Hi Instant History! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Boud (talk) 20:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks you Boud for your Welcome message, and yeah I liked the space and will keep to stay here! Instant History (talk) 04:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Regarding your edits linking to nationalities, we do not link nationalities on articles per WP:OVERLINK. Thanks. Ss112 04:17, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, Thaks you Sir! Instant History (talk) 04:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have deleted my source on Agim Shala posthumously receiving the Hero of Kosovo award. The source was on facebook, however it shows Agim Shala, Besim Shala, Avdi Shala, and the Shala family in Jeshkova receiving awards. Shqiptar1999 (talk) 19:16, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Facebook Instant History (talk) 04:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Bejai Nerash Naiker. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 13:15, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Instant History -- Thanks for patrolling; I've declined this speedy because A7 is only for articles with no believable claims of significance at all. The Rector of a higher-education college is a clear claim. If you do not believe that Kalu is sufficiently notable for inclusion then I suggest WP:Articles for deletion. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 19:20, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Espresso Addict, thanks for clarification. Instant History (talk) 20:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Save America (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of importance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Save America (book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Save America (book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bejai Nerash Naiker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 17:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

Hello Instant History! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Category misplacement, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:21, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bejai Nerash Naiker".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:23, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gut Microbiome and Mental Health, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 21 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sulaiman Alemran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 21 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gut Microbiome and Mental Health".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Instant History. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Sulaiman Alemran".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Sonyaa Ayoddhya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 23:10, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just to clarify, that wasn’t my draft though. Instant History (talk) 05:59, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Per WP:NSPECIES, all species are automatically notable. I will be moving this back to main article space. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:40, 5 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please keep WP:NPPHOUR in mind while draftification. Since you are using the MTD script, it will show you this warning. Take heed of it in the future. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:50, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for notifying me that, Noted! Instant History (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:01, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to First United Methodist Church (Kissimmee, Florida) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 14:27, 30 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello. This is in regards to your comment at a recent ANI [1]. This comment contained several personal attacks. I replied at the ANI [2]. In any case, I think it would be best if you strike or redact your comment. This particular ANI discussion has come under scrutiny by ARBCOM and sanctions are in place [3]. This means that you can be blocked for such comments. Well, you could be blocked with or without sanctions being in place. So, it is up to you, what you want to do. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 22:57, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Instant History, and thanks for taking a look at Frederick Walter Davis earlier today. I wanted to give you a heads-up on what happened to it, since your edits are now behind a redirect.

It turns out there was already a long-standing article on the same person at Frederick W. Davis (created in September 2007). I hadn't spotted it when I wrote mine, which was my mistake. I've now done a bold merge: the sourced content from my version has been folded into Frederick W. Davis and the old title redirects there, so the page history is preserved for attribution.

On the {{Notability}} tag you added — I didn't carry it across to the merged article, since I think the combined sourcing resolves it. Davis is treated in James Oles's South of the Border: Mexico in the American Imagination (pp. 123–127), in Helen Delpar's The Enormous Vogue of Things Mexican, and in the Davis & Pack and Morrill & Berk surveys of Mexican jewelry and silver, alongside auction-house coverage. If you still think notability is shaky after seeing the merged version, please do re-tag or raise it on the talk page — I'd rather work it out than have you feel steamrolled.

Two of the categories you removed (Category:Mexican jewelry designers and Collectors of Mexican art) I've handled differently: the first is on the merged article since he designed jewellery produced under his own mark, and the second I dropped, as that category doesn't actually exist. Your removal of the red-linked See also entries was right and I haven't restored them.

Thanks again for the review. Properpint (talk) 14:45, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Properpint thanks for informing and explaining all. Instant History (talk) 08:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Obang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no real sources. The one source (with a broken link which appears that it should be to here) doesn't mention the village. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Mahammad Mammadov (scientist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and The majority is unsourced. Everything must have a source. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 12:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 17:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

---

Administrators: If this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue. Admins lifting or loosening such blocks without appropriate authorization may, at the discretion of the Arbitration Committee, be desysopped.