User talk:Block411

[redacted]

Your submission at Articles for creation: USPS Postal City (July 4)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Mcmatter, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be blank. If you have not written your text yet, please add your content before resubmitting. If you did write the text, it may be hidden by a formatting error. Please check the "Edit" tab to ensure your text is not inside a comment tag.
Further submittals without putting in some actual context will be met with outright rejection to stop the wasting of our time.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:USPS Postal City to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:09, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Block411! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 05:09, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 4)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, DoubleGrazing, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be blank. If you have not written your text yet, please add your content before resubmitting. If you did write the text, it may be hidden by a formatting error. Please check the "Edit" tab to ensure your text is not inside a comment tag.

Next steps

  • Edit User:Block411/sandbox to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:12, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: User:Block411/sandbox/USPS Postal Cities has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Block411/sandbox/USPS Postal Cities. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:45, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: USPS Postal Cities (July 4)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
This draft provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please see the guide to writing better articles for how to improve your writing.
This article needs to be a summary of reliable sources, as for all encyclopedia entries, not just a list of places where people can go and make their own summary.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:USPS Postal Cities to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

ChrysGalley (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

Hello, Block411, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources. Articles must be written in a neutral manner and may not contain AI generated material.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840✒️ 12:43, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:USPS Postal Cities has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:USPS Postal Cities. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:23, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: USPS Postal Cities (July 5)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection
The reviewer, Nfutvol, left the following feedback:
Borderline abuse of the AfC system. Notability still has not been demonstrated through significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Topic is already sufficiently covered as a section in ZIP Code and a standalone article is not justified in this case.

Next steps

Scam warning

nf utvol (talk) 00:42, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

July 2026

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to ZIP Code did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. If you use a registered account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Editor → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.

Also, please do not add excessive or inappropriate external links.
  –Skywatcher68 (talk) 19:20, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ive retroactively added an edit summary Block411 (talk) 02:59, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.