Law which sets a maximum time for the initiation of legal proceedings
A statute of limitations, known in civil law systems as a prescriptive period, is a law passed by a legislative body to set the maximum time after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated.[1][2] In most jurisdictions, such periods exist for both criminal law and civil law such as contract law and property law, though often under different names and with varying details.
When the time which is specified in a statute of limitations runs out, a claim might no longer be filed or, if it is filed, it may be subject to dismissal if the defense against that claim is raised that the claim is time-barred as having been filed after the statutory limitations period.[3]
When a statute of limitations expires in a criminal case, the courts no longer have jurisdiction. Most common crimes that have statutes of limitations are distinguished from particularly serious crimes because the latter claims may be brought at any time.
In civil law systems, such provisions are typically part of their civil and criminal codes. The cause of action dictates the statute of limitations, which can be reduced or extended in order to ensure a full and fair trial.[4] The intention of these laws is to facilitate resolution within a "reasonable" period of time.[5] What amount of time is considered "reasonable" varies from country to country.[6] In the United States, it may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and state to state. Internationally, the statute of limitations may vary from one civil or criminal action to another. Some countries have no statute of limitations whatsoever.
Common law legal systems can include a statute specifying the length of time within which a claimant or prosecutor must file a case. In some jurisdictions (e.g., California),[2] a case cannot begin after the period specified, and courts have no jurisdiction over cases filed after the statute of limitations has expired. In some other jurisdictions (e.g., New South Wales, Australia), a claim can be filed which may prove to have been brought outside the limitations period, but the court will retain jurisdiction in order to determine that issue, and the onus is on the defendant to plead it as part of their defence, or else the claim will not be statute barred.
Once they are filed, cases do not need to be resolved within the period specified in the statute of limitations.
Purpose
The purpose and effect of statutes of limitations are to protect defendants. There are three reasons for their enactment:[7]
A plaintiff with a valid cause of action can pursue it with reasonable diligence.
By the time a stale claim is litigated, a defendant might have lost evidence necessary to disprove the claim.
Litigation of a long-dormant claim may result in more cruelty than justice.
In Classical Athens, a five-year statute of limitations was established for almost all cases, exceptions being such as the prosecution of non-constitutional laws (which had no limitation). Demosthenes wrote that these statutes of limitations were adopted to control "sycophants" (professional accusers).[8]
The limitation period generally begins when the plaintiff's cause of action accrues, meaning the date upon which the plaintiff is first able to maintain the cause of action in court, or when the plaintiff first becomes aware of a previous injury (for example, occupational lung diseases such as asbestosis).
A statute of repose limits the time within which an action may be brought based upon when a particular event occurred (such as the completion of construction of a building or the date of purchase of manufactured goods), and does not permit extensions. A statute of limitations is similar to a statute of repose, but may be extended for a variety of reasons (such as the minority of the victim).
For example, most U.S. jurisdictions have passed statutes of repose for construction defects.[9][10][11][12] If a person receives an electric shock due to a wiring defect that resulted from the builder's negligence during construction of a building, the builder is potentially liable for damages if the suit is brought within the time period defined by the statute, normally starting with the date that construction is substantially completed. After the statutory time period has passed, without regard to the nature or degree of the builder's negligence or misconduct, the statute of repose presents an absolute defense to the claim.
Statutes of repose are sometimes controversial; manufacturers contend that they are necessary to avoid unfair litigation and encourage consumers to maintain their property. Alternatively, consumer advocates argue that they reduce incentives to manufacture durable products and disproportionately affect the poor, because manufacturers will have less incentive to ensure low-cost or "bargain" products are manufactured to exacting safety standards.
Many jurisdictions toll or suspend the limitation period in exceptional circumstances such as if the aggrieved person (plaintiff, appellant or petitioner) was a minor, or has filed a bankruptcy proceeding. In those instances, the running of limitations is tolled or paused, until the condition ends. Equitable tolling may also be applied if an individual may intimidate a moving party into not reporting or has been promised a suspended period.
The statute of limitations may begin when the harmful event, such as fraud or injury, occurs or it may begin when the harmful event is discovered. The U.S. Supreme Court has described the "standard rule" of when the time begins as "when the plaintiff has a complete and present cause of action." The rule has existed since the 1830s.[13] A "discovery rule" applies in other cases (including medical malpractice), or a similar effect may be applied by tolling.
According to U.S. district judge Sean J. McLaughlin, the discovery rule does not apply to mass media such as newspapers and the Internet; the statute of limitations begins to run at the date of publication.[14] In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Gabelli v. SEC that the discovery rule does not apply to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's investment-advisor-fraud lawsuits since one of the purposes of the agency is to root out fraud.[15]
In private civil matters, the limitation period may generally be shortened or lengthened by agreement of the parties. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, the parties to a contract for sale of goods may reduce the limitation period to one year but not extend it.
Limitation periods that are known as laches may apply in situations of equity; a judge will not issue an injunction if the requesting party waited too long to ask for it. Such periods are subject to broad judicial discretion.
For US military cases, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) states that all charges except those facing court-martial on a capital charge have a five-year statute of limitations. If the charges are dropped in all UCMJ proceedings except those headed for general court-martial, they may be reinstated for six months after which the statute of limitations has run out.
Prescription
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2015)
In civil law countries, almost all lawsuits must be brought within a legally-determined period at the end of which the right of action is extinguished. This is known as liberative or extinctive prescription. Under Italian[16] and Romanian law,[17] criminal trials must be ended within a time limit.
In criminal cases, the public prosecutor must lay charges within a time limit which varies by jurisdiction and varies based on the nature of the charge, whose directives vary from country to country. Over the last decade of the 20th century, many United States jurisdictions significantly lengthened the statute of limitations for sex offenses, particularly against children, as a response to research and popular belief that a variety of causes can delay the recognition and reporting of crimes of this nature.[citation needed]
Common triggers for suspending the prescription include a defendant's fugitive status or the commission of a new crime. In some jurisdictions, a criminal may be convicted in absentia.[18] Prescription should not be confused with the need to prosecute within "a reasonable delay" as obligated by the European Court of Human Rights.[19]
In Australia, there are no statutes of limitation in criminal proceedings if the maximum penalty that can be imposed for an offence committed by an individual includes imprisonment for more than 6 months. For civil matters, the statutes of limitation are prescribed by each state or territory jurisdiction.[21]
Victoria
The Limitations Act of 1958 allows 12 years for victims of child abuse to make a claim, with age 37 the latest at which a claim can be made. The police submitted evidence[22][failed verification] to a commission, the Victorian Inquiry into Church and Institutional Child Abuse (in existence since 2012) indicating that it takes an average of 24 years for a victims of child sexual abuse to go to the police.[23] According to Attorney General Robert Clark, the government will remove statutes of limitations on criminal child abuse; victims of violent crime should be given additional time, as adults, to deal with the legal system.[24] Offenders of minors and the disabled have used the statute of limitations to avoid detection and prosecution, moving from state to state and country to country; an example which was presented to the Victorian Inquiry was the Christian Brothers.[25]
An argument for abolishing statutes of limitations for civil claims by minors and people under guardianship is ensuring that abuse of vulnerable people would be acknowledged by lawyers, police, organisations and governments, with enforceable penalties for organisations which have turned a blind eye in the past. Support groups such as SNAP Australia,[26] Care Leavers Australia Network[27] and Broken Rites have submitted evidence to the Victoria inquiry,[28] and the Law Institute of Victoria[29] has advocated changes to the statute of limitations.
Western Australia
The Criminal Procedure Act 2004 outlines the statute of limitations, stating that a simple offence (an offence which can only be brought to a magistrate's court, and cannot include more than 12 months' imprisonment as the maximum penalty) shall have a statute of limitations of 12 months. However, all crimes (offences which can be brought to a district court or the supreme court) have no statute of limitations. Furthermore, a person may be charged with a simple offence after 12 months' if the person consents to such a charge being laid, or if that offence has a different statute of limitations as provided by law.[30]
Indictable (serious) offences such as fraud, serious theft, murder, kidnapping, arson, bribery, perjury, do not have a limitation period. A defendant can be charged at any future date.[32] In sexual abuse cases in particular, men and women have been charged and convicted up to 26 years after the abuse had been committed.[33][34][35]
Civil law limitations vary by province.[36] In Ontario, this is governed by the Limitations Act, 2002.[37]
Finland
In Finland, the authority of a prosecuting official to bring charges for a crime expires after a set period of time has passed since the act. This period is 20, 10, 5, or 2, years depending on the seriousness of the offence. Offences punishable with life imprisonment, such as murder and treason, do not expire. Sexual offences committed against minors do not expire before the victim reaches 23 or 28 years of age, depending on the nature of the offence.[citation needed]
Germany
In Germany, the statute of limitations on crimes varies by type of crime, with the highest statute of limitation being 30 years for voluntary manslaughter (Totschlag). Murder, genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression have no statute of limitations.
In Germany, the crime of murder used to have a 20-year statute of limitations. In 1969, the statute of limitations for murder was extended from 20 to 30 years. The limitations were abolished altogether in 1979, in order to prevent Nazi criminals from avoiding criminal liability.[citation needed]
For most other criminal offences, the statute of limitations is set by Section 78(3) of the Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch) as follows:
30 years for offences which are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment for life;
20 years for offences which are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of over 10 years but not by imprisonment for life;
10 years for offences which are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of over 5 years but no more than 10 years;
5 years for offences which are punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of over 1 year but no more than 5 years;
In the civil code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch), the regular statute of limitations is three years (plus the time until the end of the calendar year); however, different terms between two and thirty years may apply in specific situations. For example, the term is only two years for claims for alleged defects of purchased goods, but 30 years for claims resulting from a court judgement (such as awarded damages).
India
The statute of limitations in India is defined by the Limitations Act, 1963.[39]
The statute of limitations for criminal offences is governed by Sec. 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The statutes of limitations in New Zealand are defined by section 25 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. For offences committed by body corporates, the statutes of limitation are determined as if they were a natural person. The limits are as follows:[40]
6 months for offences which are punishable by a maximum of 3 months imprisonment or a $7,500 fine.
12 months for offences which are punishable by a maximum of 6 months imprisonment or a $20,000 fine.
5 years for offences which are punishable by a maximum of 3 years imprisonment, although this can be extended with the consent of the Solicitor-General.
No limit for offences which are punishable by more than 3 years imprisonment.
Norway
The statute of limitations on murder was abolished by a change in law on 1 July 2014, causing any murders committed after 1 July 1989 to have no statute of limitations. This led to the national police force implementing a new investigation group for old cases called the "Cold Case" group. The law was also changed to let cases involving domestic violence, forced marriage, human trafficking and genital mutilation to count from the day the defendant turns 18 years old. Cases where the statute of limitations has already passed can not be extended due to the constitution preventing it.[41]
Philippines
In the Philippines, the Revised Penal Code has different limitation periods, based on the penalty of the crime:[42]
Reclusión perpetua or reclusión temporal (imprisonment of 12 years and 1 day to 40 years): 20 years
Other afflictive penalties (imprisonment of 6 years and 1 day to 12 years): 15 years
Correctional penalties: 10 years, except:
Arresto mayor (imprisonment of 1 month and 1 day to 6 months): 5 years
Libel and other similar offenses: 1 year
Oral defamation and slander: 6 months
Light penalties (imprisonment of 1 day to 30 days): 2 months
Other special laws have their own limitation periods. For crimes punished under the Revised Penal Code, the limitation period won't run if the offender is outside the Philippines, while for those punished under other laws, it does. Municipal ordinances have a limitation period of 2 months.
South Korea
In July 2015, the National Assembly abolished a 25-year limit on first degree murder; it had previously been extended from 15 to 25 years in December 2007.[43]
Turkey
Turkish Code of Obligations sets the general limitation period to ten years, which applies where the law does not provide a specific limitation period.[44]
There is no statute of limitations for sexual offenses committed against minors, however, under both the Turkish Penal Code (article 99) and Turkish Civil Code (Law No. 2827).[45]
Unlike many countries, the United Kingdom has no statute of limitations for criminal offences beyond minor summary offences (offences tried exclusively in the magistrates' courts).[46] Criminal proceedings for summary offences must be brought within six months according to the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980. To obtain a conviction in "some road traffic offences" (e.g. speeding), the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 requires that the driver must be notified within 14 days of the offence of the intention to prosecute.[46]
For civil claims, the period of validity varies depending on the type of claim. For example, a claim (debt) from a simple contract can no longer be pursued after six years.
United States
In the United States, statutes of limitations may apply in criminal procedures and civil lawsuits.[47][48] Statutes of limitations vary significantly among U.S. jurisdictions.
A civil statute of limitations applies to a non-criminal legal action, including a tort or contract case. If the statute of limitations expires before a lawsuit is filed, the defendant may raise the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense to seek dismissal of the claim. The exact time period depends on both the state and the type of claim (contract claim, personal injury, fraud etc.). Most fall in the range of one to ten years, with two to three years being most common.
Criminal statutes
A criminal statute of limitations defines a time period during which charges must be initiated for a criminal offense.[51] If a charge is filed after the statute of limitations expires, the defendant may obtain dismissal of the charge.
Initiation of charges
The statute of limitations in a criminal case only runs until a criminal charge is filed and a warrant issued, even if the defendant is a fugitive.[52] When the identity of a defendant is not known, some jurisdictions provide mechanisms to initiate charges and thus stop the statute of limitations from running. For example, some states allow an indictment of a John Doe defendant based upon a DNA profile derived from evidence obtained through a criminal investigation.[53] Although rare, a grand jury can issue an indictmentin absentia for high-profile crimes to get around an upcoming statute of limitations deadline. One example is the skyjacking of Northwest Orient Airlines Flight 305 by D. B. Cooper in 1971. The identity of D. B. Cooper remains unknown, and he was indicted under the name "John Doe, aka Dan Cooper."[54]
Heinous crimes
Crimes which are widely considered heinous have no statute of limitations. Although there is usually no statute of limitations for murder (particularly first-degree murder), judges have been known to dismiss murder charges in cold cases if they feel that the delay violates the defendant's right to a speedy trial.[55] For example, waiting many years for an alibi witness to die before commencing a murder trial would be unconstitutional.[citation needed]
Under 46 U.S. Code § 30106, "Except as otherwise provided by law, a civil action for damages for personal injury or death arising out of a maritime tort must be brought within 3 years after the cause of action arose." There are some exceptions to this, primarily with regard to Jones Act cases filed against the government, in which case the statute of limitations can be less than 2 years.[57]
Murder involving rape, cannibalism, or a child: 50 years
Mass murder: 45 years
Murder: 40 years
Terrorism not resulting in death: 30 years
Manslaughter: 25 years
Rape: 15 years
Violent felonies: 10 years
Nonviolent felonies: 5 years
Nonviolent felonies committed by a minor: 2 years[citation needed]
A bill was proposed to abolish the statute of limitations for most sex offenses, but it was not submitted for a vote in the state senate. Efforts continue to pass legislation to extend the limitations period for the prosecution of sex offenses.[59]
No statute of limitations for "malicious misdemeanors", per NCGS §15-1
Utah
Sexual conduct, violence, or abuse against a minor (below the age of 18): 10 years after the victim becomes 18 years old[60]
Murder, rape, manslaughter, aggravated kidnapping: No limits[61]
Exceptions
U.S. jurisdictions recognize exceptions to statutes of limitation that may allow for the prosecution of a crime or civil lawsuit even after the statute of limitations would otherwise have expired. Some states stop the clock for a suspect who is not residing within the state or is purposely hiding. Kentucky, North Carolina, and South Carolina have no statutes of limitation for felonies, while Wyoming includes misdemeanors as well. However, the right to speedy trial may derail any prosecution after many years have passed.[62]
When an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to impair the court's impartial performance of its legal task, the act (known as fraud upon the court) is not subject to a statute of limitation: "This concept that the inherent power of federal courts to vacate a fraudulently obtained judgment—even years after the judgment was entered—has long been recognized by the Supreme Court."[63] Fraud on the court can be done many ways and in any court. One of which can be "where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted."[64] Officer of the court includes any judge, law clerk, court clerk, lawyer, investigator, probation officer, referee, legal guardian, parenting-time expeditor, mediator, evaluator, administrator, special appointee, and/or anyone else whose influence is part of the judicial mechanism.[65][66]
Continuing-violations doctrine
In tort law, if any person or entity commits a series of illegal acts against another person or entity (or in criminal law if a defendant commits a continuing crime) the limitation period may begin to run from the last act in the series.[67][68] The entire chain of events can be tolled if the violations were continuing. Courts have explained that the continuing-violations doctrine "tolls the statute of limitations in situations where a continuing pattern forms due to discriminatory acts which have been occurring over a period of time, as long as at least one incident of discrimination occurred within the limitations period."[69] Whether the continuing-violations doctrine applies to a particular violation is subject to judicial discretion; it was said to apply to copyright infringement in the jurisdiction of the Seventh Circuit,[70] but not in the jurisdiction of the Second Circuit.[71][72]
^"Wolk v. Olson, 730 F. Supp. 2d 376". U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Harvard Law School. 2 August 2010. The issue before the Court is whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would apply the discovery rule to toll the statute of limitations in a mass-media defamation case. The Court holds that it would not.
^"Archived copy". 1 September 2022. Archived from the original on 1 September 2022. Retrieved 30 October 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
^Kohout, David, Statutory Limitation of Crimes under International Law: Lessons Taken from the Prosecution of Nazi Criminals in Germany after 1945 and the New Demjanjuk Case Law, International Comparative Jurisprudence, Vol. 3, Issue 1 (2017), pp. 37-54.
^See, e.g., 8 C.F.R. 1003.2 ("(a) General. The Board may at any time reopen or reconsider a case in which it has rendered a decision on its own motion solely in order to correct a ministerial mistake or typographical error in that decision or to reissue the decision to correct a defect in service.... The time and numerical limitations set forth in paragraph (c)(2) of this section shall not apply to a motion to reopen proceedings:...
(v) For which a three-member panel of the Board agrees that reopening is warranted when the following circumstances are present, provided that a respondent may file only one motion to reopen pursuant to this paragraph (c)(3): (A) A material change in fact or law underlying a removability ground or grounds specified in section 212 or 237 of the Act that occurred after the entry of an administratively final order that vitiates all grounds of removability applicable to the alien; and (B) The movant exercised diligence in pursuing the motion to reopen;
(vi) Filed based on specific allegations, supported by evidence, that the respondent is a United States citizenornational....") (emphasis added)
^Reinhart, Christopher (6 March 2015). "Statute of Limitations for Prosecutions"(PDF). Office of Legislative Research Research Report. State of Connecticut. Retrieved 22 May 2020.
^"Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law". U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). 31 May 2021. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials.
^"Egervary v. Young, 366 F.3d 238". U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Harvard Law School. 30 April 2004. p. 246. Traditionally, in tort law, 'proximate cause' has been defined as a person's wrongful conduct which is a substantial factor in bringing about harm to another.
Gary Miller Membro della Camera dei Rappresentanti - California, distretto n.31Durata mandato3 gennaio 2013 - 3 gennaio 2015 PredecessoreXavier Becerra SuccessorePete Aguilar Membro della Camera dei Rappresentanti - California, distretto n.42Durata mandato3 gennaio 2003 - 3 gennaio 2013 PredecessoreJoe Baca SuccessoreKen Calvert Membro della Camera dei Rappresentanti - California, distretto n.41Durata mandato3 gennaio 1999 - 3 gennaio 2003 PredecessoreJay Kim SuccessoreJerry Lewis…
Artikel ini sebatang kara, artinya tidak ada artikel lain yang memiliki pranala balik ke halaman ini.Bantulah menambah pranala ke artikel ini dari artikel yang berhubungan atau coba peralatan pencari pranala.Tag ini diberikan pada Desember 2022. Maurice EvansEvans pada 1956LahirMaurice Herbert Evans(1901-06-03)3 Juni 1901Dorchester, Dorset, Inggris, Britania RayaMeninggal12 Maret 1989(1989-03-12) (umur 87)Rottingdean, Sussex Timur, Inggris, Britania RayaPekerjaanPemeran, produserTahun …
Pour les articles ayant des titres homophones, voir O, Au et Aux. Pour les articles homonymes, voir Eau (homonymie). Eau Identification Nom UICPA eau Synonymes monoxyde de dihydrogène, oxyde d'hydrogène, hydrogénol, hydroxyde d'hydrogène, oxyde dihydrogéné, oxydane No CAS 7732-18-5 No ECHA 100.028.902 No CE 231-791-2 PubChem 962 ChEBI 15377 SMILES O PubChem, vue 3D InChI InChI : vue 3D InChI=1/H2O/h1H2 InChIKey : XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Apparence liquide incolore[a], inod…
Political office in North Carolina, United States Secretary of State of North CarolinaSeal of the North Carolina Secretary of StateIncumbentElaine Marshallsince January 6, 1997StatusConstitutional officerMember ofCouncil of StateSeatRaleigh, North CarolinaAppointerGeneral electionTerm lengthFour years, no term limitsInaugural holderJames GlasgowFormationNovember 12, 1776(247 years ago) (1776-11-12)Salary$146,421Websitewww.sosnc.gov The North Carolina Secretary of State is an elect…
Josef Masopust Josef Masopust (1962)Informasi pribadiTanggal lahir 9 Februari 1931 (umur 93)Tempat lahir Most, CekoslowakiaPosisi bermain GelandangKarier junior1945–1950 Banik MostKarier senior*Tahun Tim Tampil (Gol)1950–19521952–19681968–1970 Vodotechna TepliceDukla PrahaCrossing Molenbeek Tim nasional1954–1966 Cekoslowakia 063 0(10) Kepelatihan1973–19761976–19801980–19841984–19871988–199119921993–1996 Dukla PragueZbrojovka BrnoHasseltCekoslowakiaIndonesiaZbrojovka Br…
Kementerian Keuangan Republik IndonesiaLambang Resmi Kementerian Keuangan RIGedung Kementerian Keuangan RI yang merupakan bekas istana Gubernur Jenderal DaendelsGambaran umumDibentuk19 Agustus 1945; 78 tahun lalu (1945-08-19)Dasar hukum pendirianPeraturan Presiden Nomor 57 Tahun 2020Bidang tugasKeuangan negara dan kekayaan negaraSloganNagara Dana Rakça (Penjaga Keuangan Negara) Susunan organisasiMenteriSri MulyaniWakil MenteriSuahasil NazaraSekretaris JenderalHeru PambudiInspektur Jenderal…
Konstantin NovikovNama asliКонстантин Афанасьевич НовиковLahir6 Agustus 1919Desa Medvezhye, Kegubernuran Oryol, RSFSRMeninggal9 Januari 1958 (usia 38)Moskwa, USSRPengabdian Uni SovietDinas/cabang Angkatan Udara Uni SovietLama dinas1939—1945PangkatKaptenPerang/pertempuranPerang Dunia IIPenghargaanPahlawan Uni Soviet Konstantin Afanasyevich Novikov (Rusia: Константин Афанасьевич Новиковcode: ru is deprecated ; 6 Agustus 1919 ̵…
Gymnotus carapo Klasifikasi ilmiah Domain: Eukaryota Kerajaan: Animalia Filum: Chordata Kelas: Actinopterygii Ordo: Gymnotiformes Subordo: Gymnotoidei Famili: Gymnotidae Genus: Gymnotus Spesies: Gymnotus carapoLinnaeus, 1758 Gymnotus carapo atau Ikan pisau berpita adalah spesies ikan yang berasal dari berbagai habitat air tawar di Amerika Selatan.[1] Ikan ini adalah spesies Gymnotus yang paling tersebar luas,[1] tetapi sering dikelirukan dengan beberapa kerabatnya, termasuk beber…
Contoh percobaan pikiran yang terkenal, yaitu kucing Schrödinger (1935), yang terkait dengan kemungkinan seekor kucing ditemukan hidup atau mati, yang bergantung pada peristiwa kuantum yang acak. Percobaan pikiran ini mencoba menggambarkan permasalahan dalam penerapan interpretasi Kopenhagen dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Eksperimen pikiran atau gedankenexperiment (dari bahasa Jerman) adalah eksperimen yang dibayangkan untuk menyelidiki sesuatu. Eksperimen pikiran dapat atau tidak dapat dilakukan…
Ayako絢子女王Putri Ayako saat Penyambutan Tahun Baru pada 2 Januari 2012Kelahiran15 September 1990 (umur 33)Rumah Sakit Aiiku, Tokyo, JepangWangsaWangsa Kekaisaran JepangNama lengkapAyako (絢子code: ja is deprecated )AyahNorihito, Pangeran TakamadoIbuHisako, Putri TakamadoAgamaShinto Keluarga Kekaisaran Jepang Baginda Sang KaisarBaginda Sang Permaisuri Paduka Sang Putri Toshi Baginda Sang Kaisar EmeritusBaginda Sang Permaisuri Emerita Paduka Sang Putra Mahkota dari JepangPaduka Sang P…
Begonia dregei TaksonomiDivisiTracheophytaSubdivisiSpermatophytesKladAngiospermaeKladmesangiospermsKladeudicotsKladcore eudicotsKladSuperrosidaeKladrosidsKladfabidsOrdoCucurbitalesFamiliBegoniaceaeGenusBegoniaSpesiesBegonia dregei Otto dan A.Dietr., 1836 lbs Begonia dregei adalah spesies tumbuhan yang tergolong ke dalam famili Begoniaceae. Spesies ini juga merupakan bagian dari ordo Cucurbitales. Nama ilmiah spesies ini pertama kali diterbitkan oleh Christoph Friedrich Otto dan Albert Gottfried …
Festival Film Indonesia 1978 adalah Festival Film Indonesia yang ke-IX. Pemenang penghargaan Film Jakarta Jakarta Sutradara Ami Prijono - Jakarta Jakarta Pemeran utama pria terbaik Kaharuddin Syah - Letnan Harahap Pemeran utama wanita terbaik Joice Erna - Suci Sang Primadona Pemeran pendukung pria terbaik Masito Sitorus - Jakarta Jakarta Pemeran pendukung wanita terbaik Nani Widjaja - Yang Muda Yang Bercinta Skenario terbaik N. Riantiarno dan Ami Prijono - Jakarta Jakarta Tata sinematografi terb…
Paus Inosensius X (1574–1655) dan seorang sekretaris. Paus Inosensius X (menjabat 1644–1655) mengangkat 40 kardinal dalam 8 konsistori: 14 November 1644 Camillo Francesco Maria Pamphili (1622–66) Camillo Francesco Maria Pamphilj Giancarlo de' Medici Domenico Cecchini Francesco Maria Farnese 6 Maret 1645 Niccolò Albergati-Ludovisi (1608–87) Alderano Cybo (1613–1700) Niccolò Albergati-Ludovisi Pier Luigi Carafa Tiberio Cenci Orazio Giustiniani Federico Sforza Benedetto Odescalchi Alder…
Junjung SirihKecamatanPanorama Malereang Gando di Nagari PaninggahanNegara IndonesiaProvinsiSumatera BaratKabupatenSolokPemerintahan • Camat-Populasi • Total−19,684 jiwa jiwaKode Kemendagri13.02.13 Kode BPS1303140 Luas- km²Nagari/kelurahan- Junjung Sirih (ditulis juga sebagai Junjuang Siriah dalam bahasa minang) adalah sebuah Kecamatan di Kabupaten Solok, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia. Kecamatan ini hasil pemekaran dari Kec. X Koto Singkarak, Junjung Sirih terdiri dar…
Asean SkiesKolaborasi karya Fariz RMDirilisDesember 1992GenrePopLabelWin InternationalProduserErwin Indrawan & Orlando IlacadKronologi Fariz RM Romantic(1992)'Romantic'1992 Asean Skies (1992) Dongeng Negeri Cinta(1997)'Dongeng Negeri Cinta'1997 Asean Skies adalah album kolaborasi dari musisi Fariz RM dengan penyanyi dari Filipina Janet Arnaiz yang dirilis pada tahun 1992. Sebelumnya Fariz sudah berkolaborasi dengan penyanyi lokal seperti Sophia Latjuba, Malyda, Deddy Dhukun, dll. Fariz j…
Kodok laut Chaunacops melanostomus Klasifikasi ilmiah Domain: Eukaryota Kerajaan: Animalia Filum: Chordata Kelas: Actinopterygii Ordo: Lophiiformes Subordo: Chaunacoidei Famili: ChaunacidaeGill, 1863 Genus[1] Chaunacops Chaunax Chaunacidae adalah ikan dalam ordo lophiiformes yang dikenal sebagai Kodok laut.[2] Ikan ini adalah ikan yang hidup di dasar laut yang ditemukan di lereng benua Samudra Atlantik, Hindia, dan Pasifik,[3] pada kedalaman setidaknya 2.460 m. Ada juga t…
Lokasi Kabupaten Buru Selatan di Provinsi Maluku Berikut ini adalah daftar kecamatan dan desa di Kabupaten Buru Selatan, Provinsi Maluku, Indonesia.Kabupaten Buru Selatan terdiri atas 6 kecamatan dan 81 desa dengan luas wilayah 3.780,56 km² dan jumlah penduduk 72.993 jiwa (2017). Kode Wilayah Kabupaten Buru Selatan adalah 81.09.[1][2][3][4] Kode Wilayah Nama Kecamatan Ibu kota Jumlah Desa Daftar Kelurahan dan Desa 81.09.01 Namrole Elfule 17 lbsKecamatan Namrole, …
M. Enthieh Mudakir (lahir 24 April 1963) adalah sastrawan berkebangsaan Indonesia. Namanya dikenal di kancah kesusasteraan Indonesia melalui karya-karyanya berupa cerita pendek dan puisi yang dipublikasikan di sejumlah surat kabar antara lain Suara Merdeka, Kedaulatan Rakyat, Pikiran Rakyat, Swadesi, Koran Merapi, Minggu Pagi, dan lain-lain. Enthieh merupakan salah satu penyair yang puisi-puisinya terangkum dalam antologi Dari Negeri Poci.[1][2] Latar belakang Enthieh Mudakir lah…