ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Wikipedia articles must not contain original research. On Wikipedia, original research means material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no...

into a dispute over word choice, someone may shout that we must WP:STICKTOSOURCES. They will do that because they believe that the cited sources (or most...

given. — Bilorv (talk) 02:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:STICKTOSOURCE: If no reliable independent sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia...

citations are published reliable sources. It was my intention to follow WP:STICKTOSOURCE Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing...

another's argument is Whataboutism, then link to that article. The WP:STICKTOSOURCES shortcut leads to the "Using sources" section of Wikipedia:No original...

is. Most of this article is WP:OR without any suitable sources. WP:STICKTOSOURCES tells us that if there aren't independent sources that discuss a topic...

are interesting they are not found in independent sources. Wikipedia:STICKTOSOURCE. Keep the reliable part and write it somewhere as prose, not original...

substantially sticks to the sources to describe its subject/person as per WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Additionally, the above sources and some other references sufficiently...

fails WP:V, WP:GNG, WP:NOT and WP:NLIST by extension. In short, WP:STICKTOSOURCES. We don't write Wikipedia articles without suitable sources. Shooterwalker...

separatist, movements;" That's true but why creating a WP:OR non-WP:STICKTOSOURCE article with copied material instead of expanding the already existing...

only that, but we have a policy that no guideline can override (WP:STICKTOSOURCE): If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia...

references it must by definition be WP:OR. Under the subheading WP:STICKTOSOURCE which states rather explicitly "If no reliable third-party sources can...

Merge version of what according to the description of the article WP:Sticktosource so i dont deal with this, its okay if your saying image is inappropriate...

05:42, 7 May 2016 (UTC) Ilovetopaint, maybe should you learn what WP:STICKTOSOURCE and WP:CONTEXT mean ? All the references I used to expand the list explicitly...

nunciature of Naples continued. I suggest to stay stick to sources WP:STICKTOSOURCE. To change the title of such category is an historical error. A ntv...

of best practices that are supported by consensus." Please read WP:STICKTOSOURCES, which is policy: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on...

that calls a company's claims "debunked lies" and insist we must WP:STICKTOSOURCES, claiming to use toned-down words or phrases would be original research...

was also based on the sources from the Philippine history itself WP:STICKTOSOURCE ({ ᜉ᜔ ᜀ᜔| ໑ } P.A.-II (talk) 01:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)) Keep even if...

even say that the song has been influential on KROQ Top 106.7. (see WP:STICKTOSOURCE and WP:UNDUE)) June 6 - (Undid revision 959882967 by Evrik (talk) rv...

supplying one to aid WP:V. It is because they reverted an editor, citing WP:STICKTOSOURCE in the edit summary but found in fact that the sentence was unsourced...

different sentences. Each time, I've changed and improved my edits. I wp:STICKTOSOURCE, I used wp:RSs and there is no wp:OR. 2) This report is bizarre because...

– Levivich 21:40, 4 January 2020 (UTC) These two paragraphs of WP:STICKTOSOURCE capture, in their entirety, what is at issue with that conclusion. So...

discussion, TheShadowCrow also misrepresented a source violating WP:STICKTOSOURCE in relation to the Karo Parisyan article and made a misleading edit...

I was honestly shocked by the blatant violation of WP:STICKTOSOURCE policy by way of WP:CHERRYPICKING statements from the VICE article....

rules and pushing nationalistic POV, Kuatilya here, who champions WP:STICKTOSOURCE, lectures everyone to follow RS and quickly revert others if content...

doesn't say that the use of "Namechecked" can't not be put instead per wp:STICKTOSOURCE. For information, one user Ojorojo wrote here: "if he were to be used...

it's not even worth mentioning. I directed TheShadowCrow to review WP:STICKTOSOURCE as this is an obvious and blatant violation of this. However, instead...

with this article presented me with an obvious and quite shocking WP:STICKTOSOURCE policy violation, on the very first citation. Reverting editors ignoring...

rules and pushing nationalistic POV, Kuatilya here, who champions WP:STICKTOSOURCE, lectures everyone to follow RS and quickly revert others if content...

article. Politrukki (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2018 (UTC) @BullRangifer:, WP:STICKTOSOURCE is a policy. If you use an old source that is exclusively about candidate...

destroying America culturally and politically. Could everyone not just WP:STICKTOSOURCE and be happy? Put that gem in there and Wikipedia:Let the reader decide...

nunciature of Naples continued. I suggest to stay stick to sources WP:STICKTOSOURCE. To change the title of such category is an historical error. A ntv...

areas. I would be happy to see this expanded upon, perhaps in NOR's WP:STICKTOSOURCE section, to say that there is no substitute for knowing what the sources...

off of. Unless I'm missing something here, this would be against WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2026 (UTC) Would this be ok for the...

of best practices that are supported by consensus." Please read WP:STICKTOSOURCES, which is policy: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on...

topic, i.e. Of Human Feelings, following the principle expressed in WP:STICKTOSOURCE: "Best practice is to research the most reliable sources on the topic...

and occasionally disjointed, one-dimensional playing". Please see WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Flow Ridian (talk) 21:42, 26 July 2014 (UTC) It "strikes" you? I did...

separatist, movements;" That's true but why creating a WP:OR non-WP:STICKTOSOURCE article with copied material instead of expanding the already existing...

confused, I'll change it. Dan56 (talk) 22:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC) WP:STICKTOSOURCE Article: "Robert Christgau believed they rely on a low-key, vulnerable...

fails WP:V, WP:GNG, WP:NOT and WP:NLIST by extension. In short, WP:STICKTOSOURCES. We don't write Wikipedia articles without suitable sources. Shooterwalker...

given. — Bilorv (talk) 02:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC) Delete: Per WP:STICKTOSOURCE: If no reliable independent sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia...

references it must by definition be WP:OR. Under the subheading WP:STICKTOSOURCE which states rather explicitly "If no reliable third-party sources can...

there's no way these articles constitute original research. See WP:STICKTOSOURCE for information on what OR is, and see in there where we specifically...

05:42, 7 May 2016 (UTC) Ilovetopaint, maybe should you learn what WP:STICKTOSOURCE and WP:CONTEXT mean ? All the references I used to expand the list explicitly...

substantially sticks to the sources to describe its subject/person as per WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Additionally, the above sources and some other references sufficiently...

was also based on the sources from the Philippine history itself WP:STICKTOSOURCE ({ ᜉ᜔ ᜀ᜔| ໑ } P.A.-II (talk) 01:16, 23 July 2016 (UTC)) Keep even if...

only that, but we have a policy that no guideline can override (WP:STICKTOSOURCE): If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia...

is. Most of this article is WP:OR without any suitable sources. WP:STICKTOSOURCES tells us that if there aren't independent sources that discuss a topic...

are interesting they are not found in independent sources. Wikipedia:STICKTOSOURCE. Keep the reliable part and write it somewhere as prose, not original...

there's no way these articles constitute original research. See WP:STICKTOSOURCE for information on what OR is, and see in there where we specifically...

what the point of this whole discussion is. Methinks the answer is WP:STICKTOSOURCE, because here is what Geraldatyrrell said: "...this is not about the...

by--Catflap08 (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC) Comment by others: 2) WP:STICKTOSOURCE We all at times quarrel on sources, about their relevance. Deleting...

sources/references are adequate, many of them are false ref which is not WP:STICKTOSOURCE or just put there in order to discourage other editors to dip in and...

article in rough proportion to its coverage in the sources. See WP:STICKTOSOURCES. Of course an awful lot of Wikipedia editing in practice goes the other...

a particular article/album, then they should be used instead, as WP:STICKTOSOURCE suggests, "the most reliable sources on a topic". Dan56 (talk) 18:04...

purpose is to reflect the knowledge in such excellent sources, so WP:STICKTOSOURCE and WP:ASSERT its claims unless there is some RS saying that paper is...

off of. Unless I'm missing something here, this would be against WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2026 (UTC) Would this be ok for the...

goalposts, last seen westbound out of town. So Charlotte's edit could WP:STICKTOSOURCE better about the population sample Archer applies to. You see, that's...

Wikipedia? Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC) Since, per WP:STICKTOSOURCE, mainstream newspapers are (with some exceptions, of course) reliable...

sources ("a shorthand for a number of factions.."), and point out WP:STICKTOSOURCE, affirming that the media links do not "directly and explicitly" support...

WP:OVERCITE guidelines? --K. Peake 07:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC) No, I would WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Heartfox (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC) fn 7, 20, 25, 82, 86, 92,...

person in defamatory sense". 3.) Not according to WP:BLP, WP:OR, WP:STICKTOSOURCE WP:SYNC, and WP:NPOV. 4.) No, the context as mentioned above by Guy...

23Contradictions_invalidated_by_WP:STICKTOSOURCE.3F regarding the intersection of WP:Cherrypicking and WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Comments are appreciated. Rhoark...

stated otherwise, they're talking about garage punk, not garage rock (WP:STICKTOSOURCE). I've repeatedly asked Garagepunk66 to supply direct quotes that support...

WP:WEIGHT). --ColinFine (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC) So, basically WP:STICKTOSOURCE, right? I can do that. Thanks for the response. Jellypear (talk) 19:28...

sources to the table in support of a POV. We mustn't do that - simply WP:STICKTOSOURCE and summarize what our WP:MEDRS-compliant secondary sources have concluded...

outdated publications or to "unclear or inconsistent passages". (See WP:STICKTOSOURCE, incorporated by reference in WP:BLPREMOVE.) --Dervorguilla (talk) 08:00...

otherwise violates Wikipedia policy on original research based on WP:STICKTOSOURCE and WP:SYNTHESIS. Piriczki (talk) 12:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Secondary...

Wikipedia? Fowler&fowler«Talk» 15:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC) Since, per WP:STICKTOSOURCE, mainstream newspapers are (with some exceptions, of course) reliable...

confused, I'll change it. Dan56 (talk) 22:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC) WP:STICKTOSOURCE Article: "Robert Christgau believed they rely on a low-key, vulnerable...

secondary sources that do so." As the section in NOR linked to by WP:STICKTOSOURCE says "If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce...

and thus violates the basic rule of Wikipedia ie WP:OR precisely WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Everything is explained on talk page of this article. This (whole)...

topic, i.e. Of Human Feelings, following the principle expressed in WP:STICKTOSOURCE: "Best practice is to research the most reliable sources on the topic...

WP:OVERCITE guidelines? --K. Peake 07:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC) No, I would WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Heartfox (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC) fn 7, 20, 25, 82, 86, 92,...

"not complex". This seems to be a case of inference on his part. WP:STICKTOSOURCE states that: Take care not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources...

appear to "disavow racism", he disavowed his previous writing... so WP:STICKTOSOURCE. What do people think? Zenomonoz (talk) 22:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)...

and occasionally disjointed, one-dimensional playing". Please see WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Flow Ridian (talk) 21:42, 26 July 2014 (UTC) It "strikes" you? I did...

Well-written too. Bon courage (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC) WP:STICKTOSOURCE is very good too, especially its second paragraph. Llll5032 (talk) 06:08...

things "award". That is WP:SYNTH. Time does not call it an award, so WP:STICKTOSOURCE". And I have to agree with him, your refusal to get the point is getting...

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC) There are also WP:STICKTOSOURCE issues, where interpretation of just one source may involve some aspect...

edit-warring, editing against Wikipolicy (and attempts to bend "WP:STICKTOSOURCE" to support your crusade), and dismissal of sources whose reliability...

enforced “no matter what the sources state” is a clear violation of WP:STICKTOSOURCE, and your claim about the purported ”60+ articles” that have apparently...

MOS and follow sources about the origin of Covid. I said we should WP:STICKTOSOURCE when sources use qualifiers like "likely". I quoted sources. All the...