Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of mainstream rock performers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of rock genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please take care not to add entries to this master list unless they are included in one of the sublists, for which they are required to have media across multiple franchises. For example a television show with multiple television spinoffs is only in a single media and is not multimedia. BD2412 T 04:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@BD2412 I'm sorry LoganDocManBoy2000 (talk) 04:40, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of rock genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Binksternet Sorry LoganDocManBoy2000 (talk) 14:00, 6 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of hip-hop genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Solidest (talk) 04:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Solidest Oh brother LoganDocManBoy2000 (talk) 04:59, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mfield (Oi!) 06:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Admin note - repeatedly pulling up to the 3RR line on the same article and then returning later is no better than blowing right through that limit. If you continue to edit war on this article you will be blocked from editing it entirely. Mfield (Oi!) 06:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of rock genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please take a look at the template categorization guidelines for how to correctly add categorization to templates.

And also at Help:Colon trick for how to link to categories. In a nutshell: [[Category:X1]] is not the same as [[:Category:X1]]. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:38, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wikitext for categorization of templates must be placed inside tag <noinclude>...</noinclude>. Your edit to Template:Folk music broke categorization of articles, where the template is used, because wikitext [[Category:Music genre templates]] was placed after the closing tag </noinclude>. —⁠andrybak (talk) 04:18, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Atmospheric doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 05:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Symphonic doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias (talk) 06:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Doom folk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias (talk) 06:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Without any references, there can be no article. See Help:Referencing for beginners to learn how to cite sources. However, after a further search, I am skeptical this term is notable at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atmospheric doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Symphonic doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 05:39, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Folk doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and require WP:RS, WP:IS and needs to be rewritten. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 06:19, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Symphonic doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Folk doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EatingCarBatteries was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Folk doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EatingCarBatteries _{(contributions, talk)} 06:28, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tenshi Hinanawi was:

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Articles for Creation help desk or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may also advise you to visit the help desk.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Symphonic doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:08, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Folk doom (2nd time). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and republished unsourced article . I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 17:59, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Will you please make Folk Doom abd Symphonic Doom real pages on Wikipedia please I am begging you please make those 2 Heavy Metal genres real genres on Wikipedia already please ~2025-41752-95 (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Symphonic doom (2nd draftify). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and once again no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Atmospheric doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of rock genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 18:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

What ever happened to editing any page you want I mean this is ridiculous calling me out time and time again because of my ferocious habit of editing Wikipedia pages left and right why can't you just let me do my job and leave me alone in peace and quiet please ~2025-41752-95 (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is a collaborative place, not a private publishing platform for you alone. There are rules here, and folks must abide by the rules or face the consequences.

You keep creating pages with no supporting citations, and you keep adding less relevant stuff to the List of rock genres. This behavior is definitely going to get you noticed. Binksternet (talk) 18:33, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

And yet there are some non-rock genres that do have influences/elements of rock or rock adjacent things like Acid Jazz is sort of an offshoot of Acid Rock with jazz elements thrown in there so you gotta agree with me on that one ~2025-41688-62 (talk) 20:24, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Soul music. Binksternet (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Zinnober9 (talk) 06:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

As much as your recent mass addition of Category:Lists of rock music groups is appreciated, all those lists are already under sub-categories of that same category, and thus your edits are superfluous.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 13:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I agree. @LoganDocMan2000, please stop this. I suggest reading Wikipedia:Categorization, especially WP:SUBCAT, before doing any more categorization tasks on Wikipedia. Woodroar (talk) 23:01, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I am so sorry folks LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hey, no worries. Mistakes happen, just try not to make them again.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 21:53, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

The same issue is happening now with the pages created below. Please acknowledge the messages @LoganDocMan2000. Thank you aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 08:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I see that you are a newer member of the project. Welcome! If you would like advice or guidance, I'm happy to lend my experience. Happy editing!--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 21:55, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lists of classical composers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Sophisticatedevening^(talk) 00:44, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lists of British music artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:27, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of folk music artists. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of experimental music artists. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of electronic music artists. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of reggae artists. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of rhythm and blues artists. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:36, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of heavy metal artists. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:42, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of punk rock artists. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:43, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of hardcore punk bands. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:45, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of extreme heavy metal bands. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of death metal bands. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:47, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of black metal bands. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. In general, a list should not simply be links to other lists. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:49, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia with 7,225,434 articles.

Getting Started

Tutorial

Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse

Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center

Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

And, you have been warned a lot in the past. Please edit reliable.

Happy editing!

هادية أنسو (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of List of power trios. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:List of power trios, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you.
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of power trios, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 09:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of brown eyed soul musicians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of brown eyed soul musicians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:41, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to List of Latin metal bands. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 11:44, 30 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please just make more lists of artists depending on different music genres please LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 00:08, 2 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of animated feature films after 1970. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

1970 seems like an arbitrary date to choose for a separation.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:03, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 01:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Maybe you misunderstood: I didn't meant it as a good thing. I've added tags to the page and don't believe that it meets WP:NLIST. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 23:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Lists of animated feature films after 1970. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and see List of animated feature films before 1940 for example on how to write similar article.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Lists of animated feature films before 1970. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and see previous. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 07:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Could you please stop adding ‘classical hip hop’ to the list of subgenres? You’ve been doing this since December, and you've been reverted more than five times, but you keep repeating. Nowhere in the article does it say that this is a genre, it’s a radio format, and we don’t include them in the list of genres. It has been placed at the bottom in the ‘See also’ section. Solidest (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay first of all it is Classic Hip Hop not Classical Hip Hop second of all I didn't want the list of Hip Hop genres to go without Classic Hip Hop and third of all you should definitely leave Classic Hip Hop where it should be because it is totally a subgenre of Hip Hop just like Classic Rock is a subgenre of Rock music and Classic Country is a subgenre of Country music LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 01:20, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

To add these items to genre lists, you should include these statements in the articles and back them up with WP:RS. Until this is done, it is just your WP:OR and they should not be included in the genre lists. If you continue to add them back, despite the fact that this contradicts the content of the articles, I will unfortunately have to appeal to WP:RAA. Solidest (talk) 02:03, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of musicians by genre. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of musicians by geography. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:17, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000. Thank you for your work on Lists of music instrumentalists. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:NLIST. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:18, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm RandomPerson238. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of disco artists (F–K) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RandomPerson238 02:34, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

That is because I made a list of Disco artists encompassing everything from A to Z already LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 02:37, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the misunderstanding. Next time, changing it to a redirect or noting in the edit summary would be helpful. I've changed it to a redirect for you. Thanks, RandomPerson238 02:44, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

No problem you're welcome LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 02:46, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Bold mergers are permitted if uncontroversial, however the pages must be redirected and all appropriate WP:MERGE procedures adhered to especially those concerning attribution, thank you. ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 03:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

You got it LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

All good. Issues now remedied. Previous versions indicate the page was split due to WP:PEIS issues, though that is clearly no longer an issue, assuming it was ever one to begin with. ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 03:31, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Awesome LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:32, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article List of easy listening genres has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citations at all. This is basically a list of what the author thinks are genres that belong in easy listening.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Talk:List of easy listening genresthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. LeviAckerman3855 (talk) 06:20, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of experimental music genres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be draftified.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of experimental music genres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

LeviAckerman3855 (talk) 06:27, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of rhythm and blues genres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be draftified.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rhythm and blues genres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

LeviAckerman3855 (talk) 06:27, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of contemporary folk genres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be draftified.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of contemporary folk genres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

LeviAckerman3855 (talk) 06:27, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm ~2026-14944-70. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 03:32, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry but I had to put the hardcore punk subgenres in the punk rock subgenres page because hardcore punk itself was feeling lonely or something like that so I moved the hardcore punk subgenres over there and then I deleted the hardcore punk genres page and whatever LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:35, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your response is rather opaques, but none of the policies or procedures have anything to do with loneliness. If you wish a page moved and are unable to effect the move yourself, make a listing at WP:RM/TR. If instead you believe a redirect should be deleted, make a listing at WP:RFD; detailed instructions at WP:RFDHOWTO. ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 15:11, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay it is for consolidation once again LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 16:15, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

If by consolidate you mean WP:MERGE, see WP:PROMERGE. ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 22:29, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Okay fine I was merging pages all right LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 22:31, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

That is fine, just make sure you follow the procedure. If there were previous cases where you copied content without making a link to the source page as detailed in that procedure and WP:CWW, see WP:RIA for how to fix things. Otherwise just adhere to the procedure and there should not be any issues. ~2026-14944-70 (talk) 22:37, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Gotcha LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 22:46, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Rock music, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 01:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 01:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Doom folk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:08, 6 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ScalarFactor, left the following feedback:

This draft does not include any sources or inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. You should also use inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

• quotations;
• any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
• any material about living people.

Learn how to create inline citations in the:

• Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup.
• VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Doom folk to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ScalarFactor (talk) 04:45, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Category:Popular music navigational boxes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 16:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

You can merge this already if you want to LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 21:03, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atmospheric doom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please give every genre of music their own dedicated Wikipedia page please LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 18:38, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Folk doom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Symphonic doom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Folk doom (2nd time), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:09, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Symphonic doom (2nd draftify), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atmospheric doom (2nd draft), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Punk rock, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Editor → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! —⁠andrybak (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Andrybak What seems to be the problem this time LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 21:36, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Out of your edits 98.4% don't have edit summaries, while only 1.6% have edit summaries. This is the problem, and unfortunately, after notices earlier this year in January and in April, it is still a problem today.

Please always use edit summaries. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:21, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Andrybak I need to work on that LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 22:31, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

It looks like it didn't help at all. Now the stats are at 98.8% of edits without edit summaries. This makes reviewing your edits harder for other editors.

Communicating your intentions about your edits in edit summaries in an important part of the collaborative nature of the project. Please enable the checkbox recommended in the original message. —⁠andrybak (talk) 13:34, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Atmospheric doom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:08, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Folk doom".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:33, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Atmospheric doom".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@DreamRimmer bot II Just delete it already please LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Folk doom".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@DreamRimmer bot II Just delete it already please LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Symphonic doom".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 18:26, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@DreamRimmer bot II Just delete it already please LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 18:28, 19 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Stop adding regional music scenes such as British rock music, Japanese rock, Japanese metal, etc., to Category:Rock music genres. Those articles are about a wide range of music from those countries, not specific, defined musical genres. Hence why they are listed in the infoboxes at Rock music and Heavy metal music as "Regional scenes" and not as "subgenres". Xfansd (talk) 01:44, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh okay my mistake and yet I thought that regional rock counts as a real genre of rock music LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 01:46, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please stop linking to other navboxes in the below section of navboxes as you have here and many, many other places. Navboxes are for navigating between articles. --woodensuperman 10:08, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Woodensuperman Sorry my mistake LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 15:11, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

And yet you're still doing it - this is just one example that I have had to undo. --woodensuperman 13:03, 14 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aw crap LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 01:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

And STILL you're doing it!!! --woodensuperman 10:34, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Honestly, this is beyond a joke now. You're replacing valid links with template links. Please. DO NOT add template links into navboxes. You are creating a hell of a mess. --woodensuperman 10:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Woodensuperman I'm sorry LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 12:31, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Woodensuperman Aw nuts LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 12:30, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have previously been told off for adding too many lists to this category that were already present in relevant subcategories, and now you try to completely nuke the category? This is deeply disruptive, and I highly suggest you refrain from making similar edits in the future! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 14:27, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Vif12vf I am so sorry LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi LoganDocMan2000! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of List of power trios. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:List of power trios, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:55, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Revirvlkodlaku Sorry my mistake LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 15:04, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just a reminder that you need to be careful when you're categorizing templates. Most of the time you do it correctly, but in the past couple of weeks there's been more than one instance where you placed the "XX navigational boxes" category outside the noinclude tags, thus causing all of the articles that had the template on them to become categorized as "navigational boxes" and forcing other people to clean up the error. So just a reminder that you need to be careful about this, and ensure that the category is inside noinclude tags so that it doesn't get transcluded onto all of the template's uses. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Bearcat Gotcha LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you understood, then why am I having to fix templates again because you placed categories outside the noinclude tags and caused them to get transcluded onto articles again? Bearcat (talk) 03:50, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have no idea LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:51, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Try harder then, because paying attention to what you're doing isn't that difficult Bearcat (talk) 04:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

And I just had to fix yet another instance of you adding a navbox category to a navbox outside the noinclude tags, thus causing the navbox category to get transcluded onto every article, draft or user sandbox page that had the template on it. Are you planning to actually start listening at some point? Bearcat (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Bearcat No not exactly LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Bearcat I mean yes LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Also, please stop adding template categories to categories with articles: Special:Diff/1364899658, Special:Diff/1364899520, Special:Diff/1364898552, Special:Diff/1364899496. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:20, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Andrybak What is wrong with doing just that LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Using the first diff as an example: articles in the category Category:News Corporation subsidiaries do not belong in category Category:United States mass media company navigational boxes because the former is for articles, which aren't navigational boxes, and the latter is for navigational boxes, which aren't articles.

If you have trouble understanding the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization, please consider asking for help at Wikipedia:Teahouse. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:43, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Andrybak Oh okay LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 17:45, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

And you're STILL doing it! [1] and [2] --woodensuperman 08:07, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Woodensuperman What do you want me to do about this problem LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 13:02, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

How about not do it again? --woodensuperman 13:22, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Woodensuperman This time I will stop for reals no more screwing up with the templates navigational pages or anything else on Wikipedia unless it is acceptable or necessary LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 13:23, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, just dropping by to let you know that when you add a template to a page you don't need to include the word "Template" inside the brackets {{ }}, it's fine to just use the name. Happy editing. ★Trekker (talk) 12:26, 22 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to List of bubblegum pop artists. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Significa liberdade What can I do to make this page better LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 14:52, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! You'll want to do two main things to improve this article:

1. Make sure the list meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for lists: One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines, and other guidelines on appropriate stand-alone lists. The entirety of the list does not need to be documented in sources for notability, only that the grouping or set in general has been. Because the group or set is notable, the individual entries in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists through methods such as only including entries for independently notable items. This means you'll need to find reliable, independent sources that discuss bubblegum pop as a whole.
2. Expand the lead section. This section should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points.

To help you create this article, you may want to check out examples of Featured Lists, which have been reviewed by experienced editors and designated as having met high expectations. That said, I do not see any similar lists having met these standards. Regardless, addressing the above concerns will greatly improve the article.

I hope this makes sense! Let me know if you have any follow-up questions, comments, and/or concerns. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:48, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:

This draft does not have sufficient content to warrant a standalone article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Bubblegum music.

• Edit the existing article to include your text and citations into an appropriate section.
• If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's Talk page.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:List of bubblegum pop artists to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to List of post-Britpop bands. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:04, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

As correctly pointed out by another editor, this list already exists in mainspace and there's no reasonable explanation for a WP:SPLIT at this time.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be a duplicate of an existing article. Wikipedia does not permit multiple articles on the same topic.

• To improve the existing article, please edit it directly at Post-Britpop#List_of_artists. If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's talk page.
• If you are writing about a different subject with the same name, ask the reviewer to rename your draft to distinguish it.

No justification for WP:SPLIT

Next steps

• Edit Draft:List of post-Britpop bands to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:06, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Huey Lewis and the News, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:48, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Binksternet It said that Huey Lewis and the News was listed in the Yacht Rock artist list so I had to put them under Yacht Rock groups LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why are you looking at Wikipedia for your information? Wikipedia is considered unreliable per WP:USERG.

Huey Lewis must be described as a yacht rock artist in reliable sources, and those sources must be summarized and cited in the article.

If there's nothing about yacht rock in the Huey Lewis article itself, then you must put it in there yourself before applying the category. Binksternet (talk) 04:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Binksternet I am so sorry buddy LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 04:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

No worries. I'll start working on the cleanup. Binksternet (talk) 04:07, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Binksternet Of course you will LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 04:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Binksternet Why did you have to delete my Yacht Rock groups category I mean come on man I was just adding stuff to the Wikipedia categories list of music artists and things like that LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 13:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edits like Special:Diff/1354195429/1367441753, Special:Diff/1177913520/1367442592, and Special:Diff/1337676346/1367442818 are disruptive. You don't follow advice given to you on your talk page despite promises (User talk:LoganDocMan2000#Template links in navboxes and User talk:LoganDocMan2000#Templates). You don't engage with the edit summaries when your edits are reverted (Special:Diff/1365013090, Special:Diff/1361064615, Special:Diff/1364923591).

Please stop editing template categories. —⁠andrybak (talk) 06:23, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Andrybak Okay my bad LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 13:02, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Andrybak Any chance of some cleanup help? Loads more template category edits, and now having issues such as Category:Nickelodeon navigational boxes listing show articles that are very clearly not templates. Magitroopa (talk) 17:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Magitroopa What is even the stinking difference between a navigational box and a template I mean come on man stop me calling me out so many times already please LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 17:35, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Review WP:NAVBOX and please participate in the discussion(s) at ANI. --Super Goku V (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Magitroopa, many articles showing up in a template category usually means that the categorization wikitext got placed outside the <noinclude>...</noinclude> tags in a template of that category. These issues are also reported at Wikipedia:Database reports/Template categories containing articles. —⁠andrybak (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Andrybak I'm sorry folks I was just fooling around with adding and subtracting content here and there please don't terminate my Wikipedia account I will stop terrorizing your website I won't do it again I promise just please give me one more chance here please LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 23:27, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive edits within many templates (primarily regarding categories). Magitroopa (talk) 17:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

There is also a separate discussion at ANI called User behaviour issues, though I am trying to see if we can get the relevant part folded into the discussion linked to above. --Super Goku V (talk) 23:20, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V What have I been doing wrong this time LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 23:21, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Quoting: "Editor continues with highly disruptive edits among templates (...) primarily regarding adding categories to templates", "It feels like less of a WP:NOTHERE and more of a WP:CIR issue (...)", & "(...) editing interests appear to revolve exclusively around adding navbox templates to navbox categories, which he frequently does by plopping the category down outside noinclude tags so that it gets transcluded onto every article, draft or sandbox page that's invoking said template, but which don't belong in navbox categories because they aren't navboxes."

Also going to point you to WP:NOINCLUDE based on those quotes. --Super Goku V (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@LoganDocMan2000: Just wanted to let you know that the ANI discussion has been unarchived. (Specifically, there were two discussions involving you. The latter one got partly merged into the earlier one which seems to have been overlooked.) If you believe that it should be re-archived or that the issue has been resolved, then you should respond to either this message or the discussion at ANI as soon as possible. Thank you for your time, Super Goku V (talk) 02:46, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V You don't understand I was just getting rid of the categories that said artists not musicians I got the musicians made and they aren't going anywhere LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 02:51, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V What have you been discussing about is it about animation LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 02:59, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

(Replying to both) Part of the ANI discussion is about animation and part of it is stuff that does not have to do with animation. Regardless, in what way do I not understand? Would it be something that would cause me to re-archive the discussion? (I don't believe so partly due to User:LoganDocManBoy2000.) --Super Goku V (talk) 03:06, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V How do I even archive my discussions anyway LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:08, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

WP:ARCHIVE talks about how to archive discussions on your talk page, but I am referring to the discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents called Disruptive edits within many templates (primarily regarding categories). --Super Goku V (talk) 03:12, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V How many templates have I messed with on Wikipedia LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:13, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Messed with" is odd wording. To answer a slightly different question, you have edited the Template namespace 1,348 times and have edited 361 different templates. As you can see, the majority of your edits are to music based templates with {{Rock music}} being the most edited of all templates. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:19, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V Can you give me a list of the templates that I edited so I can wrong the rights or something like that LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:20, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I can give you a link as linking to 361 different templates would be very time consuming for me. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:24, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V That would suck but is there anything I can do to make things right without getting my Wikipedia account terminated or something like that LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:27, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia accounts don't get "terminated", but can be either blocked or banned. At the moment, no one has responded to the ANI discussion, so if it gets archived again, then it would appear that there was not a behavioral problem to deal with. I will note that after rechecking, there were comments at ANI outside of edits that you made to the Template namespace. And I will note again the existence of User:LoganDocManBoy2000. Honestly, you might want to stay away from areas that have been discussed in the ANI discussion and the above discussion called #Stop editing template categories. Alternatively, you need to note when someone tells you that an edit had a problem in it and try not to repeat that issue again. That is the best advice I have at the moment. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:35, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V Thank you LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:53, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

No problem, but do keep an eye on the ANI discussion in case someone does ask you something or comments there again. --Super Goku V (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Super Goku V You got it dude LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 04:08, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Additionally, I believe that the discussion at ANI and here was more that you are making too many edits to the Templates. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:25, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

If you were asking how many times you have had an edit reverted in the Template namespace, then it is currently 345 times. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:23, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh, and I am subscribed to this discussion if you don't want to ping me. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:13, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. If you are logged in to your account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Editor → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Augmented Seventh (talk) 16:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of Rhythm and Blues artists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:47, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Liz How do I redirect pages LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 03:54, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of electronic music artists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:50, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of folk music artists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of experimental music artists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of electronic music artists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of reggae artists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of rhythm and blues artists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of hardcore punk bands, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, LoganDocMan2000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lists of extreme heavy metal bands, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply