User talk:Jay eyem

Hello, Jay eyem! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! MrBill3 (talk) 21:06, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to WP. I hope you enjoy editing. Kudos for engaging on talk when you have questions about editing. The most important advice I can give is sources a good read of the Identifying reliable sources guideline will greatly facilitate participation in the project. As you are already aware of talk pages you are a good step ahead, when making edits that may be controversial a mention of what you are doing on talk is of great use. It will also provide a forum for you to support your edits. Please have some patience with the community, unfortunately contention and strong points of view are sometimes not well and reasonably argued. The strongest arguments are based on policy and sources. You may want to take a look at some of the WikiProjects based on your area(s) of interest. I am active at WP:WikiProject Medicine and the WP:Fringe theories/Noticeboard. Feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. Best wishes and happy editing. - - MrBill3 (talk) 21:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jay eyem. You have new messages at Secret Agent Julio's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

AFC Ann Arbor

added links pointing to Jack Smith, Colin Watson, Kevin Taylor, Hector Morales and Diego Martinez

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016 MLS All-Star Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of football clubs in Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schönberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2007 Columbus Crew season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Columbus Crew season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Amortias (T)(C) 00:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there JAY, from Portugal,

please, leave the SC in Columbus' name out of the infobox, for compression purposes. The full name will still appear in the storyline and the introduction, so no problem there.

Attentively, happy editing --Quite A Character (talk) 15:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• See? The administrator below told you the same thing, plus i'm willing to reach a compromise (unlike him) and leave the full name in storyline and only compress the box. I give up either way, i leave the article in peace because i don't want to make an edit war out of this. --Quite A Character (talk) 19:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You misinterpreted what he said. It had nothing to do with "compression purposes," and you failed to address the issue I brought up. Jay eyem (talk) 20:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Which is it (i did incur in a potential misunderstanding when i said the admin "told you the same thing", i admit that, i meant to say he also reverted you) --Quite A Character (talk) 20:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gastón Sauro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused. There appears to be a precedent set regarding using "Columbus Crew SC" in the infobox rather than "Columbus Crew." Look at every other player other than Sauro and Pedro Santos, who should have had it labeled as "Columbus Crew SC" in the first place. That is what it has been colloquially called since the name change, intended to differentiate itself from the origional team name. See Kei Kamara's infobox as an example of what I'm talking about. Jay eyem (talk) 19:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you need to address the issue that has been raised at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Clarification_for_Club_Names_in_Infobox before just reverting my edits as vandalism. It is not vandalism, and is not a violation of either of those WIkipedia policies that you mentioned. Please confront the problem directly rather than going behind my back, reverting my edits, and threatening to revoke my editing privileges. Jay eyem (talk) 17:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Jay eyem, thanks for your good work. Keep it up. Don't get disappointed just because you have just met one of the most distructive users (Giant(S)No(w)man) in our sphere. Greetings --Huligan0 (talk) 22:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as File talk:Chris Wingert.jpg, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KatiBOT (talk) 15:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is a bot, but just for the record all I did was tag it for inclusion in WP:FOOTY. Jay eyem (talk) 15:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Never even occurred to me that fake bots were real. Not surprised, but definitely caught off guard. Jay eyem (talk) 21:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I think Ben Mines first playoff goal is notable also Gonzalo Veron scoring in the last match ever at RFK and his first mls playoff goal, can you add that back? Going forward i understand the notability aspect but since these are unique cases can you undo the changes?

thanks

Elopez76 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elopez76 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as I, and the rest of the community, disagree with your assessment (including admins), I will not be adding back the text. The only reason I haven’t reverted the edits at Ben Mines again is because I’m trying to avoid an edit war. You need to bring these arguments up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Jay eyem (talk) 15:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Jay eyem. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Albert Watson (footballer, born 1985), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 09:09, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FC Edmonton folded, so naturally he no longer plays for the team. Do I have to find a source that mentions him specifically to demonstrate this? Jay eyem (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jay eyem. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2012 FC Tucson season, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: for regular events held by notable entities, significance is presumed. Thank you. SoWhy 08:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your prompt action. Footwiks (talk)

Glad we got things sorted out. The reason I originally redirected the article is just because it was the same material. I wasn't intending to negate the importance of the amateur game, etc. Cheers. Jay eyem (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Regrettably, I cannot history-merge El Trafico into El Tráfico, for reasons which are explained at WP:Parallel histories. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jay,

I have begun a template to use for college men's soccer season articles. You can find it here, if you have any ideas to improve the article, be sure to leave a comment on the talk page. Thanks! Quidster4040 (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have tagged 3 pages as MfD [1], but there is no deletion discussion page. So what is your plan? Hhkohh (talk) 09:46, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hhkohh: I'm not real clear on what happened, I'm not super experienced using Twinkle so I don't know that happened or how to fix the issue. I'll try to figure that out soon. Jay eyem (talk) 18:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of these, per my close at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Wyatt Omsberg, these kinds of pages can usually be redirected or tagged for a history merge without coming to MfD. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:18, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Premeditated Chaos: good to know for the future, thanks. Jay eyem (talk) 19:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oka Nikolov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful when adding categories as eg here - you've added a bunch of categories with typos in, which leads to red links which are banned per WP:REDNOT. Please go back and fix the likes of Category:Association footballer defenders, Category:Association footballer forwards and Category:Association footballer midfielders - it's not helpful to have broken categories like that.Le Deluge (talk) 10:21, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Le Deluge: thank you for catching that, can't believe I didn't notice the typo. I'll fix it now. Jay eyem (talk) 14:57, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jay eyem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jay! Thank you for your contribution at the WP:FOOTY talk page. I wanted to share with you the Wikipedia:Hatnote wikilink so that you can see the different types of hatnotes for articles. These are especially useful for the intra-wiki web of connections. I hope it proves useful during your editing travels through Wikipedia! Sincerely.--MarshalN20 ^✉🕊 18:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MarshalN20: Awesome! I'm slowly learning the ins and outs of Wikipedia and knew these existed, but for the most part wasn't sure how to create them. Thank you for the link! Jay eyem (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am wondering why you removed my post on Portal:Current events/2020 February 7 about an Anti-Vax group causing a boy to die. You used the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not as your reason to remove the post. I would like to discuss this with you. I consider it to be just notable enough to get a mention on the page, because an Anti-Vaccination group, using Facebook, convinced a mother to basically kill her son. It is almost like a remote murder. Thank you for responding.Elijahandskip (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. An iPad isn’t the best editing platform. Kleuske (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kleuske: No apology needed, but thank you! I've just been going through a bunch of football articles and re-rating them and I was surprised to see it reverted so quickly lol. Sorry if my tone was harsh! Jay eyem (talk) 16:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a lot of discussion over various football task forces about the relevance of applying WP:FPL to Women's teams and Women's players, as this guideline was set up principally for Male players, Male teams, Male competitions. Currently there are only 2 countries with Women's leagues listed as fully professional (England and USA). Therefore to apply this guideline strictly - using Male criteria where professionalism started developing decades earlier - we need to remove literally THOUSANDS of articles for all female soccer/football players who have not played for their national teams, who have not played in the 2 leagues deemed professional. I invite you to research this further and look at these discussions. Matilda Maniac (talk) 00:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Matilda Maniac: the place for this discussion is on WT:FPL or WT:FOOTY, not here. Plus I think FPL is actually too lax for inclusion for most player articles anyway. Jay eyem (talk) 00:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't so much for discussion, more as information/education. Matilda Maniac (talk) 22:26, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well the place to discuss the issue is not in the various task forces either, but on the guideline itself or the project itself. I have seen no discussion exempting women footballers from this criteria. Jay eyem (talk) 03:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope all is well. I issued a warning on said IP user's page, and they still attempted to remove the information of female players on the wiki midfielder article even so. This had already been going on repeatedly, as you know as you have reverted their edits, so this seems to be a clear case of vandalism at this point. Would it be possible to block them at this point? These are the only edits they have ever made on wikipedia. I think we should consider blocking them because of this; I don't have the authority to do so, but would you know anyone who could, because this has become very frustrating. Thanks! Best, Messirulez (talk) 19:09, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Messirulez: I would wait to see if it happens again first, just because they were not directly given warnings before on their talk page. If it happens again, just report them to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, they usually act pretty quickly. Jay eyem (talk) 23:07, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for the Orlando City All Time Roster page. Did you compile this list by hand and what source did you use if you don't mind me asking? I am creating a database of Orlando City stats and this data is a tremendous help! A.S. Williams (talk) 02:04, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to clarify, once a team qualifies for the NCAA Tournament (men's or women's) then a season page is justified per NSEASONS? I noticed some historical ACC articles that I've created have been getting re-directed and just wanted to understand the outcome of the conversations. Thanks Swimmer33 (talk) 15:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Swimmer33: that's the established consensus, yes. Ultimately an article still needs to meet WP:GNG but I think over time we have determined that a team that makes the NCAA tournament tends to have significant coverage. I looked over the coverage for those articles briefly before redirecting and didn't see any, but I was mostly undoing a mass reversion done by another editor against the consensus established at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Ohio State Buckeyes men's soccer team. I don't own any articles of course, so if you can establish GNG for those seasons, go for it! Jay eyem (talk) 15:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to double check because I've made all the season articles for the 2021 ACC season, so I guess I should stop doing that because at the end of the season, when some teams don't make the tournament, they will be re-directed. My general practice had been to make them before the season and keep them updated as the season progressed, but I suppose that will have to change. Swimmer33 (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Swimmer33: I think that's fair. My personal opinion is to wait until the NCAA tournament teams are announced before these team season articles are made, just because I think making the tournament gives it that extra little boost of notability. And that's not to discourage any work you've done, I've seen the articles you have made they do look good, I just think we should focus on being consistent with Wikipedia's guidelines. Cheers! Jay eyem (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I'll wait before creating further soccer articles then. Are you going to re-direct the pages for the season in progress now or should I keep updating them until the NCAA Tournament gets announced? If you're re-directing, I believe there are also some women's pages that need to be re-directed. I've created FSU, UNC, Duke, UVA, Boston College, and Clemson. Maybe for this season we'll just wait till the tourney gets announced and then re-direct appropriately. Swimmer33 (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @Swimmer33: Honestly the only ones I redirected were the ones that were reverted by another user during the then-ongoing AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Ohio State Buckeyes men's soccer team, and that was only because between 50-60 were reverted in a span of a few hours. I'm not going to hunt down every article that doesn't make the tournament and redirect it because I don't think that's a productive use of my time or anyone else's. And I personally would rather not deal with anything relating to the women's college game, I'll leave that to members of WP:WFOOTY. Jay eyem (talk) 20:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mu'nas Dabbur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	I hope we can work together to maintain and update pages related CONCACAF soccer. Dazzling4 (talk) 05:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The information you are changing is factually wrong, the football team (selecció) of Catalonia is not a national team. Please refrain from spreading misinformation out of political ideology, this is meant to be an encyclopedia, not a pamphlet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Chumbo One (talk • contribs) 12:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As far as justification for what sports items to include on the sidebar, I would suggest starting with comparing the total views of the WP articles for the relevant leagues. Farolif (talk) 23:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm I suppose I see some validity in that. Alternative proposal: using the leagues with the highest revenues as a cutoff. These are the largest leagues in the world and won't have a bias towards English-speaking or English-adjacent nations. I suspect that most of the larger leagues that have lower pageviews in English is likely due to use in their own native language. If anything, that makes a more compelling argument to shorten the list than make it longer. Jay eyem (talk) 00:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If we go by total revenue as the main indicator, then should remove Campeonata Brasileiro. According to the list you've referenced, they take in less money than the major leagues in China, Russia, or Japan, and we aren't including any of those. Not to mention the current season article's pageviews on English WP are comparatively low. Farolif (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine by me, I'm sure the primary viewers of that league primarily use the Portuguese page anyway. Plus the 2022 MLS season just ended yesterday, can probably go ahead and remove that as well. Jay eyem (talk) 22:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jay eyem! Your additions to 2022 MLS Expansion Draft have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: woah wait, what the hell?? All I did was use the previous article as a reference, and there hasn't ever been any copyright issue in the past for these kinds of articles, so why is this one an exception?? Jay eyem (talk) 16:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The format of the draft, which was a substantial part of the article was a verbatim copy of the source. You can't do that, even if you cite the source. If you have done this for other articles, please identify them so that they can have the copyrighted text replaced with a rewritten section that doesn't copy the source text. Thanks. -- Whpq (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: I have only been using the previous year's draft article as a template while replacing the relevant information per year. It looks like the other affected articles are 2020 MLS Expansion Draft and 2021 MLS Expansion Draft judging based on their similarity to what I added to the 2022 page, but I imagine every expansion draft would have used a significant amount of information from the league sources. I genuinely don't mean any harm here, but with any sort of possibility of getting blocked for this, I don't think I will be touching these articles anymore. Sorry if what I said came across poorly. Jay eyem (talk) 16:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't going to get blocked for a good faith effort to create an article. I encourage you to continue to contribute to these articles. I think you understand you can't copy the source text. Thank you for listing out the articles. I will have a look at them. -- Whpq (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just rewrote the "format" section of 2020 MLS Expansion Draft. I suggest that you use that as a guide, and give rewriting the "format" section of 2021 MLS Expansion Draft a try. It would be good practice for any future articles on MLS expansion. Let me know if you are going to give a go. If not, I will do a rewrite. -- Whpq (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mu'nas Dabbur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you write topics for Womens soccer as well? Hyperactive343434 (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jay eyem. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Graz derby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jay eyem. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Graz derby".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rutgers Scarlet Knights men's soccer seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is it okay if I can just ask you if you think Fa30sp's manner and attitude is acceptable. Personally, he seems to lack respect when writing his comments. Should he be told to speak and write a more respectable fashion or am I overthinking it? ILoveSport2006 (talk) 21:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I forgot to say, he is now calling people useless, which is disrespectful. ILoveSport2006 (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ILoveSport2006: I would certainly describe the edit summaries for their edits on 2025 FIFA Club World Cup and 2029 FIFA Club World Cup as disruptive and uncivil. Since this is otherwise a content dispute, I want to avoid taking the issue to WP:ANI if possible, but we will see if it continues. Jay eyem (talk) 21:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bro hahahaha if u think I lack respect when writing you need to come talk w/ me, so we can clear up the situation. Because that's not my intention here!

But u act like a child coming in other users talk page to cry!

Come on bro hahahaha, help me help you! Fa30sp (talk) 04:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taken to WP:ANI. You can discuss the matter there, not on my talk page. Jay eyem (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jay eyem - I hope your doing well. If you get a moment, would it be okay if you could contribute an article or two (or few) towards Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/The 1000 Destubbing Challenge? We're so close to reaching the goal - I've been doing a lot of it by myself but it's really long overdue that I ask for help xD - no worries if you can't! RossEvans19 (talk) 02:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]