log · block user · block log) Bunkerpr violates WP:COI and WP:REFSPAM on a regular basis and either deletes or ignores warnings on his talk page...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1074
Selasa, 2022-05-31 23:50:15violation of WP:REFSPAM. The Israel person is adding Ray Carney books as "Further reading" to a great many articles. For example, this refspam at the film...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive456
Minggu, 2023-02-05 03:26:49reliable" in his first edit summaries), in the last reverts Hipal has cited WP:REFSPAM in the last reverts. Hipal has argued that the onus lies on me to demonstrate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2017 February 25
Jumat, 2024-05-24 13:25:22contributions) 19:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC) I think this is called WP:REFSPAM. But it would take an expert in the field to be sure. What if this is really...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive233
Sabtu, 2023-03-18 06:43:26attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page Comments: Won't stop with refspam... no attempt at discussion. Sailsbystars (talk) 07:22, 21 January 2014...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive448
Sabtu, 2022-12-03 00:37:42later information is "unsourced" oe as they call it or "redundant" or "refspam" to then have pretext later to return and delate it as "unsourced". Point...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sir Sputnik
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:04:08them; at most we should add a tag. (For clarity, I am not talking here of refspam). — kashmīrī TALK 12:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC) Oppose Per lack of content...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleven Arts
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 23:32:40in the first place, though a list of films distributed would work. WP:REFSPAM is also a concern with this draft. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 20:38...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive924
Senin, 2026-05-04 02:25:59is one above that was just closed with a community site-ban. Academics refspam pretty regularly, cause disruption doing it, and folks find it... upsetting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive922
Senin, 2026-05-04 02:47:4818:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC) In my opinion, this is clearly inappropriate WP:REFSPAM. So many references to one individual's work across such a variety of articles...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1005
Senin, 2023-03-20 14:50:19Lyng, so much so that these cites are collectively trodding on the WP:REFSPAM guideline. Last August I removed a bunch of these but another Irish IP...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive752
Senin, 2026-06-29 08:16:52adding links to this book and is considered WP:Spam. In particular it is WP:REFSPAM because the additions are just Mass spammed and don't appear to verify...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive123
Selasa, 2023-03-21 17:37:53Reading" of various articles (this is the first time I've encountered "refspam"). I left spam template tags on his Talk page, and his response was to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1044
Sabtu, 2026-02-07 07:02:27made to this discussion. Surjitxingha seems to be WP:SELFCITE-ing and WP:REFSPAM-ing a number of pages. I removed them once but he went ahead and reinserted...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive339
Senin, 2026-06-08 22:59:14Special:Contributions/31.2.227.69 are also related. It indeed looks like promotional refspam but they appear to have stopped for now when warned two days ago... —PaleoNeonate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive670
Selasa, 2023-03-14 19:22:32through his site, historyofsurgery.ca. This falls into the catagory of WP:REFSPAM, WP:COI and WP:OR more thad it does WP:EL--Hu12 (talk) 19:18, 7 February...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1079
Selasa, 2023-08-22 07:45:44about WP:SELFCITE [103], warned about copyvio's [104], warned about WP:REFSPAM [105] [106] [107], and eventually brought to ANI (thread). However, they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive996
Kamis, 2026-02-12 21:49:37doing the same back in 2016 and Ada1944 back in 2013. Primary sources, REFSPAM, PROMO/UNDUE, etc. Am posting here instead of EWN because the problem spans...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive668
Senin, 2026-06-29 08:01:18edits, almost all of their edits since have been to insert various spam or refspam into articles. It looks like 10ZiG has been their only article creation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive816
Rabu, 2025-09-24 22:14:12(talk) 14:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Seconded. It's a textbook case of WP:REFSPAM. I'm removing more now, but someone should check again tomorrow once the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive969
Kamis, 2026-04-02 21:47:29Jtbobwaysf (talk) 16:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC) That is most definitely WP:REFSPAM. -- ChamithN (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC) Blocked for spamming...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive330
Selasa, 2023-04-18 11:41:46block user · block log) I plan to block the above-mentioned accounts for WP:REFSPAM and, based on the preponderance of evidence, undisclosed WP:PAID. I originally...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1047
Senin, 2025-01-06 15:41:28concerns relative to WP:COI, WP:SOCK, WP:BOMBARDMENT, WP:NOTGENEALOGY, WP:REFSPAM and other policies. And hence, perhaps, there is scope for a broader review...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive943
Minggu, 2022-06-05 21:11:04they are already linked through an official website. This is basic SEO refspam. Only in death does duty end (talk) 19:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC) (edit conflict)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive971
Selasa, 2024-05-21 06:44:53discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. It's WP:REFSPAM, then. Blocks have been applied. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:07,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive914
Sabtu, 2026-07-11 08:13:23adding them. I've removed all links to both of those sites, both for being refspam (replacing existing refs with links to sites like these is blatant refspamming)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive948
Rabu, 2025-09-24 21:04:25(talk) 07:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC) I have just nuked another bunch of WP:REFSPAM added by Vipul and his friends. I started out by suggesting a way forward...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive599
Selasa, 2026-03-10 19:22:44(Gibnews). To Gibnews, spam does not have to be financial in motive. WP:REFSPAM concerns references that are added for non-financial reasons. You said...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shamshamster1234/Archive
Sabtu, 2021-05-22 17:05:51application of his ideas" at the time." Others include the astonishing WP:REFSPAM which the editor perpetuated through his Manfromnewmexico profile. In which...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive998
Senin, 2026-02-16 21:30:22edits, and he did not assume good faith when calling the sources I used "refspam" (which they absolutely are not), and inexplicably references WP:WTAF even...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive858
Rabu, 2023-03-22 08:11:44Loganmac (talk · contribs) is one of several accounts of a decent age who has since become solely a single purpose account to attempt to skew the Gamergate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive221
Selasa, 2024-07-09 12:52:58hedgepedia.com Domains added by Tobby100: hedgepedia.com (33). Looks like WP:REFSPAM. MER-C 09:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC) Yeah. Roll back. --jpgordon::==( o ) 16:04...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive840
Senin, 2025-10-20 07:07:45copyrighted material to the article (from the mag website), plus linkspam/refspam. Bfrye26 has also been given a copyvio-warning. Thomas.W talk 16:54, 16...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive241
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 01:39:45http://www.photographytalk.com @Bilby: Photographytalk insertions are WP:REFSPAM. This domain has been spammed previously. MER-C 02:08, 11 November 2012...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive820
Kamis, 2023-03-16 19:34:47deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) I just reverted some blatant WP:REFSPAM by this user: [81][82][83][84][85]... not the kind of "contributions" expected...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive935
Selasa, 2026-01-20 19:57:52often see authors inserting their own books into Wikipedia. It's called refspam. I don't care what the text says, in February I removed some pro-church...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive841
Rabu, 2024-11-27 02:59:33this one. Other than that, his posts have been nothing but bald-faced WP:REFSPAM. He's received multiple warnings, including a non-template explanation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive718
Senin, 2026-07-06 02:00:47quite a number of articles likely as promotional. Another user removed the refspam and reported it at Wiki Project spam. Subsequently, Golb12 has adopted...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive807
Sabtu, 2023-02-18 15:24:33previously had problems with promotional SPAs. They've continued to add refspam despite three warnings, and have not commented on any talk page or their...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive842
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 18:16:54June 2014 (UTC) Per WP:NOTVAND, it's not vandalism, but it is spam per WP:REFSPAM. Ian.thomson (talk) It is vandalism as defined in WP:VANDTYPES Link vandalism:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive331
Senin, 2026-06-08 20:28:50answer the warning. User is making edits such as WP:W2W, WP:PUFFERY, AND WP:REFSPAM. User has been issued a second warning, but due to the severity the undersigned...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive334
Minggu, 2026-07-05 08:42:31The inclination to throw clear non-notable BLPs into draftspace with refspam needs to stop. Nate • (chatter) 01:37, 5 July 2021 (UTC) I think the article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1085
Minggu, 2026-05-03 22:34:55is that the site being added is not a reliable source and that the WP:REFSPAM concerns raise elsewhere are legitimate and need to be addressed. Finally...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1084
Minggu, 2023-02-05 04:02:08Another IP of the range hits other pages too all trying to bring back the refspam of the sock. Then the IPs loses it and tries to revert my edits in other...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive909
Sabtu, 2023-03-04 00:39:57domaintools • AboutUs.com ), and were links that had been added as both refspam and external links, in some cases with multiple links to them on the same...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1034
Selasa, 2024-05-07 17:58:27Johnuniq (talk) 00:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Cullen328, Good block, this is WP:REFSPAM. If he engages on Talk, we can unblock. Guy (help!) 10:05, 16 April 2020...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive826
Senin, 2024-02-19 19:41:22I issued a warning to a new user for promoting their book as BookSpam (refspam) and removed their additions but I have an established user that seems...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive957
Senin, 2026-05-04 21:59:54Nuked and blocked by Materialscientist 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC) The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2019 May 5
Kamis, 2019-05-09 08:27:03The relevant policy is WP:SELFCITE, I think, though in some cases WP:REFSPAM may also apply. --ColinFine (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2019 (UTC) @ColinFine:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive975
Senin, 2026-02-09 00:23:02LII. Also, a large number of the edits seem to rely on onstream24.com as refspam. The created pages that are clearly promotional can be tagged with {{G11}}...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive915
Jumat, 2026-06-05 20:01:48site, will keep an eye on them and block if any further COI-editing or refspam comes up. Ian.thomson (talk) 07:54, 28 February 2016 (UTC) Thank you, Ian...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive992
Kamis, 2023-03-30 23:11:19from User:Doc James in July 2017. They are now edit warring to restore WP:REFSPAM from Stallman and other poor quality refs at Biopsychosocial model. I'd...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive323
Rabu, 2023-05-17 08:55:59I'm trying to clean up after Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Refspam_across_many_articles but it's very difficult to find equivalents to ANI...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive831
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:35:58they were linked to, were unreliably sourced, or were just attempts at refspam. He has not "destroyed" anything. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:37,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1053
Rabu, 2026-02-11 07:24:46articles, adding book references all over the place, mostly looking like refspam. User was warned on their talk page by user NeedsGlasses but to no avail...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 56
Selasa, 2026-04-07 20:58:49WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks for the ping. We have WP:REFSPAM too which perhaps could be improved (adding some information about dead-link...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1027
Selasa, 2026-06-09 19:42:46BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 22:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC) My first impression was also refspam, the domain however appears to be one of East–West Center's so not the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1070
Senin, 2022-02-21 17:52:18should be made to this discussion. ZaniraM and AceUofT exclusively add refspam by Shafique N. Virani. AceUofT was warned about citing himself but he ignored...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive973
Sabtu, 2023-03-04 20:01:40primary-sourced to his published work. I blocked for: Promotional editing, adding WP:REFSPAM to Maximiliano Korstanje (IP address geolocates to subject's location and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive991
Minggu, 2022-03-27 02:58:29credibility. This person is here solely to promote SOM Media (including refspam that remain and everyone can still see, like this) and is obviously evading...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive965
Kamis, 2025-05-15 16:32:38contributions talk 14:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC) (edit conflict) It was just refspam of a business. Outdoorsy added a ref to an already referenced statement...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive828
Minggu, 2026-04-05 22:25:46that already has two references, they also need to read WP:BOMBARD/WP:REFSPAM and WP:RS... Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 18:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Orangemoody/Archive/1
Minggu, 2022-04-24 00:27:48[96] and [97] (adding refspam to bostonexecutivelimoservice.com) Diffs linking Ninzax99 and Bladhark: [98] and [99] (adding refspam to cittadiniditwitter...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 May Kado massacre (2nd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 18:48:41fail WP:RS. --WMSR (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Delete all. It's refspam for Tigray: Atlas of the humanitarian situation, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qualified personal residence trust (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2026-01-06 23:36:26I assume the "mass removal of content" is the removal of Jacob Stein's refspam, copyvios, peacock language ("consult an expert like Jacob Stein" appeared...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision
Kamis, 2022-03-03 11:22:50February 2022 (UTC) the REFSPAM issue above, #RFC on status of Skeptical Inquirer? Any GSoW "backwards editing" which veers into WP:REFSPAM or WP:SELFCITE is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aftershock81/Archive
Sabtu, 2025-10-11 14:55:01editors. The horrible treatment in question was precisely the cleanup of refspam that led to this SPI in the first place. The explanation offered for this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of state media by country
Sabtu, 2025-05-31 03:25:02i removed citation's because another editor was involved in Wikipedia:REFSPAM - involving 100's of articles. This manipulated the search results and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/Local/accrasportsnews.com
Selasa, 2025-08-12 20:34:34New data reported. --COIBot (talk) 08:23, 12 August 2025 (UTC) Reverted. Refspam=my and likely COI. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:34, 12 August 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 February 21
Rabu, 2018-09-12 07:52:27promotion. See WP:NOTPROMO. This includes using iTunes as a source, see WP:REFSPAM. 3) When you write articles, make sure you cite at least three professionally-published...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florentin Smarandache (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2026-01-06 19:45:13excellent research, cant add anything to that other than some concerns about refspam in the article. Seems to be going for quantiy over quality RadioFan (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bianbum/Archive
Senin, 2023-03-06 02:22:45All in all, this is far beyond coincidence. The person being promoted in refspam by both accounts is also listed in WHOIS as owner of both websites; whilst...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 144
Minggu, 2024-10-20 06:45:44underlinking/overlinking pages, and a final one might have a conniption fit about REFSPAM. Automatically creating the MFD discussion by bot will only lead to more...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. Craig Hanna
Sabtu, 2026-07-25 00:40:08a weak keep. I revamped the article, removing all of the voluminous WP:REFSPAM and other dubious references, kept the good references, as a way to try...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 19
Selasa, 2022-06-07 07:37:36alarm people and to link to his own works outside of Wikipedia (see WP:REFSPAM). He has since been blocked. The media doesn't use the terminology 'massacre'...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/RfC: Wikimedia referrer policy
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:18:30to the organizations. The second, refspam is a problem. I remove several instances of refspam every day. (by refspam I mean addition of a valid citation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vanburrena/Archive
Jumat, 2023-03-03 11:03:042012 (UTC)) User compare report Auto-generated every hour. Pharmacy WP:REFSPAM [1][2][3] and other SEO nonsense [4][5][6] (note similar formatting and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kspellskarthik/Archive
Minggu, 2022-03-27 15:40:44concerned this may be part of a larger farm. First we has Sagarissweet adding refspam: [1] Additionally, Sagarissweet has created a substantial number of fully-formed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Archive
Senin, 2021-05-31 12:37:30Warning issued on talk page Swarm 2018-05-14 Indefinite Cesaree01 WP:REFSPAM, conditional unblock Based on our policy on conditional unblocks, I'm willing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 95
Senin, 2022-03-28 05:20:26protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Y cleaned by others; academic refspam for Levinson? Biological theories of dyslexia (edit | talk | history |...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 113
Selasa, 2024-11-26 07:59:48be kept relatively clean, without a couple of boosterism links (or WP:REFSPAM links) in every paragraph on every page? That requires serious effort,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joost de Valk (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-12-12 09:33:05[15] ~Kvng (talk) 21:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Seriously? This is pure refspam. One of your links is to a article that starts with "37 SEO experts" on...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-followed Instagram accounts
Rabu, 2026-01-21 18:13:36article should be internal links to other Wikipedia articles, not offsite refspam links to other websites. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:21:08author of the sources. fails WP:GEOFEAT and WP:GNG this is a serial WP:REFSPAM user Dom from Paris (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Brianhe
Jumat, 2023-04-21 22:44:47that 1/2 is good, 1/4 marginal, and 1/4 is bad. Deleting bookspam and refspam is a good thing; COI editing should be suspect. Sadly, I see links to good...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1165
Minggu, 2022-10-16 16:32:22(UTC) @David notMD:@MatroMonk: I wouldn't accept it yet. There is a lot of refspam in there. For example, I see four citations for one bibliography entry...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1157
Rabu, 2023-08-09 14:43:04"edit" on Binders full of women. Actions taken: none; Filter description: Refspam detection (diff) Informationageuser (talk) 00:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC) I'm...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pitambarlama/Archive
Rabu, 2021-09-29 21:31:40throwaway accounts with Indian-like usernames whose only purpose is to add WP:REFSPAM for celebritiesheight.com. Examples: [1][2][3][4]. For the two stale accounts...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blended learning (2nd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 02:38:20some of the "references" look as though they are more in the nature of refspam than sources for the article's content. In any case, even if everything...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 August 2
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:25:44dolls. Geo Swan (talk) 03:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC) Delete: a nine-source 'refspam' for the simple fact that WP:ITEXISTS, plus a whole swathe of citations...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2016 February 3
Minggu, 2016-02-07 07:33:43I believe the other editors thought you were trying to publicize your articles as described at WP:REFSPAM. —teb728 t c 09:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Iryna Zarutska
Minggu, 2025-09-21 04:41:47used here to add to a number, which we have always discouraged under WP:REFSPAM. Nathannah • 📮 22:19, 7 September 2025 (UTC) "You're never going to see...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 5
Minggu, 2020-08-16 03:58:44renominating this in light of Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Refspam_across_many_articles which strongly indicates that the editor who created...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2019 February 17
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:44:30removed very quickly by KH-1 because they appeared to that editor to be "refspam": i.e. links intended primarily to drive users to a commercial site. I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 June 9
Senin, 2026-02-09 01:07:35Bellerophon talk to me 16:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC) @IvaInc: Please also read WP:REFSPAM. --NeilN talk to me 16:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC) @Bellerophon:If I wanted just...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Reliability of sources and spam blacklist
Rabu, 2022-05-04 10:57:01specific document is needed Until recently, XLinkBot could not revert WP:REFSPAM XLinkBot can revert the addition of sites that are listed in it, however...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hidan of Maukbeiangjow
Jumat, 2026-01-09 15:13:01notability. Cerebellum (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Comment: the {{refspam}}ing has begun. As of this edit, three of the seven citation in the article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1095
Jumat, 2022-05-20 12:56:47Special:Diff/1006409403). This was reverted by MrOllie with edit summary Rm apparent refspam. Then an account was created, a new section added to the article and referenced...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canada–Tonga relations
Sabtu, 2026-01-17 00:34:03two). Lacking any indication of relevance it would seem to be simple WP:REFSPAM. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC) The title does make it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 33
Kamis, 2025-11-20 08:22:22useful and ad-free source. It is hard enough to keep external links and WP:REFSPAM out of the article currently, and this proposal would make the content/external...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 12
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 01:34:14June 2015 (UTC) Delete I'm trying hard to AGF but for me this looks like refspam, and in any case it's impossible to verify beyond a shadow of a doubt if...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1139
Jumat, 2022-05-20 12:56:36improper signed refspam". "rv" means "reverted", "signed" refers to the fact that you incorrectly added your signature to the article, and "refspam" refers to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanna Pickering (3rd nomination)
Selasa, 2025-10-07 08:42:09subject's website. We do not provide free webhosting for resumes. The refspam is distracting, yes, but there's really nothing left if you dismantle it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 52
Minggu, 2026-02-22 10:56:03there is no way to block that, nor should we want to. We already have WP:REFSPAM in place to discourage COI citations. Fences&Windows 01:12, 20 February...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:24:03and/or a primary source, there are templates for that. And if it's WP:REFSPAM, there are suggestions for dealing with it. --Cybercobra (talk) 16:41,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Wikidata/2018 Infobox RfC
Minggu, 2023-11-26 18:41:1111:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC) Besides that it sounds really strange to me that refspam has not started on WikiData yet (I know that spammers strike sometimes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2015 January 16
Senin, 2022-03-28 11:41:3315:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC) No, we dont link to commercial sites. Thats refspam. The item itself is valid reference that it exists, which is all that linking...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 November 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:33:04article should be internal links to other Wikipedia articles, not offsite refspam links to other websites. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Chelsea232024/Archive
Kamis, 2022-03-10 05:17:02through their contribs shows that almost all of their edits contained refspam. The company also offers article writing services and User:Chess pointed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 June 17
Selasa, 2022-06-28 01:18:5812 June 2022 (UTC) Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. The refs provided are refspam at most. – The Grid (talk) 23:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC) Keep per WP:AUTHOR...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 18
Jumat, 2021-03-05 01:56:44in the first place, though a list of films distributed would work. WP:REFSPAM is also a concern with this draft. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 20:38...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1096
Senin, 2025-08-11 12:57:54Ruslik_Zero 21:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC) IdontlikePR, you tripped a refspam edit filter. When you're citing a source multiple times in an article,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 November 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:49:23last 14 hours online (don't they ever sleep??) adding a huge amount of refspam to pad out the article and make it appear notable. The editor has seen...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:29:51September 2017 (UTC) Actually, I read both the article and the massive refspam list here - none of it includes coverage. Perhaps you can point out the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 23
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:28:57the article before it was stripped of what was termed "refspam". I've looked at it, and "refspam" seems a fair enough description. Delete per nom; and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 November 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:58:49expectation that sources be added to 'improve' the article, rather than as {{refspam}} for already verifiable points is hardly unreasonable. My 'Delete' opinion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 21
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:33:49JSTOR · TWL) No real evidence of notability, despite a huge amount of refspam. Created by an SPA, all sources in the article are primary, unreliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 August 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:37:35either Press Releases, WP:SPSes, or minor coverage. A great example of refspam that does nothing to satisfy WP:N. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 14:13, 6 September 2013...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1131
Sabtu, 2022-08-06 00:54:58@PerpetuityGrat, you may be looking for WP:WALL or WP:CONTENTFORK, WP:REFSPAM, WP:LINKFARM. If unsatisfied please reach out to me. Celestina007 (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:48:58view, definitely yes. It doesn't matter whether the links are inline or refspam, it's still predominantly a list of links to outside content, and this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1023
Jumat, 2022-07-22 17:58:29"references". I've been reverting those additions which are clearly just WP:REFSPAM, but I'm also aware we have lots of existing links. I'm going to ping Beetstra...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Gänshirt
Kamis, 2025-11-13 12:03:41Delete This is just a ridiculous case of Self promotion. Using Citespam and Refspam for Bookspamming through a zoo of socks. Has ever anyone written one substantial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SethMacfarlaneGypsy/Archive
Kamis, 2022-03-10 06:38:36duck edits as the accounts listed in the archive. That is, they make hoax refspam which is patently false but it allows them to advertise and promote the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 18
Senin, 2020-06-29 07:35:10is used in the article), even though among the Nepali sources it's got refspam fitting every description. Looking at the current revision (permalink)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 February 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:44:19I assume the "mass removal of content" is the removal of Jacob Stein's refspam, copyvios, peacock language ("consult an expert like Jacob Stein" appeared...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 172
Selasa, 2021-05-18 10:47:50as a positive addition. I don't agree that it's "refspam plain and simple". When we talk about refspam, we're typically talking about the addition of sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 March 4
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:12:43news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An interview, refspam of mentions does not notability and WP:CORPDEPTH maketh (amusing that the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1147
Jumat, 2025-01-17 02:53:39per WP:SPAM#Warning spammers. This kind of thing probably falls under WP:REFSPAM and most refspammers probably are just going to keep going until stopped...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 July 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:42:26July 2010 (UTC) Delete. Non-notable as can be seen by the quantity of refspam and lack of substantial reliable coverage. Article has also suffered from...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 June 27
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:15:03scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) after cleaning up the refspam, I did some before and can find little in the way of coverage. It appears...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:50:23as WP:OR for over five years, and the only "fixes" have been adding WP:REFSPAM. Guy (Help!) 13:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 25
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:21:01and external links lead to them: the whole article is WP:LINKSPAM and WP:REFSPAM. To the extent there is an objective concept one might call "brand intimacy"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 October 31
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:28:13in third party reliable sources. while someone has done a good job of refspam, even a cursory review shows that most blatantly fail WP:RS. when looking...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:35:17unreliable sources inappropriate for a BLP. I removed tfoxbrand.com as WP:REFSPAM. --Ronz (talk) 16:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 May 29
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:03:46unsourced claim. The three references to academic journals are bordering refspam - not sure what they are to prove (WP:PRIMARY). Of course, I don't need...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 August 27
Jumat, 2023-03-03 23:13:18notability. Cerebellum (talk) 17:44, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Comment: the {{refspam}}ing has begun. As of this edit, three of the seven citation in the article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 17
Minggu, 2021-11-28 00:09:35fail WP:RS. --WMSR (talk) 22:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC) Delete all. It's refspam for Tigray: Atlas of the humanitarian situation, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1143
Rabu, 2025-10-15 00:07:15is good, it’s great that we can use it! The only problems come from WP:REFSPAM, but adding a chunk of text with citation is clearly easier to detect that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 May 21
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:35:38desktop virtualization article. Currently just being used as a vehicle for refspam, and I don't see it being developed into an encyclopedic article given...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 September 1
Selasa, 2020-09-22 01:08:46satisfies WP:NACTOR and WP:RS. Also some refs appears an attempt at WP:REFSPAM, i have removed some just thought i should bring it here. Possible WP:PROMO...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 27
Minggu, 2021-12-12 21:48:36that the creator of this article cited in another article (WP:SPS, WP:REFSPAM). The article Perfect box theory was created in late July, not long before...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 40
Selasa, 2025-09-23 22:29:542010 (UTC) For the record, User Pharaway has received their REFSPAM Final Warning for Refspam. They deleted the warning from their discussion page, and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2018 April 8
Kamis, 2018-04-12 07:30:01have the same problem as ELs - being unstable and possibly false bait (WP:REFSPAM-like). --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC) In general, a bad...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 232
Selasa, 2026-03-03 00:21:16fact also noted by BrillLyle here. So this brings no value and is just refspam, and we should not cite it here. Thoughts? Jytdog (talk) 05:21, 8 October...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 21
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:21:56TWL) autobiographical article created by a user that has been adding WP:REFSPAM all sources are self published or affiliated. Fails WP:NOTPROMO Dom from...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 January 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:45:05contribs) 19:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTDIC, WP:HOAX or WP:REFSPAM: take your pick — Iadmc♫talk 19:42, 20 January 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 August 7
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:49:45Article uses deceptive methods in an attempt to mask lack of notability (refspam for example). For example, it says "Labeled an "honest-to-goodness expert"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 20
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:17:13(talk) 09:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC) Delete Literal WP:WHOCARES, along with WP:REFSPAM, we're not the Miami New Times or Deco Drive. Dave Aronberg is also packed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 8
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:44:43pushing into various Wikipedia articles for a couple of months now (WP:REFSPAM). It appears that unless new reliable sources are found and prove otherwise...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 December 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:49:21two). Lacking any indication of relevance it would seem to be simple WP:REFSPAM. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:01, 12 December 2010 (UTC) The title does make it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Biscoe
Minggu, 2025-11-30 22:32:44September 2017 (UTC) Actually, I read both the article and the massive refspam list here - none of it includes coverage. Perhaps you can point out the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 May 19
Kamis, 2020-05-28 06:19:36neither in the presented sources nor in a WP:BEFORE. Lots and lots of WP:REFSPAM - but only one reference link that even mentions the site itself (the New...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 280
Sabtu, 2020-05-09 02:47:55cases. --Aquillion (talk) 23:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC) We call this WP:REFSPAM. The correct response is to revert, notify them of WP:COI, and if they...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 20
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:07:49CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:56, 20 October 2018 (UTC) This doesn't look notable. The refspam notwithstanding, the only interesting source I can see out and about it...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:05:13Keep but it is good this article was AfD-ed, since it was entirely WP:REFSPAM, with promotional links to marketers hawking Smarketing. The spam is removed...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 287
Sabtu, 2023-07-22 14:45:24famousbirthday variants. It's never an acceptable source and at best it's just refspam. Being correct doesn't mean reliable. Praxidicae (talk) 11:48, 8 March...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 29
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:02:05roundabout advertisement for SewEasy products featuring chunks of canned WP:REFSPAM. I did a google search with "Garment sewing data" in quotes, only got 6...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 July 15
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:40:05article is much better watched, unlike this one which is a magnet for WP:REFSPAM.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 16
Jumat, 2021-11-26 12:36:56Rusalkii (talk) 01:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC) Delete per nom and above. WP:REFSPAM in the article is trying to connect the organization with the larger voting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 30
Sabtu, 2020-05-09 08:08:27article (I count five independent sources cited, out of 41 citations—WP:REFSPAM?), and this item doesn't strike me as particularly significant to the project's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 18
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:07:35results for the phrase 'affinity marketing'. It easily passed WP:GNG. WP:REFSPAM can (and should) be cleaned up, but that is not a valid reason for deleting...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 June 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:28:03JSTOR · TWL) Blatant advertising. References are to commercial sites WP:REFSPAM, no notability as per WP:NALBUMS. This may qualify for G-11 and or A-7...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 June 14
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:16:21Delete - entire purpose of article is likely to house spammed links / refspam to Shijiazhuang Kidney Disease Hospital, spam report here. --CliffC (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 July 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:17:38of the subjects own work being used to reference things it feels like refspam. Curdle (talk) 21:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 946
Kamis, 2019-05-02 12:33:38inkspam_citing_Eoghan_Lyng..._Filter?, describing the violations of WP:REFSPAM, with the persistent promotion of articles written by Irish writer Eoghan...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248
Rabu, 2022-06-15 15:50:48indication anywhere to me that this is a reliable source and appears only to be refspam that has been going on for years. There is no editorial control, no about...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:33:46February 2013 (UTC) Delete Non-notable neologism and fairly obvious WP:REFSPAM. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Snow Delete per WP:NEO...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 January 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 18:58:07--SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:29, 19 January 2019 (UTC) Delete irrespective of the REFSPAM going on in the subject article, there is a clear lack of in-depth, reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 281
Minggu, 2024-06-30 06:11:21--Jayron32 13:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC) Jayron32, yes, it's a WP:UNDUE and WP:REFSPAM problem not a RS problem. But I think we've fixed it anyway. Guy (help...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:24:21result was Speedy Delete per WP:CSD#G11. Article was just cover for WP:REFSPAM. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Love spells (edit | talk |...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 March 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:37:10WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I have been cleaning up a large amount of refspam related to the paid editing ring of user:Vipul. Among his edits were dozens...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 October 13
Rabu, 2021-10-27 01:15:00scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) after the removal of refspam and a search for RS, I see no indication this meets WP:SINGER or WP:GNG...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 December 4
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:45:02Delete This is just a ridiculous case of Self promotion. Using Citespam and Refspam for Bookspamming through a zoo of socks. Has ever anyone written one substantial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:57:21as minimal as a brief citation. Fails WP:NOR, WP:GNG, and probably WP:REFSPAM. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:19, 2 September 2016 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 September 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:06:44commercial motive behind it, such as clever, concealed placement of WP:REFSPAM. So we've seen self statement of "routinely interviewed by experts" a whole...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:08:14they aren't there, and that's also one of the most appalling attempts at refspam I've seen in recent times. And you've not even formatted them. Lukeno94...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 June 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:02:54a weak keep. I revamped the article, removing all of the voluminous WP:REFSPAM and other dubious references, kept the good references, as a way to try...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 October 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:00:27for those not on the chart. Not good enough. This is a bloated mess of refspam and promotion and needs to go. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2016...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 November 13
Kamis, 2022-11-24 19:35:41Non-notable game level that doesn't have WP:SIGCOV. If you review the WP:REFSPAM you will find that most of these are passing mentions, or even unreliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:06:35combination of NPOV violations, original research, and a coatrack for refspam. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC) Redirect to United...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 14
Rabu, 2022-03-23 11:52:35images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:TOOSOON: there is countless refspam arguabley 2/28 refs meet GNG Yogiile (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 30
Jumat, 2021-10-15 16:31:49Jclemens (talk) 21:49, 30 September 2021 (UTC) Delete Seems to be WP:REFSPAM, article creator contributions are pretty much solely trying to add "citations"...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:36:33independent source (the pleasontonweekly article), and it has a lot less refspam (links to her own show), so I'd say it just barely passes WP:CSD#A4. With...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 January 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:19:44recognized work on the subject by a credentialled authority in philosophy as "refspam"? That's going to such extremes to defend an outright error that it's almost...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200
Jumat, 2023-04-28 00:01:27(UTC) Comments please on the triple removal of these two refs as "refspam" and "rv, refspam/not RS. Links added by SPA" (I object to being described as an...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 October 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:08:08Delete Per above, with thanks to Newslinger for organizing the refs. WP:REFSPAM is the issue here; unless an independent, in-depth source provides a information...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 20
Selasa, 2021-11-30 09:09:05article to try and fix this issue, but there's other issues with COI/UNDUE/REFSPAM that also need to be addressed. I do think the sources provided constitute...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 31
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:49:51multiple independent reliable sources focused on her, but there is some WP:REFSPAM in there, plus WP:PRIMARY sources. If the article is kept, I'll try to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 8
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:49:38undue weight WP:UNDUE and the blatant advertising WP:ADVERT through WP:REFSPAM, this article should be deleted per WP:TNT. --Mark viking (talk) 21:45...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 5
Kamis, 2021-11-18 03:53:14Promospam. No sign of meeting WP:NCORP. More than 100 sources, most of them refspam, and nothing that's actually about the company. bonadea contributions talk...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 November 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:32:59created by Sdurante07 who has been spamming wikilinks to this page, and refspam to the Medical Hypotheses article, in many other articles, which is how...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 August 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 23:13:34two references for the bare existence of these conferences. Can we say {{refspam}}? This is no substitute for "significant coverage"! HrafnTalkStalk(P)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 7
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:06:05product, that seems to exists as a WP:COATRACK for WP:LINKSPAM and WP:REFSPAM. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 13:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 March 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:14:14excellent research, cant add anything to that other than some concerns about refspam in the article. Seems to be going for quantiy over quality RadioFan (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:49:58Brackett. All three books unambiguously serve to promote the diet (WP:REFSPAM). The diet itself claims to treat various mental disabilities at opposite...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 September 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:18:09Sakaton, has also inserted a great deal of other links I would call refspam, the majority of which point to other of Huser's papers. This editor was...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 April 10
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:04:46probably. In any event, there's a lot of Button Poetry-related promo and refspam that gets added regularly wherever possible in the encyclopedia. The pattern...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 October 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:45:52some of the "references" look as though they are more in the nature of refspam than sources for the article's content. In any case, even if everything...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:00:41reasoning for not allowing the book is WP:SELFPUBLISH, WP:SELFCITE and WP:REFSPAM. Mr. Hill's reasoning from my talk page is: "I hate to be in the position...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 7
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:25:07providing an in-depth, independent look at the company. I will also mention WP:REFSPAM, as many of the sources (over half) are links to the homepages of companies...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 85
Minggu, 2024-10-20 08:42:25I've removed maybe a dozen of this ip's edits because of the spamming (WP:REFSPAM) and promotional (WP:NPOV and WP:SOAP) nature of the material, but decided...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 January 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:19:58edits, almost all of their edits since have been to insert various spam or refspam into articles. It looks like 10ZiG has been their only article creation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:22:14FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article about a technical certification replete with WP:REFSPAM and several dubious references. This is one of several non-notable certification...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 60
Senin, 2025-08-11 08:08:10commercial sites are often appropriate." And since you wanted to throw WP:REFSPAM in my face earlier, here's the entire quote: "Citation spamming is the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 12
Sabtu, 2020-06-20 01:18:54was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Template:Refspam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Unnecessary and little-used...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 101
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:29:55resulting in errors in the article, rather than it being a dispute over REFSPAM behind a basically accurate sentence. At absolute minimum, I think that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 79
Minggu, 2024-03-03 09:19:52see this a problem, but the sheer number of these edits seems to be WP:REFSPAM and tendentious editing. Eric Vanderburg serves as the director of JurInnov...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 15
Sabtu, 2020-08-29 22:27:18[16] ~Kvng (talk) 21:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Seriously? This is pure refspam. One of your links is to a article that starts with "37 SEO experts" on...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 November 14
Selasa, 2020-11-24 11:17:18no go theorem is evaded is explained by Ahluwalia in 2017.[48] That's refspam at carpet-bombing levels, not encyclopedic writing. Either summarize then...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 275
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 14:46:50MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist#zoominfo.com I've reverted almost identical WP:REFSPAM from at least a dozen IP/users in the last month or two. XLinkBot was given...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 192
Senin, 2025-09-01 03:35:53under a particular top-level domain is "bad" and can never be linked: "rm. refspam", "The .guru domain is blogs ans orherr such unreliable sources. feel free...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 162
Kamis, 2023-03-16 05:51:59these sources to Wikipedia is greatly less than our value to them. WP:REFSPAM most likely applies. Remove, and if people edit-war (with no history of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 101
Sabtu, 2022-03-12 09:43:46each of those articles to the EL/further reading section. That is pure refspam. I removed them. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion per WP:PROMO...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 July 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:39:14Kierzek (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2015 (UTC) Delete per Nom, whoever is adding refspam from Bangalore isn't helping this article any. Brianhe (talk) 05:08, 27...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 223
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:44:41pursuant to MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/March_2017#Immigration_law_refspam_round_3. I was wondering, could Nolo.com ever be a legitimate reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 November 24
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:09:26as well have been submitted unsourced as what I removed was essentially refspam and otherwise unreliable sources. After searching myself, all that I can...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 15
Jumat, 2023-03-03 10:30:552017 (UTC) Note on this, citations are valuable targets for vandalism. WP:REFSPAM is one of the most insidious kinds of spamming there is - when someone...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 170
Kamis, 2023-02-09 22:47:59review. I've started to work on removing and reverting the most obvious refspam, but I'm not comfortable doing so in all cases because I lack the mathematical...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 25
Sabtu, 2021-12-04 06:30:54This article was part of a series of over 100 articles created as WP:REFSPAM for a self-published source (the Atlas) by an editor now under sockpuppet...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 14
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:50:19article should be internal links to other Wikipedia articles, not offsite refspam links to other websites. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 268
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 14:43:17• Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com Recently noticed here (obvious SEO refspam). I then noticed 11 extant uses in main space, some pointing to dead pages...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 April 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:03:52reliable sources other the reports about his court case. Take out the iMDb refspam, the blogs, and the primary sources where Mr. With discusses Sylvester...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Angela Gh/Archive
Minggu, 2018-12-30 01:55:12cuwiki · SI) Special:Diff/847445105 I removed several but there are many refspams still in article space that need to be removed and stale accounts found...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 256
Sabtu, 2021-04-24 18:39:14IP address added all or most of them. In which case it's Operation WP:REFSPAM. Guy (Help!) 09:14, 4 January 2019 (UTC) Not reliable. McIntyre's blog...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 331
Senin, 2024-11-25 23:53:56but also other earlier works). So it's at least bordering on being WP:REFSPAM, and a deliberate attempt to promote Nikulin by getting him cited as many...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobblehat99/Archive
Kamis, 2022-03-10 05:11:18Auto-generated every hour. Editor interaction utility Bunch of single-edit WP:REFSPAM accounts with [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11],...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 21
Senin, 2018-10-01 11:43:01just lists artists. This leaves me inclined to view that citation as WP:REFSPAM. In Without Words (Bethel Music album), Amazon, iTunes, and Spotify are...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 88
Rabu, 2025-09-24 04:39:25Addition of a particular company's whitepapers could easily verge into WP:REFSPAM - if the value to the linkee is greater than the value to the encyclopedia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mass dimension one fermions
Jumat, 2025-12-12 12:15:34no go theorem is evaded is explained by Ahluwalia in 2017.[48] That's refspam at carpet-bombing levels, not encyclopedic writing. Either summarize then...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 189
Rabu, 2026-02-25 14:32:22the middleman? --Pete (talk) 21:57, 11 May 2015 (UTC) We call this WP:REFSPAM. The answer is: No. Guy (Help!) 21:53, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Is it okay to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 849
Rabu, 2019-10-02 11:55:31generally avoided as references. The general guidance for this is at WP:REFSPAM. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 17:50, 21 October 2018 (UTC) Hi Wyatt850, the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 267
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:43:51either ALB Articles or ALB law firm. I suspect that this is a case of WP:REFSPAM, since on the face of it the website looks like a blog - however, others...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123
Senin, 2022-05-16 12:54:15gave the appearance of someone trying to build traffic to the site via refspam. After a quick search for news references to either the site or its author...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 114
Sabtu, 2023-04-15 00:24:11delete | links | watch | logs | views) are POV dominated by commercial refspam, (plus a weak Trusted Storage specification) including SPA/almost SPA editors...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 235
Minggu, 2024-10-20 05:50:04meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com This looks an awful lot like WP:REFSPAM to me. Is this really a reliable independent source? Guy (Help!) 21:49...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authenticity in art
Senin, 2026-01-05 14:43:18recognized work on the subject by a credentialled authority in philosophy as "refspam"? That's going to such extremes to defend an outright error that it's almost...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Peer review/Ethics/archive1
Sabtu, 2024-06-15 00:02:33beyond a general disambiguation link – looks to me like at least borderline REFSPAM. In this case, however, I think readers might genuinely benefit from notes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Schwartz (technologist) (2nd nomination)
Senin, 2026-01-05 16:13:04commercial motive behind it, such as clever, concealed placement of WP:REFSPAM. So we've seen self statement of "routinely interviewed by experts" a whole...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120
Jumat, 2023-03-03 06:31:54conclusions reached follows. Its been confirmed this is a sock puppet WP:REFSPAM campaign by Michael Fisher (Web Site Developer / Web Content Manager for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 68
Senin, 2025-01-20 17:52:29resolved, but I had a look at the first couple of edits and it is classic WP:REFSPAM: add an inconsequential or obvious factoid with a reference that just happens...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 272
Selasa, 2025-11-18 01:10:31say at the very least galaxylollywood is just a success story on how to refspam and has been used as a result of others seeing it but isn't reliable. I...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 224
Senin, 2023-01-30 15:49:06it as a reference for every one of their contributions, suggesting WP:REFSPAM. What do others think of this website? Deli nk (talk) 19:17, 19 April 2017...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 July 28
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:39:04self-published sources when I happened upon this article. It was riddled with WP:REFSPAM and when that was removed, only one source remains, a news clipping naming...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 289
Minggu, 2023-07-09 22:14:21(talk) 14:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC) An editor has been repeatedly adding WP:REFSPAM to a predatory journal to Integer complexity. More eyes on this would be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:44:07request an AWB run to remove it as it appears to me as some long term refspam. It is basically an aggregate of several websites, of which several have...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 231
Senin, 2025-10-13 21:33:04actually looking to use WP to drive traffic to its website (which is WP:REFSPAM) Not saying either thing is happening in this instance. All of our articles...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 152
Selasa, 2025-01-21 01:54:56site. It certainly doesn't look like a reliable source for anything. WP:Refspam applies - "adding references with the aim of promoting the author or the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 240
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 05:28:56leader of the Ahmadiyyas. Its Written by Aboobacker Amani" with a bunch of refspam links to the book. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:17, 18 July 2016 (UTC) But you will...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 41
Jumat, 2026-07-24 15:17:22like it is being done in good faith, but it remains original research and refspam regardless. Now that it has been bought up I think that Rabhyanker should...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2016 April 25
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:36:07to renew their domain, or was bought out, or possibly was added as WP:REFSPAM to begin with. In any case, I have removed the link. Ian.thomson (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kww and The Rambling Man/Evidence
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 20:35:08not create) Special:AbuseFilter/526 - 560 hits, disruptive addition of refspam. Special:AbuseFilter/529 - 913 hits, disruptive addition of twitter chart...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 118
Senin, 2025-09-01 09:57:32views) Y reverted refspam Corporate recovery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Y reverted refspam Len Deighton (edit |...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Smile Lee/Archive
Senin, 2023-04-24 20:41:07IPs from an obviously related geolocation have been adding that link as refspam. In 2020, a Japanese editor asked on my talk page and on the Help desk...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 87
Jumat, 2023-12-01 17:02:232011 (UTC) I'll just repeat my comments from earlier; Very obvious WP:REFSPAM. These links seem to serve no real purpose other than to self promote the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126
Jumat, 2023-06-16 22:24:36Text: In 1995, the Catholic Church's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) issued a Notification on the True Life in God writings of Rydén which...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 329
Senin, 2021-11-15 01:59:11pattern of the same author getting added into numerous article develops, WP:REFSPAM is something to be on the look out for. See Talk:Rarotonga for example...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 129
Jumat, 2025-07-18 23:55:34SmartSE (talk) 21:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC) Edits like this are clearly WP:REFSPAM as well, but they are quite well hidden between other edits. I will try...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 234
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:02:15the Death Penalty, appears to be cited redundantly for the purpose of refspam. Editorial opinion comparing Premiership of Narendra Modi in India with...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 257
Sabtu, 2026-05-02 05:12:33appears to be a hobby site) this is spammed on? I'd say this is closer to refspam than anything that satisfies reasonable inclusion. Praxidicae (talk) 00:14...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 93
Minggu, 2024-10-20 06:57:24an in-depth look at the various acquisitions of Irish Car Rentals [35], refspam for pet sitters [36], the notable advertising campaigns of the Thailand...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar/Workshop
Minggu, 2023-01-29 03:39:472010 (UTC) Comment by others: Yes, a continual problem especially with WP:REFSPAM. Some guidelines would be good. Guy (Help!) 20:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 3
Sabtu, 2024-10-19 17:50:45prominence, while removing the two references, which could be regarded as WP:REFSPAM. However, IBM is so big, that there is no clear mention on Wikipedia of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 113
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:47:20Beeman. It is a primary source. In Courting Condi, it was being used as refspam for a petition. I have removed it. In Washington Peace Center, it is in...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/List
Jumat, 2026-08-14 03:24:22primarily from Rhode Island. Europeanhematology 2020-03-24 19:43:42 WP:REFSPAM: IPs geolocating to Czech Republic or Slovakia adding references using...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/Archive 64
Minggu, 2026-04-19 17:17:342017 (UTC) Something to do with the recent reversions here. Labelled as refspam by one editor - probably as one of the parties has a book out. The complaint...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 364
Senin, 2022-01-31 11:11:51album/artist. SilkTork (talk) 16:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC) There's an issue of WP:REFSPAM here. Citing Metacritic violates that policy. Sikonmina (talk) 06:01, 18...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 84
Jumat, 2021-09-17 23:56:19David Eppstein (talk | contribs) . . (56,031 bytes) (-494) . . (Undo WP:REFSPAM, WP:TOOSOON to tell whether this is of any significance)” looked biased...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 108
Senin, 2025-09-01 09:10:21appear to be bumping into is WP:COI addressing conflict of interest, and WP:REFSPAM relating to self-promotion. Your intentions to be constructive must be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ugur none/Archive/1
Senin, 2019-11-25 06:20:37Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour. Bunch of throwaway REFSPAM accounts... that all insert fake access dates to deflect scrutiny. Methinks...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 291
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:05:54to MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/March 2017 § Immigration law refspam round 3. Pinging JzG for comment. By the way, you can use the nowiki tag...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 83
Selasa, 2026-03-03 22:02:59contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (refspam now removed) Joe Ciminera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 194
Senin, 2022-05-23 03:26:25X-height article used a couple of refs by him. These were removed by JzG as "refspam" and (after prompt restoration by another editor) with "The .guru domain...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/QuantumTHEO/Archive
Senin, 2020-08-17 06:11:52sections above. Mwilde & Spirandola, you could both do with reading WP:REFSPAM and WP:SELFCITE. Cabayi (talk) 10:22, 19 July 2020 (UTC) No substantial...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RiffFinch/Archive
Jumat, 2019-11-29 09:03:52yourself against claims. CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - Blatant refspam, please confirm & check for sleepers. Cabayi (talk) 19:35, 29 September...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 286
Rabu, 2024-07-24 14:55:29an option that would seem less likely to run afoul of WP:COPYVIO and WP:REFSPAM. - MrX 🖋 13:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see a fundamental difference...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 116
Kamis, 2026-04-16 19:42:41264+ links are to its blog? I am not sure if we have a massive case of refspam, or a valid publication with valid references. (copied from WP:WPSPAM because...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 97
Minggu, 2024-10-20 00:56:46many general articles where they are irrelevant, making this a case of WP:REFSPAM in my book, although it may well have been done in good faith. There are...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 94
Jumat, 2025-12-05 09:42:54the way). Is this the best approach? Probably not. It might well be WP:REFSPAM (and WP:LINKVIO, too) and better sources are likely available. If you know...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Liborbital/Archive
Rabu, 2023-05-03 04:43:11Hunter (talk) 20:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC) Zalam4u edits where clearly refspam (I've reverted). Blocked but awaiting tags Some of Albert Dawkins' edits...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 677
Sabtu, 2026-04-11 13:00:02(or that of its parent company, Fast Retailing) in probable breach of WP:REFSPAM/WP:PRIMARY; better address WP:GOODFAITH editors who nevertheless insert...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 15
Minggu, 2022-10-16 19:05:20the price Amazon is charging for a particular book. WP:LINKSPAM or WP:REFSPAM may also apply.- MrX 03:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Probably not. I think a...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vwegba4real/Archive
Selasa, 2026-02-10 18:18:45amount of O/Egedegbe sockpuppetry in recent months – mostly in the form of refspam and image spam. This latest account's editing is bolder than most, but...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 45
Sabtu, 2025-01-25 06:35:37bought this up with the user before. Edits like these are also clearly refspam in my opinion as they add very little (if any) relevant information to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2026 May 18
Minggu, 2026-05-24 07:20:14press releases were incorrectly labelled as news articles, and reinserted refspam. I have fixed these errors again for you. Since you have submitted the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 119
Kamis, 2023-02-09 22:46:22contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Refspam concern Buddhabob replaced dead links to high quality souces with links...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 1
Sabtu, 2024-11-02 04:11:57(now deadlink) [15] . I believe that such links are in violation of WP:REFSPAM and WP:RS. The second point of debate is the insertion of lengthy quotes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 11:28:00| history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: Constant refspam from sockpuppeteer. Jasper Deng (talk) 10:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC) Automated...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 109
Kamis, 2026-02-12 22:40:54Editor also is adding questionable material to AuthBridge and probable refspam elsewhere [4]. Looked at as a whole, the account seems to be devoted to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 47
Jumat, 2025-12-26 22:01:40noticeboard) because people there are familiar with links that might be WP:REFSPAM. Johnuniq (talk) 02:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC) I've dropped them a note and...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 138
Jumat, 2019-02-15 04:32:34seems to fail WP:NCORP and is overly promotional, irrespective of the refspam. The connected editor's refusal to disclose a connection and dodging of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 20
Senin, 2024-12-23 02:27:49reference is very poor, as any reference will almost certainly be deleted as 'refspam' or 'embedded external links'. Similarly, the advice to turn the link into...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 98
Selasa, 2022-05-31 02:05:26exist. Elaenia (talk) 18:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC) Seems to me a case of WP:REFSPAM. Anyway, I have reverted the last edit and added the page to my watchlist...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested/Archive 10
Minggu, 2023-01-29 02:03:27edit filter. In recent weeks I have removed Isaiah Ogedegbe/"Warri Times" refspam here (see all post-2016 edit history), here, here, here, here, here, here...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 126
Senin, 2021-10-18 09:08:52answered him. I'm Tony Ahn (talk) 06:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC) Comment refspam there's undisclosed use of refs written by the article editor, for example...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 135
Selasa, 2020-06-02 20:46:51sourced in the body of the article. As such, this looks like a form of WP:REFSPAM, even if from a better source than usual. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:38, 10...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 133
Selasa, 2026-01-06 22:01:16credibility. This person is here solely to promote SOM Media (including refspam that remain and everyone can still see, like this) and is obviously evading...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 18
Kamis, 2023-02-09 16:34:13December 2016 (UTC) 160.202.8.237 (talk · contribs) as well. I agree, it's WP:REFSPAM. --Ronz (talk) 16:27, 28 December 2016 (UTC) I agree as well. Definitely...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 134
Sabtu, 2026-05-09 19:20:30adding self-refs and do not respond to others' concerns about it? Classic refspam. I see User:Melcous has already started rolling them back. DMacks (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulsi Pujan Diwas
Kamis, 2025-04-03 19:23:46a non-RS self-publication. Unfortunately, despite the WP:NEWSORGINDIA-refspam cited at this AFD, I have yet to see any independent coverage beyond the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2022/04
Minggu, 2023-03-19 11:03:28Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article is being targeted with refspam from changing IPs advertising a website that claims to sell counterfeit...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2021/06
Jumat, 2026-03-20 21:04:12history | links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent refspam by various IPs. Pahunkat (talk) 18:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC) Please also consider...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuuki (Sword Art Online Character)
Senin, 2025-12-22 11:19:23has been done on the article since its nomination. I'm not encouraging REFSPAM but if there are any reliable sources, they should be added as it is unlikely...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 116
Jumat, 2025-08-29 05:04:45appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. refspam (?) Bulova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 125
Sabtu, 2024-10-19 21:53:2019:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC) Bbb23 reverted most of the crappy little refspam edits. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC) I think everything that...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 105
Sabtu, 2024-03-23 03:26:21Pell Research. Outside of creatin that article all contributions are to refspam Pell's research. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC) added another...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 26
Minggu, 2024-11-24 01:30:32September 2024 (UTC) I'm not quite sure what you mean by canvassing. WP:REFSPAM, maybe? All of the diffs you link show an online magazine being used to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 17
Senin, 2023-01-30 19:08:15(UTC) Any link that isn't clearly a reference would be blatant linkspam/refspam. Assuming that all links would be appropriate as references ignores our...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 186
Rabu, 2022-02-02 21:06:38that article by Gerbic is indisputably at odds with the letter of COI/refspam/PROMO. It might not reflect the purpose of the group or even its primary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Archive 37
Kamis, 2023-02-09 16:48:51notable enough for its own article yet. Nevertheless, there seem to be WP:REFSPAM concerns as the IPs involved seem to concentrate exclusively on adding...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 121
Minggu, 2022-04-24 03:20:27October 2017 (UTC) I've removed all but one of their additions of the refspam and given both IPs an Only Warning so they can be given the bum's rush...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 143
Sabtu, 2020-05-09 01:29:33COI/promotional to me, similar to (but not quite falling into) WP:SELFCITE or WP:REFSPAM. The user has not declared a COI. Is this okay or is it COI, and if it's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Edit filter/Requested/Archive 7
Jumat, 2023-02-10 02:10:51Tag pages that were created by the ContentTranslation extension and have unnecessary HTML tags or attributes. Initial conditions: The page has the contenttranslation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 102
Senin, 2024-03-04 19:59:40deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 5 years of REFSPAM / EXTspam stockbrokers.com! Promo only account Intermittent editing, so...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 45
Rabu, 2021-09-22 07:39:44on what separates an admissible primary source from a "spam link"? WP:REFSPAM says "Often [spam refs] are added not to verify article content but rather...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 142
Rabu, 2019-05-15 10:21:39up resume/autobio and he has good experience cleaning this garbage up. Refspam is an exceedingly common UPE tactic designed to trick less experienced...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2015/06
Rabu, 2023-03-22 16:34:18Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP with huge amounts of refspam, some of which doesn't support what it purports to. I recommend semi-protection...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2019/09
Rabu, 2023-03-22 16:48:27semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP has been attempting to add refspam over the last couple of weeks. Barkeep49 (talk) 15:36, 12 September 2019...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2018/10
Minggu, 2026-03-01 20:54:19history | links | watch | logs) Semi-protection: Persistent addition of refspam. Just plain Bill (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC) Declined – Not enough...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/03
Sabtu, 2026-04-25 15:47:46semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of WP:REFSPAM to illegal copies of episodes by IP addresses. EvergreenFir (talk) Please...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/08
Jumat, 2025-08-29 13:23:07| links | watch | logs) Temporary semi-protection: IP edit warring of refspam. Anarchyte recently semi-protected for a few days, but IP is back after...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2016/04
Kamis, 2025-08-28 23:36:56Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of refspam in recent days. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2016 (UTC) Automated...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 115
Kamis, 2023-02-09 22:46:07like Forbes sites and bloggy things more unfamiliar to me. Plus plain old refspam like boxofchallenge.com , pour-this.com, ohmybox.com, etc. - Bri (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 57
Jumat, 2023-03-03 02:05:07reliable sources and so the content should be removed. It's essentially WP:REFSPAM regardless of the motivation behind it. SmartSE (talk) 09:49, 12 May 2012...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 51
Senin, 2025-01-20 01:07:07deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User adding WP:REFSPAM and internal links to BOMB Magazine. The material added typically describes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Bot requests/Archive 89
Sabtu, 2026-08-15 06:33:0201:31, 24 March 2026 (UTC) Moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam § refspam bot I would like to see a bot that would detect likely Reference spam,...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 62
Minggu, 2026-03-29 02:04:28more suspicious than I was before. I'm surprised no one has linked WP:REFSPAM already - it is a more relevant part of the policy than WP:BOOKSPAM. I'll...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 336
Sabtu, 2026-04-18 17:10:47about the status of that site either tbh. (ad 2) Yeah I'm allergic against refspam too, but I suppose it depends on what comes out here... Mvbaron (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2017/07
Sabtu, 2025-03-01 05:13:272017 January February March April May June July August September October November December Amy Johnson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Temporary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 44
Sabtu, 2026-03-07 23:09:42Ms. Bates edited. See [4], [5], [6], etc., in possible violation of WP:REFSPAM guidelines. Mjbinfo feels differently, that these references are a contribution...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 17:03:0964.34 (talk) 23:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC) Looks like a pretty clear WP:REFSPAM and WP:LINKSPAM violation. The site is highly promotional in nature and...
Click to read more »