ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

"Relisting [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Article]]". Shortcut WP:WDAFDWP:WDAFD If you change your mind about the nomination, you can withdraw it. Withdrawing...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:WDAFD. (non-admin closure) The Origins of Heaven (talk) 18:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)...

contradiction between WP:WDAFD and WP:INVOLVED. While it might be less of an issue for experienced editors, to my mind, WDAFD only mentions "may" (not...

MitYehor📘^talk 19:57, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator per WP:WDAFD; sources were identified and added to the page, making it borderline, and...

"officially" retract now. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 12:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC) WP:WDAFD Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

5 September 2014 (UTC) JacobiJonesJr, in that case, do you think a WP:WDAFD makes sense? Kyledmichelson (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC) The above...

WP:Before. Sullyboywiki (talk) 03:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC) @Sullyboywiki: See WP:WDAFD. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

to just nip it in the bud. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC) WP:WDAFD. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:30, 3 August 2025 (UTC) How do I close it then...

March 2015 (UTC) You can withdroaw the nomination for yourself - see WP:WDAFD. --Scott Davis Talk 23:59, 16 March 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

notability of the subject. So, I am withdrawing this nomination per WP:WDAFD.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:58, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

(UTC) For the convenience of other reviewers, you might want to follow WP:WDAFD. Thank you. Praemonitus (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...

October 2016 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator - new info about album released (WP:WDAFD). TheKaphox T 20:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC) Comment: The album title was...

(talk) 15:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC) Comment Saqib, you should have a look at WP:WDAFD about about to withdraw AfDs. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 15:47, 10 May...

Mccapra (talk) 22:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Follow the instructions at WP:WDAFD. Bakazaka (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Done thanks. Mccapra (talk)...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:WDAFD: Withdrawn by nom.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC) [Hide...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Involved close per WP:WDAFD SpinningSpark 13:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...

nomination, because there are no dissenting votes at this time - see WP:WDAFD. And then read thru to the next section for how to do this, including "Procedure...

stage withdraw the nomination, which would save time all round. See WP:WDAFD. Thanks. PamD 10:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC) Thanks, I've done that now. --ElKabong888...

is now eligible to be closed by nominator withdraw (procedure here: WP:WDAFD). Would you please consider doing so? The outcome here is now in WP:SNOW...

delete !vote. See WP:WDAFD. If Kosboot withdraws his Delete !vote, you could properly withdraw using the steps in the WP:WDAFD; but if he doesn't, this...

nomination?Rathfelder (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC) @Rathfelder: Per WP:WDAFD, not anymore. This nomination will have to run to term. Chris Troutman (talk)...

speedy keep per nom withdrawal. (Also worthwhile reading the paragraph at WP:WDAFD to provide additional context.) snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 14:14, 19 November...

this run longer, but you could withdraw and close as a speedy keep per WP:WDAFD. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Firefangledfeathers...

. afaik one can only withdraw before delete votes are appended (see WP:WDAFD). Whatever. Time to sort this matter out once and for all. I herewith ping...

Sheroddy, I would suggest withdrawing the nomination as described at WP:WDAFD, what do you say? New Media Theorist (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)...

Withdrawing my nomination. Any editor can close this as Speedy Keep per WP:WDAFD. Platonk (talk) 02:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Thanks! I have to say, this...

Should nom wish to withdraw they may follow the instructions given at WP:WDAFD. — Sam Sailor 21:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

(and allow the move discussion to continue). I suggest withdrawing (WP:WDAFD) this deletion request and just changing Great British Nuclear to a redirect...

withdrawing the nomination as "Speedy keep". Follow the instructions here: WP:WDAFD --Klausklass (talk) 22:53, 20 August 2023 (UTC) Keep no doubt it follows...

If the nominator is ready to consider this proposal, follow this link WP:WDAFD, to learn about how to withdraw the nomination. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC)...

should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing per WP:WDAFD, all viewpoints to keep. (non-admin closure) Cubnorth (talk) 02:09, 19 July...

--Tagishsimon (talk) 12:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Keep. If I understand WP:WDAFD correctly I can't withdraw the nomination as there have been several Delete...

the article. Since someone else has supported deletion, according to WP:WDAFD I cannot close this myself, but I don't believe anybody else will support...

@Walter Görlitz: You can't withdraw when there are delete !votes. See WP:WDAFD.  Philg88 ♦talk 05:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Thanks. We'll let it play-out...

known outside the region. You can withdraw your nomination if you like: WP:WDAFD. Dreamyshade (talk) 01:39, 25 September 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...

this discussion?BurritoQuesadilla (talk) 06:25, 9 August 2021 (UTC) WP:WDAFD. KidAd • SPEAK 06:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC) I'm aware of WP:OR. This isn't...

from such statements. Wikipedia:WDAFD is the correct procedure.Djflem (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC) WP:WDAFD can't be used because several people...

there's already three in the article, and there's plenty of more to add. WP:WDAFD? — Sam Sailor 00:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Could you just confirm to me...

prevented from so doing by an earlier 'Delete' vote' as per guidance at WP:WDAFD. We will have to await an admin to make the closure, and would hope this...

it? Montanabw(talk) 15:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC) @Montanabw: Here's how: WP:WDAFD. Nice improvements to article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)...

and I'd like to withdraw my AfD nom (though I'm not sure I can, per WP:WDAFD since someone else has supported deletion). But I think this AfD can be...

opinion. As I'm the nominator here, I'm not sure how this works, does WP:WDAFD apply here? Seagull123 Φ 23:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC) @Seagull123:. I have...

Should they wish to withdraw the nomination, they may chose to follow WP:WDAFD and add * {{Withdraw}} <Brief explanation.> ~~~~ immediately below the nomination...

November 2016 (UTC) @The Banner: To save editors' time, you should Wikipedia:WDAFD. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 15:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC) And by that approve...

if you like, here are the instructions for withdrawing a nomination: WP:WDAFD. Technically I think this now qualifies for a speedy keep either way but...

copyvio. I'll just remove the copy paste and add the revdel tag for you. WP:WDAFD has the instructions for withdrawing an AfD, you can either close this yourself...

per WP:WDAFD. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:02, 11 November 2024 (UTC) A withdrawal is only possible when there are no delete votes per WDAFD. Piotr voted...

can expand. I suggest again nom withdraws the nomination, by following WP:WDAFD and adds * {{Withdraw}} <Your brief explanation.> ~~~~ immediately below...

withdrawn comment to the top and add a brief explanation of why, as per WP:WDAFD. You can then close the discussion discussion yourself as Wikipedia:Speedy...

November 2016 (UTC) @The Banner: To save editors' time, you should Wikipedia:WDAFD. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 15:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC) And by that approve...

this nomination and close it, please, what would be in accordance with WP:WDAFD? We've already turned the article into a redirect, so there's no longer...

through AfD. If you agree you can just withdraw your AfD nomination (see WP:WDAFD). BruceThomson (talk) 04:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC) I doubt I can do what...

Slatersteven - I'm involved, so can't close, but as nominator, you can - see WP:WDAFD. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC) I have no idea how, as I...

October 2016 (UTC) I agree. Too late for me to withdraw the nomination per WP:WDAFD, but it's now worth a Keep. Cabayi (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Keep...

bad advice was forgetting to tell the nom to withdraw the nomination. WP:WDAFD allows the nominator to "change your mind" and "realise the nomination was...

want to withdraw this nomination, you can follow those steps listed at WP:WDAFD. --Kbabej (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC) Keep have expanded it with some...

the discussion below and the work of Beccaynr. Using procedure from WP:WDAFD.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

Servite et contribuere (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2025 (UTC) Yes, see WP:WDAFD for more info. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC) The above...

The "...discussion has produced new information about the topic..." (WP:WDAFD), thanks to JimRenge who provided sources to the article. Next, we need...

--Cmurphey80 (talk) 15:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC) @Cmurphey80: See WP:WDAFD. -- intgr [talk] 15:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is...

delete above, so it is ineligible for withdrawal by the nominator (see WP:WDAFD). Bakazaka (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC) Comment-ahhh didn't notice...

Bookscale (talk) 09:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC) hi Bromptop, please see WP:WDAFD about withdrawing nomination. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:26, 23 January 2020...

does comply with criteria 6 of WP:ACADEMIC however in accordance with WP:WDAFD another editor (Cagepanes) has has supported deletion of the article. It...

deleted. In the meantime, I ask you to withdraw your nomination; see WP:WDAFD. Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC) I...

now want a merge in stead of deletion, withdraw the AfD, close it (per WP:WDAFD) and make a merge proposal instead Vexations (talk) 17:33, 25 January 2021...

Sistorian (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator (WP:WDAFD). I accept the work done by the cricket editors to find additional sources...

In light of the new sources, I change my position to neutral—under WP:WDAFD I can't technically withdraw the nomination, since it's gotten some support...

withdrawn. While they can certainly express their own change of view, WP:WDAFD does not permit withdraw/close once, as here, another editor has supported...

You can withdraw the AfD nomination (just by explicitly saying so, cf. WP:WDAFD), and then go to Talk:Motonormativity and initiate a WP:RM process instead...

mind, I encourage you to withdraw this nomination in accordance with WP:WDAFD. Aintabli (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2023 (UTC) if i did it wrong, please tell...

19:08, 26 May 2025 (UTC) Thanks. You can withdraw it if you so choose: WP:WDAFD. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 19:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC) Comment - I have taken...

would have been fine if Greykit wanted to withdraw the nomination, per WP:WDAFD - though admittedly, in that case, a note should have been left on this...

is struck out the AfD nominator doesn't have the option to withdraw. WP:WDAFD Rupples (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC) On the other hand it looks like...

Oncenawhile (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator per WP:WDAFD. No support for proposal, and IZAK's interpretation is a reasonable compromise...

(talk) 10:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC) Onetwothreeip, unfortunately, per WP:WDAFD, you can only withdraw it if no one else has supported the deletion proposal...

to close the AFD nomination, you can find guidance on the process at WP:WDAFD. CaptainGalaxy 19:13, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Delete The deletion rationale...

@RPI2026F1: Just wanted to let you know that I've reverted the withdrawl, per WP:WDAFD, given that your deletion nomination has gained deletion support from at...

and withdraw your nom. Artw (talk) 23:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC) First, WP:WDAFD doesn't allow withdrawal once someone else has supported deletion. Second...

standards applied therein), take a peek at WP:AFD or more specifically WP:WDAFD. There is a conversation to be had about these articles for sure, this just...

archive searches. If nom should wish to withdraw, they may chose to follow WP:WDAFD and add * {{Withdraw}} <Brief explanation.> ~~~~ immediately below their...

sources do indeed exist. Yes, you can withdraw an AfD. Instructions are at WP:WDAFD. Valereee (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC) @Valereee Ok thank you. I’ll look...

AfD is usually only withdrawn if there are no supporting !votes – see WP:WDAFD – but I for one still support deletion. The sources provided seem either...

not AFD it again. Blanking it after it started won't work for me. See WP:WDAFD if you want to officially withdraw the AFD. QuackGuru (talk) 04:20, 25 February...

nomination cannot progress once there is any support for deletion, per WP:WDAFD: If no one has supported deletion of the article you may close the discussion...

(which is the case here). Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with WP:WDAFD. The sourcing is still weak and I hope you know that "Report of Superintendent...

delete in that AfD about comets and China. Primefac, in violation of WP:WDAFD, withdrew out of embarrassment. That was only last month. If the candidate...

nomination, as nobody else has asked for the article to be deleted. See WP:WDAFD. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC) @Phil Bridger:, I am...

2015 (UTC) Has the nominator withdrawn this proposal? If so, please see WP:WDAFD. We can have a new discussion later if necessary. Prhartcom (talk) 15:10...

(talk) 15:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC) in light of that I suggest you should WP:WDAFD and WP:SK. And perhaps familiar yourself with how to make proper checks...

"delete" in my mind; however, as it stands now, I see its value. Per WP:WDAFD, as there are dissenting views on the topic, this discussion has to stay...

withdraw "If no-one else has supported the deletion proposal..." See WP:WDAFD. Here Joseph2302 and SwisterTwister appear to have supported the deletion...

opening a new one?--Rusf10 (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:WDAFD: By removing/withdrawing the bundled Mount Olivet Cemetery (Newark) re-nomination...

here. As the "no external reference claim" is wrong, I kindly ask for WP:WDAFD (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Withdrawing_a_nomination)...

nomination and close the debate yourself to save everyone time. (Per WP:WDAFD). Then draftify it (WP:IAR if need be - I don't see that anyone will object)...

nominated it. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 07:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC) Per WP:WDAFD, you cannot withdraw a nom once it's been supported by somebody else. --Redrose64...

Swordfish (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator as per WP:WDAFD for the following reasons: It's abundantly clear that there is no consensus...

weak support, I don't believe I'm allowed to close this myself, per WP:WDAFD, but perhaps someone else will kindly do it. Thank you all. Msnicki (talk)...

· Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC) Per WP:WDAFD: Since there are those who have expressed support for deletion the AFD should...

withdrawn at this point (since there are delete !votes registered; see WP:WDAFD and WP:SKCRIT), but you can certainly strike your earlier !vote if your...

LibStar (talk) 01:43, 28 April 2017 (UTC) LibStar and Shirt58, please read WP:WDAFD: AfD nominations can only be withdrawn "[i]f no-one else has supported the...

(UTC) GDP Growth, to withdraw your AfD nomination, use the procedure at WP:WDAFD. Since no one has !voted anything but "keep", you can currently still do...

including this one. I have stated that this fact prevents it's removal by WP:WDAFD, I believe this is accurate. I am under the impression that Rusf10 has been...

Slatersteven - I'm involved, so can't close, but as nominator, you can - see WP:WDAFD. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 10:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC) I have no idea how, as I...

was. DBigXrayᗙ 13:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator per WP:WDAFD since the community believes that redirects to unvetted proposals can be...

establish notability. It appears that I'm not allowed to do so, however, by WP:WDAFD, because other editors have supported the nomination. I would appreciate...

rape.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC) @E.M.Gregory: per WP:WDAFD nomination can only be withdrawn with no other delete votes. Best path to...

2014 (UTC) Can you do your part and employ the procedure laid out at WP:WDAFD, please? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Keep This is...

can satisfy the second bullet of WP:NPOL.and at this point, I can use WP:WDAFD and can withdraw my nomination, always provided that @Bkissin: agrees with...

from such statements. Wikipedia:WDAFD is the correct procedure.Djflem (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC) WP:WDAFD can't be used because several people...

Викидим (talk) 08:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator per WP:WDAFD. Reason: WP:SNOW due to little support. --Викидим (talk) 19:11, 25 January...

2015 (UTC) An AfD can't be withdrawn once anyone else has supported it (WP:WDAFD), though you're welcome to change your own vote. I continue to feel in its...

nomination, because there are no dissenting votes at this time - see WP:WDAFD. And then read thru to the next section for how to do this, including "Procedure...

(talk) 11:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Hi @UserABCXYZ, see WP:WDAFD. Eevee01(talk) 12:18, 1 November 2021 (UTC) @UserABCXYZ I have closed the...

Should nom wish to withdraw they may follow the instructions given at WP:WDAFD. — Sam Sailor 21:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...

can expand. I suggest again nom withdraws the nomination, by following WP:WDAFD and adds * {{Withdraw}} <Your brief explanation.> ~~~~ immediately below...

--Tagishsimon (talk) 12:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC) Keep. If I understand WP:WDAFD correctly I can't withdraw the nomination as there have been several Delete...

opening a new one?--Rusf10 (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Wikipedia:WDAFD: By removing/withdrawing the bundled Mount Olivet Cemetery (Newark) re-nomination...

November 2016 (UTC) @The Banner: To save editors' time, you should Wikipedia:WDAFD. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 15:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC) And by that approve...

If the nominator is ready to consider this proposal, follow this link WP:WDAFD, to learn about how to withdraw the nomination. Delta fiver (talk) (UTC)...

this discussion?BurritoQuesadilla (talk) 06:25, 9 August 2021 (UTC) WP:WDAFD. KidAd • SPEAK 06:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC) I'm aware of WP:OR. This isn't...

Bookscale (talk) 09:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC) hi Bromptop, please see WP:WDAFD about withdrawing nomination. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:26, 23 January 2020...

Sistorian (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator (WP:WDAFD). I accept the work done by the cricket editors to find additional sources...

opinion. As I'm the nominator here, I'm not sure how this works, does WP:WDAFD apply here? Seagull123 Φ 23:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC) @Seagull123:. I have...

"delete" in my mind; however, as it stands now, I see its value. Per WP:WDAFD, as there are dissenting views on the topic, this discussion has to stay...

establish notability. It appears that I'm not allowed to do so, however, by WP:WDAFD, because other editors have supported the nomination. I would appreciate...

(talk) 15:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC) Comment Saqib, you should have a look at WP:WDAFD about about to withdraw AfDs. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 15:47, 10 May...

delete !vote. See WP:WDAFD. If Kosboot withdraws his Delete !vote, you could properly withdraw using the steps in the WP:WDAFD; but if he doesn't, this...

article an hour ago - this was reverted and the user was advised to follow WP:WDAFD instead. --McGeddon (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Delete as this...

prevented from so doing by an earlier 'Delete' vote' as per guidance at WP:WDAFD. We will have to await an admin to make the closure, and would hope this...

--Cmurphey80 (talk) 15:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC) @Cmurphey80: See WP:WDAFD. -- intgr [talk] 15:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is...

there's already three in the article, and there's plenty of more to add. WP:WDAFD? — Sam Sailor 00:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC) Could you just confirm to me...

want to withdraw this nomination, you can follow those steps listed at WP:WDAFD. --Kbabej (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC) Keep have expanded it with some...

and withdraw your nom. Artw (talk) 23:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC) First, WP:WDAFD doesn't allow withdrawal once someone else has supported deletion. Second...

March 2015 (UTC) You can withdroaw the nomination for yourself - see WP:WDAFD. --Scott Davis Talk 23:59, 16 March 2015 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...

Sheroddy, I would suggest withdrawing the nomination as described at WP:WDAFD, what do you say? New Media Theorist (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)...

withdraw "If no-one else has supported the deletion proposal..." See WP:WDAFD. Here Joseph2302 and SwisterTwister appear to have supported the deletion...

speedy keep per nom withdrawal. (Also worthwhile reading the paragraph at WP:WDAFD to provide additional context.) snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 14:14, 19 November...

does comply with criteria 6 of WP:ACADEMIC however in accordance with WP:WDAFD another editor (Cagepanes) has has supported deletion of the article. It...

the article. Since someone else has supported deletion, according to WP:WDAFD I cannot close this myself, but I don't believe anybody else will support...

WP:Before. Sullyboywiki (talk) 03:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC) @Sullyboywiki: See WP:WDAFD. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...

it? Montanabw(talk) 15:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC) @Montanabw: Here's how: WP:WDAFD. Nice improvements to article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2017 (UTC)...

is now eligible to be closed by nominator withdraw (procedure here: WP:WDAFD). Would you please consider doing so? The outcome here is now in WP:SNOW...

@RPI2026F1: Just wanted to let you know that I've reverted the withdrawl, per WP:WDAFD, given that your deletion nomination has gained deletion support from at...

the discussion below and the work of Beccaynr. Using procedure from WP:WDAFD.–CaroleHenson (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...

nomination?Rathfelder (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC) @Rathfelder: Per WP:WDAFD, not anymore. This nomination will have to run to term. Chris Troutman (talk)...

nominated it. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 07:08, 22 April 2021 (UTC) Per WP:WDAFD, you cannot withdraw a nom once it's been supported by somebody else. --Redrose64...

now want a merge in stead of deletion, withdraw the AfD, close it (per WP:WDAFD) and make a merge proposal instead Vexations (talk) 17:33, 25 January 2021...

(talk) 15:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC) in light of that I suggest you should WP:WDAFD and WP:SK. And perhaps familiar yourself with how to make proper checks...

this run longer, but you could withdraw and close as a speedy keep per WP:WDAFD. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:18, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Firefangledfeathers...

(which is the case here). Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with WP:WDAFD. The sourcing is still weak and I hope you know that "Report of Superintendent...

deleted. In the meantime, I ask you to withdraw your nomination; see WP:WDAFD. Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC) I...

would have been fine if Greykit wanted to withdraw the nomination, per WP:WDAFD - though admittedly, in that case, a note should have been left on this...

The "...discussion has produced new information about the topic..." (WP:WDAFD), thanks to JimRenge who provided sources to the article. Next, we need...

2014 (UTC) Can you do your part and employ the procedure laid out at WP:WDAFD, please? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2014 (UTC) Keep This is...

here. As the "no external reference claim" is wrong, I kindly ask for WP:WDAFD (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Withdrawing_a_nomination)...

further edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep per WP:WDAFD. (non-admin closure) The Origins of Heaven (talk) 18:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)...

(talk) 10:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC) Onetwothreeip, unfortunately, per WP:WDAFD, you can only withdraw it if no one else has supported the deletion proposal...

@Walter Görlitz: You can't withdraw when there are delete !votes. See WP:WDAFD.  Philg88 ♦talk 05:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC) Thanks. We'll let it play-out...

2015 (UTC) Has the nominator withdrawn this proposal? If so, please see WP:WDAFD. We can have a new discussion later if necessary. Prhartcom (talk) 15:10...

weak support, I don't believe I'm allowed to close this myself, per WP:WDAFD, but perhaps someone else will kindly do it. Thank you all. Msnicki (talk)...

withdrawn at this point (since there are delete !votes registered; see WP:WDAFD and WP:SKCRIT), but you can certainly strike your earlier !vote if your...

rape.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC) @E.M.Gregory: per WP:WDAFD nomination can only be withdrawn with no other delete votes. Best path to...

2015 (UTC) An AfD can't be withdrawn once anyone else has supported it (WP:WDAFD), though you're welcome to change your own vote. I continue to feel in its...

this nomination and close it, please, what would be in accordance with WP:WDAFD? We've already turned the article into a redirect, so there's no longer...

withdrawn comment to the top and add a brief explanation of why, as per WP:WDAFD. You can then close the discussion discussion yourself as Wikipedia:Speedy...

· Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 20:40, 6 January 2016 (UTC) Per WP:WDAFD: Since there are those who have expressed support for deletion the AFD should...

ruckus in talkingheadland is not a lasting effect. So; withdrawing. Per WP:WDAFD I cannot close, as there are !votes supporting the nomination. Jytdog (talk)...

October 2016 (UTC) I agree. Too late for me to withdraw the nomination per WP:WDAFD, but it's now worth a Keep. Cabayi (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2016 (UTC) Keep...

Mccapra (talk) 22:37, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Follow the instructions at WP:WDAFD. Bakazaka (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Done thanks. Mccapra (talk)...

Withdrawing my nomination. Any editor can close this as Speedy Keep per WP:WDAFD. Platonk (talk) 02:28, 2 February 2022 (UTC) Thanks! I have to say, this...

edits should be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Per WP:WDAFD: Withdrawn by nom.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2018 (UTC) National...

withdrawn. While they can certainly express their own change of view, WP:WDAFD does not permit withdraw/close once, as here, another editor has supported...

October 2016 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator - new info about album released (WP:WDAFD). TheKaphox T 20:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC) Comment: The album title was...

Should they wish to withdraw the nomination, they may chose to follow WP:WDAFD and add * {{Withdraw}} <Brief explanation.> ~~~~ immediately below the nomination...

5 September 2014 (UTC) JacobiJonesJr, in that case, do you think a WP:WDAFD makes sense? Kyledmichelson (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC) The above...

be made to this page.‎ The result was speedy keep. Involved close per WP:WDAFD SpinningSpark 13:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC) Genghis Khan (TV programme) (edit |...

and I'd like to withdraw my AfD nom (though I'm not sure I can, per WP:WDAFD since someone else has supported deletion). But I think this AfD can be...

In light of the new sources, I change my position to neutral—under WP:WDAFD I can't technically withdraw the nomination, since it's gotten some support...

not AFD it again. Blanking it after it started won't work for me. See WP:WDAFD if you want to officially withdraw the AFD. QuackGuru (talk) 04:20, 25 February...

can satisfy the second bullet of WP:NPOL.and at this point, I can use WP:WDAFD and can withdraw my nomination, always provided that @Bkissin: agrees with...

delete above, so it is ineligible for withdrawal by the nominator (see WP:WDAFD). Bakazaka (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC) Comment-ahhh didn't notice...

notability of the subject. So, I am withdrawing this nomination per WP:WDAFD.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:58, 8 November 2014 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...

Oncenawhile (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator per WP:WDAFD. No support for proposal, and IZAK's interpretation is a reasonable compromise...

. afaik one can only withdraw before delete votes are appended (see WP:WDAFD). Whatever. Time to sort this matter out once and for all. I herewith ping...

AfD is usually only withdrawn if there are no supporting !votes – see WP:WDAFD – but I for one still support deletion. The sources provided seem either...

(UTC) For the convenience of other reviewers, you might want to follow WP:WDAFD. Thank you. Praemonitus (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2015 (UTC) The above discussion...

if you like, here are the instructions for withdrawing a nomination: WP:WDAFD. Technically I think this now qualifies for a speedy keep either way but...

article an hour ago - this was reverted and the user was advised to follow WP:WDAFD instead. --McGeddon (talk) 12:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC) Delete as this...

ruckus in talkingheadland is not a lasting effect. So; withdrawing. Per WP:WDAFD I cannot close, as there are !votes supporting the nomination. Jytdog (talk)...

regarded as such verifiable info. As such, it may be useful to remind WP:WDAFD, under which the nominator always has the possibility of withdrawing the...

WP:WDAFD. Or marking it as "Speedy close" is also acceptable given the circumstances (WP:IAR). "Speedy keep" is obviously inappropriate per WP:WDAFD and...

nomination, closing it as a "speedy keep". Problem is this is in violation of WP:WDAFD, which clearly states: "If no one else has supported the deletion proposal...

Gnome (talk) 05:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC) @The Gnome: {{not done}} See WP:WDAFD - once anybody (other than the nominator) has !voted to delete, an AfD cannot...

FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 09:11, 22 April 2021 (UTC) {{not done}} - per WP:WDAFD, you cannot withdraw an AfD nom once it's been supported by somebody else...

contradiction between WP:WDAFD and WP:INVOLVED. While it might be less of an issue for experienced editors, to my mind, WDAFD only mentions "may" (not...

per WP:WDAFD. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:02, 11 November 2024 (UTC) A withdrawal is only possible when there are no delete votes per WDAFD. Piotr voted...

withdrew the nomination as I decided it was wasting everyone's time. Per WP:WDAFD : "If no one has supported deletion of the article you may close the discussion...

to just nip it in the bud. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:27, 3 August 2025 (UTC) WP:WDAFD. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 21:30, 3 August 2025 (UTC) How do I close it then...

MitYehor📘^talk 19:57, 8 June 2026 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator per WP:WDAFD; sources were identified and added to the page, making it borderline, and...

Swordfish (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator as per WP:WDAFD for the following reasons: It's abundantly clear that there is no consensus...

to close the AFD nomination, you can find guidance on the process at WP:WDAFD. CaptainGalaxy 19:13, 17 April 2025 (UTC) Delete The deletion rationale...

nomination, as nobody else has asked for the article to be deleted. See WP:WDAFD. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC) @Phil Bridger:, I am...

See WP:WDAFD - X201 (talk) 09:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC) Hi @Mokshalini: if you're the nominator, you can withdraw it as detailed here: WP:WDAFD; otherwise...

sources do indeed exist. Yes, you can withdraw an AfD. Instructions are at WP:WDAFD. Valereee (talk) 14:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC) @Valereee Ok thank you. I’ll look...

Викидим (talk) 08:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator per WP:WDAFD. Reason: WP:SNOW due to little support. --Викидим (talk) 19:11, 25 January...

through AfD. If you agree you can just withdraw your AfD nomination (see WP:WDAFD). BruceThomson (talk) 04:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC) I doubt I can do what...

(and allow the move discussion to continue). I suggest withdrawing (WP:WDAFD) this deletion request and just changing Great British Nuclear to a redirect...

"officially" retract now. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 12:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC) WP:WDAFD Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC) The above discussion...

is struck out the AfD nominator doesn't have the option to withdraw. WP:WDAFD Rupples (talk) 17:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC) On the other hand it looks like...

should be made to this page. The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing per WP:WDAFD, all viewpoints to keep. (non-admin closure) Cubnorth (talk) 02:09, 19 July...

copyvio. I'll just remove the copy paste and add the revdel tag for you. WP:WDAFD has the instructions for withdrawing an AfD, you can either close this yourself...

nomination cannot progress once there is any support for deletion, per WP:WDAFD: If no one has supported deletion of the article you may close the discussion...

bad advice was forgetting to tell the nom to withdraw the nomination. WP:WDAFD allows the nominator to "change your mind" and "realise the nomination was...

regarded as such verifiable info. As such, it may be useful to remind WP:WDAFD, under which the nominator always has the possibility of withdrawing the...

known outside the region. You can withdraw your nomination if you like: WP:WDAFD. Dreamyshade (talk) 01:39, 25 September 2025 (UTC) The above discussion...

You can withdraw the AfD nomination (just by explicitly saying so, cf. WP:WDAFD), and then go to Talk:Motonormativity and initiate a WP:RM process instead...

Servite et contribuere (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2025 (UTC) Yes, see WP:WDAFD for more info. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC) The above...

standards applied therein), take a peek at WP:AFD or more specifically WP:WDAFD. There is a conversation to be had about these articles for sure, this just...

nomination and close the debate yourself to save everyone time. (Per WP:WDAFD). Then draftify it (WP:IAR if need be - I don't see that anyone will object)...

mind, I encourage you to withdraw this nomination in accordance with WP:WDAFD. Aintabli (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2023 (UTC) if i did it wrong, please tell...

withdrew the nomination as I decided it was wasting everyone's time. Per WP:WDAFD : "If no one has supported deletion of the article you may close the discussion...