Search Results: Wikipedia:RMCLOSE


Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions
Minggu, 2026-08-09 17:42:33

is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Shortcuts WP:RMCIWP:RMCI WP:RMCLOSEWP:RMCLOSE...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 11
Senin, 2023-01-30 19:33:40

CfDs don't seem to cover this, the general guideline for renaming (WP:RMCLOSE) says (in WP:THREEOUTCOMES):There are rare circumstances where multiple...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 169
Senin, 2022-07-04 23:03:49

cleanup work expected, or the order in which things should be done. WP:RMCLOSE says "Clean up after the move by fixing all double redirects, fair use...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1003
Selasa, 2026-03-24 16:29:39

for a revert of the move) [170] Closed the discussion in violation of WP:RMCLOSE#Conflicts_of_interest as well as WP:INVOLVED. [171] I think the whole point...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 34
Senin, 2024-07-29 03:34:34

responded. I cannot close the discussion myself, of course (as per WP:RMCLOSE). If someone will close it, I shall execute the move. Thank you! – Quick...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 31
Minggu, 2026-04-05 20:42:33

2021 (UTC) In which case, why do you need an admin to close it? See WP:RMCLOSE#Conflicts of interest, last paragraph. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:17, 5 March...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 32
Rabu, 2024-05-01 09:04:46

elapsed and consensus has becomes clear and discussion has slowed, per WP:RMCLOSE. Uninvolved editor is needed, thank you. AshMusique (talk) 20:44, 2 June...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 April
Rabu, 2022-02-16 16:25:15

suggested standard or procedure described in THREEOUTCOMES or elsewhere in WP:RMCLOSE. I'm also troubled by their final comment, "It'll go to WP:MRV, just like...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2020 May
Kamis, 2020-07-23 00:38:44

proposer of the move. In my view, it corresponds to Wikipedia practice and WP:RMCLOSE. The "vote count", to the extent that it applies here, was 3 in favor and...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2019 August
Minggu, 2023-08-27 05:25:47

the discussion should not be read as opposition to those arguments. Per RMCLOSE, Paine Ellsworth evaluated the arguments, assigned due weight to each,...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2022 April
Minggu, 2022-05-01 13:54:00

that opposed vs. supported the move request but I do not believe that WP:RMCLOSE was followed as well as it could have been. One minor complaint would be...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Archive debates/2019 May index
Kamis, 2023-02-09 18:44:43

CfDs don't seem to cover this, the general guideline for renaming (WP:RMCLOSE) says (in WP:THREEOUTCOMES):There are rare circumstances where multiple...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Closure requests/Archive 38
Selasa, 2025-08-26 20:43:20

uncontroversial merge discussions by involved users are allowed.") with WP:RMCLOSE (saying not to do so but rather to request closure here). I considered...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1215
Rabu, 2024-05-15 04:39:49

Talk:Jupiter_(god)#Requested_move_7_February_2024 since they want to close it ASAP but WP:RMCLOSE tells me not to if I ever opened a request (which I made a few RM). So...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2025 October
Minggu, 2026-04-05 21:33:20

the close is any good is a different topic. BADNAC is an essay, as is RMCLOSE, there is no superseding to be done here. CNC (talk) 20:30, 11 October...

Click to read more »
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2024 July
Minggu, 2026-07-05 08:56:05

should be open for a minimum of a week. WP:RM is a process page and WP:RMCLOSE is an essay. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 17:57, 16 July 2024 (UTC) Overturn/relist...

Click to read more »