User talk:Oicumayberight

Contrast STEM Fields STEAM Fields

Hello Oicumayberight! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! --Nishkid64 23:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting Help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Hi Oicumayberight,

Back in 2007, you changed the following line in Design:

In philosophy, the abstract noun "design" refers to pattern, or to purpose/purposefulness (or teleology).

to

In philosophy, the abstract noun "design" refers to a pattern with a purpose.

(see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Design&diff=next&oldid=99932146)

I'm working on a PhD on the subject of the Philosophy of Design and was wondering whether you might recall where you got this intriguing definition from. Your revision seems a rather fundamental change to the older entry.

Regards, Bobvanvliet (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)bobvanvliet[reply]

I didn't get it from any source, else I would have attributed it. Since the original line wasn't sourced, I figured it was fair game to change it, one user's interpretation vs another's.

The word "or" left the possibility of purposeless patterns open to interpretation. I didn't think it was accurate to imply that a pattern without a purpose is design. A pattern could be completely accidental or random.

I also moved the reference to teleology to a more specific paragraph, because I thought the wikipedia article was narrower in scope than "purpose" (to include synthetic design) at the time. The teleology article has since been rewritten. But I still think the definition of "teleology" [1] raises too many existential questions to keep the design article objective. Oicumayberight (talk) 16:26, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Web design, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Widgets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to revert while a discussion at Talk:Digital#Disambiguation page is going on may be held against you. Anytime somebody makes a disputed edit while citing WP:IAR it raises concerns. Why should you be the only person allowed to ignore all rules? What about the people on the other side of the dispute? Should they be expected to follow the rules while you do not? We do have a policy on WP:Edit warring and admins are standing by to enforce it. Those admins are unlikely to accept IAR as an excuse. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:33, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider myself the only person to be allowed to WP:IAR. I'm the editor who's had my efforts reverted without consensus. The editor who removed my edits citing a WP:MOS was ignoring the rule of WP:BRD and WP:NOCONSENSUS. I'm just trying to get the editor who initially removed my edits to discuss each link removed on a case-by-case bases before removing them repeatedly as they have done. I'm willing to be educated here. I want to know exactly why the editor who is removing my links thinks they are in violation of a rule or not keeping with the a guide. I simply don't see how what I did was wrong or harmful. Oicumayberight (talk) 20:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a solution to your problem, you can create a WP:Set index, it would be separate from the disambiguation page. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I'll look into it. Oicumayberight (talk) 15:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reflowable document, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Print (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw the changes you made in relation to computerize, they created a big amount of links to a disambiguation page and that is not a desirable things. Since you are already working on it and have knowledge of the subject it would be great if you have the time to change the incoming links to point to the respective article. Aisteco (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I will look into it. I know that the wikipedia community will correct the links gradually and eventually over time, but I will make it a higher priority when I find time to devote to wikipedia editing. Maybe a I'll learn how to use bots. I just don't want to oversimplify the meaning if there is more specific articles to link to. Oicumayberight (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grid (graphic design), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Text (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:08, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oicumayberight. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Computer animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plugin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oicumayberight. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oicumayberight. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oicumayberight! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello [User:Oicumayberight], you rightly made a comment that the page title was more general than the content [[2]]. I have tried to resolve this, but have had one person defending a fixed perspective. I don't wish to drag you in, but if you could provide feedback on my contribution , it might help us out of the deadlock. Ultimâ (talk) 23:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Software development (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't a valid disambiguation page because the articles listed here are about the same topic more-or-less (or at least very closely related topics). See Talk:Software development#Merge in of Software development methodology for discussion of a possible merge.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]