This user may have left Wikipedia. Johann Wolfgang has not edited Wikipedia since November 17, 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Dear Johann Wolfgang,

I apologize for the inconvenience, but have no other way than appealing for administrators’ help recover a deleted article.

I published a film article entitled Drits (Derivas), a film by Portuguese director Ricardo Costa. It is the second film from an autobiographic trilogy, Faraways. The article was kept untouched by several months. To my surprise, it was recently eliminated and redirected to the director’s page with no discussion. I undid the redirection, but saw the article was proposed to deletion. Reason: independent, verifiable, secondary resources. I argued that the article couldn’t have but primary sources (the producer’s ones) as it is an upcoming film, like many others listed at upcoming films. A film that has not yet been premiered or distributed may not be commented. Besides, none of the films so listed has ever been deleted or even contested.

At last, in discussion, user User:reddogsix proposed that the article should be renamed to Drifts (film) or similar, and at the same time put at the disambiguation page of Dritf this reference «Drifs, unreleased film by Ricardo Costa (filmmaker). I created a new page for the same article entitled Drifts (Portuguese film). As the semantic root “drift” seemed to be the problem, I replaced the article name to Derivas (Drifts) and published it once more with some improvements. As a result, the article was fast deleted and I blocked for three days.

In the meantime, a new article about the trilogy was published: Faraways, which was proposed to fast deletion as well by the same user, User:reddogsix.

Although unreleased, although having no reliable secondary sources, Drifts is unquestionably an outstanding film for its uniqueness and characteristics: autobiography, comedy, docufiction, metafiction in one. I guess that “outstanding” may be a synonym for “notable” in such cases and that articles like this shouldn’t be deleted without previous cared analyses: important information may be lost.

This sequence of interventions is clearly a personal attack by User:reddogsix, supported by two or three user friend. It has no other explanation. It contributes in nothing to improve articles quality. Mists article, which I created on 10 September 2010, is the latest example. The article structure was unreasonably modified, loosing clarity and useful content.

NOTE: sent to 30 administrators.

Thanks for your attention, User:Tertulius 21:48, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-07-28T21:48:00.000Z","author":"Tertulius","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Tertulius-2013-07-28T21:48:00.000Z-Articles_deletion","replies":[],"displayName":"User:Tertulius"}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BarbadosCoin-dime-1987-obverse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:11:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:11:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:BarbadosCoin-dime-1987-obverse.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BarbadosCoin-dime-1987-reverse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:11:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:11:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:BarbadosCoin-dime-1987-reverse.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BarbadosCoin-penny-1986-obverse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:12:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:12:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:BarbadosCoin-penny-1986-obverse.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BarbadosCoin-penny-1986-reverse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:12:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:12:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:BarbadosCoin-penny-1986-reverse.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Calgary-100-1875-1975-obverse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:25:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:25:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Calgary-100-1875-1975-obverse.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Calgary-100-1875-1975-reverse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:25:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:25:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Calgary-100-1875-1975-reverse.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Calgary2-100-1875-1975-obverse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:26:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:26:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Calgary2-100-1875-1975-obverse.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Calgary2-100-1875-1975-reverse.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2013-10-15T15:27:00.000Z","author":"Stefan2","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Stefan2-2013-10-15T15:27:00.000Z-Possibly_unfree_File:Calgary2-100-1875-1975-reverse.JPG","replies":[]}}-->

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 06:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-01-01T06:38:00.000Z","author":"Moe Epsilon","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Moe_Epsilon-2014-01-01T06:38:00.000Z-Notification_of_pending_suspension_of_administrative_permissions_due_to_inactivi","replies":[],"displayName":"Moe"}}-->

Your upload of File:BarbadosCoin-dollar-1988-obverse.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-01-18T12:51:00.000Z","author":"Theo's Little Bot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:51:00.000Z-Notification_of_automated_file_description_generation","replies":["c-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:53:00.000Z-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:51:00.000Z","c-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-19T12:49:00.000Z-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:51:00.000Z","c-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-19T12:51:00.000Z-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:51:00.000Z"]}}-->

• Another one of your uploads, File:BarbadosCoin-quarter-1973-reverse.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-01-18T12:53:00.000Z","author":"Theo's Little Bot","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:53:00.000Z-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:51:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

• Another one of your uploads, File:BarbadosCoin-quarter-1973-obverse2.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:49, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-01-19T12:49:00.000Z","author":"Theo's Little Bot","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-19T12:49:00.000Z-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:51:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

• Another one of your uploads, File:BarbadosCoin-dollar-1988-reverse.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:51, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-01-19T12:51:00.000Z","author":"Theo's Little Bot","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-19T12:51:00.000Z-Theo's_Little_Bot-2014-01-18T12:51:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-01-25T03:50:00.000Z","author":"MadmanBot","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MadmanBot-2014-01-25T03:50:00.000Z-Notification_of_imminent_suspension_of_administrative_permissions_due_to_inactiv","replies":[]}}-->

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Acalamari 22:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-02-01T22:23:00.000Z","author":"Acalamari","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Acalamari-2014-02-01T22:23:00.000Z-Suspension_of_administrative_permissions_due_to_inactivity","replies":[]}}-->

Hi Johann Wolfgang, welcome back! Yes, you can ask to have them restored: the bureaucrats' noticeboard is the correct place to ask for them back. All you need to do is start a new discussion section on the noticeboard, as you would a regular talk page, in which you state you've returned and would like to have your adminship restored. There will be a 24-hour wait from the start of your request; this wait is the reason why I can't give them back to you right now. Hope this helps; do let me know if you need anything else. Acalamari 10:12, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2014-11-17T10:12:00.000Z","author":"Acalamari","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Acalamari-2014-11-17T10:12:00.000Z-Your_note","replies":[]}}-->

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2015-11-23T13:07:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2015-11-23T13:07:00.000Z-ArbCom_elections_are_now_open!","replies":[]}}-->

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Johann Wolfgang|JW]]..<font color="blue">[</font> [[User_talk:Johann Wolfgang|<span style="color:green;">T</span>]]..[[Special:Contributions/Johann_Wolfgang|<span style="color:orange;">C</span>]] <font color="blue">]</font> <font color="307D7E"></font> : JW..[ T..C ]

to

[[User:Johann Wolfgang|JW]]..<span style="color: blue;">[</span> [[User_talk:Johann Wolfgang|<span style="color: green;">T</span>]]..[[Special:Contributions/Johann_Wolfgang|<span style="color: orange;">C</span>]] <span style="color: blue;">]</span> : JW..[ T..C ]

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 20:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2017-12-04T20:58:00.000Z","author":"Anomalocaris","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Anomalocaris-2017-12-04T20:58:00.000Z-Your_signature","replies":[]}}-->

The article Scale focus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Much better (sourced) version of content is in Depth of Field

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe (talk) 19:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-02-13T19:49:00.000Z","author":"Joereddington","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Joereddington-2019-02-13T19:49:00.000Z-Proposed_deletion_of_Scale_focus","replies":[],"displayName":"Joe"}}-->

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-04-10T18:09:00.000Z","author":"MediaWiki message delivery","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-MediaWiki_message_delivery-2019-04-10T18:09:00.000Z-WikiProject_Numismatics_newsletter","replies":[]}}-->

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-10-19T23:29:00.000Z","author":"ZLEA","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-ZLEA-2019-10-19T23:29:00.000Z-2019_US_Banknote_Contest","replies":[]}}-->

Please contact me ASAP alsopcalverkhail@gmail.com 2001:56B:9FE5:A9A1:2C07:D294:77DF:9091 (talk) 13:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2022-06-14T13:01:00.000Z","author":"2001:56B:9FE5:A9A1:2C07:D294:77DF:9091","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-2001:56B:9FE5:A9A1:2C07:D294:77DF:9091-2022-06-14T13:01:00.000Z-Toxoplasma_lens_curvature_&_bloodline(s)","replies":[]}}-->