User talk:Charles Matthews

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

• /About me
• /Plaudits

Thank you so much, Charles, for creating the article page.

If you are interested as a "lead author" there is a compiled version of the text here https://globalartscollective.org/corruption-of-economics.htm#top, or I cand lend you a copy of the second edition, 2022, from Shepheard-Walwyn Ltd.

PS. I just seen the latest version. You are obviously interested...

Janosabel (talk) 23:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be able to get a library copy of the book. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Charles. Would it be enough for now to make Capitalism As Power into a stub class? Janosabel (talk) 19:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

Best wishes for the season, and beyond! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 66, November – December 2024

• Les Jours and East View Press join the library
• Tech tip: Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --17:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Charles, there is a review of Capital as Power here https://capitalaspower.com/2022/01/owen-lynch-book-review-capital-as-power/

Janosabel (talk) 23:00, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Under WP:UGC, that review is unlikely to be accepted as a reliable source. I have found a review by Salvador Santino Regilme that will be useful. Charles Matthews (talk) 04:04, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good! Thank you. Janosabel (talk) 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What more should I do to make this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Janosabel/sandbox#Capital_As_Power%E2%80%94A_Study_of_Order_and_Creorder into a Stub class entry?

At present it reads like an essay. WP:TONE says that "Articles and other encyclopedic content should be written in a formal tone". Below that, under WP:PRONOUN, it says "Articles should not be written from a first- or second-person perspective." So when you write "I", there is a problem.

What I saw in the review was a reference to the Cambridge capital controversy. This is helpful background. If Capital as Power builds on some positions taken in that controversy, there should be a way to explain the argument of the book more simply. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding references to the draft...

I leave it to you to submit when ready...

PS. I don't want to appear to be sitting back, but just can not understand Wikipedia editing jargon.

Still looking for a mentor for a newbie lesson in London. Posted in Teahouse, no offers yet. Janosabel (talk) 12:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I could recommend my own book (as co-author) wikibooks:How Wikipedia Works. It is Chapter 6 that explains how to start a new article: wikibooks:How Wikipedia Works/Chapter 6. I should comment that some people may think that "how to start a new article" should be Chapter 1, but really it is quite complicated.

That book is from 2009, and you can find it also as a PDF [1] which is in some ways better. There were in fact fewer acronyms in those days! Charles Matthews (talk) 12:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Janosabel (talk) 21:42, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Residue class has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 22 § Residue class until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 23:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Charles Matthews. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Traditional regional associations of Oxford Colleges, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]