This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Course in Miracles article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as High-importance). Religious texts (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Spirituality Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Course in Miracles - Original EditionA Course in Miracles - Original Edition was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 05 January 2014 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists.

Gary RenardGary Renard was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 13 August 2017 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

This article gives some background and a very basic explanation of what it is, but it lacks even a fundamental description of its content. 166.182.250.207 (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

What if the reason the article only gives the most basic outline of the Course is because no one really knows what it is talking about? For what if there is no reason or light in this darkness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.189 (talk) 09:12, 21 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• ACIM3COVER.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• ACIM3COVER.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Matthew Remski passes WP:N. If you think he doesn't, this is not the place to argue that, instead you should submit his article for deletion. Do I like yoga? No, but it's a free country. People don't have to ask for my permission in order to practice yoga. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

What if, seeming to tell the truth, ACiM is a book of lies?

What if, appearing to heal, the book contains many harmful ideas?

What if, having promised to show the/a way - the Course sets out to mislead? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.153.122 (talk) 21:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia isn't about WP:THETRUTH, but about WP:Verifiable information form reliable sources. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

it is misleading to claim that this teaching " borrows from New Age ideas " There is no evidence of this at all. It is highly original in content. Of course those indoctrinated with familiar Christian dogma, are going to dismiss it, on entirely spurious grounds 80.189.60.71 (talk) 22:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The statement is sourced. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have watched this subject butchered many times over many years, this rendition is by far the worst.

‘A Course In Miracles’ is a modern day manual for the transformation of Mind, as given by Jesus. 2001:8003:321A:7001:1CE2:EBD3:D857:1D5 (talk) 12:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

First, I'm not a Christian, so I have no reason to defend Christian dogmas. Similarly, there are religion scholars who ascribe ACIM to the New Age, but do not write in order to defend Christian dogmas.

Second, see emic and etic. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MoreTimeThanBrains: The Library of Congress is not a scholar. LoC is not a full professor, therefore LoC is not WP:RS, except for its own subjective opinions. tgeorgescu (talk) 10:29, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also, facim.org is not WP:RS. tgeorgescu (talk) 10:33, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@MoreTimeThanBrains: Wapnick is not WP:RS. E.g. we don't WP:CITE Friedrich Engels as WP:IS about Karl Marx. Wapnick has a story to sell. Wapnick is not a disinterested (i.e. unbiased) scholar of religion, he is an involved party. tgeorgescu (talk) 15:36, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you George, I've witnessed what I came here to witness....All the best MoreTimeThanBrains (talk) 15:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Well, Wikipedia is heavily biased for the mainstream academic view, for the views of real scholars of religion vs. New Age gurus. When there is no evidence of the mainstream academic view, we consult debunkers of pseudoscience and heresiologists. Of course, without implying that a certain theology would be WP:THETRUTH.

In other words, Wikipedia is a venue for rendering scholarly views, rather than a venue for witnessing in favor of new religious movements. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again George! The course is one path of many, nothing to fear. Big HUG brother. MoreTimeThanBrains (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Community sees Wikipedia as a venue for citing WP:RS, not for ventilating our own opinions. These are the WP:RULES of the game. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@TA: You're spamming this article. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:04, 23 January 2026 (UTC)Reply