Tukey's B method, also known as the Tukey-Kramer B procedure, or Tukey's Wholly Significant Difference (WSD) is a post-hoc multiple comparison statistical test used to identify which specific group means differ significantly from each other after a statistically significant result has been obtained from an analysis of variance (ANOVA).^[1] It is considered a compromise between two other popular multiple comparison procedures: Tukey's range test and the Newman-Keuls method.^[2]

The primary purpose of post-hoc tests like Tukey's B is to control the family-wise error rate (FWER) when performing multiple comparisons. Without such control, the probability of making at least one Type I error increases with the number of comparisons made.^[3]

The development of multiple comparison procedures stems from the work of Ronald Fisher, John Tukey and others in the mid-20th century. Tukey's HSD test is a conservative method that guarantees the FWER does not exceed the chosen significance level (e.g., ${\displaystyle \alpha =0.05}$). Conversely, the Newman-Keuls (NK) method, while providing higher statistical power, is known to be anti-conservative; that is, not strictly controlling the FWER as the number of groups increases.^[2]

Tukey's B method was introduced to provide an intermediate level of conservatism. It seeks to balance the strict error control of HSD with the greater sensitivity to differences offered by Newman-Keuls.^[1]

Tukey's B method operates by comparing all possible pairs of means. For each pair, it calculates a critical value based on the studentized range distribution.

While Tukey's HSD uses a single critical value ${\displaystyle q_{\text{HSD}}}$ derived from the total number of groups (${\displaystyle k}$), and Newman-Keuls uses critical values ${\displaystyle q_{\text{NK}}}$ that vary depending on the number of steps between the ordered means (${\displaystyle r}$), Tukey's B calculates the critical value (${\displaystyle q_{B}}$) as the simple arithmetic mean of the critical values obtained from those two procedures:^[1]

${\displaystyle q_{\text{B}}={\frac {q_{\text{HSD}}+q_{\text{NK}}}{2}}}$

The absolute difference between two means, ${\displaystyle \vert {\bar {X}}_{i}-{\bar {X}}_{j}\vert }$, is then compared against a critical difference value:

${\displaystyle {\text{CD}}_{\text{B}}=q_{\text{B}}{\sqrt {{\frac {{\text{MS}}_{\text{error}}}{2}}\left({\frac {1}{n_{i}}}+{\frac {1}{n_{j}}}\right)}}}$

where:

• ${\displaystyle {\text{MS}}_{\text{error}}}$ is the mean squared error from the ANOVA, and
• ${\displaystyle n_{i}}$ and ${\displaystyle n_{j}}$ are the sample sizes of the groups being compared.

If ${\displaystyle \vert {\bar {X}}_{i}-{\bar {X}}_{j}\vert >{\text{CD}}_{\text{B}}}$, the difference is declared statistically significant.

Tukey's B method is a standard post-hoc option in statistical packages such as SPSS,^[1] and provides a middle ground for researchers:

• Error rate control: it offers better control over the family-wise-error rate than the Newman-Keuls method, but is less conservative than Tukey's HSD.^[2]
• Statistical power: it generally has greater statistical power than Tukey's HSD, making it more likely to detect true differences.^[1]

In contemporary statistical practice, the procedure has largely fallen out of favor due to several factors:

• Theoretical grounding: unlike the Tukey HSD, which is rooted in the distribution of the studentized range, Tukey's B lacks a rigorous mathematical justification for its averaging approach.
• Error rate control: because it is a hybrid, it does not guarantee the same level of family-wise error rate protection as more modern, stepwise procedures.
• Availability of alternatives: the development of more powerful and theoretically sound procedures, such as the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch (REGW) or the Fisher-Hayter test, has rendered Tukey's B largely obsolete in most modern statistical software packages.^[4][5]

• Post-hoc analysis
• Multiple comparisons problem
• Tukey's range test
• Newman–Keuls method