ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Shortcuts WP:WINARSWP:WINARS WP:NOTSOURCEWP:NOTSOURCE WP:WINRSWP:WINRS WP:DCWOWWP:DCWOW...

Delete per nom --Truest blue 20:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and WINARS (wikipedia is not a resume service...) Pharmboy 22:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)...

SunloungerFrog (talk) 15:44, 4 July 2025 (UTC) Speedy delete: a blatant WP:WINARS violation despite a previous warning on the discredited creator's talk page...

isn't written) in Wikipedia articles doesn't prove shit per WP:UGC and WP:WINARS, but I'm not so sure they aren't talked about in that article; In their...

on wikipedia as a source (sources 17,18), in violation of WP:OR and WP:WINARS. The only remaining sources are a couple of listicle articles, and one brief...

St★lwart111 08:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) I've just reminded myself that WP:WINARS exists... I love that acronym. St★lwart111 08:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)...

"encyclopaedia" has been written but if it's anything like WP then, per WP:WINARS, we might have to question its reliability. I'm not hugely convinced by...

have a secondary stress there. Also, wikt links are unpersuasive; see WP:WINARS. A link to NOAD that supported your view would be much stronger evidence...

on other Wikipedia articles is both directly against policy (WP:V and WP:WINARS) and only true because you yourself have added links to multiple articles...

Louisianajones1978 (talk) 16:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Changed vote. See below. Keep WP:WINARS. I think the fact that both this term and the actual material phenomenon...

places. The article is very inclusive. MB 01:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1. WP:WINARS: "Wikipedia is not a reliable source." You can't cite Wikipedia article...

mirroring WP content is ipso facto not reliable; if for no other reason than WP:WINARS. WP:CIRCULAR may also come into play. RSN seems like the right venue to...

the references to wikipedia and explained why (using WP:CIRCULAR and WP:WINARS) yet the user continued to re-add the reference to the other wikipedia article...

reality. All he is doing is making WP:DE and calling me a dumb kid. But WP:WINARS, so this user is just being the dumb one. I hope he gets blocked so I could...

October 2015 (UTC) For IP 96.24.75.223's edification, it's known as WP:WINARS. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC) IP, my problem with that...

other Wikipedia articles,for which I let him know was a violation of WP:WINARS.Mountain157 (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC) To offer my point of view...

(except for corrections, like any other publication), so I'm not sure if WP:WINARS applies. — Newslinger talk 10:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC) My initial thoughts...

Delete per nom --Truest blue 20:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom and WINARS (wikipedia is not a resume service...) Pharmboy 22:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)...

places. The article is very inclusive. MB 01:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC) 1. WP:WINARS: "Wikipedia is not a reliable source." You can't cite Wikipedia article...

"encyclopaedia" has been written but if it's anything like WP then, per WP:WINARS, we might have to question its reliability. I'm not hugely convinced by...

Louisianajones1978 (talk) 16:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Changed vote. See below. Keep WP:WINARS. I think the fact that both this term and the actual material phenomenon...

St★lwart111 08:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) I've just reminded myself that WP:WINARS exists... I love that acronym. St★lwart111 08:06, 17 September 2021 (UTC)...

of the sources cited for this work come directly from Wikipedia (note WP:WINARS), but more specifically are the same Woodward "references" above. Aside...

a leftist-ish and not affiliated with the Turkish government. While WP:WINARS applies to the Wikipedia articles, there are English language sources used...

articles or is regularly referenced elsewhere on Wikipedia (caveat: WP:WINARS), it should (in theory) come to the attention of contributors and an article...

of the sources cited for this work come directly from Wikipedia (note WP:WINARS), but more specifically are the same Woodward "references" above. Aside...

isn't written) in Wikipedia articles doesn't prove shit per WP:UGC and WP:WINARS, but I'm not so sure they aren't talked about in that article; In their...

on other Wikipedia articles is both directly against policy (WP:V and WP:WINARS) and only true because you yourself have added links to multiple articles...

list entry where it may or may not be appropriate for Wikipedia is a WP:WINARS argument. Again, Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS, therefore grabbing at any information...

articles or is regularly referenced elsewhere on Wikipedia (caveat: WP:WINARS), it should (in theory) come to the attention of contributors and an article...

source. Stalwart111 13:59, 8 December 2012 (UTC) Reply - I understand "WP:WINARS". IMO, per the AfD, Penix was mentioned in enough reliable articles to be...

February 12, 2014. —rybec 13:58, 5 March 2014 (UTC) Not reliable per WP:WINARS. Jinkinson talk to me 14:05, 5 March 2014 (UTC) I just removed it and all...

--AMX 12:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)AMX What's the origin of "A winnar (or winar or even winrar) is you! VICTOLY!"? --frothT C 00:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)...

references)". Other Wikipedia pages are not suitable references, per WP:WINARS. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:15, 12 May 2015 (UTC) Except that the material...

articles cannot be used to support the statements per WP:CIRCULAR and WP:WINARS. The third source clearly views (most) Taiwanese as Chinese ("the Chinese...

source. Stalwart111 13:59, 8 December 2012 (UTC) Reply - I understand "WP:WINARS". IMO, per the AfD, Penix was mentioned in enough reliable articles to be...

1965 Q63831693 0 3035 Ulrike Platten-Wirtz 1965 Q63837893 0 3036 Hilda Winar 1965-02-20 Padang Q64518083 2 3037 Lia Tilon 1965 Waterland Q80693866 1...

weighing my comments against WP:WINARS which TDJankins also hit on. I don't think we can follow the logic of WP:WINARS because of the accepted guideline...

region"[[23]]. On the talk page I went over things such as WP:PRIMARYNOTBAD and WP:WINARS with him. I even pointed out a book named Jacob Abbot Cummings' 1815 Introduction...

WP:CLONE, which according to WP:WINARS makes the source unreliable." 07:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC) "removed source violating WP:WINARS" 06:43, 25 May 2023 (UTC)...

Famous (1 edit): N GoldRomean (talk) 23:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Johannis Winar (1 edit): ? GoldRomean (talk) 23:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) Quintin Dove (1...

PR content "where no significant journalism work was done". Of note (WP:WINARS aside because I'm sure people can check the sources in an article)...

it is just a copy of Wikipedia, that material is obviously subject to WP:WINARS. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 03:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC) It's not a wiki. —Alalch...

SunloungerFrog (talk) 15:44, 4 July 2025 (UTC) Speedy delete: a blatant WP:WINARS violation despite a previous warning on the discredited creator's talk page...

article that appeared to cite from our Wikipedia article about him. Per WP:WINARS and WP:CIRC, does that mean we need to have a discussion about the reliabilty...

“unreliable” [173] [174] but an article that uses Wikipedia as its source (WP:WINARS) is reliable.[175] Whatsupkarren also seems to add sources without even...

(talk) 11:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Sablc4747, in brief: no, never; per WP:WINARS. You must always use a reliable source, and as Wikipedia is self-published...

on wikipedia as a source (sources 17,18), in violation of WP:OR and WP:WINARS. The only remaining sources are a couple of listicle articles, and one brief...

a Wikipedia summary, which my trigger WP:CIRCULAR issues as well as WP:WINARS. Mathglot (talk) 07:57, 12 November 2024 (UTC) @Mathglot: Yeah, so I mentioned...

occasionally will cite another Wikipedia article which is against the WP:WINARS guidelines. Would be great if someone can take a look at the users contributions...

(UTC) This is one of those times it's useful to invoke the old chestnut WP:WINARS. The Woad article is not great. Yes, it's in the popular imagination that...