ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article or a Wikipedia policy, as it has not been reviewed by the community. Shortcut WP:SPOVWP:SPOV...

Semi-recently created noticeboard that isn't being used for anything. Since WP:SPOV was a failed policy I don't think this is appropriate. Noformation Talk 20:36...

its competitors RationalWiki and Conservapedia. I asked, "What is best, SPOV, NPOV or CPOV?" Here was its response: All three of these approaches to writing...

1) SPOV is not NPOV 2) What is SPOV is complicated. 3) How SPOV interacts with NPOV is complicated. 4) In general, when there is a coherent SPOV it should...

Wikipedia. Even SPOV, let alone debunking, is formally rejected by the community (till the recent Cold Fusion ArbCom at least). If debunking and SPOV are permitted...

and SPOV (scientific point of view)? On most topics, like Palpatine, there is no SPOV. On topics like wave function collapse there is only the SPOV, which...

07:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Some thoughts.... Speaking of NPOV and SPOV, the SPOV functions in a manner similar to Wikipedia's sourcing policies and other...

tripped over myself using an old version of policy....nice answer concerning SPOV as well. Homestarmy (talk) 17:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Tony Sidaway 18:30...

difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 23:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC) SPOV is not a recognised term within Wikipedia...

"snarky point of view" and "scientific point of view" (both abbreviated as SPOV) rather than a "neutral point of view" (NPOV), and publishes opinion, speculation...

self-proclaimed POV that is admittedly incompatible with WP:NPOV (see RW:SPOV.) There is an active copyright tag on the page, which could be addressed...

(talk) 19:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC) I forked the article to Wikinfo. They allow SPOV and OR, so in time either make this article good enough to justify maintaining...

actually see about it), and is only used to back up the statement "They use SPOV instead of NPOV" 2- The second source is from this extremely unreliable website...

say that SPOV would tend to prevail in those situations, if only because it has more reputable primary sources to cite. Generally, NPOV and SPOV will be...

e. Bensaccount insists on reporting from the "Scientific Point Of View" (SPOV). {Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse...

2010 (UTC) Do the arbitrators believe that WP:SPOV should be followed as it is written currently? Does WP:SPOV contradict WP:V? Are scientists to be considered...

difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? From reading the WP:SPOV article, it appears that SPOV is a component of NPOV, especially...

Seems to also be used in modern day creationism, and as we follow NPOV not SPOV its worth including. --Salix alba (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Delete...

mod/admin/thing change my username to SPOV?Wikpedia 15:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC) Yes, kitten huffing is inappropriate. SPOV is acceptible. Name change complete...

rules were changed to be SPOV, then things would be fine. There wouldn't be a fight, because everyone who said "NPOV not SPOV," and "follow WP:WEIGHT,"...

light. SPOV would be one of the routes to which articles attain a neutral point of view, so there really is not a different between NPOV and SPOV. Neutral...

to bring them together. If anything, doing so supports, not opposes, the SPOV--I'd think any even partially rational person who might nonetheless think...

say I'm a liar, because I really have been urging WP to go either way on SPOV. If it's gone SA's way, why wouldn't I congratulate him? If you know any...

2010 (UTC) Do the arbitrators believe that WP:SPOV should be followed as it is written currently? Does WP:SPOV contradict WP:V? Are scientists to be considered...

any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?---- ragesoss (talk) 22:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC) I'm not familiar with SPOV but I do know that Wikipedia...

between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Answer: To be flip about it, WP:NPOV is a fundamental Wikipedia principle, and WP:SPOV is an essay. More...

research scholarship and editorship, where SPOV is largely meaningless. But in narrow sense there are some SPOV implications interwoven in to the dispute...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC) Certainly...

related articles, the global warming related pages are edited according to WP:SPOV, despite this not being official policy. This then leads to tensions in which...

what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Hi Ragesoss. SPOV is not a term I've heard before (did you come up with...

Havaname (Talk) 05:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose - While response to SPOV was okay, it was uninspired and stock to almost to the point of being blunt...

recently in WP:V, where you seemed to be advocating "scientific point of view" (SPOV). I completely agree with you that academic sources are almost always better...

summary", it was "all the ScienceApologist 'improvements' are designed as SPOV spin;" this was genuine; all of his edits were to promote the scientific...

is not a open NPOV project ... it is to push a SPOV (William doesn't seem to adhere to NPOV, just SPOV). My attempt to "join" was deliberate to keep balance...

article is acceptable and should always take precedence over SPOV, especially since SPOV isn't even a guideline. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:05, 26...

problem with SPOV lies within its context. SPOV, according to the historical page, "should be written to the exclusion of all others" or "SPOV should be...

December 2007 (UTC) Amply qualified for the job. Support Good answer on the SPOV question in particular. Homestarmy (talk) 17:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Support...

Oppose.Sweetfirsttouch (talk) 17:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose per NPOV/SPOV answer... the flat earth bit is a straw man, and has been repeated by more...

Oppose candidate is to cavalier with his analysis of the topic related to SPOV. In particular, candidate seems to be too accomodationist and vaguely opposed...

need for it, etc. He also seems to be trying to impose his own version of SPOV. Issues perceived by user:Skoppensboer: The issue I have with FT2 is that...

(UTC) Well we have a standing committee on the matter. But seriously, WP:SPOV was rejected and I don't think changing NPOV to incorporate it would be a...

2006-12-13t20:41z Support -- Candidate understands the issues regarding SPOV very well (school of hard knocks can be a real asset). I encourage those...

difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC) WP:SPOV is an old proposal that suggested we...

“Ta fys aym”. 09:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose unfamiliarity with SPOV issues apparent in candidate's first brush attempt to describe the problems...

the nominator supports having articles with a scientific point of view (SPOV), when we aim to be from a neutral point of view. The claims of science and...

Wikipedia. It doesn't actually discuss Wikinfo beyond the mention its an SPOV fork of Wikipedia. The second source mentions Wikinfo in only one sentence...

--ElaragirlTalk|Count 19:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose -- terrible response to SPOV question. Seems to evince a lot of popular misconceptions that an encyclopedia...

block log). (Evidence: identical user page, in one case created by SPOV.) Due to SPOV's edits to the user page of EntmootsOfTrolls (talk · contribs · deleted contribs ·...

presented (double plus if supported by WP:RS), I'm just saying that if the SPOV is "this is bunk", that's not grounds for deletion. Pete.Hurd (talk) 05:35...

to SPOV question was so anti-science as to be ridiculous. The question was not "does science answer everything", the question was related to the SPOV issues...

(talk) 17:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose per lack of knowledge about NPOV/SPOV issue. Skinwalker (talk) 18:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose over his lack...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 17:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC) I'm withdrawing...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Thanks, good first question for me on a subject...

(talk) 17:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose per content-free answer to NPOV/SPOV question. Skinwalker (talk) 18:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose - The arbcom...

Oppose.Sweetfirsttouch (talk) 17:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose per NPOV/SPOV answer. Skinwalker (talk) 18:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose - The arbcom...

above-linked comments from the NPOV FAQ as a way to resurrect the deprecated WP:SPOV. It's as if so-labelled pseudoscientific topics have magically become exceptions...

NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?---- ragesoss (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Neutral point of view is just that, neutral. A SPOV can be biased...

2009 (UTC) Keep and perhaps add Template:historical as was done with WP:SPOV. Otherwise, the present version of the page, sans the deletion template,...

December 2006 (UTC) Support -- Candidate's response to question regarding SPOV was better than many of the more seasoned editors. --ScienceApologist 16:35...

Wikipedia as fact? An SPOV encyclopedia would simply say "this is hooey"; Wikipedia has to say "Scientists say this is hooey". SPOV would also require a...

difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? I must say I haven't seen the term "SPOV" around much, but I would say that neutral...

Mar 27, 2005 (UTC) Wikipedia:Scientific point of view (WP:SPOV) is a discussion on SPOV and NPOV. Criticism and further development of ideas, improvemtn...

going to happen is that admins, many of whom are clueless about things like SPOV=NPOV in science and medicine, will think the loudest whiner is the one in...

We should draft and adopt a SPOV policy. Editors on any article can decide by consensus that they want to let the SPOV policy apply to their article...

is based on faith, not science; a SPOV would dictate that such an article be deleted or removed. In addition, an SPOV would also violate some of our other...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss (talk) 04:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)...

difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 17:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC) I'm not sure. WP:SPOV is historic and has one edit...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View is significantly...

moral support. There is sometimes an important difference between NPOV and SPOV. But she's a good guy. ——Martinphi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 05:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)...

who admit up front that there really isn't any difference between NPOV and SPOV. Thanks, Rebecca. ScienceApologist (talk) 16:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Support...

brings on trouble!!! On Wikinfo, One can write a SPOV article and another writes a "Criticism" of the SPOV article. People stay out of each other's hair...

delicate matters such as those the candidate discussed in the response to his SPOV question. However, I am concerned that even though the candidate seems to...

"praise" section, and to have both is to spiral into the bulgy-eyed valley of SPOV. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 15:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC) This time as 24.136...

its name. (sorry, Martin, but I'm just tired of circular arguments over SPOV, I want to get some real work done at those pages. If I wanted to argue to...

Sweetfirsttouch (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Lack of a detailed answer to NPOV/SPOV question, as well as concerns raised above. Skinwalker (talk) 18:07, 5 December...

Diablo (talk) 14:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose per evasive answer to NPOV/SPOV question. Skinwalker (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC) --Cactus.man ✍ 18:28...

persecuting people. Why can't I put an external link such as "Please see SPOV article at [Wikinfo:Subject name]" or "For original research material on...

scientific controversies as evinced by a rather poor response to the question on SPOV. --ScienceApologist 16:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose MediaMangler 09:58...

policy will be met with great resistance and hostility. Attempts to create SPOV (sympathetic point of view) will be similarly met. And no, not all ArbCom...

NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 23:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC) While there is some overlap on scientific topics, NPOV and SPOV are distinct...

22:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Per Daniel and the fact that your answer on SPOV shows lack of clue.--Docg 01:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC) I've regrettably changed...

diff five days ago. I formally had her listed as a suspected sock of User:SPOV because of the incredibly similar userboxes. She also reported an autoblock...

didn't include substantive participation from people outside the group of SPOV proponents who take a hard line on topics such as Homeopathy. We received...

same topic. And ANY changes to those articles that are not in line with the SPOV grouping is immediately reverted and the contributor harassed until they...

exclusion of ideas not understood as evinced by candidate's response to SPOV question. --ScienceApologist 17:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Weak oppose. the...

currently socking and evading his ban fairly actively to advance his view on the SPOV/expert withdrawal issue. A representatively constructive comment describes...

and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC) This really had been a serious controversy from time and time again. SPOV is...

(and other article pages he has managed to delete), there's still plenty of SPOV and SqueakAttacks to be documented if ever there is a need. I agree that...

also seems to me that the current version of the article is excessively SPOV (sympathetic point of view) and I'm concerned that it's misleading. I'll...

reconciliation and fact-checking of these various sources is where WP:V and SPOV meet at WP. Science is how I refer to science practiced with integrity and...

option, at least if one continues to prefer NPOV over Subject's POV -- alas, SPOV has been preempted as an abbreviation. The only reason I do not myself revert...

only want editors that will edit to their liking. NPOV is not the goal, "SPOV" or their POV is. Fair warning: If you have even the slightest disagreement...

equivalence of NPOV and SPOV, or the declaration that SPOV trumps NPOV in some cases. Rather, it situates the relationship of SPOV to other views in a way...

still discussing the stance of where SPOV fits into things here. Right now there is a movement to make the SPOV a part of policy regarding the way scientific...

needs to be fixed, namely that a small number of users are trying to impose SPOV on certain articles, and now on the policies. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:44, 30...

civility issues' and move on. You'll most likely be asked about NPOV and 'SPOV', whatever that means. Have an answer. Make it more than a sentence long...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? The Scientific point of view proposal was rejected...

However, SPOV tell us that the moon is in fact a round ball or a globe but from where most of us view the moon it is flat but we accept the SPOV. NPOV and...

battling kooks, there is a huge danger of this being used by people who prefer SPOV to NPOV to run off their opponents. Gah Gah. No. You want a secularliberalpedia...

PhilKnight and you basically said I shouldn't refer to ScienceApologist's SPOV or editing methods in my comments or edit summaries. I'm still unclear on...

22:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC) Yup, maybe an encyclopedia which does not take WP:SPOV seriously would be a better choice. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:26, 20 June 2019...

in the climate change area, this means that Wikipedia needs to adopt WP:SPOV. Count Iblis (talk) 21:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC) I agree that the system...

back when they had actual silver in them) and I'm admittedly one of the SPOV-with-appropriate-balance crowd, but they won't let me into the cabal. ;)...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? I don't think it would make a large difference...

fact. So in closing we shouldn't hold Wikipedia to SPOV because well most encyclapedias arn't SPOV. Deathawk 02:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC) But the point is...

WP:ARBPS. By uncanny knowledge I mean knowing that WP:NPOV boils down to WP:SPOV in scientific matters. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC) I was...

Hello. I found someone with an inappropriate username User:CFIF. He makes all sorts of broadcast media related edits and may be confused with radio station...

which seems best, so I will not be that closer. I think something like WP:SPOV should be a guideline, but some believe WP:NPOV contradicts it.) — Arthur...

help much. The result of this is that in many controversial areas the NPOV/SPOV has a tendency to match the preconceptions of a majority of those WPedians...

his admin power CoYep 14:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose -- Response to SPOV question misses issues related to WP:OR, WP:V, and WP:RS in favor of a neofascist...

inspired in part by WP:SPOV but avoid some of the major pitfalls of that particular proposal. In particular, the idea that SPOV even exists is a real problem...

failed to achieve consensus because many editors opposed it? What about WP:SPOV, also a failed proposal, right? Of course I agree that Wikipedia completely...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? (Note: The ArbCom has traditionally stayed away...

Declined 2008-01-31 - diff Webby Awards - Declined 25 January 2008 - diff SPOV and civility in fringe articles - Declined 23 January 2008 - diff Austrian...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? The Scientific Point of View is, by definitely...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Thank you for volunteering to take on this task...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 05:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC) Both...

that I think that it is superiour to SPOV in any way. It's what we use on Wikipedia. I personally might wish that SPOV be satisfied before NPOV be considered...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 23:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC) All Wikipedia...

2006 (UTC) Oppose weasely though surprisingly argumentative response to the SPOV question does not inspire confidence in candidate's abilities to adjudicate...

December 2006 (UTC) Oppose candidate's answer to the question regarding SPOV seems to ignore the delicate nature of the controversies that can arise....

(if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 23:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC) In Wiki context, NPOV and SPOV share the same basis and...

(UTC) Oppose, sorry; no. Huldra (talk) 08:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Oppose SPOV response was stock and vague not evincing any sort of confidence in candidate's...

context of a pseudoscientific topic is always a science-related context (ie. SPOV). The current text reads: The task before us is not to describe disputes...

on whether people feel they will support their view (e.g.do you support SPOV? could become a litmus test) - as some sort of election would be necessary...

that this is a nuiance but it seems almost like the difference between WP:SPOV and WP:NPOV. Since science is the right answer then it will show up in a...

NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC) As far as I understand the (rather vague) definition on WP:SPOV, the differences...

Come on, this is hardly SPOV. scapegoating?. And while you've largely been SPOV about Hitler, you're totally NSPOV (not SPOV) about Treaty of Versailles...

to create a less-reliable encyclopedia. Answer to the question regarding SPOV took an article-by-article stance on the subject rather than addressing the...

engaging in meat puppetry. --Scandum 01:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose SPOV response was stock and vague not evincing any sort of confidence in candidate's...

know that NPOV does not allow us to entrench a POV, and certainly not a SPOV. Those are the breaks, that's what we all signed up for. Purported and claimed...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? I don't know what you mean by "scientific point...

that WP should follow SPOV rather than NPOV (the established policy), this editor is of course free to follow NPOV rather than SPOV. Same goes here: I may...

articulation with regards to issues surrounding controversies of science and SPOV means I cannot support this candidate. --ScienceApologist 17:01, 14 December...

It seems too much like taking a Wikinfo-style sympathetic point of view (SPOV). I'm not asking the ArbCom to state whether RoM or FYROM should be the standard...

Suspected sockpuppetry by blocked user Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SPOV Suspended ban Suspicious activity at Talk:Broly Suspicious contributions...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC) A1. This...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? A: Sounds awfully like a content dispute to me...

23:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC) Oppose -- in response to question regarding SPOV, this person evinced a poor understanding of the unique requirements of an...

issues here. Wikipedia is not about our western views of "truth" (ie not WP:SPOV) but rather WP:NPOV which permits significant minority view points. As such...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Although I could say "ArbCom answers conduct...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? In practice, I don't think there's a particularly...

to bring them together. If anything, doing so supports, not opposes, the SPOV--I'd think any even partially rational person who might nonetheless think...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?---- ragesoss (talk) 22:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)...

aware of it, the problem is that some want to use it as a backdoor to slip SPOV into our policies. NPOV is not negotiable, period. --Dragon695 (talk) 23:16...

17:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Opppose I might be reading it wrong, but your SPOV answer sounds like Wikipedia should blatantly accuse ideas that aren't mainstream...

official goals of Wikipedia, but that is incorrect. He is a proponent of SPOV (with an extreme interpretation)[131][132][133][134], which has been rejected...

2008 (UTC) Prodego talk 03:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Oppose. Talking about "SPOV versus NPOV wars" is the wrong idea of the role of science on Wikipedia....

actually see about it), and is only used to back up the statement "They use SPOV instead of NPOV" 2- The second source is from this extremely unreliable website...

the community for it. I've been called "anti-science" for misinterpreting SPOV. I blocked a trolling IP for voting against me in the last ArbCom election...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? In science-related articles, none. However, in...

resolve the entire dispute; it certainly will not solve the debates about SPOV, BLP, reliable sources, etc. But I do think it should be given a shot, for...

such a template tempts editors of all stripes to use it to perpetuate RPOV/SPOV debates while pretending to be talking about something else, and a primar...

presented (double plus if supported by WP:RS), I'm just saying that if the SPOV is "this is bunk", that's not grounds for deletion. Pete.Hurd (talk) 05:35...

difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:13, 5 November 2007 (UTC) WP:SPOV is outdated and historical for a reason...

issues here. Wikipedia is not about our western views of "truth" (ie not WP:SPOV) but rather WP:NPOV which permits significant minority view points. As such...

Wikipedia. It doesn't actually discuss Wikinfo beyond the mention its an SPOV fork of Wikipedia. The second source mentions Wikinfo in only one sentence...

interested. See RationalWiki. I like the suggestion that, unlike us, it takes a SPOV ('snarky point of view'!), Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 01:17, 11 March 2019...

December 2006 (asking an important question of the candidates about NPOV vs SPOV) and work done at Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science. On that basis...

theories have no relevance. The community explicitly rejected a proposed WP:SPOV guideline which would have preferred scientific points of view over others...

sufficiently neutral. The correct meaning of NPOV (and ofr that matter, SPOV) is that an objective presentation of even the most folly-ridden subject...

the nominator supports having articles with a scientific point of view (SPOV), when we aim to be from a neutral point of view. The claims of science and...

(talk) 19:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC) I forked the article to Wikinfo. They allow SPOV and OR, so in time either make this article good enough to justify maintaining...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC) I think...

astrology - scientists, skeptics and debunkers do, so, if anything, the title is SPOV. Numerous suggestions have been made with respect to the title. What is yours...

00:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC) The gist of PelleSmith's argument is similar to "SPOV is the same as NPOV", which didn't gain consensus. I think he is in effect...

06:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC) Endorse I don't see eye-to-eye with JzG on some SPOV issues, dealing with lack of positive, *nonpartisan* feedback, battle damage...

self-proclaimed POV that is admittedly incompatible with WP:NPOV (see RW:SPOV.) There is an active copyright tag on the page, which could be addressed...

sufficiently neutral. The correct meaning of NPOV (and ofr that matter, SPOV) is that an objective presentation of even the most folly-ridden subject...

him, I am not the least agnostic about their existence. I take a purely SPOV to the subject of their real existence, but there is no doubt that there...

viewpoint has been subjected to peer review by that body. By rejecting WP:SPOV, the community indicated that it does not favor academic viewpoints over...

between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? WP:NPOV is a well established and described policy. Honestly, I do not know what is SPOV. Obviously if...

here that they're opposed to WDM because he's too SPOV (scientific POV). Of course, I prefer the SPOV (where it matters, say science articles and the related...

23:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Oppose. SPOV is not a NPOV. A neutral point of view is best represented by objectivity. SPOV explicitly states and takes a POV...

the existence of a category for articles about practices which, from the SPOV, are quackery?" Bkalafut 18:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC) I agree with you up...

articles here. -- Fyslee 08:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia has not adopted an SPOV policy and is committed to NPOV. Read up about it. --Leifern 01:06, 7 April...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 22:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC) Answer...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? We have to be careful what we call "scientific"...

be guarded against is the possibility of drifting from NPOV and toward an SPOV (specialist/sympathetic POV) where the view of so-called specialists dominates...

be left, I'll just start over. You say in your oppose that I was framing spov and npov as a battle that npov must win, and badger drink pinned me as a...

22:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC) Yup, maybe an encyclopedia which does not take WP:SPOV seriously would be a better choice. Tgeorgescu (talk) 22:26, 20 June 2019...

etc etc come to mind as worthy recipients. This is not just about ensuring SPOV, NPOV or reverting vandalism, but about arguing and defending against trivial...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragesoss...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? A point of view that is neutral is one that does...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Probably the same difference as between Creationism...

We should draft and adopt a SPOV policy. Editors on any article can decide by consensus that they want to let the SPOV policy apply to their article...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss (talk) 04:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)...

delist" - The delisting proposal is an attempt to push fringe Wikipedia SPOV policy by bashing a NPOV article. The article is sufficient for "Good" criteria...

by Guy 23:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC) This strikes me as equivalent to WP:SPOV, which has not been accepted by the community (for better or worse). --EngineerScotty...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 04:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Answer:...

article? rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 02:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Well remember the WP:SPOV was rejected in favor of WP:NPOV, I think holding the idea that NPOV is tops...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC) Well,...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 23:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC) There...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss (talk) 04:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)...

Article status. It is too difficult to distinguish NPOV (essential) from SPOV (which is actually a POV). Any such article, such as this one or Creation...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? They actually address different points. The neutral...

rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 02:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC) I've not gotten stuck in on the SPOV versus NPOV wars, so this may be not as complete as you like, but my thoughts...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Hi! All your rhetorical and standard questions...

Although I have spent the last five years here supporting and promoting SPOV and the highest standards of sourcing possible, Awickert has been reduced...

them, just like any other article. There is no point of view (such as WP:SPOV) which has special precedence because people WP:KNOW something is "fringe...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? I believe in the context of Wikipedia there is...

I support the fundamental policies including NPOV (but not the idea of a SPOV).I have grave concerns about our ability to deal with incivility. And I've...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC) Scientific...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? The scientific POV attempts to find the best...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 04:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC) That's...

from being (nor obviates the need to be) neutral. Support: Let's slay that "SPOV" dragon once and for all. A method can no more hold a point of view than...

into a pro-Pius and an anti-Pius article, which conforms with Wikiinfo’s SPOV but not with not Wikipedia’s NPOV. [62] Proposal rejected by me. personal...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Opinions vary because some people place considerably...

differ based on the topic of the article, my views stated at the rejected 'SPOV and civility in fringe articles' request for arbitration thread (in January...

what I woudl consider to be neutral (in matters of hard science, NPOV and SPOV are close to, though not exactly, synonymous). Reddi has been sanctioned...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC) Does science...

Wikipedia arguing that science itself is an opinion (this may go back to the old SPOV/NPOV disputes). Of course, NPOV is easier to get towards when both sides...

the topic of the article? rspeer / ɹəədsɹ 02:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)' SPOV is half of NPOV. In explaining the scientific point of view in an article...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 00:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC) This doesn't...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC) My background...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 03:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC) There...

inspired in part by WP:SPOV but avoid some of the major pitfalls of that particular proposal. In particular, the idea that SPOV even exists is a real problem...

xavexgoem: But that's scientific before anything kim_: is that wrong? kim_: SPOV ~= NPOV kim_: it's close enough... most of the time kim_: I figure one day...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? I haven't heard of Scientific Point of View before...

Request made by: Harald88 17:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC) Status: (--to be modified by mediator--) new request, accepted by mediator, awaiting further response...

ScienceApologist stated, a peer-reviewed journal. Isn't that the standard for the SPOV used in articles on science and scientists? There are plenty of other, major...

have any success, though—Wikipedia's NPOV on such topics usually is the SPOV, even though it isn't supposed to be. Editing contentious Wikipedia articles...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? That sounds like an awfully particular debate...

articles here. -- Fyslee 08:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC) Wikipedia has not adopted an SPOV policy and is committed to NPOV. Read up about it. --Leifern 01:06, 7 April...

rewritten so that NPOV becomes SPOV. Not that we don't want NPOV, but rather that achieving NPOV is best done by sticking to SPOV. Now, there is no consensus...

Today as a reliable source, for example. I think the difference between SPOV and NPOV is that we would identify and explain notable fringe theories and...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? Both apply to all articles. Neutral point of...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 04:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC) I suppose...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? The proposal that Scientific point of view should...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? This is well illustrated in Wikipedia:Requests...

the community for it. I've been called "anti-science" for misinterpreting SPOV. I blocked a trolling IP for voting against me in the last ArbCom election...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)? A: Well, I hope you're not looking for support...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Scientific...

most weight, thus enforcing our status as a mainstream encyclopedia where SPOV rules. -- BullRangifer (talk) 03:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC) That was attempted...

fringe. As religion, they're shared by rather large number of Christians. WP:SPOV was rejected for a reason. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:26, 14 April 2014 (UTC)...

00:29, 20-Jan-2008 18:50, 25-Jan-2008 6 Declined 0 6 0 0 3 I I D D D D D D I SPOV and civility in fringe articles 05:10, 18-Jan-2008 02:03, 24-Jan-2008 6 Declined...

the Wikipedia context, what is the difference (if any) between NPOV and SPOV (scientific point of view)?--ragesoss 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC) There...

degrading, offensive and demeaning ways they call snarky point of view (SPOV), and which after the Sorcha Faal article had been deleted from Wikipedia...

Salvadoreans? Ethiopians? Regardless, we can assume it is sufficient to qualify for SPOV purposes as a "widespread belief system" Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 04:34, 26...

*giving the viewpoint* from the article about it. WP:MAINSTREAM and WP:SPOV are not policy. If you believe there is a policy justification for deleting...

astrology - scientists, skeptics and debunkers do, so, if anything, the title is SPOV. Numerous suggestions have been made with respect to the title. What is yours...

prolongs the battle over the definition of WP:NPOV, and whether or not WP:SPOV is indistinguishable therefrom. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 10:31, 2 December 2013...

Seems to also be used in modern day creationism, and as we follow NPOV not SPOV its worth including. --Salix alba (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC) Delete...

the good quality science articles that are effectively edited according to SPOV, despite this not being official policy. And ATren & co. are only active...

editors Template:WP:DWDAE Wikipedia:Scientific point of view Template:WP:SPOV Wikipedia:Semi-policy Template:WP:SEMP Wikipedia:Utilities Template:WP:UT...

delist" - The delisting proposal is an attempt to push fringe Wikipedia SPOV policy by bashing a NPOV article. The article is sufficient for "Good" criteria...

article, it is the first thing to be seen in the references. This has an "SPOV" such as can be found on Rationalwiki, and while I personally find this to...

Article status. It is too difficult to distinguish NPOV (essential) from SPOV (which is actually a POV). Any such article, such as this one or Creation...

Suspected sockpuppetry by blocked user Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SPOV Suspended ban Suspicious activity at Talk:Broly Suspicious contributions...

his control of finances and the relationships of the people. BLP is not SPOV. If he's a cult leader, so be it. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 03:35, 14 December...

in every article – but we're always going to have editors who prefer WP:SPOV over NPOV, and many of them don't even know that's what they're doing. The...