Submission declined on 4 July 2026 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by DoubleGrazing 45 days ago. Last edited by DoubleGrazing 45 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 30 June 2026 by Dan arndt (talk). This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers. Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute. Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed. This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Dan arndt 49 days ago.

• Comment: All but two of the citations are to the group's own website, and of those two at least one appears to be based on a press kit or similar. We don't want to know what this business is saying about itself, we want to know what reliable and entirely independent secondary sources have said about it, to satisfy the WP:NCORP notability guideline. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Fails WP:NCOMPANY, is almost entirely reliant on primary sources - the company's website, which is not independent or reliable. Dan arndt (talk) 05:44, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

ASBUD Group - real estate developer operating in the residential and commercial property markets. The company undertakes urban-scale residential and office projects, as well as mixed-use developments, primarily in Warsaw and the surrounding area.^[1]
The developer has been active in the Polish property market for around 30 years. It specialises in large-scale projects combining residential and commercial functions. One of the company’s largest projects is a complex covering an area of approximately 130,000 m², located in the Rondo Daszyńskiego area of Warsaw. The company is currently finalising the first phase of the Nowa Praga development in Warsaw’s Praga Północ district.^[2]

Raied Tanous serves as the company’s CEO.

Projects completed by the ASBUD Group include:^[3]

• Towarowa Towers
• Towarowa Square^[4]
• Metro Point Office^[5]
• Karolkowa Business Park^[6]
• Metro Point Apartments^[7]
• Grzybowska 85^[8]
• Młody Żoliborz Housing Estate^[9]
• Flora^[10]
• Twoje Osiedle – Czerniakowska^[11]
• Twoje Osiedle – Białołęka^[12]
• Twoje Osiedle – Konstancin^[13]
• Twoje Osiedle – Przylądek Bielany^[14]
• Twoje Osiedle – Ustronie Wiślane^[15]
• Twoje Osiedle – Przylesie^[16]
• Twoje Osiedle – Solariego^[17]

The Towarowa Towers project has received market awards in the fields of architecture and property. These accolades include:^[18]

• European Property Awards 2022–2023 – awards in the Residential High Rise Development and Residential High Rise Architecture categories, as well as a Five Stars distinction, which is awarded to the highest-scoring project in a given category.
• TITAN Property Awards 2022 – Gold Winner in the Property Development – Residential High Rise category.
• Global Future Design Awards 2023 – an award in the high-rise residential projects category.
• Warsaw Business Journal 2023 – Exceptional Business Achievement Award in the Real Estate Development of the Year category.
• New York Architectural Design Awards 2024 – Silver Winner.