disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The link isn't ambiguous because i (newspaper) and i (British newspaper) link to the same place. In almost all cases these are piped links meaning this is a purely a WP:COSMETIC edit that doesn't change the output HTML/reader experience. As WP:MEATBOT says Purely cosmetic changes performed by a human editor in a bot-like fashion may also be considered disruptive. So, with that in mind, is there a tangible non-cosmetic reason to make these edits? Are you thinking changing where i (newspaper) redirects? Cakelot1 ☞️ talk18:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:COSMETIC: a substantive edit is one that does change the output HTML
The link is to the same place, there is no change from the point of view of the person clicking the link. The only difference is what the link looks like in wikitext which is effectively a Cosmetic edit. Your yet to articulate what benefit (to the reader) is gained by these edits. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk19:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The only difference is what the link looks like in wikitext
That is dead wrong. The HTML contains a different link.
Will the British paper be the primary topic from here to eternity? Will it not be? Do you have some reason to think that its going to change anytime soon? I can see no proposal or discussions of moving the redirect. Surely such changes can be left until there's an actual need, and not when nothing is broken and there's seemingly no indication that it will ever become broken. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk20:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
