Talk:Common pheasant

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actual usage in USA

AFAIK, in the USA, the term "Ring-necked pheasant" refers to Phasianus colchicus, and Phasianus colchicus is generally known as the Ring-necked pheasant.
E.g.:

Smallest genome

The Common Pheasant article said that as of 2005, that bird has the smallest known genome of all living amniotes, only 0.97 pg (970 million base pairs) and gives the source: "Animal Genome Size Database". but that source says the black-chinned hummingbird has the smallest genome of all birds. Aren't all birds amniotes? I've updated the articles to reflect that the black-chinned hummingbird now seems to have the smallest genome of birds and therefore also amniotes. Tom B (talk) 12:40, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

(Original) Range Map

The sentence "It is native to the country of Georgia" must be corrected or improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.241.130 (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common pheasant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common pheasant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


revert

User:Justlettersandnumbers You reverted my edits saying 'Not clear that this is an improvement, please discuss on talk'. If you are not sure you should discuss on talk, not unilaterally revert a good faith edit. Please explain, for instance, how on earth the female pheasant you prefer (tiny image, some tail missing), could be better than the image I inserted. And since I took both the images of the male, I am in a good position to judge which is more encyclopaedic. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:51, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Impact on insect populations

The huge ecological impact of pheasant rearing on insect populations, especially threatened species, should be covered. 80.7.168.14 (talk) 07:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

missing language German

The Common Pheasant in German is https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasan I can't link it in the choice of languages. 2001:4BC9:A46:6AEC:62A7:8DA:7A14:99BC (talk) 21:24, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think I've fixed that – the German page was linked to generic pages such as our Pheasant. I can't see that de.wp has such a page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

[dubiousdiscuss]

The only places I can find the term "phezzans" (based on a quick search) are citations of Datus C. Proper. Unless someone can get an independent source, the "chinks" and "phezzans" line should be removed. 23.129.0.30 (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Having read the source on Internet Archive, I second this (and may go ahead and remove it later if I remember and there's no response). The "phezzens" name is a rendering of an apocryphal Montana farmer speaking in an accent/with imprecise terminology. The "chinks" term was allegedly used by sportswriters "for a time" according to Proper (referencing the birds' Asian origin), and so a primary source calling them as such would be better.
Overall, I think the "phezzens" part should certainly be removed - we don't attempt to document phonetic renderings of regional pronunciations of animal names, after all.
Edit: having searched some more, I found at least one other place (here) which claims that Montanans refer to the birds as phezzens, though I'm unsure of whether this is really the type of source we can use as a reference. 2601:644:680:CE30:944F:2DEC:8A5B:4AA0 (talk) 05:55, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.