Search Results: Wikipedia:THIRDPARTY
Redirect to:
Wikipedia:Independent sources
Selasa, 2026-08-11 18:29:12Identifying and using independent sources (also called third-party sources) helps editors build non-promotional articles that fairly portray the subject...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wellborn, Texas
Sabtu, 2026-01-10 01:02:06community. A few minor mentions in local sources (which are therefore non-thirdparty) is not enough to meet WP:N, and its lack of status as a city or town...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhtar Raza Khan
Minggu, 2025-11-16 20:59:52images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Highly unremarkable person. No thirdparty secondary sources available for the importance of including him here....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KTechlab
Rabu, 2026-01-07 13:39:11software using wikipedia as free advert (for three years). I can find no thirdparty reliable sources. 16x9 (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Bloom (musician)
Kamis, 2026-01-08 06:38:0419:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Comment - I don't think these sources meet WP:THIRDPARTY, specifically, "How to meet the requirement," sections: "Sources: At least...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8 Flavahz
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 19:26:54point of view (WP:FAN) and lacks sufficient third-party references (WP:THIRDPARTY). WANI ♪♫♪ 17:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GMail Drive (2nd nomination)
Selasa, 2026-01-06 21:37:01scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable, no WP:THIRDPARTY refs. mono 16:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sérgio Kato
Jumat, 2025-11-28 04:04:57WP:NACTOR. Michitaro (talk) 15:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Delete - Lack of thirdparty or indepedent sources, the subject does not establish notability as per...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrine Maui
Senin, 2025-12-01 11:41:39Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Delete: there's not a single WP:THIRDPARTY references available across the web that can give this article a significant...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community College Futures Assembly
Selasa, 2026-01-06 05:39:23entity, fails WP:ORG and WP:N; references assed are all from a single non-thirdparty source -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 22:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higgsfield AI
Minggu, 2026-05-31 19:43:52other across the web are corporate trivial ones, with no reliable WP:CORP thirdparty source. Delete as not notable. Techcrunch and similar sources are only...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soccer Star 2017 Top Leagues
Senin, 2025-12-01 12:40:33GiantSnowman 10:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC) Delete per insufficiency of reliable, WP:THIRDPARTY, WP:INDEPENDENT sources; those that a WP:BEFORE search brings up are blogs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Seaman
Minggu, 2025-11-30 01:58:47or all of the other sources are questionable under WP:SOURCES and WP:THIRDPARTY. I don't think the stuff with questionable sources can be merged maybe...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noetic Advanced Studies Institute
Jumat, 2025-11-28 03:15:59IRWolfie- (talk) 20:59, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:GROUP and WP:THIRDPARTY, If you didn't notice (and I believe you did) a majority of these sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hurley IV
Senin, 2025-11-24 05:06:37FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG; aside unsourced parts, no reliable WP:THIRDPARTY source are passing mentions, none of those assert why he is notable. In...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JMathLib
Selasa, 2023-02-07 11:41:03votes/comments. - Mike Rosoft 13:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Delete unless a thirdparty reliable source (like a review maybe?) or evidence of popularity can be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishop Challoner Catholic Secondary School
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:00:46The article has no 3rd party sources, and according to WP:Source and WP:THIRDPARTY 3rd party sources are key. Personally I worked on this article as a much...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sitka Fine Arts Camp
Selasa, 2025-11-18 17:08:12goverment site announcing an award (I assume, the link is dead), not a WP:THIRDPARTY source discussing the camp and the award, if this camp is truly notable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Loyal Order of Moose/1
Rabu, 2026-05-13 22:41:56article heavily relies on connected sources. Until we can remove the {{thirdparty}} cleanup tag, we should remove good article status. — BillHPike (talk...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Christian Church Milsons Point
Senin, 2023-02-06 08:09:18Delete as nn. DakPowers (Talk) 19:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC) Delete unless thirdparty sources are found that indicate verifiabilty or notability. A search of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Training Corps Association of New Zealand
Sabtu, 2025-12-13 19:27:05scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) apparently no thirdparty sources, nor would I expect there to be any DGG ( talk ) 04:56, 27 July...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dehan Chen
Kamis, 2025-11-13 15:33:12Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society Award and Healthgrades Honor Roll. He has thirdparty sources besides derectory links [1], [2], [3] . He has also notable educational...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Hutchins
Minggu, 2025-11-23 17:58:42(Michael Hutchence) not to be confused with. Fails WP:GNG, no reliable WP:THIRDPARTY source to back it up other than books by him. Donnie Park (talk) 22:28...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/99.155.84.49/Archive
Rabu, 2022-02-16 17:58:19he may accuse TV fan of being a sockpuppet so I figured I should get a thirdparty involved with more experience in these matters. I probably should have...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Rails
Kamis, 2026-01-08 14:08:36WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC) Have updated article to add thirdparty references related to the industry now, so now it should not be deleted...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashk Dahlén (2nd nomination)
Minggu, 2025-11-30 21:56:25J947(c) 22:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC) Keep Per PROF and GNG. Realiable thirdparty sources.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC) Which categories of WP:Prof...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dapat Alam Mo!
Selasa, 2025-12-16 03:40:092022 (UTC) I'd be surprised if Lionheart.TV passes WP:RS. This needs WP:THIRDPARTY RS that gives it WP:GNG coverage. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:20, 8 August...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denys Marchenko
Selasa, 2025-07-08 02:00:38Comment – @Dclemens1971: What do you mean by "contested"? @Spiderone: Is "thirdparty" coverage the same as "independent"? Anyway, I'd lean towards Delete....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of albums awarded Best New Music by Pitchfork Media
Jumat, 2025-11-14 10:15:06not a published, reliable source. Double check your sources and read WP:THIRDPARTY: "Every article on Wikipedia must be based upon verifiable statements...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Man 3 (video game)
Jumat, 2025-11-28 02:13:47(talk) 18:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC) Notability is determined by reliable WP:THIRDPARTY sources not WP:PRIMARY sources.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:35, 7 June 2013...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fazhengnian (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2025-11-28 01:45:18guidelines regarding sources, including appropriately using templates such as thirdparty and primarysources, and making them clearer and better to match what is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Swift Retort (film)
Rabu, 2025-12-10 10:56:28purports to depict the Pakistani national viewpoint, with no independent WP:THIRDPARTY coverage. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC) Thanks for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 May 26
Senin, 2018-12-03 03:41:33contain all Steam games either. wumbolo ^^^ 08:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC) Keep Thirdparty coverage of these games will generally note having gone through the Greenlight...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Differences between Stargate and Stargate SG-1
Selasa, 2026-01-06 11:52:05sources, and there its stated nowhere that articles may only consist of thirdparty sources. See my reply below your !vote. – sgeureka t•c 16:47, 15 October...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saints of Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica
Selasa, 2026-01-06 21:26:58appears so highly bureaucratic, but we'd need WP:RELIABLE, WP:SECONDARY, WP:THIRDPARTY sources, and at the moment the article has none. Therefore, I've been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programming Without Coding Technology
Kamis, 2026-01-08 19:43:54xharbour community 1 - http://www.xharbour.org/index.asp?page=product/thirdparty you will find a link to the project under the name (Mahmoud DoubleS (Super...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Okura
Minggu, 2025-11-16 21:12:02attracted independent notability. Virtually all of the references meet WP:THIRDPARTY and well exceed the recommended minimum of two. The Los Angeles Times...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Alliance for Life
Minggu, 2025-11-30 04:32:58They all stink to high heaven of violations of WP:RS, WP:INDY, and WP:THIRDPARTY. Perhaps there are reliable sources out there, but the contributors (who...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olympic class starship
Kamis, 2026-01-08 13:44:47although I am unsure how these sources would be classified according to WP:THIRDPARTY#How to meet the requirement. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 11:34, 12 May 2011...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive888
Senin, 2025-10-20 11:58:14trying to introduce non-THIRDPARTY material, which has less weight than the United Nations reports, as shown by their THIRDPARTY status, intergovernmental...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 171
Jumat, 2023-03-03 12:46:19becoming self-contradictory in your accusations ("You cited THIRDPARTY" "You didn't cite THIRDPARTY"). I think you're making this more personal than it has...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melrose Bickerstaff (second nomination)
Rabu, 2023-02-08 05:04:16(UTC) STRONG DELETE I did do an indepth google and dogpile search for Thirdparty articles. She fails WP:BIO very badly. WP:ILIKEIT does not trumph WP:V...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of killings of Muhammad (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2026-01-07 22:20:18just Hadith and Tabari, the article's reliability is questionable. WP:THIRDPARTY -- As well as being heavily dependant on Hadith sources, the article lacks...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksa Janković (footballer)
Kamis, 2026-01-29 19:24:41@GiantSnowman: Actually, interviews count as SIGCOV if there is plenty of thirdparty analysis. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:19, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Yes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser/Template redirects
Selasa, 2026-07-28 04:35:30{{Third-party source-inline}}, {{Thirdparty-inline}}, {{Third party source}}, {{Third party inline}}, {{Thirdparty inline}}, {{3rd party inline}}, {{3rd-party...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poison In The Grapes
Selasa, 2026-01-06 23:36:04think the subject is. We only care about the opinions of independent WP:THIRDPARTY Reliable sources. -- dsprc [talk] 03:15, 12 September 2015 The insults...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive193
Senin, 2026-04-20 00:21:24explicitly mentioned any specific rules, but i did ask if we needed some thirdparty to help us settle things) Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive789
Jumat, 2023-04-21 21:32:08I'd take time to read up on wp:rs, wp:primary vs. wp:secondary & wp:thirdparty, make sure you really understand how sources are supposed to work, then...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive852
Senin, 2026-02-16 23:31:43dispute: it ought to be carefully handled with regard to WP:WEIGHT and WP:THIRDPARTY. Silvio1973 is not the kind of user that one can work with in this manner...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive887
Kamis, 2026-02-12 20:49:33to Somalia related articles, and associated continual removals of WP:THIRDPARTY sources, often replacing them with official or less scholarly sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive181
Jumat, 2026-05-22 21:27:56cited source. point out dubious citations which violate WP:RS and WP:Thirdparty policy. For example, My last edit, explained above, is about citation...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive879
Rabu, 2024-05-22 00:30:32based on reliable, third-party, published sources...". The linked page WP:THIRDPARTY says "A third-party source is one that is entirely independent of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive302
Rabu, 2025-09-24 21:36:46Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive887#WP:NPA breech following NPOV, THIRDPARTY breeches. Cordless Larry (talk) 05:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC) Where does...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive946
Sabtu, 2024-09-07 20:57:14Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive887#WP:NPA breech following NPOV, THIRDPARTY breeches. Middayexpress eventually quit Wikipedia promising to recruit...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1089
Rabu, 2024-11-06 09:44:57dates even though there is an established norm and consensus that WP:THIRDPARTY sources are required for songs and singles - as artists and labels often...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive270
Minggu, 2020-09-13 11:08:42[35]—I pointed to the fact that the James R. Lewis source does not meet WP:THIRDPARTY. However, I did not remove this source, or revert Binksternet’s edit as...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Horn of Africa
Sabtu, 2026-03-28 00:00:48Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive887#WP:NPA breech following NPOV, THIRDPARTY breeches and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive888#Middayexpress's...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1036
Selasa, 2026-06-09 19:44:06(UTC) (Non-administrator comment) I just tagged a bunch of them with {{Thirdparty}}. The website used as a only source also mentions the membership of said...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Webb (priest)
Minggu, 2026-05-17 12:38:47Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:Neutrality, WP:Thirdparty, and violates WP:Conflict of Interest. Catfurball (talk) 17:07, 5 May...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/IWGP Junior Heavyweight Championship/archive2
Selasa, 2026-03-24 21:14:40List" and as such should have independent confirmation from independent thirdparty sources. There are pitfalls to the "official" story being the one being...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 72
Kamis, 2022-12-15 15:07:48the "Rollback" tool. There's the "Rollback" user right, and also some thirdparty versions found in Twinkle and RW/UV. So, I'm wondering what the difference...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 December 28
Senin, 2023-08-28 13:23:14articles that recognize this as a genre. It certainly seems to have WP:THIRDPARTY support, and articles would go a long way towards addressing the issues...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 July 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 23:06:45non-thirdparty"? For the record, WP:N does not "ban" local sources as indications of notability and certainly does not label them "non-thirdparty."--Oakshade...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/April 2010
Jumat, 2010-04-30 05:25:16List" and as such should have independent confirmation from independent thirdparty sources. There are pitfalls to the "official" story being the one being...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2011 January 27
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:10:07the book that is the subject of the article. Please read WP:NOTE, WP:THIRDPARTY and WP:NBOOK. Please understand that the book must be the subject of multible...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines to cite in deletion debates
Rabu, 2026-06-17 14:06:23talented does not mean being automatically notable Third party sources WP:THIRDPARTY WP:3PARTY Describes the value of third-party sources Useful/useless WP:USEFUL...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John M. Madsen
Senin, 2025-11-17 20:09:47associated with the LDS church and are therefore probably WP:BIASed. Some WP:THIRDPARTY sources would be nessicary for this article to be kept. CombatWombat42...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 109
Kamis, 2026-04-16 20:09:28concept and not to be confused with". I'll go make that change at WP:THIRDPARTY. Jc3s5h, we cite non-independent secondary sources all the time. Any review...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everybody Draw Mohammad Day
Selasa, 2026-01-06 17:28:11(UTC) Keep per Cirt.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Keep WP:THIRDPARTY a lot of valid / reliable sources out there for this.. Traxs7 (Talk) 02:11...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheist and Agnostic Group
Senin, 2026-01-05 14:17:46article. The deletion of the group may prove interesting and get enough thirdparty coverage (see:WP:OR) to warrant an article in the long run, but at the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/st.com
Minggu, 2008-12-21 16:48:05com/mail/2006-01-26.html (9776, 427, 2, 1) www.kotaku.com/gaming/madcatz/thirdparty-nunchuks-inbound-214220.php (9776, 5698, 15, 1) gear.ign.com/articles/840/840028p1...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 3
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:31:14guidelines regarding sources, including appropriately using templates such as thirdparty and primarysources, and making them clearer and better to match what is...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fictional elements, materials, isotopes and atomic particles
Selasa, 2026-01-06 19:02:47October 2007 (UTC) And notability is currently not established by reliable thirdparty sources (WP:N, WP:RS), making all entries and therefore the whole lists...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 February 1
Selasa, 2022-10-18 07:43:49article. The deletion of the group may prove interesting and get enough thirdparty coverage (see:WP:OR) to warrant an article in the long run, but at the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 63
Selasa, 2026-04-07 22:44:12ask, but I'd rather have more input than just the single person that "thirdparty" normally gets.) Ubcule (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2019 (UTC) This is not...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:58:09or all of the other sources are questionable under WP:SOURCES and WP:THIRDPARTY. I don't think the stuff with questionable sources can be merged maybe...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 September 19
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:24:07purports to depict the Pakistani national viewpoint, with no independent WP:THIRDPARTY coverage. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:18, 20 September 2019 (UTC) Thanks for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 October 8
Selasa, 2022-04-05 16:44:30sources, and there its stated nowhere that articles may only consist of thirdparty sources. See my reply below your !vote. – sgeureka t•c 16:47, 15 October...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 4
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:34:42(talk) @Desmay: Yes, but does it pass WP:NOTE? The sources are no WP:THIRDPARTY sources. If it doesn't then (in my opinion) it shouldn't be on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2011 May 12
Jumat, 2023-02-10 13:11:56not clear to me if these sources count as third-party sources per WP:THIRDPARTY. Where can I bring this up in order to receive clarification? Would WP:RSN...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 September 28
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:05:52just Hadith and Tabari, the article's reliability is questionable. WP:THIRDPARTY -- As well as being heavily dependant on Hadith sources, the article lacks...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 8
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:49:56goverment site announcing an award (I assume, the link is dead), not a WP:THIRDPARTY source discussing the camp and the award, if this camp is truly notable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connie Fournier
Sabtu, 2025-11-22 15:21:25to avoid idiosyncratic articles based upon a single perspective. WP:THIRDPARTY There are many more than two reliable third-party sources that are independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AnonEMouse
Minggu, 2023-03-26 08:02:34sites, personal pages, dressed up blogs but to none of the independent thirdparty source that Jimbo Wales so importantly pointed out were essential for...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 April 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 23:15:47software using wikipedia as free advert (for three years). I can find no thirdparty reliable sources. 16x9 (talk) 19:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 April 28
Jumat, 2023-03-03 23:15:33Wikipedia is not a WP:GAMEGUIDE, and moreover this entire article lacks WP:THIRDPARTY sources as required by WP:V, WP:OR, WP:RS, and WP:N. I couldn't so much...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 April 14
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:27:5419:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Comment - I don't think these sources meet WP:THIRDPARTY, specifically, "How to meet the requirement," sections: "Sources: At least...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 July 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:55:28point of view (WP:FAN) and lacks sufficient third-party references (WP:THIRDPARTY). WANI ♪♫♪ 17:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 April 6
Selasa, 2022-04-05 16:06:03votes/comments. - Mike Rosoft 13:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC) Delete unless a thirdparty reliable source (like a review maybe?) or evidence of popularity can be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Hawkins (2nd nomination)
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 03:19:02interview, nor a published record of the interview (within the limits of WP:THIRDPARTY). A small blurb regarding Hawkin's book Power vs. Force is mentioned at...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 25
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:53:55J947(c) 22:23, 25 April 2017 (UTC) Keep Per PROF and GNG. Realiable thirdparty sources.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC) Which categories of WP:Prof...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 March 30
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:37:05scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not notable, no WP:THIRDPARTY refs. mono 16:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 19:54:08GiantSnowman 10:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC) Delete per insufficiency of reliable, WP:THIRDPARTY, WP:INDEPENDENT sources; those that a WP:BEFORE search brings up are blogs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 5
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:39:35IRWolfie- (talk) 20:59, 5 April 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:GROUP and WP:THIRDPARTY, If you didn't notice (and I believe you did) a majority of these sources...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 February 5
Minggu, 2023-02-19 00:12:59party” requirement does not matter here, for the reasons explained in WP:THIRDPARTY and WP:SPS. But I can give you a contrary example to let you better understand...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 October 6
Selasa, 2022-04-05 16:44:16October 2007 (UTC) And notability is currently not established by reliable thirdparty sources (WP:N, WP:RS), making all entries and therefore the whole lists...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 1
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:59:23images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Highly unremarkable person. No thirdparty secondary sources available for the importance of including him here....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 May 28
Rabu, 2023-03-01 12:14:01Gene93k (talk) 12:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Delete: there's not a single WP:THIRDPARTY references available across the web that can give this article a significant...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 August 7
Selasa, 2022-04-05 16:55:46xharbour community 1 - http://www.xharbour.org/index.asp?page=product/thirdparty you will find a link to the project under the name (Mahmoud DoubleS (Super...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:07:43appears so highly bureaucratic, but we'd need WP:RELIABLE, WP:SECONDARY, WP:THIRDPARTY sources, and at the moment the article has none. Therefore, I've been...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 April 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:52:25(UTC) Keep per Cirt.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Keep WP:THIRDPARTY a lot of valid / reliable sources out there for this.. Traxs7 (Talk) 02:11...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 11
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:27:40think the subject is. We only care about the opinions of independent WP:THIRDPARTY Reliable sources. -- dsprc [talk] 03:15, 12 September 2015 The insults...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 July 14
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:42:38WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC) Have updated article to add thirdparty references related to the industry now, so now it should not be deleted...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Jashraj
Kamis, 2026-01-08 21:36:44the article fails WP:BIO and WP:RS and has no third party sources WP:THIRDPARTY apart from Lohana community to back the article. Further, Tomb of Genghis...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 16
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:52:34attracted independent notability. Virtually all of the references meet WP:THIRDPARTY and well exceed the recommended minimum of two. The Los Angeles Times...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 July 27
Rabu, 2021-08-04 19:19:05scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) apparently no thirdparty sources, nor would I expect there to be any DGG ( talk ) 04:56, 27 July...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 17
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:24:48FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:GNG; aside unsourced parts, no reliable WP:THIRDPARTY source are passing mentions, none of those assert why he is notable. In...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 January 26
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:41:24Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society Award and Healthgrades Honor Roll. He has thirdparty sources besides derectory links [27], [28], [29] . He has also notable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Envelope model
Senin, 2025-12-01 01:50:49(talk) @Desmay: Yes, but does it pass WP:NOTE? The sources are no WP:THIRDPARTY sources. If it doesn't then (in my opinion) it shouldn't be on Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 7
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:03:42associated with the LDS church and are therefore probably WP:BIASed. Some WP:THIRDPARTY sources would be nessicary for this article to be kept. CombatWombat42...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 November 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:58:03entity, fails WP:ORG and WP:N; references assed are all from a single non-thirdparty source -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 22:04, 10 November 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 10
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:47:55Deviantart? Youtube? Equestriadaily.com which blatantly violates WP:THIRDPARTY? Does not meet WP:N at all. Androids101 | Visit me! | talk | contribs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 May 12
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:12:27although I am unsure how these sources would be classified according to WP:THIRDPARTY#How to meet the requirement. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 11:34, 12 May 2011...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:33:13is incorrect. As for the third-party requirements, what I read at WP:THIRDPARTY is (1) "A third-party source is one that is entirely independent of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Parsons
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 05:24:04fascinating info taken from her employer's site (which isn't exactly a WP:THIRDPARTY source) that "Her hobbies and interests include Feng Shui, science, the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 2
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:47:07fascinating info taken from her employer's site (which isn't exactly a WP:THIRDPARTY source) that "Her hobbies and interests include Feng Shui, science, the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2007 August 22
Senin, 2023-02-20 20:30:09Explorer, in which case go into Tools, Internet Options, Advanced, Enable thirdparty browser extensions, and uncheck it. Once you've restrated your computer...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 January 10
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:15:21not a published, reliable source. Double check your sources and read WP:THIRDPARTY: "Every article on Wikipedia must be based upon verifiable statements...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 5
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:14:16They all stink to high heaven of violations of WP:RS, WP:INDY, and WP:THIRDPARTY. Perhaps there are reliable sources out there, but the contributors (who...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 August 9
Rabu, 2022-08-17 18:02:292022 (UTC) I'd be surprised if Lionheart.TV passes WP:RS. This needs WP:THIRDPARTY RS that gives it WP:GNG coverage. Howard the Duck (talk) 23:20, 8 August...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nemerle
Kamis, 2026-01-08 10:44:31party” requirement does not matter here, for the reasons explained in WP:THIRDPARTY and WP:SPS. But I can give you a contrary example to let you better understand...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 25
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:08:38WP:NACTOR. Michitaro (talk) 15:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Delete - Lack of thirdparty or indepedent sources, the subject does not establish notability as per...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 June 6
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:27:06(talk) 18:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC) Notability is determined by reliable WP:THIRDPARTY sources not WP:PRIMARY sources.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:35, 7 June 2013...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 22
Jumat, 2023-03-03 20:06:51to avoid idiosyncratic articles based upon a single perspective. WP:THIRDPARTY There are many more than two reliable third-party sources that are independent...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 December 19
Jumat, 2023-03-03 22:24:06the article fails WP:BIO and WP:RS and has no third party sources WP:THIRDPARTY apart from Lohana community to back the article. Further, Tomb of Genghis...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 7
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:28:54The article has no 3rd party sources, and according to WP:Source and WP:THIRDPARTY 3rd party sources are key. Personally I worked on this article as a much...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 273
Selasa, 2023-02-21 13:18:38coindesk should not be relied as a central source, but it's reasonably WP:THIRDPARTY, and often contains details that can't be found elsewhere. Forbes72 (talk)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spaceships of Eve Online (2nd nomination)
Jumat, 2026-01-09 08:21:16Wikipedia is not a WP:GAMEGUIDE, and moreover this entire article lacks WP:THIRDPARTY sources as required by WP:V, WP:OR, WP:RS, and WP:N. I couldn't so much...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 September 15
Jumat, 2023-03-03 21:43:43interview, nor a published record of the interview (within the limits of WP:THIRDPARTY). A small blurb regarding Hawkin's book Power vs. Force is mentioned at...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 96
Senin, 2024-11-18 14:14:33sources. I am unsure if these sources count as third-party sources per WP:THIRDPARTY#How to meet the requirement. They are not published by the subject, since...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout: Equestria
Sabtu, 2025-11-29 22:24:14Deviantart? Youtube? Equestriadaily.com which blatantly violates WP:THIRDPARTY? Does not meet WP:N at all. Androids101 | Visit me! | talk | contribs...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 257
Sabtu, 2026-05-02 05:12:33involved party in at least some of the events, the book fails the WP:THIRDPARTY criterion and it may be WP:BIASED. That does not mean that it cannot be...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2011 March 24
Jumat, 2022-05-20 15:24:47order to be notable in the sense of Wikipedia (see also WP:RS and WP:THIRDPARTY). Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 01:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC) I was trying to edit...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/reveal.org
Kamis, 2024-12-12 08:32:59history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: www.reveal.org/library/thirdparty/giambalvo_carol_rosedale_bostonmovement.pdf (R/Xmeta/L) 2022-08-15 22:09:47...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2014 November 13
Jumat, 2023-03-03 13:58:18starting the game, unless you put Steam in to offline mode. (And unlike with thirdparty DRM, Steam doesn't even generally tell you if the game has Steam DRM.)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 127
Senin, 2025-01-20 06:16:00involving those subjects. I have several problems with that in regards to WP:THIRDPARTY, WP:NPOV and WP:VERIFY. A third party must be independent and unaffiliated...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional candidate poll/Archive 10
Jumat, 2026-05-01 19:36:47Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive887#WP:NPA breech following NPOV, THIRDPARTY breeches. Though this ANI thread took place in 2015, it shows him joining...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reference Desk archive 3
Minggu, 2006-06-11 17:01:54"verklempt" actually mean anything in any language? If so, what and in which? ThirdParty Someone has given an answer at http://pub122.ezboard.com/fwordoriginsorgfrm7...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/smashbros.com
Kamis, 2008-04-24 11:24:48com/articles/840/840028p1.html (4878, 41, 5, 1) www.kotaku.com/gaming/madcatz/thirdparty-nunchuks-inbound-214220.php (4878, 580, 7, 1) uk.wii.ign.com/mail/2006-01-26...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 January
Rabu, 2011-03-23 13:04:59http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/26791/RuneScape_House_Jagex_Enters_ThirdParty_Publishing.php http://www.guiaglobal.com.br/noticia-jogos_online_prim...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhat Samgiita
Jumat, 2025-11-28 03:30:07is incorrect. As for the third-party requirements, what I read at WP:THIRDPARTY is (1) "A third-party source is one that is entirely independent of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 693
Sabtu, 2017-12-02 00:01:23of writing a biography of a living person in a neutral tone based on thirdparty sources, independant if the subject. So, my advice would be to gather...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 168
Jumat, 2024-10-04 07:22:08for that sort of naïveté regarding either side. None of them are really THIRDPARTY. Imo the best thing to do is to simply attribute both sides. That is to...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Myles (2nd nomination)
Rabu, 2025-12-24 05:27:07claim is strictly coterminous with the reliability and independent thirdpartyness of the specific source you use to specifically footnote his own personal...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109
Rabu, 2025-09-24 02:26:27very close to the subject. Wikipedia articles should primarily use WP:THIRDPARTY sources, and fansites are almost always too close to be considered entirely...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184
Kamis, 2025-08-28 22:10:31defers to WP:V and WP:OR. Some things that should be ascertained: Is it WP:THIRDPARTY? Is it WP:SECONDARY? Is the publishing organization independent of the...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 191
Jumat, 2022-02-18 08:47:23no problem.Dante1717mx (talk) 21:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC) Please see WP:THIRDPARTY. Press releases do not help in establishing notability, and their use...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 201
Jumat, 2022-02-18 08:46:46article about any artist but it should have WP:IS. You should go through WP:THIRDPARTY which states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 304
Sabtu, 2023-02-11 03:37:17webcite all there are just check marks in a grid, and I can't find any thirdparty sourcing that they do legitimate peer review. As far as I can tell father...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2010 October 5
Jumat, 2026-01-23 16:56:42break rules. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 22:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC) WP:THIRDPARTY explains that a third-party source is "independent of the subject being...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback/Archive 2015 3
Minggu, 2022-06-12 17:16:52Mobile/13B143 Safari/601.1 URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thirdparty_bia&veaction=edit 3rdpartybia (talk) 18:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC) @3rdpartybia:...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/January 2016
Kamis, 2025-01-09 21:05:13headline name here. Sca (talk) 18:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC) That's a COI. A thirdparty headline ould be more important.Lihaas (talk) 18:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 May 24
Sabtu, 2024-07-13 00:44:58Delete as nn. DakPowers (Talk) 19:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC) Delete unless thirdparty sources are found that indicate verifiabilty or notability. A search of...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive284
Minggu, 2022-03-27 02:38:40leeway.Slatersteven (talk) 18:12, 18 May 2019 (UTC) The problem is that thirdparty sources that have interviewed/quoted her (eg not her blog) do not put...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Middayexpress/Archive
Senin, 2021-11-15 03:37:04Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive887#WP:NPA breech following NPOV, THIRDPARTY breeches. Following that, Middayexpress quit Wikipedia (there was also...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 143
Jumat, 2023-02-10 01:43:46that he believes in WP:THIRDPARTY sources. If he accepts to reinstate the "Surgical strikes" claim section sourced to THIRDPARTY sources, we can close...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006 December 8
Selasa, 2022-04-05 15:27:47(UTC) STRONG DELETE I did do an indepth google and dogpile search for Thirdparty articles. She fails WP:BIO very badly. WP:ILIKEIT does not trumph WP:V...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 92
Jumat, 2023-06-23 23:53:25"avoid stating opinions as facts".--Peaceworld 22:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC) WP:THIRDPARTY is a useful one here. It is clear, by bullet point 2 above, that Pakistan...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 January 25
Jumat, 2023-02-10 01:01:34http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/26791/RuneScape_House_Jagex_Enters_ThirdParty_Publishing.php http://www.guiaglobal.com.br/noticia-jogos_online_prim...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 December 9
Sabtu, 2024-12-28 07:33:05rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 16 December 2024 (UTC) File:Zelda-Purah-ThirdParty.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kung Fu Man...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 64
Kamis, 2020-06-18 07:29:57article heavily relies on connected sources. Until we can remove the {{thirdparty}} cleanup tag, we should remove good article status. — BillHPike (talk...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography/Article alerts/Archive 3
Minggu, 2026-08-09 14:16:07FfDed by Zxcvbnm was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024 – File:Zelda-Purah-ThirdParty.png (on Purah) FfDed by Ganesha811 was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Nintendo/Article alerts/Archive 1
Senin, 2025-12-22 07:53:58by (Oinkers42) was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024 – File:Zelda-Purah-ThirdParty.png (on Purah) FfDed by Ganesha811 was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 30
Selasa, 2025-07-08 14:00:31Comment – @Dclemens1971: What do you mean by "contested"? @Spiderone: Is "thirdparty" coverage the same as "independent"? Anyway, I'd lean towards Delete....
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 9
Senin, 2026-05-25 01:51:41Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2026 (UTC) Delete fails WP:Neutrality, WP:Thirdparty, and violates WP:Conflict of Interest. Catfurball (talk) 17:07, 5 May...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 67
Kamis, 2025-07-10 01:57:14(with the associated subpolicies of WP:DUE, WP:WEIGHT, WP:BIASED, WP:THIRDPARTY and WP:CONTEXTMATTERS). These are time-tested policies and nobody produced...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 January 22
Jumat, 2026-01-30 08:22:01@GiantSnowman: Actually, interviews count as SIGCOV if there is plenty of thirdparty analysis. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:19, 27 January 2026 (UTC) Yes...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 May 24
Senin, 2026-06-01 19:20:29other across the web are corporate trivial ones, with no reliable WP:CORP thirdparty source. Delete as not notable. Techcrunch and similar sources are only...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 January 25
Jumat, 2024-02-02 15:24:02claim is strictly coterminous with the reliability and independent thirdpartyness of the specific source you use to specifically footnote his own personal...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1193
Selasa, 2025-09-23 22:34:05anything promotional from it...For me, i think i should be referencing the thirdparty, in whose favor i am writing. His Achivements and everything. After Observing...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Video game characters/Article alerts/Archive 1
Sabtu, 2026-08-15 14:12:29FfDed by Iruka13 was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024 – File:Zelda-Purah-ThirdParty.png (on Purah) FfDed by Ganesha811 was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Fictional characters/Article alerts/Archive 9
Senin, 2025-12-22 07:54:18FfDed by Iruka13 was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024 – File:Zelda-Purah-ThirdParty.png (on Purah) FfDed by Ganesha811 was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article alerts/Archive 16
Senin, 2025-12-22 07:54:22FfDed by Iruka13 was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024 – File:Zelda-Purah-ThirdParty.png (on Purah) FfDed by Ganesha811 was closed; discussion 09 Dec 2024...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 446
Selasa, 2024-08-13 05:20:48%localappdata%/UnrealEngine. Additionally, PhysX3 can be seen in Engine/Binaries/ThirdParty. PhysX is not used in unreal engine 5. It was last used in Unreal Engine...
Click to read more »