ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

to bottom New topic All village pumps Shortcuts WP:VPPWP:VPP WP:VPPOLWP:VPPOL The policy section of the village pump is intended for discussions about...

"advertised", e.g. with an {{RfC}} template, at WP:Village pump (policy) (WP:VPPOL), via WP:Centralized discussion, at talk pages of implicated policies and...

suicide references to remove criminal allusion, VPPOL 2017 Stigmatizing language regarding suicide, VPPOL 2018 Suicides?, WTW 2018 RFC: Categories with...

The essay's point is a very valid one. The big thread last year at WP:VPPOL proposing to make BRD a guideline instead of an essay brought up this very...

definition are not dictionaries. To clarify the policy I suggest going to WP:VPPOL for your proposal. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2020 (UTC)...

Anomie⚔ 01:49, 5 March 2016 (UTC) Not sure why this was advertised at WP:VPPOL, since this is simply straightforward compliance with WP:MOSDASH; it's not...

case has a discussion hanging around (I think WP:VPT but it might be WP:VPPOL) regarding removing the technical ability of administrators to unblock themselves...

limited, at least compared to something like an RfA, or one of the few WP:VPPOL discussions or RfCs elsewhere that attracts hundreds of !voters (and MoS...

some way serve such a purpose (see strong consensus to retain them at the VPPOL RfC a year or so ago). Disclaimers: I'm a Stevie Nicks fan. I used to live...

gamed with enough effort, and VPPOL is the hardest one to game that we have. When it comes to things like this, VPPOL is the best venue we have.  — SMcCandlish...

same underlying apparent logical failure arose in an unrelated subject on VPPOL, where User:Spinningspark labeled it: "It's the fallacy of composition (the...

16:37, 22 July 2020 (UTC) I just closed a well-attended discussion at WP:VPPOL, "Stop InternetArchiveBot from linking books", with the conclusion that...

here. I'm reposting it here, since even though Radiphus contributed to the VPPOL discussion and the dispute raised over it, I became aware that they are...

matter at WP:VPPOL. In theory, it could be at WT:CSD, except there is not yet any establishment of a consensus against these portals, and VPPOL is where that...

SPI report; VPPOL is not the place for this discussion.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  05:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC) User:SMcCandlish - VPPOL was the place...

have strong views on the topic at issue, expressed in the RfC on it at WP:VPPOL in February [25], and is thus clearly WP:Supervoting. More importantly,...

constructively) on some other pages. The entire thing might be better as a WP:VPPOL discussion about adjusting WP:BLANKING and maybe some other parts about...

April 2019 (UTC) Please don't start the RFC here. The correct place is WP:VPPOL or WP:VPPRO (or if it is possibly going to be lengthy, a subpage of any...

notify editors in neutral wording at WP:Village pump (policy) (a.k.a. WP:VPPOL), as well as relevant wikiprojects. For a major change, like elevation of...

The fox asks, "Why do you think the proper venue is WP:VPPOL?? Atsme Talk 📧 21:19, 23 April 2019 (UTC)...

of article talk pages about some RfC. WP:FRS exists for a reason. So do WP:CENT and WP:VPPOL if people feel a particular issue rises to that level.)...

the wrong place. AN is not for content-making decisions. You want VPPRO/VPPOL (pick your poison). B) Every change advertised when proposed is insane....

right venue for such a discussion anyway; it would be WP:VPPOL", post a notification on WP:VPPOL if you'd like. I don't think the previous discussion with...

project, guideline, etc., talk page that seems relevant, and often also at VPPOL (even CENT if the matter could affect a large number of articles), but never...

dispute about this, one could do a WP:RM (again) and this time list it at WP:VPPOL and even WP:CENT to attract sufficient editors to get a firmer consensus...

just a dead stick now. Given the length and ranco[u]r of debates at WP:VPPOL about such identify matters, this is probably not surprising. It would take...

be having. Please consider leaving a comment/question/discussion at WP:VPPOL#Discussion re Verifiability issues with Wikidata. Though I will try to answer...

WP:RFPP. —Guanaco 10:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Please come participate: WP:VPPOL#IPs nominating articles for deletion. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join...

to {{policy}}, for which as I remember, a bot sends notifications to WP:VPPOL in case it gets added anywhere. I would rather see this one deprecated;...

such that are apt to have wider views and demographics, for balance. But VPPOL is generally where to find a broad intersection of WP editors when we need...

remove part of a guideline, the place is the guideline's talk page or at WP:VPPOL. I've not gone deep-digging for diffs, so I have no idea how many pages...

and host it somewhere much more watchlisted than WT:AIRPORTS, like WP:VPPOL. However, given that Reywas92 concedes that some of Blissfield101's work...

transmogrify somehow into "ideal" secondary sourcing. In a post today [21] at WP:VPPOL in a thread largely about ARBAP2, I explicated this in some detail – starting...

discussion and this 2019 Manual of Style discussion (with a closed follow-on at VPPOL 2019) that allows for "committed suicide" if editors chose to use that language...

at WP:VPPOL or WP:VPT) and then start a page with a working set of rules. --Izno (talk) 12:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC) Put it at VPT not not VPPOL if you...

more persuasive. It's also proven more effective to RfC these matters at VPPOL rather than at WT:MOS, because on multiple occasions the result of RfCs...

already been consensus for a long time and we're just reaffirming it again at VPPOL. But it needs to be done with all of them, no exceptions. Ideally, it would...

(talk) 18:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC) Sure. The reason this is being RfCed at VPPOL is because of editwarring over the wording. The triviality of the subject...

going to leave pointers to this RfC at every wikiproject on the system; VPPOL exists for a reason. PS: If anyone really wants to, the places to look for...

When it comes to important matters that will affect many articles, WP:VPPOL (or WP:VPPRO, depending on the nature of the discussion) and WP:CENT exist...

reform from without. A couple of years ago, for example, I opened (at WP:VPPOL) an "advisory-to-ArbCom" RfC to either A) do away with the counterproductive...

matter at WP:VPPOL. In theory, it could be at WT:CSD, except there is not yet any establishment of a consensus against these portals, and VPPOL is where that...

specific-editor-level stuff is clouding the more important issue, the general one. WP:VPPOL isn't WP:ANI, and user behavior concerns about specific requests or patterns...

supporters of guideline status state that consensus was already achieved at WP:VPPOL to elevate that wikiproject advice page from WP:Essay to WP:Guideline, earlier...

already looked at most of them and is producing contradictory results, so a VPPOL RfC is probably in order to get a consistent answer.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 ...

often controversial (and many to that template in particular have been WP:VPPOL RfCs in their own right), it seemed pertinent to notify this board of the...

Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#Instruction creep in WP:CITEVAR. The relevance to VPPOL is that some wording in the guideline has been interpreted by some as being...

should forestall a lot of future rehash that would waste editorial time. VPPOL has served us well on similar "will not die" debates over detailia at the...

would think the community should discuss the nature of the problem here in VPPOL for a while, then WT:RS could host a more focused discussion on what RS...

to get all of them. They get doled out over time.) Post a pointer at WP:VPPOL (or even host the RfC there). The whole point of VP is that it's where the...

WP:SUBCAT. Mitch Ames (talk) 13:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC) Copied to WT:EL#From VPPOL per WP:MULTI. --Izno (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC) The following discussion...

09:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC) This seems like a question for WT:AT or WP:VPPOL or its own move request. IznoPublic (talk) 12:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)...

(UTC) Iluvlawyering You may have a better discussion about that topic on WP:VPPOL or WT:MATHS. This space for issues (or requests) that deal with how the...

author of WP:Race and ethnicity; and I'm the opener of the back-to-back WP:VPPOL RfCs that led to |religion= and |ethnicity= being removed from most biographical...

never dissipated. I go out of my way to draw broader attention (e.g. at WP:VPPOL) to MOS/AT/NC/DAB-related RfCs, but overall the participation in them is...

have something similar. This question is fine here; the WP:Teahouse or WP:VPPOL can also be used. --Izno (talk) 18:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC) Okay so I know...

the "rule" in question should be changed or deleted, you know where WP:VPPOL is, or can propose a change more locally at the talk page of the P&G page...

aren't in agreement, so it's a false×2 consensus. If you RfCed this at WP:VPPOL there would likely be WP:SNOW opposition to permitting pointless joke/nonsense...

Ovinus (talk) 08:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC) A sizeable talkfork occurred at WP:VPPOL#Disallow political opinion and userboxes on userpages. Leaving a note here...

the proper venue is WP:VPPOL. Despite having little time or patience for WP:DRAMA right now, I'm simply going to go open the VPPOL RfC myself if I get any...

pretty much everything else at that page, and at previous discussions at WP:VPPOL, WP:VPTECH, WP:VPPRO, and WT:WIKIDATA, and etc., etc.). It's clear that...

existing articles. ϢereSpielChequers 16:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC) started at WP:VPPOL#Define "recently" for CSD R3 The following discussion is closed. Please...

  put'r there  16:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC) That doesn't track at all. WP:VPPOL is our broadest venue for settling WP:P&G questions of all kinds; it is...

, his post in this thread and many like it elsewhere, frequently at WP:VPPOL. However, some incidents give me pause, because they indicate a reckless...

too long). PS: As of this writing, there's an ongoing RfC about this at VPPOL, here. Whenever I review COIN, the majority of the threads appear to be...

one but admins pays any attention to. If we RfC this it should be a WP:VPPOL.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  07:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC) @Guy Macon:...

of another discussion, please move the discussion to someplace like WP:VPPOL or WT:CRAT. You're welcome to start an RFC to discuss the meaning of "under...

Line#Requested move 11 December 2017, following the snowball RfC at VPPOL – was declined by an admin [79] as controversial) 2017-12-13: [80], [81]...

debate, so we can draft a new and much clearer RfC, to broadly "advertise" (VPPOL, CENT) to get a clearer consensus and guidelines.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 ...

wouldn't even be the right venue for such a discussion anyway; it would be WP:VPPOL, since this is not a proposal, but is an out-of-process attempt to override...

e.g. here), and an earlier one that was probably the longest RfC in WP:VPPOL's history (here, followup here), so it should be interpreted in light of...

discretionary desysops.  Swarm  talk  03:43, 17 November 2018 (UTC) WP:VPPOL might be a better place to ask questions like, "Should bureaucrats be allowed...

between WMF and the wiki, not for making a consensus decision. WP:VPPRO/WP:VPPOL is -> over there. Izno (talk) 13:48, 6 August 2021 (UTC) Yeah... I saw this...

box, feel free to open yet another RfC proposing this, at WT:MOS or WP:VPPOL. Good luck with that; the community does not want the encyclopedia articles...

 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC) At this point, I think a WP:VPPOL RfC might be the best bet, using a lot of examples from this thread. While...

entire matter can settle it. If the latter, it can even be hosted at WP:VPPOL so no one can make any claims that it wasn't public enough. It's all going...

suggest sorting these more centrally, whether at WT:TW or at WP:VPM or WP:VPPOL. Ad hoc attempting to change certain user warning or block templates isn't...

recommend an RFC at a place of your choosing, perhaps WP:CLN or WP:VPPRO/WP:VPPOL. Izno (talk) 21:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC) Template:Golden Raspberry Award...

too long). PS: As of this writing, there's an ongoing RfC about this at VPPOL, here. Whenever I review COIN, the majority of the threads appear to be...

(UTC) Meta-commentary on waiting periods: This sounds worth RfCing at WP:VPPOL. I'm not opposed to the idea of default waiting periods, and there is a...

then AN. RfC began "NFL_Draft"/"National_Football_League_draft"_etc. at VPPOL, moved to its own RfC page. Randy_Kryn a) canvassed for weeks, b) wikilawyered...

box, feel free to open yet another RfC proposing this, at WT:MOS or WP:VPPOL. Good luck with that; the community does not want the encyclopedia articles...

suggest a series of RfCs, neutrally "advertised" at WT:NPOV, WT:BLP, WP:VPPOL, and specifically grounded in NPOV and WP:NOT#ADVOCACY policy. Start with...

debate, so we can draft a new and much clearer RfC, to broadly "advertise" (VPPOL, CENT) to get a clearer consensus and guidelines.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 ...

MOS 2014, WTW 2016, MOSBIO 2017, MOS 2017, VPPOL 2018, VPPOL 2017, WTW 2018, CAT 2019, VPPOL 2021, VPPOL 2023. {{Sam S|💬|✏️|ℹ️}} 19:20, 20 March 2025...

the RfC (and the fact that it involves policy matters like WP:NPOV) to WP:VPPOL. I'm not sure there's much for the dispute resolution noticeboard to do...

MOS 2014, WTW 2016, MOSBIO 2017, MOS 2017, VPPOL 2018, VPPOL 2017, WTW 2018, CAT 2019, VPPOL 2021, VPPOL 2023. {{Sam S|💬|✏️|ℹ️}} 19:20, 20 March 2025...

would-be article WP:OWNers). Last year, this culminated in an attempt (at VPPOL RfC) to deny the community's ability to examine the matter, including weeks...

comment/Capitalization of NFL draft article titles (which was originally at WP:VPPOL#RfC on capitalization in "NFL Draft"/"National Football League draft" etc...

such an issue that arose in an article itself. (See also this archived VPPol discussion) I’m really sorry for this jumbled mess of words and hopefully...

anti-religion atheist PoV-pushers and censors, and this is not okay. That whole VPPOL thread and the RfC it spawned are worth a detailed read. Warrenmck returns...

address whatever their concerns are at WT:FRINGE and WT:SPAM (or even WP:VPPOL if it seemed warranted). Anti-P&G campaigning, as defined in the essay,...

(policy)#RfC on renaming AfD  – excessive length (over 200 comments) per WP:VPPOL. silviaASH (inquire within) 14:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC) Should the Articles...

context and outside it. Tenders of VPPOL itself should do more to encourage splitting threads to subpages of VPPOL or RFC or a topic-specific proposal...

change, then that's a matter to raise at the policy's talk page or at WP:VPPOL. It does happen occasionally happen, but most claims that a policy has become...

fork. I'll respond more fully in user talk rather than post long again in VPPOL. My concerns have more to do with aggregatate behavior of our left-leaning...

who sees a discussion. In the same way that holding the discussion at WP:VPPOL would have been differently discoverable and almost certainly have resulted...

WP:Requests for comment/Capitalization of NFL draft article titles (Moved from WP:VPPOL due to length, much of it caused by people, mostly in favor of capitalization...

about one article, but maybe we could consider putting notices of every WP:VPPOL RfC into watchlists, similar to what's done for RfAs...? -sche (talk) 20:51...

comment/RfC on renaming AfD  – excessive length (over 200 comments) per WP:VPPOL. silviaASH (inquire within) 14:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC) To me, WP:GAME is...

appropriate venue for "advertising" a discussion about something like that is WP:VPPOL itself. Editors who care to be involved in the formation of our P&G pages...

Please discuss the policy questions in an appropriate place such as WP:VPPOL. There might be something useful to the question of whether Randy Kryn deserves...

There's a marked difference here (aside from opposition-silencing): The VPPOL RfC opened (per WP:CONSENUS#By_soliciting_outside_opinions) after RM/MR...