ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

deletion – guidelines on discussion format and shorthand. Shortcut WP:RGUIDEWP:RGUIDE The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers...

be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...

September 2017 (UTC) WP:Don't worry about performance. You should also read WP:RGUIDE; notably, the first and second sentences. WP:RFD#Keep also makes for good...

become unnecessary. —PaleoNeonate – 01:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC) See WP:RGUIDE and WP:CHEAP. the purpose of redirects is to help people find target articles...

no discussion after at least 7 days, the default result is delete. on WP:RGUIDE eviolite (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

quick search. Flatscan (talk) 04:35, 31 August 2025 (UTC) WP:REDIRECT and RGUIDE says that non-category redirects are cheap, meaning if they solve a problem...

be made to this section. The result of the discussion was delete. Per WP:RGUIDE: "If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...

get the point across, effectively being a rephrase of this passage from RGUIDE: In discussions, always ask yourself whether or not a redirect would be...

up at RfD separately. --Habst (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC) See WP:RGUIDE - "If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for...

notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC) @Liz: Per WP:RGUIDE: If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...

Ryazanov (talk) 22:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC) User:Mikhail Ryazanov see WP:RGUIDE good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers will find themselves...

to this section. The result of the discussion was speedy keep under WP:RGUIDE point 4, Redirects nominated in contravention of Wikipedia:Redirect will...

wasn't clear, my nomination was for the redirect to be deleted. Per WP:RGUIDE: If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...

(𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC) Delete per nom. Also, per WP:RGUIDE, unchallenged RfDs should be closed as delete after seven days, instead...

(UTC) Redirects without a mention are tagged as {{R without mention}}. WP:RGUIDE, WP:RFD#DELETE and WP:RFD#KEEP do not concern with redirect titles being...

(implausible typo). @Explicit: is there any reason you relisted this? Per WP:RGUIDE: If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...

acknowledged. The original discussion should have been closed as "delete" per WP:RGUIDE, so I'll do so now. -- Tavix (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2019 (UTC) IbranovskiIbranovski...

useful and intuitive shorthand for a very long article title. As noted by WP:RGUIDE, "If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for...

briefly mention him somewhere in the Dexter's Laboratory article. Per WP:RGUIDE, redirects are cheap; I don't see the harm in having this, even if it is...

deletion – guidelines on discussion format and shorthand. Shortcut WP:RGUIDEWP:RGUIDE The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers...

deletion – guidelines on discussion format and shorthand. Shortcut WP:RGUIDEWP:RGUIDE The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers...

(talk) 18:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC) What's unclear about the consensus? WP:RGUIDE says If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has...

opinion. However, if no one but the nominator expressed an opinion, WP:RGUIDE states that If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect...

en:user:Gumbywhale <-> members.aol.com (0%/0%/0% - Added link: members.aol.com/kipler2/rguide.html (Monitored rule: members\.aol\.com - reason for monitoring members\...

contribs) to en:en:Equus (play) (diff). Links: us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/equus.html news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5223520.stm theonion...

Declined. The title you suggested already exists on Wikipedia. Per WP:RGUIDE, I'd suggest discussing on the talk page of either Confounding or Emoticon...

September 2017 (UTC) WP:Don't worry about performance. You should also read WP:RGUIDE; notably, the first and second sentences. WP:RFD#Keep also makes for good...

become unnecessary. —PaleoNeonate – 01:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC) See WP:RGUIDE and WP:CHEAP. the purpose of redirects is to help people find target articles...

us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/of_love_and_other_demons.html (66, 65, 2, 1 R/X/L) us.penguingroup.com/static/rguides/us/of_love_and_other_demons...

not being mentioned there is an issue, consider changing the article.) WP:RGUIDE applies. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 12:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC) I wholly disagree...

Delete. per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:20, 14 July 2026 (UTC) Keep per RGUIDE and RHARMFUL. Pageviews suggest utility; on the other side of the coin,...

(talk) 18:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC) Delete per nom. I would argue that per WP:RGUIDE ("If a good-faith RfD nomination proposes to delete a redirect and has no...

contribuere (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC) @Servite et contribuere: See WP:RGUIDE. Steel1943 (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC) @Servite et contribuere: It's...

WP:CHEAP, I'd like to point out that implausibility is an outgrowth of WP:RGUIDE point 1: "If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching...

gives the best treatment to the subject). Serves an obvious purpose. WP:RGUIDE applies. Claims of WP:OR are not substantiated. -- C. A. Russell (talk)...

punctuation don't appear in sources. To me, this fits within the principles of WP:RGUIDE: The purpose of a good redirect is to eliminate the possibility that readers...

aren't actively harming, misleading, or excessively silly – voiced at WP:RGUIDE and at WP:HARMLESS (whether something is harmful or harmless are also valid...

taken as uncontroversial and the nom's preferred outcome enacted. See WP:RGUIDE point 3. Thryduulf (talk) 11:56, 7 May 2026 (UTC) to maybe be a little unfair...

notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 03:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC) Keep. WP:RGUIDE applies. Nominator's WP:NOTABILITY argument confuses Wikipedia's notability...

sure I was arguing {{R with possibilities}}, {{R from subtopic}}, and WP:RGUIDE ("redirects are cheap"). To wit, here are some insource search results that...

Template:Redirect hatnote at Fan magazine pointing to fanzine and vice versa. WP:RGUIDE applies. Additionally proposed merges should be dealt with by a proper merge...

clear as you say it is, then we should be able to speedy keep these per WP:RGUIDE and not keep having these discussions: Redirects nominated in contravention...

quick search. Flatscan (talk) 04:35, 31 August 2025 (UTC) WP:REDIRECT and RGUIDE says that non-category redirects are cheap, meaning if they solve a problem...

(contribs) on page Sara Sidle (diff) -> Added link: members.aol.com/kipler2/rguide.html (Monitored rule: members\.aol\.com - reason for monitoring members\...

up at RfD separately. --Habst (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2025 (UTC) See WP:RGUIDE - "If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching for...

particularly significant issue to me. Plausibility is the wrong metric. WP:RGUIDE states: If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching...

particularly significant issue to me. Plausibility is the wrong metric. WP:RGUIDE states: If someone could plausibly enter the redirect's name when searching...

of redirect: VGA-Copy Reason: Its name without the hyphen-minus, per WP:RGUIDE/redirects are cheap. Plus sometimes spelled without the hyphen-minus, see...