This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to COVID-19. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

The article recently survived an AfD proposal. The closing admin wrote that the "decision does not preclude a possible merge." In this light, I call upon the community of editors to provide sourced evidence for the noability of the so-called "community of shared future for mankind." This is a blatant political talking point and a slogan. To achieve independent notability we need something beyond a few mentions in Chinese-published articles. Similar terms in the West, such as Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" (examine, please, its list of references), have achieves their status of independent notability thanks to the existence of quite extensive sources. Wikipedia is neither a place for political advocacy and propaganda nor a indiscriminate listing of information. -The Gnome (talk) 08:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

I am not much of a page mover, but it strikes me that the Community with a Shared Future for Mankind is the more common formulation in English. I have recently added another English language source that uses the "...Shared Future of Mankind" formulation, in fact.

Are there other views on what the primary article title should be? I think we should move the page. JArthur1984 (talk) 15:12, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

It just irks me to see articles being written like this. Whether people like it or not, CPC/CCP is the ruling party of the People's Republic of China. You shouldn't separate them out like it's a different entity from PRC. After all, we never refer to US's announcements as Democrat's or Republican's US. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miniracer (talk • contribs) 04:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

This is a bit general, can you point out some specific sentences or proposed edits? I have made some edits to this article recently and I'm willing to take a further look if you have specific comments. JArthur1984 (talk) 13:45, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply