Antitrust case alleging Google illegally dominates internet search
This article is about the antitrust suit targeting Google's search engine practices. For the separate suit targeting Google's advertising technology practices, see United States v. Google LLC (2023). For other lawsuits, see United States v. Google.
United States, State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Indiana, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of Louisiana, State of Mississippi, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of South Carolina and State of Texas v. Google LLC
The case was heard started in September 2023 in the District Court for the District of Columbia with judge Amit Mehta presiding.[3] Mehta ruled in August 2024, finding that Google held a monopoly on their search engine technology, and illegally used that position in securing Google's position with mobile device and website partners.[4][5] Proceedings to determine what remedies will be placed on Google are still to be held.
The lawsuit has been described as a "blockbuster antitrust trial",[6] and has been widely described as one of the most important federal antitrust lawsuit against a high-tech company since the United States v. Microsoft Corp. case in 1998.[7] Legal commentators anticipate that there will likely be an appeal, regardless of how the case is decided.[8] The outcome of the case is considered to have a potential bearing on the subsequently-filed federal antitrust suits against fellow "Big Tech" companies Meta Platforms, Amazon, and Apple.[9][10][11] The DOJ filed a second antitrust lawsuit against Google over the company's advertising market practices in 2023.[12]
Background
The rapid growth of the U.S. tech industry in the 1990s led to concerns about potential for anti-competitive behavior in the sector.[13] This ultimately led to the federal government launching an antitrust suit against Microsoft, alleging that the company unfairly hindered competition.[7]
In 2008, scrutiny by the DOJ and the Canadian Competition Bureau scrutiny of an advertising deal between Google and Yahoo! led the companies to abandon their agreement. According to the DOJ, the "agreement between these two companies accounting for 90 percent or more of each relevant market" would have likely harmed "competition in the markets for Internet search advertising and Internet search syndication".[15]
The DOJ lawsuit alleges that Google Search holds an unlawful monopoly in the search engine market
In 2011, members of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) voted to demand information from Google as part of an antitrust inquiry into the company's search engine practices. Following a nineteen-month investigation, FTC staff attorneys recommended that the agency bring forth an antitrust lawsuit against Google. However, the members of the commissioners ultimately declined this recommendation, and voted on January 3, 2013, to close the investigation.[16]
In United States v. Google LLC, the federal government alleges that Google has unfairly hindered competition in the search market through anti-competitive deals with Apple as well as mobile carriers.[1] The government alleges that, as a result of these practices, Google has accumulated control of around 88% of the domestic search engine market.
In doing so, the government alleges, Google has additionally monopolized the search advertising market at the expense of competing services.[20] Per the government's estimation, Google has been able to accumulate control of over 70% of the search advertising market.[7] As a result of lack of competition, Google has been able to over-charge advertisers versus what they would pay in a competitive environment.[21]
Analysis and public interest
The case has attracted public interest amid scrutiny of the four Big Tech companies. United States v. Google LLC has been compared to the United States v. Microsoft Corp. (2002), a noted antitrust case against Microsoft.[22]
Polling by advocacy group Demand Progress in October 2020 found that respondents across party lines support the suit by a 48% to 36% margin, with 52% of Republicans and 49% of Democrats found to be in support.[25] A survey of tech workers at various firms conducted by workplace app Blind in October 2020 found that 57% of tech employees polled believe the suit has merit, though only 13% of Google workers said the same.[26]
On September 12, 2023, Kent Walker, Google's President of Global Affairs and chief legal officer was followed by someone dressed up as Mr. Monopoly, as he went to attend the antitrust trial at federal court in Washington, D.C.[27]
Politico noted that the filing of the lawsuit received praise from both Democratic and Republican politicians.[28] Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) praised the DOJ for bringing forth a "legitimate, long-time-coming suit against Google for engaging in anti-competitive, manipulative, and often illegal conduct".[29]
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) also praised the lawsuit, arguing that "Google abuses its power not just in the search market by using its monopoly power to make billions, but it also uses it to try to censor the American People".[30] The suit received additional praise from Republican Senators Mike Lee (R-UT) and Josh Hawley (R-MO).[28]
Representative Steve Cohen (D-TN) criticized the timing of the case, which was filed just weeks before the 2020 presidential election. On Twitter, Cohen questioned the DOJ's decision to launch the suit so close to the election:
"Why did the #Trump Administration wait until TWO WEEKS before the election to file a lawsuit over #Google's monopoly power? Call me cynical, but if #antitrust enforcement was a real priority at #DOJ, why did they wait until now?"
In response to questions regarding the timing of the case, Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen defended the DOJ's timeframe, stating that though "we might have even preferred to be quicker", the DOJ sought to "make sure that we've done the work that's necessary" prior to bringing the case.[28]
Response from Google
Eric Schmidt, formerly CEO of both Google and parent company Alphabet Inc., criticized the lawsuit, stating that "There's a difference between dominance and excellence".[31] On Twitter, Google denied the DOJ's allegations, with the company stating that consumers use "Google because they choose to -- not because they're forced to or because they can't find alternatives."[32]
Pre-trial proceedings and developments (2020–2023)
Owing to the accusation that Google engaged in anti-competitive conduct through exclusivity dealings with Apple, it was reported in February 2022 that the government was looking to depose "Apple's most senior executives".[33] On December 12, 2022, Google asked the court to toss out the case, arguing that it fairly achieved its dominant market share and that the DOJ's argument "relies on dubious antitrust arguments."[34]
As of 2023, Google is represented in the case by attorneys from Williams & Connolly, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, and Ropes & Gray.[35] On August 4, 2023, Judge Mehta ruled Google will not face allegations the search engine prioritized associated products over competitors in the trial, but will allow allegations over Google's use of anti-competitive contracts dealing with Search and Android to go to trial.[36]
In February 2023, the DOJ accused Google of destroying evidence relevant to the lawsuit, and requested that Google be formally sanctioned.[37][38] The DOJ alleged that Google employees used an internal chat service with "autodelete" settings prior to and during the course of the lawsuit.[39] According to the DOJ, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure meant that Google should have ceased the use of auto-deletion of employee chat messages as early as May 2019 in anticipation of a federal lawsuit. Similar accusations were made in the Epic Games v. Google antitrust case.[40]
Efforts to recuse Jonathan Kanter
Following the confirmation of Jonathan Kanter as Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ Antitrust Division, Google questioned Kanter's impartiality in the case given his past work for rival companies.[41]
Constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe criticized Google's claims, arguing they have "little legal basis and strain common sense".[42] In May 2022, it was reported that Kanter would be barred from working on the case as the DOJ considers mandating his recusal.[43]
Google's demands that Kanter recuse himself was met with criticism from politicians from both major parties. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), a Democrat, accused Google of engaging in bullying tactics.[44] Kanter was ultimately cleared by the DOJ to participate in the department's scrutiny of Google in January 2023.[45]
Trial proceedings (2023–2024)
The trial started on September 12, 2023.[46][3] In its opening statements, the DOJ accused Google of unlawfully maintaining a monopoly in the search engine market as early as 2010.[47] Google has defended itself from these accusations, with the company arguing that the high quality of its search products allows it to maintain a dominant position in the market.[48]
During the trial, Judge Mehta received criticism for closing courtroom access for certain testimonies in the case and for delaying the release of public documents pertaining to the case.[49][50] Media companies including Bloomberg News filed a motion to increase public trial access.[51] Following a week of deliberations between both parties, Mehta decided on September 27 that the DOJ would be permitted to publicly release documents shown in the trial.[52]
Much of the trial centered on Google's deal with Apple to have Google search as the default option on the Safari web browser.[53][54] Witnesses from Google, Verizon and Samsung testified about the impact of Google's annual payments of approximately $10 billion to maintain default status for Google search.[55] Following the culmination of the government's case in the week of October 19, 2023, Google began its defense in court on October 26.[56] The trial ended up concluding on November 16, 2023.[57]
Following the trial, Judge Mehta announced that closing arguments in the suit would be held in May 2024, and indicated he was uncertain as to how he would end up ruling in the case.[58] Attorneys from both sides reconvened to make their arguments on May 3 and May 4, 2024.[59]
Reuters reported that legal analysts expect that there will likely be an appeal in the case, regardless of how it is decided.[8] How the case is ultimately decided is considered to potentially set precedent that could impact other federal antitrust suits against "Big Tech" companies (Meta Platforms, Amazon, and Apple).[9][10]
Verdict
On August 5, 2024, Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in online search.[60][61] After a hearing in September 2024, Mehta gave regulators until December 2024 to propose any penalties unto Google, and likely to rule on those by August 2025.[62]
Related cases
In December 2020, 38 states brought on a similar lawsuit against Google. Co-led by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, the State of Colorado et al. v. Google LLC[63] case reportedly "goes beyond the DOJ's" in its scope of accusations, according to CNBC.[64]
In July 2021, attorneys general from 36 states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) launched an antitrust lawsuit alleging that Google has hindered competition in the app market through its Google Play store policies.[65] In September 2023, all fifty states as well as D.C. and Puerto Rico reportedly "reached an agreement in principle" to settle the case.[66]
In January 2023, the DOJ filed a second antitrust suit against Google centered on alleged anti-competitive conduct in the advertising technology (adtech) market.[67] A spokesperson for Google denied the allegations of the lawsuit and accused the DOJ of trying to "pick winners and losers in the highly competitive advertising technology sector.”[68] The trial began on September 9, 2024 and concluded on September 27, 2024.
Reportedly pending future lawsuits
In addition to both ongoing federal antitrust lawsuits against Google, it was reported in 2022 that the DOJ was in the process of investigating if Google has engaged in anti-competitive conduct through bundling its Google Maps service with company software.[69] In 2023, Politico reported that the probe focuses on the Google Automotive Services (GAS) offering provided to automakers, which includes the Maps service, the Play store, and Google's voice assistant. The probe also scrutinizes Google's control of location data through Google Maps.[70]
^ abKerr, Dana (May 2, 2024). "U.S. v. Google: As landmark 'monopoly power' trial closes, here's what to look for". NPR. Archived from the original on August 6, 2024. Retrieved May 3, 2024. The U.S. has also sued Amazon, Apple and Facebook parent Meta over business practices it says hurts both rivals and consumers. How the judge rules in this case could have far-reaching effects on how people use and interact with the internet.
^Kang, Cecilia; Isaac, Mike (December 9, 2020). "U.S. and States Say Facebook Illegally Crushed Competition". The New York Times. ISSN0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 29, 2022. Retrieved May 29, 2022. The investigations already led to a lawsuit against Google, brought by the Justice Department two months ago, that accuses the search giant of illegally protecting a monopoly.
^Perlman, Matthew (April 27, 2023). "Google Search Judge Needs More Info On Chat Sanctions Bid". Law360. Archived from the original on June 6, 2023. Retrieved June 6, 2023. Google is represented by John E. Schmidtlein, Benjamin M. Greenblum and Colette T. Connor of Williams & Connolly LLP, Wendy Huang Waszmer, Susan A. Creighton and Franklin M. Rubinstein of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati PC and Mark S. Popofsky and Matthew McGinnis of Ropes & Gray LLP.
^Papscun, Dan (August 18, 2023). "Judge Deciding Google Antitrust Fate Criticized for Closed Court". Bloomberg Law. Archived from the original on May 3, 2024. Retrieved May 3, 2024. Mehta has been criticized for how often he's closed his courtroom for certain testimony, and delaying a ruling on when trial exhibits could be made public. That's a departure from much of his prior practice. For example, in prosecutions of people involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the US Capitol, he regularly left the courtroom open.
^Perlman, Matthew (December 17, 2020). "Google Hit With 3rd Monopolization Suit". Law360. Archived from the original on August 7, 2024. Retrieved May 29, 2022. The case is State of Colorado et al. v. Google LLC, case number 1:20-cv-03715, in the U.S. District Court for District of Columbia.
In matematica e fisica, il teorema della divergenza, detto anche teorema di Ostrogradskij per il fatto che la prima dimostrazione è dovuta a Michail Ostrogradskij, è la generalizzazione a domini n {\displaystyle n} -dimensionali del teorema fondamentale del calcolo integrale. A sua volta, esso è un caso speciale del più generale teorema di Stokes. Talvolta il teorema è meno propriamente detto teorema di Gauss poiché fu storicamente congetturato da Carl Gauss, da non confondere col teorema …
Gereja Kristen Luther IndonesiaLogo GKLIPenggolonganProtestanOrientasiLutheranPemimpinBishop Pdt. Jon Albert Saragih, M.Th.WilayahIndonesiaPendiriPdt. Ds. Jetro Sinaga, M.DivDidirikan18 Mei 1965 Sumatera UtaraTerpisah dariHuria Kristen Batak ProtestanUmat17.305 jiwaSitus web resmihttp://www.gkli.org Gereja Kristen Luther Indonesia (disingkat GKLI; Inggris: Indonesian Christian Lutheran Church (ICLC)code: en is deprecated [1]) adalah suatu kelompok Gereja Kristen Protestan di Indonesia ya…
Ini adalah sebagian daftar dari planet minor bernomor, dari 1 hingga 1000. Lihat Daftar planet minor untuk daftar lengkap dari daftar semacam ini. Daftar isi: 001… 101… · 201… · 301… · 401… · 501… · 601… · 701… · 801… · 901… Nama Penamaansementara Tanggal ditemukan Tempat ditemukan Penemu 1–100 sunting Artikel ini sebatang kara, artinya tidak ada artikel lain yang memiliki pranal…
Untuk kegunaan lain, lihat Perang Dingin (disambiguasi). Presiden AS Ronald Reagan dan Sekretaris Jenderal Partai Komunis Uni Soviet Mikhail Gorbachev, pada KTT Pertama di Jenewa, Swiss, 19 November 1985Perang Dingin (Inggris: Cold Warcode: en is deprecated ; Rusia: холо́дная война́, kholodnaya voynacode: ru is deprecated , 1947–1991) adalah periode ketegangan geopolitik antara Amerika Serikat dan Uni Soviet serta sekutu masing-masing, Blok Barat dan Blok Timur. Istilah perang d…
Artikel ini memiliki beberapa masalah. Tolong bantu memperbaikinya atau diskusikan masalah-masalah ini di halaman pembicaraannya. (Pelajari bagaimana dan kapan saat yang tepat untuk menghapus templat pesan ini) Artikel ini berisi daftar yang lebih baik ditulis dalam bentuk prosa. Anda dapat membantu Wikipedia dengan mengubah artikel ini ke dalam bentuk prosa, jika sesuai. (December 2020) Artikel ini membutuhkan rujukan tambahan agar kualitasnya dapat dipastikan. Mohon bantu kami mengembangkan ar…
Irish politician and activist For other people named Richard Martin, see Richard Martin (disambiguation). Richard MartinMember of Parliamentfor County GalwayIn office1818–1826Serving with James DalyMember of Parliamentfor County GalwayIn office1801–1812Serving with Richard Le Poer Trench 1801–1805Denis Bowes Daly 1805–1812Member of Parliamentfor County GalwayIn office1800–1801Member of Parliamentfor LanesboroughIn office1798–1800Member of Parliamentfor JamestownIn off…
La circulation routière est ordonnée par la réglementation Affiche de 1937 de la Work Progress Administration (agence aux États-Unis) visant à inciter les piétons à ne pas traverser là où ils n'en ont pas le droit. Le code de la route ou droit routier est l'ensemble des lois et règlements relatifs à l'utilisation des voies publiques (trottoirs, chaussées, autoroutes, etc.) par les piétons, cyclistes, cavaliers, meneurs d'attelage, utilisateurs de deux-roues à moteur, automobil…
Institut Informatika dan Bisnis DarmajayaMotoDarmajaya The BestDidirikan5 Juni 1997KetuaDR. Andi Desfiandi, S.E., M.ARektorDR. (Can) Ir. H. Firmansyah Yunialfi Alfian, MBA., MScJumlah mahasiswa> 5.658 MahasiswaLokasiBandar Lampung, Lampung, IndonesiaWarnaBiru DongkerSitus webhttp://www.darmajaya.ac.id Institut Informatika dan Bisnis Darmajaya (disingkat IIB Darmajaya) merupakan salah satu perguruan tinggi swasta yang ada di Kota Bandar Lampung, Provinsi Lampung. Nama DARMAJAYA, merupakan akro…
У этого термина существуют и другие значения, см. Сосновый Бор. ГородСосновый Бор Флаг Герб 59°54′00″ с. ш. 29°05′10″ в. д.HGЯO Страна Россия Субъект Федерации Ленинградская область Городской округ Сосновоборский Глава городского округа Воронков Михаил Василье…
Not to be confused with KBIA. Radio station in Santa Monica, CaliforniaKBLASanta Monica, CaliforniaBroadcast areaGreater Los AngelesFrequency1580 kHzBrandingKBLA 1580 AM Talk RadioProgrammingFormatUrban/progressive talkAffiliationsBlack Information NetworkCompass Media NetworksOwnershipOwnerMulticultural Broadcasting(Multicultural Radio Broadcasting Licensee, LLC)OperatorTavis Smiley (Smiley Radio Properties, Inc.)HistoryFirst air dateJuly 30, 1947; 76 years ago (1947-07-30)For…
لوتروس، إماثياتقسيم إداريالبلد اليونان التقسيم الأعلى Alexandria Municipality (en) — Commune of Loutros, Imathia (en) السكانعدد السكان 1٬248 وفق resident population of Greece (en) (2021)1٬272 وفق resident population of Greece (en) (2001)1٬259 وفق resident population of Greece (en) (1991)1٬277 وفق resident population of Greece (en) (2011) معلومات أخرىرمز جيونيمز 735365 تعديل - تعديل م…
Greek military unit This article is about the Greek War of Independence unit. For other units with the same name, see Sacred band. You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. (April 2015) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the French article. Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary…
Ashthon JonesLahir27 Februari 1986 (umur 38)Amerika SerikatGenreR&BPekerjaanPenyanyiInstrumenVokalTahun aktif2011–sekarang Ashthon Jones (lahir 27 Februari 1986) adalah penyanyi asal Amerika Serikat. Ia berada pada posisi ke-13 pada acara American Idol musim kesepuluh. Pranala luar Ashthon Jones on American Idol lbsAmerican Idol musim 10FinalisScotty McCreery • Lauren Alaina • Haley Reinhart • James Durbin • Jacob Lusk • Casey Abrams • Stefano…
Domenico de' Marinipatriarca della Chiesa cattolico Incarichi ricoperti Vescovo di Albenga (1611-1616) Arcivescovo metropolita di Genova (1616-1635) Vicecamerlengo della Camera apostolica (1623-1625) Patriarca titolare di Gerusalemme (1627-1635) Nominato vescovo11 aprile 1611 da papa Paolo V Consacrato vescovo1º maggio 1611 dal vescovo Marcello Crescenzi Elevato arcivescovo18 luglio 1616 da papa Paolo V Elevato patriarca15 novembre 1627 da papa Urbano VIII Decedutofebbraio 1635 a Ge…
Voce principale: Falcon (famiglia di razzi). Falcon 9InformazioniFunzioneVettore di lancio orbitale medio/pesante (parzialmente riutilizzabile) ProduttoreSpaceX Nazione di origine Stati Uniti Costo per lancioFT: $62M (2016) DimensioniAltezzaFT: 70 mv1.1: 68,4 mv1.0: 54,9 m Diametro3,66 m (12 ft) MassaFT: 549054 kgv1.1: 505846 kgv1.0: 333400 kg Stadi2 CapacitàCarico utile verso orbita terrestre bassaFT: 22800 kgv1.1: 13150 kgv1.0: 10450 kg Carico utile ver…
Optical disc authoring software K3bScreenshot of K3b version 21.12.0 on Arch LinuxOriginal author(s)Sebastian TrügDeveloper(s)KDEStable release23.08.3[1] / 9 November 2023; 5 months ago (9 November 2023) Repositoryinvent.kde.org/multimedia/k3b Written inC++ (Qt)[2]Operating systemUnix-likePlatformKDE PlatformTypeOptical disc authoringLicenseGPL-2.0-or-later[2][3]Websiteapps.kde.org/k3b/ K3b (from KDE Burn Baby Burn)[4] is a CD, DVD and …
Artikel ini perlu diwikifikasi agar memenuhi standar kualitas Wikipedia. Anda dapat memberikan bantuan berupa penambahan pranala dalam, atau dengan merapikan tata letak dari artikel ini. Untuk keterangan lebih lanjut, klik [tampil] di bagian kanan. Mengganti markah HTML dengan markah wiki bila dimungkinkan. Tambahkan pranala wiki. Bila dirasa perlu, buatlah pautan ke artikel wiki lainnya dengan cara menambahkan [[ dan ]] pada kata yang bersangkutan (lihat WP:LINK untuk keterangan lebih lanjut). …
Motor vehicle Fiat 130 HP1907 Fiat 130 HP Grand Prix racerOverviewManufacturerFiatProduction1907DesignerGiovanni EnricoBody and chassisClassGrand Prix motor racingBody style2-door Tandem-seating racerLayoutFront-engine designPowertrainEngine16286 cc OHV Hemi130 HP4-Cylinder in-line twin blockTransmissionChain driven The Fiat 130 HP is a Grand Prix racing car made by Fiat in 1907 to a design by Giovanni Enrico. Built solely for Grand Prix motor racing, the Fiat 130 HP included new desig…
