Hi Anohthterwikipedian! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! DanCherek (talk) 02:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

thx Anohthterwikipedian (talk) 20:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Anohthterwikipedian! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 08:29, Thursday, June 29, 2023 (UTC)

Hi Anohthterwikipedian! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 19:24, Wednesday, October 11, 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I've received further evidence that you do not appear to have a connection with Architect 134, so I am rescinding the sockpuppetry block, with apologies. That said, I'm separately concerned that you are not here to build an encyclopedia, as evidenced by your excessive number of unhelpful edits in userspace (some of which involve Nazi flags). I am therefore not going to unblock you, but I've changed the block rationale and restored talk-page access, meaning you may appeal the block by adding the following text to the bottom of this page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Star walker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

_{(This is a renewal of an earlier unblock request, as nobody responded. I will periodically renew this unblock request every two months if no activity is detected.)} Even though I have done a lot of edits in userspace, I have also done my fair share of helpful (or at the very least good faith) edits on wikipedia, which is not the criteria on WP:!HERE. That may sound like I'm gaming the system, but I'm just saying the truth, that the block may be an over exaggeration of things. Of course, I have learned not to do so many useless edits in my userspace anymore. House^{Living room}_{DIY Fixings} 00:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please post an edit that you'd like to make to a Wikipedia encyclopedia article, not some essay in project space. It should be something useful that can be copy-pasted directly into the article in question. Do not say "I would fix grammar" or something general like that. Include an inline citation to a reliable source. Once you've done that, you can make a new unblock request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:38, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have noticed that many indef-blocked editors have to clarify what kind of edits that they have to make, so here are two examples: Firstly, on WP:CONFUSED, I want to raise a discussion on if users that no longer exist should be removed from the list, and secondly, I also want to open a discussion about if that should be a humorous essay on the basis of this heading. House^{Living room}_{DIY Fixings} 00:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Star walker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Since my last proposed edits were not sufficient evidence for me to get unblocked, the newer edit that I want to make in mainspace is to change the first "is" in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict to a "was" as the war has already finished. House^{Living room}_{DIY Fixings} 10:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This does not do as NinjaRobotPirate asked. We want to see a change that requires a citation to a reliable sources, not just a simple wording change or spelling fix. I also think your proposed change is in error, while active combat is not taking place, the dispute itself has not ended as Armenia has not withdrawn their claim on the disputed area. 331dot (talk) 11:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Star walker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I've finally found an edit I want to make, and that is to change the number of worldwide sales of PlayStation 2 from 155 million (as of March 31, 2012) to 160 million (as of November 26, 2024) on the article Sixth generation of video game consoles. As a result, I'm adding a citation to the source https://www.playstation.com/en-gb/playstation-history/2000-ps2-psp/, in the form of <ref><font color="#777777"></font>{{Cite web |title=2000 PlayStation 2 - PSP PlayStation Portable {{!}} PlayStation History timeline |url=https://www.playstation.com/en-gb/playstation-history/2000-ps2-psp/ |access-date=2024-11-26 |website=PlayStation |language=en-GB}}</ref>

Accept reason:

I'm fine giving you another chance. Please focus on improving the encyclopedia rather than doing the sort of things that led to the block. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 10:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please note, per Help:Minor edit -

A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism.

Your edit to Wikipedia:Five Pillars was not a minor edit. - Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 00:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Wikipedia:6P has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 30 § Wikipedia:6P until a consensus is reached. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 07:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello Star walker, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Medusa Film. Thanks! Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:27, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Medusa Film, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Kovcszaln6 (talk) 14:54, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Kovcszaln6 I’m sorry, but I can’t accept this, as all I did was move the original tagger’s request to the right place. Please send this to Mellamelina instead.

House^{Living room}_{DIY Fixings} 09:56, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Let me be quite clear - if you continue to use your user page to attack other groups of people through the use of pejoratives and slurs, you'll find yourself blocked from editing again. Given your previous block, I don't expect you'll find it anywhere near as easy to convince someone to unblock you a second time. stwalkerster (talk) 22:18, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I’m sorry for offending people with my tasteless usage of that userbox, and will not do that again. In the meantime though, can you unrevert the edit where I added the non-offensive topicon? Nevermind, because I’m pretty sure that doing so will also show my previous edits. Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 03:21, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

My revert only removed the userbox. The topicon was left untouched. I cannot undelete that revision as doing so would also reveal the userbox. stwalkerster (talk) 10:07, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Anohthterwikipedian.

Can you move the article names, North Koolaupoko, Hawaii to North Koʻolaupoko, Hawaii, Haleiwa, Hawaii to Haleʻiwa, Hawaii, and Waianae, Hawaii to Waiʻanae, Hawaii? User:Station1, unilaterally renamed them by dropping the Hawaiian orthography, claiming it as "controversial", even though it is not, and in MOS:HAWAII#Article names, the Hawaiian naming convention and rules are clearly stated. Other Wikipedia articles about landforms, settlements, roads, squares, and buildings in Hawaii, which are in the Hawaiian language, use Hawaiian orthography. So other users moving the Hawaiian article names to its Hawaiian orthography was correct and didn't violate any Wikipedia policy. Hawaiian orthography is officially used by the State of Hawaii for place names (i.e. in official documents and for place signs) and is also overwhelmingly used in the English-language Hawaiian media. This was discussed and settled in favor of retaining Hawaiian orthography for place names in Wikipedia articles, in Talk:Hawaiʻi (island)#Requested move 3 July 2025.

Yours sincerely, Oratas (talk) 09:46, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done, though I have no idea why you’re asking me.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 09:59, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much. I was editing in the Waipiʻo Valley article, where I added sourced information about the 2006 earthquake, when I saw that the spelling of article name was changed. Oratas (talk) 12:13, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A little late, but next time you should ask a page mover, as they can move more pages.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 02:21, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

	The Original Barnstar
	Sorry, but here is a barnstar! ~Rafael! (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 02:33, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you for your page moving activites. I wanted to ask why not just remove the request rather than reply saying it's done as at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests&diff=prev&oldid=1304237772 ? -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I still leave it up there in case anyone disagrees with the move, as it’s more apparent that way. I basically just want at least one other person to agree with the move, as a sort of confirmation.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 21:07, 4 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Anohthterwikipedian thank you for your reply. I'd argue that if you're confident enough that it should be moved in accordance with guidelines and you can technically move it, you don't need further confirmation from a 3rd party. You already have the requestor thinking it should be moved too. If you're not confident it should be moved, I'd recommend just leaving it to someone else. Have you had issues with people objecting to moves you've done before? On the other hand, if page moving is something you'd like to get more involved with, do consider becoming a WP:PAGEMOVER yourself once you have over 3000 edits. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:41, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

See here. (I will now be going on a Wikibreak, meaning that I will not respond to anything)

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 21:22, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Anohthterwikipedian. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arari River (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Anohthterwikipedian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Arari River".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Fools for Rules has been speedied by the Willy on wheels —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 10:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please note that primary topic grabs are not uncontroversial, and cannot be done at RM/TR. — Tenshi! (Talk page) 10:28, 2 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can you revert your closure of this AfD? You did not provide any explanation of why you closed as "Keep", and this was a contentious discussion, so it should be closed by an administrator. Please read WP:NAC. Natg 19 (talk) 22:23, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Natg 19: Looking at the discussion, I thought I saw a strong consensus to Keep. Of course, I’ll revert my close if there’s anything else that needs to be discussed.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 22:29, 14 May 2026 (UTC) Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 22:29, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Though there are many Keep !votes, many of them are not based on policy, so I disagree with this closure. Please revert, and let an administrator close. Natg 19 (talk) 22:31, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just saw that you reverted and reopened the discussion. Thanks for doing that. Natg 19 (talk) 22:31, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Natg 19: And it was closed anyway. Oh well.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 05:42, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 05:42, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Star walker. I noticed that your signature currently contains a link to Special:Contributions/Anohthterwikipedian. Unlike User talk:Anohthterwikipedian, which redirects to your talk page, the special page doesn't work because Anohthterwikipedian technically doesn't exist anymore. Could you fix this by replacing the link with Special:Contributions/Star walker? Chess enjoyer (talk) 19:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Chess enjoyer: Nah. I mean, there is no obligation to provide a link to contributions in your signature, which means there is no obligation to fix a broken link to said page.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 23:44, 15 May 2026 (UTC) Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 23:44, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oh. I only asked because I assumed that's what you meant to do, but if it's something you want to keep then that's different. That link could be confusing to other editors, since they might click on it expecting it to lead to an actual contributions page (like I did), but I won't push it. On a related note, your signature is doubled in all of your replies here. Is that on purpose, too? Chess enjoyer (talk) 00:00, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

That is not on purpose. I have no idea why that happens.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 06:09, 16 May 2026 (UTC) Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 06:09, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

(talk page watcher) Just curious, how do you sign posts? 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 17:26, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Like this.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 22:18, 16 May 2026 (UTC) Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 22:18, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please keep in mind that doing so effectively doubles the size of your signature, which would put it at roughly 326 characters after removing the dates. This amount is more than what is permitted by WP:SIGLENGTH. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 03:00, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@45dogs: Please understand that that wasn’t intentional.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 03:01, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Now it's... Nice and normal? Maybe? 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:04, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hiya! I noticed that you've been helping out with a number of requests at WP:RM/TR recently which is great! The help is much appreciated. Just so you know, unlike other forums such as edit requests, you should remove requests immediately upon completion rather than replying with {{Done}}. There's a user script that you can use to do it more easily. Thanks! {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs}} 11:41, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Help:Wiki Education has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 22 § Help:Wiki Education until a consensus is reached. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 00:55, 22 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

is this basically an accurate representation of you? AHR (g • s • c) 01:53, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@AltoHampton: I just got my first piece of fanart, I think I’m about to ascend. Not exactly, it’s more so based on the original.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 03:11, 23 June 2026 (UTC) Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 03:11, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

ok. but i cant access the link… but thx for likin' the fanart, and it would be great for a new character that would be seen in future ahr skits and films… (the oc's name is walkstar) AHR (g • s • c) 03:16, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@AltoHampton: Oh sorry, the link is here.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 03:19, 23 June 2026 (UTC) Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 03:19, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Star walker ah, ok. i guess i kinda based the fanart off of the original star walker sprite… AHR (g • s • c) 05:27, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I noticed you moved Gillette–Campbell County Airport - I fail to see how this could have met the criteria for a non-controversial technical move, as the requesting editor previously boldly moved it and was reverted, so it’s obviously contested. Why was it moved again? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 07:04, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Danners430: It was a hasty move on my part.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 09:04, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Having a link that says "talk to me!" in your signature that does not lead to your talk page is confusing. It's especially confusing that you also have a name in there that isn't your username. Per WP:Signatures, please note that "A distracting, confusing, or otherwise unsuitable signature may adversely affect other users." Please consider changing this (while it's not required that you link to your talk page, having a link that seems to go there but doesn't is needlessly confusing). SomeoneDreaming (talk) 00:55, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

(I meant to post this here but also erroneously put it on your sandbox talk, just in case the duplication confuses you)

Hi there, @Star walker, I'd just like to bring your attention to some of our policies and guidelines relating to the appropriate use of userspace: WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTMADEUP as well as WP:UPYES and WP:UPNO. In summary; Generally, you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia. This means that pages like User:Star walker/sandbox are not appropriate uses of userspace and will have to be deleted sooner or later. You should consider opening a free wiki with Fandom or a similar service where this kind of content is more appropriate.I would greatly appreciate if you would kindly save whatever you need to save from the contents of these pages and then tag them for speedy deletion under your own request; otherwise I'll need to nominate them at MfD, they'll need to be voted on etc and it'll be an unnecessary time sink for other editors.I also notice that you have a small network of editors here who you communicate extensively with on your own talk pages as well as theirs; please do also be aware that Wikipedia is not social media and talk pages, including user talk pages, are supposed to be used for discussion of activity related to building the encyclopedia. A little bit of banter or frivolity is fine; but, in general, conversations that don't relate to Wikipedia should be kept offwiki. Athanelar (talk) 05:18, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Of course, I understand.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 08:35, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Just for your information, the vote outside the box was a different type of race condition than the usual edit conflict. I started voting and writing my comments before Star Mississippi closed the MFD. I don't object to having my vote removed, but it wasn't a case of voting after the discussion was closed. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, sorry I was sleeping and I just woke up with this, first thing you need to be very careful before performing a move, and to be clear ThilioBot does not have ability to contest any request as you said If the bot should be ignored, then it isn’t actually contested Diff. My comment was Please ignore the bot the request was removed by mistake and then added back. because I mistakenly marked and removed one request which is Nadikudi railway station as completed instead of switching to contested section See Diff. I even made it clear here. Please next time do a full checkup before executing a move. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 06:36, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Thilio: I apologise for my hastiness in moving the page, though next time you should consider keeping or pasting the former comment so other people don’t have to sift through history to find the original reason for contestation.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 06:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind, it was just me not reading closely enough.

Wikipedian ^{Talk to me!} _{or not…} 06:49, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

You're invited to join the Organized Labour community editing event, a cross-wiki event taking place throughout September 2026!

The campaign brings together Wikimedians interested in improving coverage of organised labour, workers, trade unions, and labour history. We have confirmed collaborations with Wikipedia language editions in English, Dutch, Persian, Serbo-Croatian and French. If you want to add other language editions or other wiki projects you are strongly encouraged to do so! This event spans geography and languages!

This is a one-time invitation. You're receiving it because you previously signed a petition related to Wiki Workers United (WWU). We hope you'll join us!

Regards ~ Shushugah (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply