ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

The purpose of a talk page (accessible via the "Talk" tab) is to provide space for editors to discuss editing that page. Article talk pages should not...

this section from arch to Archived arbitration cases, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 13 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

phone, etc)? to Commodities: prevalence in households, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 12 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: How to Write Headlines...

section from Question to Meaning of series of symbols, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 12 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: How to Write Headlines...

Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Science/2018 August 23 WP:LOCALCON and WP:TPOC Varicoceles Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Science/2018 August 24 Fertility...

Marquee tag in title bar to Scrolling text in title bar, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 13 (Section headings). —Wavelength (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2012 (UTC)...

He meant WP:PERNOM, but neither mention removing votes. WP:TPNO and WP:TPOC do; they expressly forbid it. Add to this the insistence that the Billboard...

closer - who will judge the merits of that concern. It is a violation of WP:TPOC to edit or remove comments of other users. -- Netoholic @ 01:08, 28 May 2018...

section from New question to US state capitals: size, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 12 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: How to Write Headlines...

that in several areas they directly contradict existing policies such as WP:TPOC. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC) This,[1] for example. ←Baseball...

them. Revising others' comments can be controversial and confusing, per WP:TPOC, and in this case not necessary. Bammesk (talk) 01:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)...

show up like that? to 8-tuples of 4 hex digit numbers, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 12 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: How to Write Headlines...

WP:TPOC. Then he deleted a comment from an IP address that disagreed with him[60], labelling it as a sock. I believe that too is against WP:TPOC and...

according to WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, WP:TPOC trumps WP:RD/G if the two disagree, and I completely reject the notion that WP:TPOC doesn't apply to the reference...

heading of this section from "IP adress" to "IP address", in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 13 (Section headings). Please see the correct spelling at IP address...

coherent English? to ESL editors with garbled English, in harmony with WP:TPOC: Section headings. Please see Microcontent: How to Write Headlines, Page...

clear that WP:TPOC applies when deciding what can be deleted. This suggested downgrade would not prevent deletions as allowed by WP:TPOC such as trolling...

violations, outing, etc. A comlete list is at WP:TPOC. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC) WP:TPOC is a guideline; the actual policy is Remove...

itself." (I am revising some indentations in this section, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 8: Fixing format errors.) —Wavelength (talk) 15:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)...

that are uncivil. Such collapsing is controversial, so please review WP:TPOC and list the specific reason why you think the collapse is appropriate in...

large stadiums?" to "NCAA basketball in large stadiums", in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 12 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

-- and blocked for repeat offenses. All editors are required to obey WP:TPOC. A small amount of humor is allowed on Wikipedia outside of our actual articles:...

purposely re-added AKonanykhin's indentation error after I fixed it per WP:TPOC, a clear example of WP:POINT. Nowhere in WP:INDENT is "overindenting to warn...

about you violating WP:TPOC by deleting KIENGIR's comments.[252] And now you are searching for "an alternative way" to violate WP:TPOC by deleting KIENGIR's...

topic ban on murders only. Could you please point to the specific part of WP:TPOC that supports "if the talk contributions are as nutso as claimed, they can...

- Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:26, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Which section of WP:TPOC do you believe allows you to remove (as opposed to reporting and letting...

comments. Per TPOC, you are to respond below other people's comments, not in them. Signing your comments does not justify violating TPOC. TPOC says "Never...

pasted version. Please read WP:TPOC and follow Wikipedia's rules. The usual way that this is handled without a WP:TPOC violation is to use this format:...

from #IP Address (under "June 17") on this page. This is in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 12 (Section headings). The new heading facilitates recognition of...

revising the section heading from Question to "Floating server". See WP:TPOC, "Section headings". -- Wavelength (talk) 03:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)] Hi...

to all pages on Wikipedia. In particular, apply WP:DDE and especially WP:TPOC. Stop complaining about other editors on the refdesk or the refdesk talk...

Emphasizing links to policies like WP:TPOC which you are ignoring is not "shouting", and it was Wikipedia that decided that WP:TPOC should be in ALL CAPS. An admin...

edit or delete the comments of other editors without their permission." (WP:TPOC). You do not have permission to delete my comments as you did here. I am...

them. Revising others' comments can be controversial and confusing, per WP:TPOC, and in this case not necessary. Bammesk (talk) 01:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)...

--Stephan Schulz (talk) 10:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC) I think WP:EDIT WAR and WP:TPOC amply justifies my actions - you do not remove other peoples comments (unless...

moved mine and other editors comments on the talk page going against WP:TPOC. AlbinoFerret (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC) Ah really the "medical...

his POV without regard for WP:CON or WP:EDITWAR. (He has also violated WP:TPOC twice on his personal talk page, removing without my permission a message...

diff, User:Wavelength revised an overly long section heading pursuant to WP:TPOC, providing a detailed rationale. In diff, 109.151.144.40 undid the retitling...

responded to. Gem fr is an experienced editor, and previous warnings about a WP:TPOC violation[15][16] had no effect. Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article...

Talk to Me!) 23:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC) And what about the bright line of TPOC, which states Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning...

as being removable at WP:TPOC, it may be removed. If not listed, we are not allowed to delete it. Some things listed at WP:TPOC may be collapsed but may...

the exemptions listed at WP:3RRNO -- and enforcing policy (WP:TALKNEW, WP:TPOC or WP:REFACTORING) is not on the list. The only relevant questions are "Did...

later. They are substantially editing my comment which is prohibited per WP:TPOC. I've made every effort to address their concerns and follow WP:REDACT. My...

and let AfD take its course.Cptnono (talk) 13:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC) WP:TPOC applies; any comment that is not obvious vandalism, BLP violation, personal...

see here. AN/I notices are exempt from WP:NOBAN and still required. WP:TPOC states "Fixing format errors that render material difficult to read. In this...

further edits should be made to this discussion. Medeis / μηδείς violating WP:TPOC again. Diff. Related: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Proposal: Topic...

difference between changing another editors comments (forbidden; see WP: TPOC) and quoting them (allowed). If you feel that someone misquoted you, you...

Chrisrus (talk · contribs) fixed the formatting[128] as is allowed in WP:TPOC, 76.250.61.95 reverted it.[129] The problem is that some of the other editors...

make them agree with him or make them confusing. This is a violation of WP:TPOC and WP:REDACTED and I have example and even more blatant example of his editing...

and in the event that BatteryIncluded removes them again (violating WP:TPOC), I humbly request that an admin here takes action. Regards, Stevertigo 23:15...

and Ҥ's responses as a product of a manual revert (which isn't okay per WP:TPOC) and had nothing to do with the disagreement between Gold333 and TompaDompa...

a number of Wikipedia's policies, including WP:RS, WP:NLT, WP:NPA, & WP:TPOC. As most of the recent IPs have been within one range, I wonder whether a...

strikethrough text while I was responding to the comment, a convention per WP:TPOC: is nothing more "undue" than that a certain party has written a book about...

actions, and find that they do not comply with WP:TALK and indeed violate WP:TPOC; you do not remove other peoples comments unless they violate policies such...

page (which he would not let me delete) is appropriate behavior, despite WP:TPOC and WP:INTERSPERSE. I reverted his edits to my comments. refrained from responding...

large chunks of the arguments put by another editor. That contravenes WP:TPOC, and should not be repeated. . dave souza, talk 23:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)...

Bullshit. I specifically asked you to "Please quote the exact wording of WP:TPOC where you are allowed to revert someone who 'modified totally his post/comment...

reason I feel compelled to report him here, as per repeated violation of WP:TPOC, and considering as aggravation he was already officially warnend by admin...

Niemti engaged in, but that's surrounded by multiple restrictions (see WP:TPOC). It would most likely only have provoked Niemti, and it would likely have...

consider this a serious personal attack, so I removed the comment. Under WP:TPOC, this is acceptable behavior - unless you think another accusing me of sock...

July 2014 (UTC) COATRACK is about article content. This discussion is about TPOC, WIAPA, and RPA. Lightbreather (talk) 20:05, 1 August 2014 (UTC) The words...

misleading edit summary: Corrected improper use of section headers per WP:TPOC. Section headers must be neutral, descriptive, and are not to be used for...

"Houdini-esque argumentation" a violation of WP:NPA that justifies removal under WP:TPOC? Compared with "What an assholish move", "detrollify", and "troll-be-gon"...

inappropriate comments.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC) I have reviewed WP:TPOC and find this may be in a grey area given the long, disruptive history of...

13 February 2018 (UTC) Returning to the deletion, you said that: Per WP:TPOC Wtshymanski is allowed to delete anything he chooses from his own talk page...

might have against anyone fixing the problem you caused are overruled. WP:TPOC. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:01, 14 August 2018 (UTC) Also, for clarity, I meant...

sentence (including italicised for emphasis comment regarding userpages) of WP:TPOC - you can remove another editors comments, but you may not amend them to...

(probably both), but he deleted the IP addess editor's reply [147] (violating WP:TPOC if I read it right) without giving a reason and substituted his own response...

attempts to continue the battle here will be moved to another section per WP:TPOC) The above clearly demonstrates that there is a huge battle going on regarding...

removing my comments at the above and has done so two times now. As per WP:TPOC I believe this user is not allowed to do this. Can someone please have a...

would work just fine on the reference desks: WP:TALK, which includes WP:TPOC, Alas, we don't follow that policy on the refdesks either. I think Rhododendrites...

15 August 2018 (UTC) I am considering suggesting the above change at WP:TPOC. If anyone is interested in helping -- or wants to talk me out of it -- please...

WT:RIGHT may have the opposite effect and may increase critical eyes upon a tpoc. The question then is whether non-involved editors who share affiliation...

someone has been editing your comments outside of the exceptions listed at WP:TPOC, report them at ANI. Someone else violating a Wikipedia policy or guideline...

security/surveillance state. to George W. Bush; War on Terror; NSA, in harmony with WP:TPOC (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: How to Write Headlines, Page...

Encyclopædia Britannica? to Wikipedia printed in volumes, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 13 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

(UTC) I have read the article, but the uploader has apparently not read WP:TPOC. First, the uploader removed this nomination, and later the uploader changed...

from "Question" to "World dependence on American grain", in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 12 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

February 2010 (UTC) Talk Page Organizers (TPO) Talk Page Organization Club (TPOC) Oppose - this is not a club. Kayau Voting IS evil 13:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)...

you don't mess with other editors' comments and formal nominations. Per WP:TPOC, "The basic rule ... is to not edit or delete others' posts without their...

people's comments on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk in ways not allowed by WP:TPOC. My concern is this: subpages such as the above that limit their effect to...

the present day to Jewish population in Soviet Union, in harmony with WP:TPOC (point 13: Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

USA” to "Westminster Bank of Brockley Cross in S.E. London S.E.4”. (See WP:TPOC: Section headings.) —Wavelength (talk) 19:26, 9 December 2011 (UTC) I want...

can be thought?" to "Thinking only thinkable thoughts", in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 12 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

I wrote less than a day into the RfC. This behavior is forbidden per WP:TPOC. Please make your point in your !votes and in the comment sections like everyone...

apply there" but the rule that is being ignored is not WP:BLP. It is WP:TPOC. --Guy Macon (talk) 10:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC) "criticizing Donald Trump's...

appropriate. μηδείς (talk) 19:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC) In harmony with WP:TPOC (point 13: Section headings), I am adding an anchor link—" Thread retitled...

closer - who will judge the merits of that concern. It is a violation of WP:TPOC to edit or remove comments of other users. -- Netoholic @ 01:08, 28 May 2018...

follow along as some editors are not a fan of "Style" correction as per WP:TPOC. Personally I just use the original format in a post even if that changes...

him to Philosopher studying philosophies of other men, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 13 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

dissolve in water? to Flavor compounds and oils dissolving, in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 13 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

to be added to WP:TPOC. Until an RfC says otherwise, we already have the answer when the local consensus attempts to override WP:TPOC: As it says in WP:LOCALCON...

you need to know that it is NOT okay to edit other users' comments. See WP:TPOC. If I see you do this again I will report it - there isn't any tolerance...

WP:NOTFORUM.Naraht (talk) 17:30, 11 April 2016 (UTC) The guideline here is WP:TPOC. The comment doesn't fall under "libel, personal details, or violations of...

you need to know that it is NOT okay to edit other users' comments. See WP:TPOC. If I see you do this again I will report it - there isn't any tolerance...

explain this to me" to "Japanese emotional words missing", in harmony with WP:TPOC, point 13 (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: Headlines and Subject...

He meant WP:PERNOM, but neither mention removing votes. WP:TPNO and WP:TPOC do; they expressly forbid it. Add to this the insistence that the Billboard...

the flow of my comments. Stop doing that, and all will be fine. Read WP:TPOC to understand why. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) So it won't be fine...

that are uncivil. Such collapsing is controversial, so please review WP:TPOC and list the specific reason why you think the collapse is appropriate in...

Thanks. --70.179.170.114 (talk) 23:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC) In harmony with WP:TPOC (point 13: Section headings), I am changing the heading of this section from...

Thanks. --70.179.170.114 (talk) 12:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC) In harmony with WP:TPOC (point 13: Section headings), I am changing the heading of this section from...

(permanent link here) [I am revising the heading of this section, according to WP:TPOC, "Section headings".] -- Wavelength (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC) Were...

alerts and archive searches, and to apply search engine optimization. See WP:TPOC, "Section headings". -- Wavelength (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)] what...

the flow of my comments. Stop doing that, and all will be fine. Read WP:TPOC to understand why. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) So it won't be fine...

curriculum. to Tutoring biology in a creationist curriculum, in harmony with WP:TPOC (Section headings). Please see Microcontent: How to Write Headlines, Page...

for a new star?" to "Stars: death, birth, spreading, clumping". (See WP:TPOC: "Section headings".) —Wavelength (talk) 18:18, 30 November 2011 (UTC) Take...

as I have done, per "Removing prohibited material such as libel" per WP:TPOC. --Lexein (talk) 21:15, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Endorse - close was proper...

well as the closing editors comments which do indeed not indicate that WP:TPOC violations might be ok in some venues. Unomi (talk) 23:47, 18 August 2010...

comments or to let this one slide. I am asking you nicely, please read WP:TPOC and reconsider your actions. --Guy Macon (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)...

RFCLOSE word for word with no added comments. In a clear violation of WP:TPOC, A. C. Santacruz deleted the post. "Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You...

NOT ALLOWED. We do, however, have a Wikipedia behavioral guideline at WP:TPOC that says that deleting other editors comments is not allowed except in certain...

falls under, or close to, the "removing harmful posts" situation in which wp:TPOC says it is sometimes okay to remove a posting. Cardamon (talk) 17:43, 4 August...

removing/replacing another editors talkpage comments, in violation of WP:TPOC, without permission, notice to the other editor, or discussion/consensus...

and WP:V through November 3.  I've posted at three places the text from WP:TPOC at WP:Talk page guidelines, "Editing...others' comments is sometimes allowed...

editing. AGAIN:Do not revert edits I removed from my own talk page. See WP:TPOC and WP:BLANKING. AGAIN:Stay off my talk page. You are, of course, free to...

start deleting your comments about other users. This is allowed under WP:TPOC, "removing harmful posts" section. I would consult with the other dispute...

please as long as it isn't total gibberish, or actually harmful (See WP:TPOC. I am going to ask Wdford to hang on to those arguments. We will have a section...

process that censors appropriate comments in what I'd say is a violation of WP:TPOC. Imzadi 1979 → 19:13, 29 March 2013 (UTC) I believe the locus of the dispute...

as I have done, per "Removing prohibited material such as libel" per WP:TPOC. --Lexein (talk) 21:15, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Endorse - close was proper...

use Template:Unsigned to add a sig. Basically, do anything allowed by WP:TPOC that isn't likely to make it so that instead of dealing with a comment I...

established that it was controversial, and I would argue that it violated WP:TPOC. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC) I try not to allow Bilby's...

the actual guideline that permits striking in cases of sockpuppetry is WP:TPOC. Another section of that guidelines (WP:SHOWN) notes that titles are "owned"...

repeated the behavior and reverted it again. This is a repeated violation of WP:TPOC. Please take necessary steps. Thanks, — Raihanur (talk) 10:30, 16 June 2026...

signature multiple times [116] [117]? That is indeed a clear violation of WP:TPOC since the signature was perfectly valid per WP:NLS. In fact your change was...