User talk:Piperium

Phi Gamma Delta et. al.

Would using langx be better? You may want to chime in on the appropriate discussion at WT:FRAT. Naraht (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

i have no idea how to use langx from Piperium (chit-chat, i did that) at 16:10, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Guru-Murthy

I think your edit summary got cut off - could you explain your rationale for this? Nikkimaria (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I was about 5 seconds away from reverting it because someone else has removed your contribution earlier today and it's technically considered an edit war. Will revert to your revision.
My summary would've been something attacking RSP because it is apparently protecting some publications over others, but that's probably not the case. from Piperium (chit-chat, i did that) at 01:36, 29 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Parsley Massacre name change

Hello, you recently changed the title of the page "Parsley massacre" in order to italicize "parsley". I don't see why parsley should be italicized, I understand that it's referring to the fact that parsley was a spoken shibboleth, but it is not so referred in most sources. Listing the first non-Wikipedia sites that show up on my Google search, Zinn History Project, NPR, UC Berkeley, BBC, Britannica, all render it without italics, along with Haitian Times, IPAHP, and so on. The term doesn't get a lot of use in academic sources, being apocryphal (that's a whole other can of worms), but I certainly don't see the italicized version used anywhere in popular sources.

Considering that Wikipedia is meant to represent your personal feelings on the rendering of a widely used name, I hope that you change the name back to the non-italicized version. I would've done it myself, but don't know how, and hope you see where I'm coming from. I'll add that this page move obviously wasn't uncontroversial, and thus should've been discussed in requested moves. Theodore Christopher (talk) 20:23, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Main addenda
  1. Changing the rendering of a title is not changing the title; the former is done via templates.
  2. You are correct—it was a spoken shibboleth, which can qualify it for MOS:WAW, which is why I changed it.
  3. Zinn, NPR, UC, BBC, and Britannica do not follow Wikipedia's style guides—nor do we follow theirs.
  4. I don't know when I moved the page? It doesn't show in the move logs...
  5. Feel free to change it back—I don't care about this article; merely, I changed it to what I thought was correct at the time (and still do) and, when I do that, usually don't care if someone reverts it (they more than likely know better than I do—you likely do, too).

Summary
MOS:WAW is the primary reason; it reduces ambiguity between murdering a herb (Parsley massacre) and murdering arising from the name of a herb (Parsley massacre).

Final notes
God bless. from Piperium (chit-chat, i did that) at 11:53, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
OK! I changed it back. Just didn't know how the italic string worked, which is why I budged in here in the first place. Pretty confident that no one is walking away from the article thinking that personified herbs were being murdered. Theodore Christopher (talk) 17:51, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Main comments
Thanks!
Summary
Piperium expresses gratitude.
Final notes
from Piperium (chit-chat, i did that) at 14:55, 8 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Gerard de Vries

Information icon Hello, Piperium. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gerard de Vries, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Fixing title"

Just a friendly hint: this was not a fix, as there was nothing broken, as your edit summary implied. Just a different way of achieving the exact same result. Paradoctor (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

from Piperium (chit-chat, i did that) at 11:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.