Shambuka (Sanskrit: शम्बूक, IAST: śambūka) is a character in some editions of the Ramayana. Some say that the character and his story are an interpolation which is not found in the original Valmiki Ramayana but in a later addition called Uttara Kanda.[1][2][disputed – discuss]
According to this version, Shambuka, a shudra ascetic, was killed by the god Rama (protagonist of the Ramayana) for attempting to perform tapas (austerities) in violation of dharma, resulting in the bad karma which caused the death of a Brahmin's son.[3][4][5]
The story is regarded to be created at a later period.[6] While the Uttara Kanda (including Shambuka's tale) is generally regarded as a later interpolation to the original epic,[1][7] the Book is considered part of "ongoing Ramayana tradition" and part of the Valmiki Ramayana.[1][8]
Shambhuka is alluded in the epic Mahabharata; his story retold in some versions of the Ramayana.[9] In Jain literature, the story of Shambuka is different and he is Surpanakha’s son.[10]
Legend in the Uttara Kanda of the Ramayana
According to this story, when Rama was ruling Ayodhya, a Brahmin approached the court and told everyone that his young son has died due to the misrule of Rama. Rama immediately called a meeting with all his ministers and enquired about the cause of this. The sage Narada told him that this has happened due to a violation of a rule of tapas (austerities). Narada informed him that a shudra was performing tapas, which was prohibited in the age of Treta. So Rama went in search of the shudra and found the place where Shambuka was performing penance. After confirming that Shambuka is indeed a shudra, Rama killed him. The gods praised Rama for this act and congratulated him for protecting their interests and for not allowing shudra to attain heaven in person. Brahmin's son was also resurrected.[1][4]
The Uttara Kanda - dated to post-Vedic period (3rd to 2nd century BCE)[11] is regarded an interpolation to the original epic.[11][1][7]
Appearance in other texts
Shambuka is alluded in 12.149.61.62[9] in the epic Mahabharata (Principally compiled in 3rd century BCE–4th century CE), in a debate between a jackal and a vulture at a cremation ground. The jackal urges the family of a dead young boy to not abandon him at the cremation ground citing how Rama revives a dead Brahmin boy and slew the sudra Shambuka.[12][13][14][15]
This story is missing in later renditions of the Ramayana such as the Ramcharitmanas, written by Tulsidas in the 16th century, which ends with coronation of Rama.[21]
Reception
According to local temple legend, Rama temple at Ramtek owes its origin to Shambuka. It is believed that Shambuka performed his tapas on Ramtek hill. Rama granted Shambuka three boons at his request: Rama stay in Ramtek (origin of the temple), Shambuka's corpse be turned into a shivalinga (icon of the god Shiva). Devotees worship Shambuka before worshipping Rama, as per the last boon.[23][24]
Authors such as Rabindranath Tagore, Mahatma Gandhi treat the character of Shambuka as an interpolation and creation of a later period.[25][26] The PushtimargVaishnavite tradition points out that the Ramayana refers to other shudras, such as Shabari, who lived in the forest. Shambuka therefore deliberately violated dharma in order to get Rama's attention, and attained salvation when he was beheaded.[27]
K.R. Raju termed the story of Shambuka as "frivolous" and "maliciously fabricated".[28]
Relationship to Caste System
The Shambuka story is connected to discussions of the caste system, because it positively portrays Rama's killing of Shambuka.[6] Shambuka acts outside his caste, so he is a threat to the social order.[29] Rinehart notes that "the Shambuka story is well known to low castes, who identify with the mistreated Shambuka."[21] Similar criticisms have been made for centuries: the eighth-century play Uttararamacharita portrays Rama as regretful, and as forced by duty to kill Shambuka to uphold the social order.[1]: 9 The same point was made explicitly in B.R. Ambedkar's essay, Annihilation of Caste, in which he points to Shambuka's story as evidence that the caste system can only be maintained by the threat of lethal force.[30] Indian social activist and politician Periyar vehmently criticized Rama for his mistreatment of the Shudras, citing Shambuka's example.[31]
These themes have appeared in modern literary work in the form of re-tellings of the Shambuka story.[32] Multiple plays have reimagined the story, variously modifying it to depict Rama as a servant of the ruling class (T. Ramaswamy Choudary's Sambuka Vadha (1920)), to have Shambuka act as mouthpiece for anti-caste scholars (Thiruvarur K. Thangaraju's Ramayana Natakam (1954)), or to have Shambuka live and instead help the Brahmin who accused him to achieve enlightenment (Kuvempu's Shudra Tapasvi (1944)).[32] The 1977 film Kanchana Sita, based on a 1961 play by the same name, depicts Rama as caught in inner conflict between moksha (the desire for enlightenment) and artha (the desire for sovereign power).[33]
^Goldman, Robert; Goldman, Sally (2022). The Rāmāyaṇa of Vālmīki: The Complete English Translation. Princeton University Press. ISBN9780691225029.: 7–8
^Government of Maharashtra, Nasik District Gazeteer:"History - Ancient Period". Archived from the original on 7 November 2006. Retrieved 1 October 2006. (text credited to Mahamahopadhyaya Dr. V. V. Mirashi)
^"Cantos LXXV-LXXVI (75-76)". Śrīmad Vālmīki-Rāmāyaṇa (in English and Sanskrit). Vol. Part III - Yuddha Kāṇḍa and Uttara Kāṇḍa (3 ed.). Gita Press. 1992. pp. 2130–2135. OCLC27360288. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023. Retrieved 22 March 2023.
^ abAn Introduction to Eastern Ways of Thinking. Concept Publishing Company. p. 158. By now, it can be confirmly said the ' Uttarkand ' of Ramayana is an interpolation of quite later period
^ abBuitenen, Johannes Adrianus Bernardus; Fitzgerald, James L. (1973). The Mahabharata, Volume 7: Book 11: The Book of the Women Book 12: The Book of Peace, Part 1. University of Chicago Press. p. 814. ISBN978-0-226-25250-6.
^Leslie, Julia (22 November 2017). Authority and Meaning in Indian Religions: Hinduism and the Case of Valmiki. Routledge. p. 116. ISBN978-1-351-77299-0.
^Gangeya Mukherji (29 November 2020). An Alternative Idea of India: Tagore and Vivekananda. Taylor & Francis. p. 83. ISBN9781000083774.
^D. K. Misra; Shambhu Lal Doshi; C. M. Jain (1972). Gandhi and Social Order. Research Publications in Social Sciences. p. 14. ISBN9780896843950. Archived from the original on 19 May 2022. Retrieved 19 May 2022. Mahatma Gandhi , on the other hand, has regarded this entire story as an interpolation
^Motiramji Sastri, Ramayan (in Gujarati) (Ahmedabad, 1961).
^ abZacharias, Usha (2008). "Union with Nature: Prakriti and sovereignty in Aravindan's Kanchana Sita". In Paula Richman (ed.). Ramayana Stories in Modern South India: An Anthology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 99–107. ISBN978-0-253-34988-0.
References
Sherraden, Aaron (1 August 2023). Śambūka and the Rāmāyaṇa Tradition: A History of Motifs and Motives in South Asia. Anthem Press. ISBN978-1-83998-471-6.