Callanecc is busy and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is Callanecc's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28Auto-archiving period: 32 days

If you wish to discuss or inform me of a sensitive or private matter please read User:Callanecc/Emailnotice before emailing me.

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If it was a warning or other notice please ping me so I know to look. If you leave me a message: I will answer on this talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages is appreciated.

Template:ACC terms has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Just checking, are you aware this user User talk:DMH223344, is currently making many edits to the Zionism page? Sorry I don't know how to link a talk page subject specifically, but you left something on their talk page regarding a block from the article. All of their edits are either on Israel, Zionism, or the Palestine-Israel conflict; so I just felt I should bring it to your attention. 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 21:06, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Terrainman, I can't see any issues with DMH's editing to that article at the moment. The previous block was specifically for breaking the one-revert restriction on the article rather than any other issue. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:18, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see, I saw that they had a high number of reverted changes to the article recently which is why I brought it up, but looks like those have stayed reverted so you're right it is fine and unrelated to their prior block. Cheers 𝙏𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙢𝙖𝙣地形人 (talk) 23:26, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Admin's Barnstar
		For taking care of the vandalism here and here. Thank you! JeffSpaceman (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks JeffSpaceman. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:16, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the edit history [1]. How am I supposed to do a dispute resolution thing since it's clear vandalism? "war flag" and naval flag has nowhere place in the infobox. Also multiple IP abuse. Beshogur (talk) 14:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pages: Flags of the Ottoman Empire and flag of Turkey. Beshogur (talk) 14:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion on the talk page like you would for any other content dispute and let the other party know it's there (on their talk page). If they then decide not to contribute you deal with it as edit warring. I'd point out that the IP has started a discussion at Talk:Flags of the Ottoman Empire. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 23:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Checkout https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/04028014

Please do not revert it back the article in the Oxford Mail is and was inaccurate, they attributed all my contributions to Charles Chapman a person whom has not being a part of the EXIENT story since 2011. I would like to keep the history as was written previously or I write the correct history but please do not put back something that is factually incorrect. 212.56.159.202 (talk) 14:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a further message on your talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since the temporary protection on Yoon Suk Yeol is because of ip users who vandalise, should it become pending changes for the remainder of the duration? Thanks. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 19:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Freedoxm, looks like Daniel Case has already done this. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 01:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

how is Gurung people considered Tibtian ethinicity when these people are listed as a indiginious Mountain ethinic group of Nepal in Nepal government. there is no such listing in Tibet or in China government official document about Gurung people. on what basis wiki admin has been changing gurung people status as tibetian people can you give some concret expination to it. 2400:1A00:B050:9DB1:81C3:21B3:6CE6:98F9 (talk) 15:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia works on what is verifiable according to reliable sources and agreed by consensus. You should follow the instructions when you try to edit and start a discussion on the talk page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:55, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you did not answerd my question, how is Gurung people tebtian when we are listed as ethinic mountain people of Nepal where as there is no such listed thing in Tibet or in China about Gurung people in there data base. 2400:1A00:B050:6571:64D6:ABA:BC73:2C11 (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't, primarily because it is a content questions that needs to be discussed on the article talk page with reference to reliable secondary sources. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! On 23 December you blocked 2605:8D80:681:0:0:0:0:0/48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for one month. I want to let you know that today an editor on 2605:8D80:684:A125:31BC:E7BB:362A:A022 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) started making similar edits on the same articles as the blocked editor. Based on the similarity of their edits and the close match to the blocked IPv6 range, I am sure that this is block evasion by the same editor. CodeTalker (talk) 21:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the new IP has stopped being used now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Callanecc. Ponyo blocked the /64 of the new IP (2605:8D80:684:A125:0:0:0:0/64) for 72 hours on 15 Jan. The next day the editor resumed block evasion, this time on 2605:8D80:685:1CAB:CC61:1AFE:503:100E (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), which Hey man im josh quickly blocked for 31 hours. As far as I can tell, the editor hasn't edited since then, but they've been making these disruptive edits to the same set of articles since at least October 2024, so I wouldn't be surprised if we see them again. CodeTalker (talk) 02:36, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Back in 2014 you applied 1RR to the article due to edit warring that was occurring at the time. Abbott has been out of politics for a while now and I don't think the restriction is needed anymore. TarnishedPath^talk 02:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TarnishedPath, done. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:02, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability/SPS RfC on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]