Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dreamy Jazz was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sequence to Sequence and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sequence to Sequence, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 10:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GChe! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 10:53, 19 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GChe. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

GermanJoe (talk) 21:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

• Please also note, that blogs - including technical blogs - are usually not considered reliable sources, please see WP:RS for more information. Thank you for your consideration. GermanJoe (talk) 21:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi GermanJoe,

Thanks for letting me know. I am an expert in my field so thanks for linking me to WP:EXPERT and informing me on self-citation policies. I will open a talk on this page to let people know I'd like my open source framework Neuraxle to be listed on that page as this is in my plans. EDIT: it seems that I'll need to wait because the article page would first need to exist before Neuraxle to appear in that list.

Please note that the article that I requested for Creation was declined by Dreamy Jazz, but that it contained only citations to other experts (whom I don't know at all personally). I created the page out of sorrow for seeing that this very important topic in modern artificial intelligence wasn't yet documented. I can't believe that the sequence to sequence (seq2seq) article doesn't exist yet. I find disappointing that it was rejected, but I think that it needed more reference and length (I thought at least creating the page was a first move). My source is VERY RELIABLE, however I might need more, so the reason for rejection is a bit odd. Any help for that?

Thanks, Guillaume Chevalier. 2019, August 26th

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sequence-to-sequence model, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, GChe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sequence-to-sequence model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply