ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

page in any namespace, not just article space. Shortcuts WP:RSPRIMARYWP:RSPRIMARY WP:WPNOTRSWP:WPNOTRS Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable...

should only include information from reliable, secondary sources. WP:RSPRIMARY also states that "Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable...

synthesise. Reputable primary sources allowed 'for specific facts' (WP:RSPRIMARY) ie 'to make straightforward, descriptive statements of fact' (WP:PRIMARY)...

WP:SELFSOURCE concerns. All sources are from the product itself, so WP:RSPRIMARY applies. Thus, there are also WP:BIAS concerns, and it seems like WP:NPROD...

Both are more like encyclopaedias, which are allowed as sources, per WP:RSPRIMARY: "Reputable tertiary sources, such as introductory-level university textbooks...

Primary sources are also more reliable in this specific context per WP:RSPRIMARY. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC) For WP:GNG notability...

sometimes the only places where information has been published. However, WP:RSPRIMARY states "Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary...

child prodigy and none of the sources in the article seem to meet WP:RSPRIMARY; they therefore give no reason to suppose that he meets this definition...

primary sources to the schools' own website and blog? which violates WP:RSPRIMARY but the rest of the sources, mainly the ones including the the British...

is automatically notable under WP:GNG and WP:RS. This is not true. wp:RSPRIMARY states that "Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary...

not considered reliable?--EchetusXe 15:55, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Sure WP:RSPRIMARY, points to caution when using primary sources. The issue here is not so...

content guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, part of which (WP:RSPRIMARY) states that Wikipedia articles should be written primarily based on secondary...

synthesise. Reputable primary sources allowed 'for specific facts' (WP:RSPRIMARY) ie 'to make straightforward, descriptive statements of fact' (WP:PRIMARY)...

on the use of primary sources in addition to secondary sources per WP:RSPRIMARY. I then opened a discussion that has generated a consensus to adhere to...

person's best papers. 60.241.181.164 (talk) 11:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC) Per WP:RSPRIMARY, the bulk of any article should come from reliable secondary sources....

16:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC) I'm not too knowledgeable either, but per WP:RSPRIMARY, Wikipedia prefers secondary sources over others. Procyon117 (talk) 17:05...

opening/closing credits or from secondary sources (preferred, see WP:RSPRIMARY). In the WGA screenwriting credit system, an ampersand (&) is used to...

himself is not independent and needs to be used with extreme caution (WP:RSPRIMARY). --Xurizuri (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC) I've just had a look...

other things violating WP:BLP, WP:QS and other verifiability issues, WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:IS, WP:BLPRS, WP:REDFLAG, WP:BIO (notability), and other policies...

October 2024 (UTC) Delete not one secondary source provided. Fails WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:NEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWS. Merging would be undue. Traumnovelle (talk)...

mentioned predominantly non-RS, but rather a mix of WP:RSSELF, WP:RS/SPS, WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:SELFSOURCE. Even though WP:SECONDARY is preferred, WP:PRIMARY is...

secondariness or independence. DUE only needs sources to be "reliable", and WP:RSPRIMARY separates secondariness and reliability by saying "Wikipedia articles...

source when a secondary source is already present, which reinforces WP:RSPRIMARY, was generated per this discussion. After I removed the primary source...

opening/closing credits or from secondary sources (preferred, see WP:RSPRIMARY)". I don't see this as a reason for removing the thing entirely. This...

(talk) 00:22, 28 June 2021 (UTC) By the way, since you are quoting WP:RSPRIMARY, you might want to pay attention to the text immediately below what you...

sources that you combine to create an interpretation (please read WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:OR). Second, instead of, for example, expanding the coverage of...

am being disruptive. With regards to the first point (Amber Heard), WP:RSPRIMARY says "Although specific facts may be taken from primary sources, secondary...

page that Wikipedia prefers secondary sources over primary sources (WP:RSPRIMARY). That's likely caused good faith among others to wane. Regarding this...

provided Primary and Secondary source. So urces are following: 1. WP:RSPRIMARY Jean Chardin stated: Azerbaijan, province of Persia, borders to the East...

WP:DE and a violation of the rules prescribed in WP:CONS, WP:NPV, WP:RSPRIMARY. Previously, the user was already blocked due to the edit war. I ask you...

quote and an exceptional claim from a primary source, in violation of WP:RSPRIMARY 22:15, 17 April 2020 one minute after the previous edit was partially...

primary sources may be used. All seem to be met for the diff listed. WP:RSPRIMARY lists the cases where primary sources may be appropriate. It states that...

talkpages. In this comment he shows that he has no clue regarding our WP:RSPRIMARY/WP:PRIMARY policy. Debresser (talk) 19:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC) He is...

concerns about references to sources affiliated with Ichikawa, per WP:RSPRIMARY, "specific facts may be taken from primary sources," and per WP:PRIMARY...

by NovelAI's account, which makes it an unreliable primary source (WP:RSPRIMARY). At best, there could be a mention of NovelAI in the article for Stable...

I figured that fit within the scope of primary sources outlined in WP:RSPRIMARY, especially since I'm trying to focus on articles with no sources so that...

secondariness or independence. DUE only needs sources to be "reliable", and WP:RSPRIMARY separates secondariness and reliability by saying "Wikipedia articles...

primary sources are perfectly fine as are passing mentionings (per WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:BASIC). Further, providing nice sources is something for a normal...

coverage, and WP:No original research and the use of primary sources, and WP:RSPRIMARY. These are basic fundamental policies. This type of newspaper coverage...

secondary sources? Largely because there is no policy against it; WP:RSPRIMARY "Reputable tertiary sources, such as introductory-level university textbooks...

(whether that’s because of non-independence of interviews, or it being WP:RSPRIMARY. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources#Examples of news reports...

himself is not independent and needs to be used with extreme caution (WP:RSPRIMARY). --Xurizuri (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC) I've just had a look...

as "proof", then forget it, and please read and try to understand WP:RSPRIMARY. --T*U (talk) 07:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC) @TU-nor:These are some data...

(talk) 15:24, 4 February 2022 (UTC) @GavriilaDmitriev: Please see WP:RSPRIMARY. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 15:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC) GavriilaDmitriev...

(PDF). 31 August 2015. Retrieved 28 December 2021. Court proceeding WP:RSPRIMARY and conflicted testimony is apparent Case about Sharma's death in a shooting...

things that can be sourced to primary sources (i.e. specific facts). WP:RSPRIMARY has more information if you're still looking for more info. Happy editing...

original on 3 November 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2021. Court case WP:RSPRIMARY Case about a different person makes passing mention of an email address...

unreliable, though there are considerations as per WP:PRIMARY and WP:RSPRIMARY. Is there another guideline specifically about memoirs? --tronvillain...

mentioned predominantly non-RS, but rather a mix of WP:RSSELF, WP:RS/SPS, WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:SELFSOURCE. Even though WP:SECONDARY is preferred, WP:PRIMARY is...

concerns about references to sources affiliated with Ichikawa, per WP:RSPRIMARY, "specific facts may be taken from primary sources," and per WP:PRIMARY...

other things violating WP:BLP, WP:QS and other verifiability issues, WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:IS, WP:BLPRS, WP:REDFLAG, WP:BIO (notability), and other policies...

"Suddenly patents are not RS?" She then claimed she was using a patent in an RSPRIMARY compliant manner. I disagree. She was using a patent to provide analysis...

baptised there. Ni'jluuseger (talk) 12:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC) See WP:RSPRIMARY. It is rarely wise to use baptismal records as Wikipedia sources at all...

by NovelAI's account, which makes it an unreliable primary source (WP:RSPRIMARY). At best, there could be a mention of NovelAI in the article for Stable...

child prodigy and none of the sources in the article seem to meet WP:RSPRIMARY; they therefore give no reason to suppose that he meets this definition...

primary sources to the schools' own website and blog? which violates WP:RSPRIMARY but the rest of the sources, mainly the ones including the the British...

Primary sources are also more reliable in this specific context per WP:RSPRIMARY. SuperSkaterDude45 (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2022 (UTC) For WP:GNG notability...

Both are more like encyclopaedias, which are allowed as sources, per WP:RSPRIMARY: "Reputable tertiary sources, such as introductory-level university textbooks...

original on 3 November 2020. Retrieved 11 December 2021. Court case WP:RSPRIMARY Case about a different person makes passing mention of an email address...

(PDF). 31 August 2015. Retrieved 28 December 2021. Court proceeding WP:RSPRIMARY and conflicted testimony is apparent Case about Sharma's death in a shooting...

for a lengthy (1500 char) block quote , which again runs contrary to WP:RSPRIMARY: "Large blocks of material based purely on primary sources should be avoided...

to get community insight. I'd argue that both sources are ok; per WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:BLPPRIMARY, the government source is only supporting statements...

primary sources are perfectly fine as are passing mentionings (per WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:BASIC). Further, providing nice sources is something for a normal...

reliability in WP:PAGs and essays. See: WP:SOURCE, WP:SCHOLARSHIP, WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:MEDANIMAL, WP:BESTSOURCES, WP:MEDPRI (policies and guidelines) and...

sources is exatly why we encorage the use of secondary ones like BC (WP:RSPRIMARY)—blindlynx (talk) 18:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC) Comment Bellingcat has, as...

opening/closing credits or from secondary sources (preferred, see WP:RSPRIMARY)". I don't see this as a reason for removing the thing entirely. This...

It's significant that this is a self-published primary source. Per WP:RSPRIMARY, we should be focused on whether reliable secondary sources generally...

Khan's work is through Secondary Sources not as a primary source- WP:RSPRIMARY, university scholars have examined his work and found apt of what to include...

inauthenticity. (6) This handwritten testimony satisfies the Wikipedia policy WP:RSPRIMARY. (7) The handwritten testimony document can be found here. Arkenstrone...

sources also have lots of independent coverage in secondary sources. WP:RSPRIMARY says that pages "should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources";...

not considered reliable?--EchetusXe 15:55, 10 April 2021 (UTC) Sure WP:RSPRIMARY, points to caution when using primary sources. The issue here is not so...

be included under WP:Aboutself guidelines, or are they in breach of WP:RSPRIMARY? Regards, CeltBrowne (talk) 11:29, 11 July 2022 (UTC) I've explained my...

on Wikipedia. The specific one on this page is Ogledalo Pravde. (6) WP:RSPRIMARY "Primary sources are often difficult to use appropriately. Although they...

LG Williams". We had a discussion on their talk page about WP:RS, WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:BLP, WP:BLPREMOVE but they insist it was okay to use, based on their...

Proposed edit to the article is to consider following sources: 1. WP:RSPRIMARY Jean Chardin stated: Azerbaijan, province of Persia, borders to the East...

content guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, part of which (WP:RSPRIMARY) states that Wikipedia articles should be written primarily based on secondary...

re: trying to claim that patents are RS (they clearly aren't) – per WP:RSPRIMARY, primary sources can be both reliable and useful in certain situations...

secondary sources? Largely because there is no policy against it; WP:RSPRIMARY "Reputable tertiary sources, such as introductory-level university textbooks...

essentially a primary source and may be used within the limitations of WP:RSPRIMARY. It should not be used for notability or the status of a route beyond...

hand-written testimony, then for that very limited use, it should be fine per WP:RSPRIMARY. Remember, all that's being said is that a digital copy of her hand-written...

of independent checking. Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources WP:RSPRIMARY: By republishing primary material, they are essentially a primary source...

Dave Jacobs' accomplishments. @Woodroar: @Isaidnoway:, per WP:RS and WP:RSPRIMARY, nothing about the source(s) being primary is a disqualifier and none...

encyclopedia, and at best its articles are tertiary, but not a proper RSS WP:RSPRIMARY so the Orange article could be used as a teriary source but I think better...

would solve a lot of the sourcing issues, and I do think it meets WP:RSPRIMARY enough. If a secondary source is available, great, we can replace the...

WP:SELFSOURCE concerns. All sources are from the product itself, so WP:RSPRIMARY applies. Thus, there are also WP:BIAS concerns, and it seems like WP:NPROD...

While other secondary sources say it shows no collusion. Pehaprs read Wp:RSPRIMARY and WP:PSTS. PackMecEng (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2025 (UTC) March 2019 sources...

Butterfly or Chuang Tzu? (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2023 (UTC) There is WP:RSPRIMARY. Beyond that I don't know whether there are any recommendations. Personally...

16:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC) I'm not too knowledgeable either, but per WP:RSPRIMARY, Wikipedia prefers secondary sources over others. Procyon117 (talk) 17:05...

coverage, and WP:No original research and the use of primary sources, and WP:RSPRIMARY. These are basic fundamental policies. This type of newspaper coverage...

the combining of a preference for relying on secondary sources (see WP:RSPRIMARY) and a greater concern when it comes to matter regarding iiving persons...

should only include information from reliable, secondary sources. WP:RSPRIMARY also states that "Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable...

is that the footage of the rapper's arrest would likely fall under WP:RSPRIMARY. Although it's difficult to acknowledge that we cannot take footage from...

October 2024 (UTC) Delete not one secondary source provided. Fails WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:NEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWS. Merging would be undue. Traumnovelle (talk)...

sometimes the only places where information has been published. However, WP:RSPRIMARY states "Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary...

DeCausa (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC) I tried pointing this user to WP:RSPRIMARY and discussing why a political attack in a primary document can't be repeated...

trivial/primary mentions of the incident but give deep coverage of other events. WP:RSPRIMARY Traumnovelle (talk) 19:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC) Thank you again for confirming...

(whether that’s because of non-independence of interviews, or it being WP:RSPRIMARY. Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources#Examples of news reports...

is automatically notable under WP:GNG and WP:RS. This is not true. wp:RSPRIMARY states that "Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary...

sources also have lots of independent coverage in secondary sources. WP:RSPRIMARY says that pages "should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources";...

articles in a general sense, and if followed literally would invalidate WP:RSPRIMARY, WP:SELFSOURCE, etc. In this specific context, I don't think it's a problem...

war warning that had advised him to discuss in Talk, claiming that WP:RSPRIMARY allowed it although WP:PRIMARY states that such sources need to be used...