ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Shortcuts WP:USESPSWP:USESPS WP:USINGSPSWP:USINGSPS...

exist on its official website and the school/collage database websites (WP:USESPS) identical to edu database-searches such as ICBSE and OutlookIndia [1],...

sense, such type sources should be treated like self-published material/WP:USESPS. -Hatchens (talk) 03:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Comment Just adding my two...

specific exception criteria described at WP:SPS or WP:ABOUTSELF; see also WP:USESPS. This list is not a complete list of companies currently engaged in the...

editorial oversight and fail to meet significant source criteria per WP:USESPS. ShelbyMarion (talk) 21:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Thanks for flagging...

but the translated paper can be cite alongside, for convenience to non-French speakers. WP:USESPS WP:RS WP:SPS WP:RSE WP:MEDRS WP:SCIRS WP:EXCEPTIONAL...

in USESPS it doesn't have that general acceptance. I would suggest an RFC to see if the wider community supports the wider definition made by USESPS, otherwise...

author's website. Spear's initial deletion was valid - the edit note said "WP:USESPS not reliable". I found the published source and verified the content, and...

between LPM and CPGB-PCC is a suggestion in an academic blog. But I think WP:USESPS would seem to allow us to accept an organization's claims about their trade...

the use of self-published sources on BLP articles. Specifically: Per WP:USESPS: "Self-published works are those in which the author and publisher are the...

attentive to your comments. Virc587 (talk) 15:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC) See WP:USESPS#Examples of self-published sources, WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:SIGCOV. Avilich (talk)...

people have pointed to sections in editorial policy like this one: Per WP:USESPS: "Self-published works are those in which the author and publisher are the...

WP:RS and WP:SCHOLARSHIP. The article doesn't violate, for example, WP:USESPS, and is more or less a secondary source based on WP:PSTS/WP:USEPRIMARY....

Third party and self-published are not the same thing. See WP: IS and WP: USESPS. --Kyohyi (talk) 16:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC) Yes, we all know that, but...

per policy, whatever the WP:USESPS essay has to offer. It doesn't even fall in one of the categories mentioned in WP:USESPS, nor those mentioned in the...

people have pointed to sections in editorial policy like this one: Per WP:USESPS: "Self-published works are those in which the author and publisher are the...

exist on its official website and the school/collage database websites (WP:USESPS) identical to edu database-searches such as ICBSE and OutlookIndia [37]...

attentive to your comments. Virc587 (talk) 15:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC) See WP:USESPS#Examples of self-published sources, WP:INDEPENDENT, WP:SIGCOV. Avilich (talk)...

it explains you that anything self published in considered unreliable WP:USESPS (so you should find the original articles not those reported in his web...

publishing it themselves. In response to the question asked at the top of WP:USESPS, the author and publisher are not the same person. I disagree that this...

editorial oversight and fail to meet significant source criteria per WP:USESPS. ShelbyMarion (talk) 21:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Thanks for flagging...

publishing it themselves. In response to the question asked at the top of WP:USESPS, the author and publisher are not the same person. I disagree that this...

sense, such type sources should be treated like self-published material/WP:USESPS. -Hatchens (talk) 03:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC) Comment Just adding my two...

it explains you that anything self published in considered unreliable WP:USESPS (so you should find the original articles not those reported in his web...

— Newslinger talk 02:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC) ​ Yes – I can be more specific. Per WP:USESPS, the question is whether the publisher and the author are the same. QW publishes...

WP:RS and WP:SCHOLARSHIP. The article doesn't violate, for example, WP:USESPS, and is more or less a secondary source based on WP:PSTS/WP:USEPRIMARY....

independent or third-party, or is it closely affiliated with the subject" WP:USESPS, seems to meet that and is thus SPS.Slatersteven (talk) 15:27, 15 September...

03:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC) I agree that by my reading of WP:SPS and WP:USESPS The Urbanist should probably be considered self-published. However, there...

The particular problem here is closer to WP:SPS, for which we have WP:USESPS. Which part of that requires this bulk removal? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:10...

material where the writer and publisher are the same individual. As per WP:USESPS, "Self-published works are those in which the author and publisher are the...

single person is being quoted. It's definitely slippery ground, so giving WP:USESPS a read could help. Typically blogs in the sense you are using them are primary...

seems to be published by a self-publisher and I deem it to be subject to WP:USESPS. I had initially applied the {{Notability}} tag before it was reverted due...

Slatersteven (talk) 16:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC) Unlike what was said above, USESPS, BIAS, and SBEXT are essay pages, not policies. And how we address systemic...

simply cannot make it otherwise. The relevant passage from the guideline (WP:USESPS) is as follows: The relationship between the author and the publisher is...

from the first discussion WhisperToMe (talk) 23:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC) WP:USESPS says that "government publications" are considered "self-published"...

(talk) 16:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC) I think it's worth pointing out that WP: USESPS says that a self-published source can have a professional structure in place...

really worth reporting, someone else will probably have done so." from WP:USESPS. Letting this go on creates a precedent where niche/special interest group...

prediscus: there is a carveout for "traditional publishers" WP:USESPS. some have argued that since USESPS is an essay and not a policy, there still remain the ambiguity...

expert-approved....Self-published sources can be reliable, and they can be used." WP:USESPS Manannan67 (talk) 03:03, 18 September 2022 (UTC) Hosting a link =/= using...

be cited as sources, even though advertisements are self-published. WP:USESPS, WP:SPS It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is published...

Barfoo. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:01, 17 December 2024 (UTC) By the WP:USESPS definition of SPS it would be an SPS, as the publisher and creator are the...

explanatory reasons). Even the actual tweets and Facebook posts as per WP:USESPS can pass to include this. Esther passaris gave a media interview to two...

December 2024 (UTC) I said "USESPS is an essay, not a policy" (emphasis added). It seems that you're confusing WP:USESPS (which as I noted is an essay)...

be cited as sources, even though advertisements are self-published. WP:USESPS, WP:SPS It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is published...

comment about quotations. Quotations are addressed in WP:USEPRIMARY and WP:USESPS, which both explicitly state, "Sometimes, a self-published / primary source...

Jeppiz (talk) 21:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC) Are you unfamiliar with WP:USESPS? Newimpartial (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC) I am very well familiar...

operates that: [4]. So it’s a self-published text which runs afoul of WP:USESPS. This is nice someone went to this effort, but it’s no different than basing...

individual articles should apparently be considered on the basis of WP:USESPS. Some other !voters objected to the factual accuracy of that assertion....

published by reliable, independent publications.", if that is the case then USESPS (which is somewhat out of date) tries to explain how to use sources that...

As noted there, the language by which the SPLC is a SPS is an essay, WP:USESPS, not actual policy. I'll note that the the majority of votes say this is...

operates that: [38]. So it’s a self-published text which runs afoul of WP:USESPS. This is nice someone went to this effort, but it’s no different than basing...

unlikely to come up. Simonm223 (talk) 12:44, 9 September 2025 (UTC) WP:USESPS: "Self-published works are those in which the author and publisher are the...

seems to be published by a self-publisher and I deem it to be subject to WP:USESPS. I had initially applied the {{Notability}} tag before it was reverted due...